Ooops! CNN admits White ethnostates are better for democracy and welfare

Diversity is NOT a strength!

If it's a war on fake news, does that make CNN, MSNBC and Fox "enemy combatants?"

Attached: 16450623895638257.jpg (700x521, 76K)

I agree. It's a virtue.

Ever wondered why there is no CNN in finland?

MTV is owned by the Bonnier Broadcasting company that is owned by Bonnier that is owned by the Bonnier family. Can you already guess of what descent the Bonnier family is aside from being Swedish citizens now?

YLE-niggers glow in the dark.

>In 2005 Alma Media sold MTV3 and its sister channels (MTV3+, Subtv, Radio Nova and a share in Urheilukanava) to Swedish Bonnier

no cnn, but we have fox finland. too bad it shows only simpsons reruns and not tucker carlson, mark levin, the five, etc.. would actually watch actual tv again.

Kikes. And MTV literally destroyed itself. The kikes are not all knowing. Theyre average retards with money

No it's not. It's owned by Viacom.

No, I just assumed it was present there. Good on you for keeping the insufferable fucks beyond your borders.

Publicly owned broadcasters? (BBC-like?) or privately owned?

We are winning war on their view of "fake news" honestly just because far right alternative medias and such in Finland are usually so badly run and full of loudmouthed retards that they almost seem like leftist false flags sometimes and do the discrediting themselves.

Nah, that's different MTV. We're talking about a Finnish TV station called MTV(3).

I suspect you may be talking about different MTVs

What they meant to say was that censorship, gun control, and approved information sources make voters predictable enough to be ignored.

>External actors

Attached: 47F0F7E3-EDDC-4A9B-8932-932DBB7C3804.png (1334x750, 1.21M)

american MTV = "music televesion"
finnish MTV = just another commercial tv station, but the biggest in our land

Redpill me on Suomi. I've seen people say that its economic and social systems are essentially a copy paste of the third reich and that's why it's so successful. Any truth to this?

Telia recently bought MTV3 back.

Both. All the channels in Finland speak in unison. Even when they aired a documentary about immigration that the BBC-like entity in Finland tried its darndest to censor, the panel they had discussing it had, what, 6 straight up leftists and a "BBC" representative. You can guess how balanced that discussion was.

It sucks to be a man in Finland, we drop out of school more, we become NEETs are much higher rates, we don't go to higher education as much, women are better educated than we are, we suffer from alcoholism and drug addictions more, we commit more suicides, we are more often homeless, and women have a fuckton of privileges that we do not have. Women can get away with fucking anything here, whereas men are always punished. Women have a right to say things, and you can see them use the power that they have (which men lack). Men just have to be quiet. What's best, NOBODY is talking about this. So there goes your fucking social justice and gender equality. We are so shitty that we're the Japan of Europe in that we barely have children anymore. So yeah, there will be no Finland in a hundred years.

>we
No one forces you to do any of things just because you are a man lol.

>third reich
Third reich did not have a privatized central bank, to my knowledge no one has been able to replicate its "systems". The Jews would never allow that to happen again.

It literally just looks like someone going
>ching chang wing wang ping pong dong
>aufen laufen spauthaven ein lagenschlagen
but for some other language.

>implying finland is not welfare state

>So yeah, there will be no Finland in a hundred years.

there will be no united states or europe as we know them in a hundred years. and what you said about women and blah blah only tells you've never been with one.

>nobody is forcing you to commit suicide
This argument is why nothing is done to better the situation of men in the west. You take all encouragement to be successful and the support systems away from the men, starting from young age, and then you make the argument that it's only the fault of the individual that he is not thriving.

There will though, as American whites are reproducing--unlike Finland (nice 1.65).

I have a gf btw

You are no christian if you believe stabbing your neighbours in the back for foreign invaders is a virtue you filthy satanist

>american whites

you know what they count as "white" these days?

If you put truth glasses on for this "news piece" it actually says
>Our fake news aren't effective import more muslims so we can gain control over you

Like so many claims you can find on the interwebs, it's a partial truth. We never had truly usury free banking, but aside from that the system was indeed similar, along with social order and values. The government owned a fuck ton of industry and the welfare of the volk was prioritized above profiteering to the point where massive subsidization went into the economy to secure jobs and a future for the people.

