Disputing it line by line -critically.
>Describe themselves as Patriots
Why would this be considered 'XRW' unless the adage patriotism and religion the last refuge of a scoundrel? Was Admiral Lord Nelson XRW? Kek?
>Add 'istan' to British place names
Because those places have a unmistakable similarity to people from Pakistan, when English is not the first choice language and the Burkha is common place.
>Describe multicultural towns as 'lost'
Where the indigenous English are a minority, there are some streets in England where there are NO English.
>Have tattoos with XRW
Possibly true, such as Aryan symbols - often sported by retards and faggots.
>Use the term Islamofascim
It's an accurate portmanteau, if you look at the lack of dissent within Islam and prohibited critiscism of it. The same cannot be said of the Anglican church, who will not chop your head off for drawing a picture of a cardinal or welcoming gay marriage.
>Discuss the creation of white only communities
Other cultures and communities do this, England was once an homogenous culture.
>Become angry at percieved injustices or threats to 'so called National Identity'
Identity is inextricably linked to notions of how we percieve ourselves. However, we are NO longer 'countrymen' in multicultural countries.
>Refer to individuals ready to challenge their XRW views as indoctrinated
Just human nature, not ready or able to balance the weight of opposing arguments.
>Make generalisations about Muslims and Jews
People stereotype, broad strokes are never entirely accurate.
>Claim that immigration is the root of injustices against vulnerable people (e.g. old age pensioners)
600,000 immigrants came to the UK according the Office of National Statistics in 2018 -this is bigger than the city of Manchester! The UK has 300,000 people already homeless, so this claim has been BTFO! Immigration is not helping vulnerable people, or those in poverty.
part II...