Why is everyone just talking about "muhhh no more plane rides" or "hey, don't touch those 60W lightbulbs, you gotta use that 10W super cool energy efficient LEDs now"?
Reforestation is the one thing we can do right now with our current tech and it can essentially stop climate change within the next 30 years and reduce CO2 levels below 400ppm again, even if we keep burning coal and oil.
No. Phytoplankton or get the fuck out.
We're already reforesting at rapid rates because of all the CO2 being pumped into the air.
sciencealert.com
GO GREEN
GO NUCLEAR
Wow. I MEAN WOW. I NEVER EVER THOUGHT I WOULD EVER NOT SHITPOST A MOTHERFUCKER ON Jow Forums. WITH A TEAR IN MY EYE. DONT TAKE THIS LIGHTLY. WELL DONE.
>We're already reforesting at rapid rates because of all the CO2 being pumped into the air.
On a global area, the forest area is going down, not up. If we just increased it year by year by 100 million ha, we could really make a big dent... especially if we use robots to cut trees out of the new forests after 30-40yrs to allow new trees to sequester even more CO2.
Yes, that too.
Nuclear power and reforestation are the only two really viable options for a sustained climate change strategy. Plus maybe e-cars which use the nuclear power and wind/solar power.
>Go nuclear
I would like not to have a cancer
Complete hoax.
Based Finland
that .gif doesn't seem right. Our (dutch) forest cover hasn't been this extensive in ~500 years. We reforested a lot.
>logical and doable solutions
Nah better just tax everyone more
False. Gobally world is 33% more forested compared to 1990.
Europe alone is 60% more forested.
Get fucked
Even if its real, whats the point? In case you haven't noticed, WE are FUCKED!
Post some sources if you want to be taken seriously. As far as I know, trees dont make a dent at all in global co2 to oxygen conversion, cause like 90% of it is done by algae in the sea, but dont quote me on the number.
Planting trees is still a very good goal in combating at least the effects of climate change, cause it can help recover areas lost to deserts, but of course not here in europe...
Climate change is good. Not only will i be able to grow medditeranian fruits in my backyard but the germany will be flooded too.
Haha Haha you actually think ((they)) want to ((fix)) anything
Thats because non whites are multiplying like rabbits. And all these extra people need firewood their entire lives.
A plague in certain areas would work 100x better than planting trees.
>Reforestation
And how will you stop the 1% from cutting it down and selling it like they do right now?
All it takes is one company starting the domino effect to undo your entire plan.
>Haha Haha you actually think ((they)) want to ((fix)) anything
^This
Can't change what the sun is doing brah. CO2 is not an issue anyway. More CO2, more plant growth everywhere, greater yields.
>but muh heat!
More heat more life, more rain, more plant growth
Cold is the absence of life, and the planet is a closed system, it recycles everything and puts it elsewhere. The deserts of Africa bring nutrient rich dust on winds to the Amazon rainforest for example. The earth does it's thing because despite being a fallen world, God made it too damn good homie.
Sorry bro, but it's fake.
Land is valuable, goyim.
Giving it over to nature means less capitalism!
Most of the export goes to rich Arab states who use it to build.
Yet they still go on about how Africa is being robbed it it's resources. When the same thing happens in Europe to a much larger scale it ABSOLUTELY FINE
This, you want to stop climate change? Reduce the living population to only Europeans and their diaspora. The planet will fix itself overnight, because we don't destroy it.
Global warming alarmists are the most intolerable twats on the planet.
Simply planting trees across the Sahara desert is enough to absorb 40% of CO2 emissions projected over the next century. Reclaiming the Sahara is a project that people want to do regardless of global warming, and it gets you half way to no global warming problem.
Chill the fuck out. It isn't a big deal.
>Simply planting trees across the Sahara desert
The niggers would cut them down and sell them the first moment they get, but trying to stop them from doing that would be colonialist and racist.
>greedy european corporations have done nothing wrong
Algae in the oceans produce more oxygen than all forsts.
news.nationalgeographic.com
Fucking imbecile. Nothing is stopping climate change because change is the natural state of the climate. There has never been this stable sunshine & rainbows everyday bullshit you ignorant children are hoping for.
I'm all for less pollution & human garbage but disregarding the factual truth isnt doing anyone any favors
Heres one unconventional truth: our planet hasnt had ice on its poles for over 90% of its existence. Having polar ice caps is the anomaly.
An umbrella in Lagrange 2 would, but that would not help pushing the propaganda, so...
Biochar.
If you turned all of the waste biomass we produce into biochar and buried it in agricultural soils as a soil amendment, we could suck every last molecule of CO2 out of the atmosphere.
If it really was a problem. We'd be doing this already.
Reforestation would increase global warming, not decrease it. More solar radiation would be absorbed by the dark forests, rather than being reflected back into space by the pale desert.
Surely all the other races care about preserving nature and conserving natural resources? Look at China and the Continent of Africa. We must import more of these people with diverse ideas of culture and living. Together we can make the Western world mirror our friends in China, Middle East, and Africa. Innovation and sustainability.
how do you reforest the countries which are being ruined by savages in the second and third world?