Much like in the rest of the West, it all took a turn for the (((worse))) in the 80's. Tradesmen were no longer respected, and everyone wanted to drive BMWs and work in offices. And once you as a nation board the (((consumerism))) choo-choo train, you know where it'll take ya.

>Rampant censorship and a one-party state is an integral part of democracy
cool

Our biggest "yellow press" -paper "Iltalehti" regulary just copy and translate CNN & BBC propaganda. I think the enemy owns our biggest platforms and the small dying newspapers etc can't challenge the metanarrative.

>women have a fuckton of privileges that we do not have. Women can get away with fucking anything here, whereas men are always punished. Women have a right to say things, and you can see them use the power that they have (which men lack). Men just have to be quiet
Care to give some examples of any of that, Pekka? Because from what I'm seeing that's pure fiction inspired by what's happening in the US.

Grow the fuck up and get a job you fucking welfare rat piece of shit.

European ancestry white Americans are waking up mate, now let me compare that to us Finnish men.

We are slaves to the globalists and we have mandatory conscription. Our population will be around 2-3 million by 2050 (not counting in migrants). You only need one banker war and a huge portion of that population (only the men) will be drafted to fight, and die, in some pre-planned conflict. Not only are Finnish men not having children, but they will also likely die in large numbers in the future, after which Finland's population will be turned into a mixture of scandinavian and African/Arabic and our entire racial identity will be destroyed, and hence our culture. Finnish people will cease to be.

uusisuomi.fi/kotimaa/281615-nyt-tuli-rankka-viesti-enaa-ei-auttaisi-vaikka-suomen-kaikki-30-vuotiaat-alkaisivat?fbclid=IwAR1gYQZv5mgKAuk1-qHffTqen3B9roF0If94RJbvTNI7goUdlAD4ifylDag

Finland is a shit race on its way to extinction, it's missing the critical human features required to remain in existence.

>largely homogenous country

welp

Actually it says just the contrary; "In Finland we have managed to keep our narrative unchallenged. Sheeple eat our shit, smile and ask for more. If somebody tries to confront them with truth they will reject it."

Don't fall for the demoralization tactics, finnbro. Your people just has to get angry one (1) time to crash and burn the bullshit.

living on welfare is pretty demoralizing

Almost everything you listed are things men choose for themselves. No one else can improve the situation but them. If they choose not to, that's not up to me or you.

What's going on in terms of gender equality pretty much follows suit with the rest of the Western world. Domestic violence/homeless shelters are only for women. Women receive more encouragement from parents and teachers, they have larger support structures (both institutional and social). Oh and don't forget conscription lol. I could go on.

Never been on welfare, have a job, but not because I want to participate in paying high taxes for the common good, but for personal reasons. The Finnish culture is shit.

>three purple finflags
Going to be a confusing thread

lmao!

>Women receive more encouragement from parents and teachers, they have larger support structures (both institutional and social).
Because women are clueless and unable to lead themselves. Men are different. Any man who feels incapable of assuming full self-responsibility over his own life is not a man, but a woman

Also, if your 30 yr olds need to give birth to more than a triplet, make them birth quintuplets.

It's best, you have less to lose. Build a cheap transmitter from scrap electronics and start a pirate radio or something. Broadcast right wing views fueled by your existential dread.

I know conscription is a "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" tier idea mostly, but doesnt it mitigate a bit of the söyness of new gen a bit? I know my conscription knocked the lolbertarian faggotry out of me.
And also being a civilian in an occupied or contested territory is no safe harbour either, seeing how americans treated france during and after their "liberation".

In a surprise to literally no-one, you haven't done two seconds of research and are just posting up fan fiction.
>Domestic violence/homeless shelters are only for women.
False.
>ensijaturvakotienliitto.fi/miehet-hakevat-apua-vaikeuksiin-yha-enemman/
>Miehet ovat saaneet apua myös väkivallan avopalveluissa ja turvakodeissa. Lisäksi miehille on kehitetty ja järjestetty ryhmätoimintaa erilaisiin elämäntilanteisiin kuten erotessa, vanhemmuuden tukemiseksi, päihderyhmiä sekä ryhmiä maahanmuuttajille.