The earth is getting greener already because of the warming moron. It's almost as if the system is designed to adjust and acclimate itself.
Almost.
As if.
Fuck you, reforest fucking Africa then
Anglos are animals
It seems like a good idea, although I wonder how much free land there is to reforest. But in the end, none of this matters. The left isn't looking for practical and functional solutions (like reforestation and nuclear), they're looking for political control. That's why the only solution they will accept is globohomo communism
>fall of Christianity
>forests are growing back
Coincidence? Was Varg right? Does Christianity bring the desert with it?
>germanigger in charge of forestry
Lmao fuck off, go fix your ips problem faggot
That would require shooting niggers and elephants
Good point but that's not enough
>sweden exactly the same
Too many niggers. We ought to kill the niggers first, only then can we protect nature.
The Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA), coordinated by FAO, found that the world's forest area decreased from 31.6 percent of the global land area to 30.6 percent between 1990 and 2015.
Please dont kill niggers
Force them to prepare soil under reforestation and use their bodies as fertilizer when they collapse
Think green!
>CO2 is not an issue anyway. More CO2, more plant growth everywhere, greater yields.
Starting between 1000ppm to 1500ppm outdoords average gets humans seriously into trouble indoors as CO2 concentration indoors without ventilation already rise to 3000ppm and more in badly ventilated rooms (at the current 400ppm outdoors concentration).
Major health effects start at prolonged exposure to 4000ppm to 5000ppm CO2 for a few hours.
Then why are Austrian companies cutting down 500 year old forests in my country and leaving entire mountain sides barren?
Based and greenpilled.
But that is an equilibrium exchange and you can’t just double the annual CO2 sequestration by algae. But you can double the global forest area and thus probably quadruple the CO2 sequestration by forests if you cut out “produced wood” and store it or use this biomass in lieu of oil/coal.
Because they are austrian
This is not how things work. The added forest areas stand in no km2 relation to the already reduced reflectivity of limited North pole sea ice extend.
And then I hear NPCs here complaining that we now get multiple tornadoes a year something that not even 10 years ago was never seen.
Give me the source spainbro pls
Not to mention the cloud / mist cover over forests (which doesn’t exist over many deforestated areas) actually helps with reflectivity. “lush green forests” are typically pic related.
>CO2 is not an issue anyway
how are you able to type, or read? you see floods in your country, only 50% of crops are planted this year, that means 50% less food and increases in food prices across the world. That's what CO2 and other greenhouse gases do, they change climate and disturb our fragile habitat. You get that we live in a habitat right, dependent on tens of thousands of species so we can food and clean water right, they don't have AC, they can't adapt fast enough to survive in drier and hotter climates.
That’s a good idea. Africa, Australia, Canada and Brazil are the main reforestation areas we can target.
They've done that China for decades. less than 1% of trees survive, and how do you think they water them? they use aquifers and suck them dry BECAUSE THERE'S NO FUCKING RAIN IN A DESERT. It's futile, if forests could grow there they would.
No, global reforestation is occurring.
Huge lands in Africa are now jungle when they were at most sparingly flourishing savannas in 1950.
In Europe reforestation is occurring at a rapid pace too. I personally know the situation of France and Germany well.
The combination of urbanization and the considerable increase in agricultural productivity means that many lands are now going back to a wilder state which usually means reforestation. We produce more wheat in Europe now while using much less land than in 1900.
The only places that still see net deforestation are Brazil and Borneo because hueniggers insist on using barely industrialized food production.
>Rich Arab states
>Latvia exports timber to Sweden
Lmaaoo
As usually, germaniggers and their cousins are root of the problem.
They propose reforestation and climate tax, meanwhile, as of now, 50% of all forests in Bavaria are imfested by Ips typographus. GL with fixing that.
Soil under savanna ecosystem is capable of producing jungle, but niggers cannot defend saplings from elephants
>Europe 1000BC
>modern borders clearly visible
Whoever made this must be an absolute brainlet.
It’s enough if we do it right.
—-
Carbon Sequestration Facts
Forestland in the Northern Forest has an average carbon content of 106 metric tons per acre. This includes all carbon in the forest, including live biomass, dead trees and fallen trees,
Trees are roughly 50% carbon (dry weight). Increases in standing timber are directly correlated with increases in bound carbon.
Following a harvest, an estimated 32.5% of forest carbon is released to the atmosphere within five years. Another 32.5% is stored in long-lived forest products, with an average annual loss of 2% to decay or disposal and an estimated 35% of forest carbon remains stored on-site, either in unharvested material, forest soil, or coarse woody debris.
About 67% of the forest carbon is not stored in forest products following a clearcut
From a carbon standpoint wood as a construction material has a smaller carbon footprint than aluminum, steel, plastic, and concrete This is true because production of wood products is often less energy-intensive.
To grow a pound of wood, a tree uses 1.47 pounds of carbon dioxide and gives off
1.07 pounds of oxygen. An acre of trees might grow 4,000 pounds of wood in a
year, using 5,880 pounds of carbon dioxide and giving off 4,280 pounds of
oxygen in the process.