>Women receive more encouragement from parents and teachers, they have larger support structures (both institutional and social).
I ask for concrete examples and you give me this shit.

>Oh and don't forget conscription lol.
>being this much of a faggot
If you don't like it, it's really easy to get out of it. Just tell them you use marijuana. That's it, you're out on the same day, no tests, no nothing, and they're not allowed to tell anyone.

You're a fucking faggot and a disgrace to our flag.

>themselves. Men are different. Any man who feels incapable of assuming full self-responsibility over his own life is not a man, but a woman

Yeah, men are different in that you only need to take the father away and he'll spend the rest of his life in front of a PC playing those games that are intended for children. You see women don't have this problem.

Your belief that men do not need support systems does not really hold up.

>first virolained
>blue as can be
THE TRUE VON UGRIC!

>Your belief that men do not need support systems does not really hold up.
True, but your belief that men completely lack a support system does not hold up. You are overdramaticizing hardships and over-determinizing life

>Diversity is NOT a strength!

it is your strength, why wont you accept this fact?

I find it empowering.

That's the joke, the niggers and wiggers at Helsinki speak like that.

>you only need to take the father away and he'll spend the rest of his life in front of a PC playing those games that are intended for children

this is starting to sound like projection, you okay user? want to talk to someone?

Keyword myös. How common do you think those shelters are. I repeat, they are only for women. The idea of a men's shelters are a joke.

>I ask for concrete examples and you give me this shit.
You'd think something would be done about a concrete and clear-cut inequality problem between that affects men negatively if it really was that concrete. That's the problem. You cannot "prove" that the fact that men commit suicides about 50x more than women is a matter of inequality. If the genders were reversed, of course it would fucking be considered an inequality. That's also where you have inequality between men and women where men are negatively affected: men's "problems" are not considered such, whereas any area where women are underperforming is immediately treated as a massive catastrophe that requires immediate attention.

You cannot be this bluepilled. It's like I'm talking to someone who only reads Helsingin Sanomat and watches MTV3.

>You are overdramaticizing hardships and over-determinizing life
No shit. Can't you tell from a mile away he's one of those people who blames others for his woes? That's the overarching theme in everything he says.

>finland
>white

Attached: 1516621462003.png (714x720, 297K)

>niggers and wiggers speak proto-Swedish
Have you ever even been there?

women dont have this problem because they can get laid easily
dudes wouldnt be playing so many video games if they could get laid

and if little stacey couldnt get any cock she'd probably be watching tv

you dont see women doing this because they are too busy playing cock to play video games

purest genes in the world and purest IDs on Jow Forums.

Not really, I'm just recognizing that our shitty culture pedestalizes women to no fucking end whereas men are demonized as sexist pigs with some invisible power-privilege, when in fact women have more privilege than fucking any group in thsi country.

>shelters are only for women
>>*posts sauce proving otherwise*
>I repeat, they are only for women. The idea of a men's shelters are a joke.
What's the point of even talking to you?

HAHA! finnish women are just as fucking awkward as finnish men. i bet there are days in finland NO ONE gets laid.

Not really, I just have brains to realize things with. There is blaming others and being a loser, then there's actually being realistic and knowing that things are decked against certain groups in my society.

A nurse here or somewhere else just a few days ago told howin nursing school they were taught that there are essentially two kinds of patients, those who blame external circumstances and recover slow or never, and those who take any action they can to become better and recover fast. From what I have seen from interacting with people online, almost everyone is clearly one or the other, and only rarely somewhere between. I wonder what is the primary determinant for that. Perhaps early life experiences?

Finland was the first country in Europe to allow women to vote, now we are basically a matriarchy but the threat of Russia has kept it in check to some extent.

However I would say that because of the overempowerment of women, men are not doing so good, they have more unemployment, less education and lower income than women.

This is one of the main causes of low birth rates in Finland, and the government does not want to do anything to address this.

They just opt for importing more third world migrants who live on welfare, which drives the country into more debt and then they sell off national assets to their friends in foreign companies to pay for the debt. Our government is literally selling us out and people vote for them anyway. Because the trust in the government is still high and that's why Finnish people have a sheep mindset.

>sauce

LOL. No men ever use any shelters, nor are they advertised anywhere for men. The fact that a men's shelter exists does not disprove my point. Fuck off you feminist cunt.

>Finland
>happiness
Isn't culturally rude to say you're not happy in Finland?

You like being an overdramatic little princess, don't you? What you say is technically true, but exaggerated to an extent that makes your rhetoric seem comically bitter. There is nothing about the fundamental societal imbalance between women and men that prevents any man from being happy and successful. Growth in life is available to just about anyone who honestly tries.

I specifically fact-checked the claim the Finland has the “best” education and determined that they are less educated than the European average using objective measures such as mathematical performance. They are basing the claim off of the fact that their education system is extremely liberal, not that it produces results. (Fuck you finland)

Attached: LEAF ALERT.jpg (1208x512, 104K)

I don't see where I'm being overdramatic. Labeling discussion as overdramatic is just a way to shut down the discussion on societal injustices that are "silent" and accepted. There's nothing bitter about simply discussing problems.

Every human being is racist, yet nobody admits to this, nor is this really possible to prove. This doesn't mean I shouldn't point out how people are racists.

>finns
>white

whatever you say ricky

That's a keen observation. I do believe we are profoundly affected by our parents' behavior. I believe the effect is everlasting unless it's intervened. How we see our parents interact with others becomes our "default" mode of behavior, of course moderated by what kind of rules our parents enforce. Most importantly how we see our parents react to hardships and sudden events is imprinted into our minds potentially forever.

I didn't realize this until my late twenties, but I've directly inherited my parents' way of interacting with strangers. I don't have to try, it just happens automatically. I started thinking about this when I noticed that my colleagues couldn't naturally form a rapport with new clients. I talked to my siblings and they had noticed the same thing.

>gypsy calling anyone nonwhite

Attached: thats-not-how-this-works-thats-not-how-any-of-this-works.jpg (1832x1864, 1.06M)

Romania, Ukraine, Russia, Hungary- all of those are producing mathematically competent people. EU education just aims to make everyone equally “educated” (equally stupid, if it must be). Finland has excelled at that.

>I don't see where I'm being overdramatic.
Let me help you on your journey to self-reflection:

>our shitty culture
>men are demonized as sexist pigs
>women have more privilege than fucking any group in thsi country
>men's "problems" are not considered such
>Yeah, men are different in that you only need to take the father away and he'll spend the rest of his life in front of a PC
>Finnish people will cease to be.
>It sucks to be a man in Finland
>women have a fuckton of privileges that we do not have.
>Women can get away with fucking anything here, whereas men are always punished.
> Men just have to be quiet
>We are so shitty that we're the Japan of Europe

>the first thing the panel focused on was the "fresh" take (for it's time, 1988!) on sexual harassment and intimidation of women in the workplace
That's such a narrow view of the movie it should be criminal.

brave

Attached: finland yassss.png (590x868, 459K)

Yeah, what's wrong with hyperbole? Don't people use this type of language all the time to get their points across? Are you a woman or why are you latching onto the way I use language?

>Romania, Ukraine, Russia, Hungary
Unsure what particular statistics you are looking at?

Attached: Screenshot_16.png (870x528, 56K)

There is indeed nothing wrong with hyperbolic rhetoric... until it becomes the basis of your argumentation. Every problem you have listed has been backed up by hyperbolic reasoning. Were you to actually argue in a more objective sense, much of the rational foundation for your bitching would collapse.

Of course after five minutes of giving each other anilingus over #MeToo they moved onto the larger themes in the book/movie, but the point is that was the first thing they observed about it. It was like a gender studies department spin on modern literature.

No matter what the topic, the narrative must be repeated over and over again until the average person's entire thinking revolves on this completely infantile line of thinking of victimization olympics.

wow...imagine that

US, RUS, CHN are the top math countries in the world and everyone knows it dumbass. OECD is totally pozzed and is giving scores based on how liberal and egalitarian they are. Look up finland’s performance in the international mathematical Olympiad.

Mutting ourselves up did make us strongee, how else could we carry an extra 50lbs?

>everyone knows it dumbass
If you say so.