Most Americans realize that cars, trucks, and industry are a major source of CO2 emissions, but the clearing and degradation of forests is also a major factor. Deforestation accounts for approximately 25 percent of annual CO2 emissions worldwide. This is roughly equivalent to the amount of CO2 produced by the entire transportation sector (cars, trucks, airplanes) worldwide.
The U.S. carbon sink absorbs 1.1 to 2.6 million metric tons of CO2 each year, which is equivalent to 20 to 46 percent of total U.S. global warming emissions.
Dont worry they are testing some fungus based substance to kill parasite, the germans are testing it here on our crops for 5 years now I am sure they will find a solution on how to destroy the ecosystem somehow.
What borders are visible??
Watch closely, somehow the extend of forests 3000 y/a follow modern political borders.
I would never trust germans with chemistry, jews will lie about it and make entire industry out of it
We should prosecute the 90 snobs responsible for destroying the world's climate first and then get start reforesting.
Instead of nuclear energy, we could invest in wind and solar energy. That would also get rid of the atomic waste problem.
Look at Poland.
Yeah, and Germany in 1000BC doesn't look to have that much forest. Less than France
And the Romans noted Germania to be a very foresty area and thus unforgiving when they tried to push through.
Don't think it's an accurate map.
Wind and solar are expensive af and solar batteries need toxic shit to produce
Go geothermal on ocean floor
That would actually cause more climate change. Look buddy the earth is going to do what it's going to do regardless.
the free market makes farming more efficient numbnuts
like keep wiping all species except bacteria once in a while
go to bed, greta
fuck your market
Wind and solar aren't even comparable to nuclear m8
Nuclear is the ONLY realistic non fossil option to power the world. Wind and solar are 10x more expensive and 10x less reliable. Pretty much a joke compared to nuclear that could actually power the world
Burning kikes, niggers and faggots is efficient too
Climate change is big business.
To actually help the environment you need to clean the oceans and grow trees or other plants.
But what happens now is that big lobbyist are paying politicians to push for "CO2" funds. We are literally giving them billions of money "to save the environment" and they don't do shit with it.
I cant comprehend how anybody falls for that lie. 99% of the shit that gets bumped into the Atmosphere is produced in 3rd world shitholes and they don't care.
Climate change is normal but we still have to protect our environment.
For Italy it was mussolini, he instituted a fuck ton of protected areas and environmental conservation effort, he made national and regional parks where gradually all farming activites ceased, I lived in one of these parks in the middle of one forest but every field around me was cultivated in 1900. Also he took areas like swamps and drove a huge effort of bonification converting them into farming areas, so the forest were progressively left alone and reclaimed a lot of territory.
Reforestation is for brainlets. The forests are already expanding.
The only way you can actually save the enviroment is by cutting all aid to Africa, bombing India, don't buy anything from China
You have to kill off a few billion people, which isn't that hard to do when you consider that the vast majority of the world's population is in Africa, China and India. Fuck those places, kill those people and we will save the planet from any and all boogeyman climate scares. Goodbye global warming, goobye global cooling, goodbye climate change, goodbye rising sea level, goodbye ocean acidification, goodbye man made CO2.
It's a feedback loop. More CO2 makes plants grow faster. We don't have to do anything about CO2. Actual chemicals and physical destruction are the problem.
>TFWYWN HAVE COMFY PERMACULTURE-BASED COMMUNITY IN YOUR LIFETIME
>TFW YOU HAVE TO DRIVE TO FIND FORESTRY
Nuclear wouldn't be cleaner when you consider that more energy and cheaper energy means more people breeding.
If we all switched to nuclear energy would become extremely cheap, and the world population would go from 7 billion to 50 billion in a few decades. Then we would be at a worse spot than we are now.
who gives a fuck about the world? I care only about europe
>Tfw you live in a forest
more vegetation + dry and hot weather for 2+ month = big forest fire
If you burn it, the organic matter just goes back into the atmosphere and it's a pointless exercise in wasting everybody's time and money. The timber need to be manufactured into long-lasting products, buried, or heated in an oxygenless environment (creating char) that could be then used possibly in fertilizer.
This.
We tried pushing reforestation and YOU told us to fuck off, just so you could funnel more carbon tax money to Tel Aviv. Screw you and your union, I hope you eat a doner and get mild diarrhea.
Scandinavians forest have been well preserved. That's nice.
Reforestation with depopulation should be enough.
Please do some actual research. You don't have special knowledge of unconventional truths, everybody knows about ice ages and that climate changes. The point is melting ice will flood all the major cities lying on coasts, estuaries and rivers.
Just like grow super trees or some shit. Bigger trees, more surface area, more carbon evolved.
I cant believe OP fag is falling for this bullshit. Germany is 1% of world wide air and what not pollution. yet we are to switch off all our energy producing plants while china is blasting out tons of Co2 emissions while producing photo voltaic panels for our fucking gut menschen boomers. Making it worse in the process.
OP is mega faggot
>400ppm
400 ppm is fucking nothing
Why would you get cancer from nuclear energy? The only thing they emit is steam.