This is now a Joseph Chamberlain appreciation and respect thread
>Free imports have destroyed this industry, at all events for the time, and it is not easy to recover an industry when it has once been lost...They have destroyed agriculture...Agriculture as the greatest of all trades and industries of this country has been practically destroyed. Sugar has gone, silk has gone, iron is threatened, wool is threatened, cotton will go! How long are you going to stand it? At the present moment these industries, and the working men who depend upon them, are like sheep in a field. One by one they allow themselves to be led out to slaughter, and there is no combination, no apparent prevision of what is in store for the rest of them. Do you think, if you belong at present to a prosperous industry, that your industry will be allowed to continue? Do you think that the same causes which have destroyed some of our industries, and which are in the course of destroying others, will not be equally applicable to you when your turn comes?
Trump administration people who have to trawl through Jow Forums: please make Trump do this.
Owen Williams
Posted this a week back and it got a good response so here goes...
Brexit Party policies
>Cut immigration to tens of thousands then to have net migration below zero >Cut foreign aid bigly >Implement PR voting >Abolish the House of Lords >Plant more trees >Save the red squirrel >Ban halal and kosher slaughter >More police on the streets >Re-nationalise the railways and the National Grid >Abolish the TV License fee
Carson Reyes
When you dab presciently on free market capitalism and bordered trade like an epic gamer but no one listens because they're soulless materialists
>Now the Cobden Club all this time rubs its hands in the most patriotic spirit and says, "Ah, yes; but how cheap you are buying." Yes, but think how that effects different classes in the community. Take the capitalist...His interest is to buy in the cheapest market, because he does not produce, but can get every article he consumes. He need not buy a single article in this country; he need not make a single article. He can invest his money in foreign countries and live upon the interest, and then in the returns of the prosperity of the country it will be said that the country is growing richer because he is growing richer. What about the working men? What about the class that depends upon having work in order to earn wages or subsistence at all? They cannot do without the work; and yet the work will go if it is not produced in this country. This is the state of things which I am protesting.
I heard talk a while back of not standing in ERG Tory seats to keep the Tories on their good side (and to be fair an established candidate has more chance of winning due to a developed rapport with locals), don't know if that's still a thing
Aaron Jones
Checked, Churchill really fucked Chamberlain over
>Organizes Norway debacle >PM gets blame >Lets put the mastermind in control
Churchill, as First Lord, had direct responsibility for the conduct of naval operations in the Norwegian campaign. Before the German invasion, he had pressed the Cabinet to ignore Norway's neutrality, mine its territorial waters and be prepared to seize Narvik, in both cases to disrupt the export of Swedish iron ore to Germany during winter months, when the Baltic Sea was frozen. He had, however, advised that a major landing in Norway was not realistically within Germany's powers.[3] Apart from the naval success at Narvik, the Norwegian campaign went badly for the British forces, generally because of poor planning and organisation but essentially because military supplies were inadequate and, from 27 April, the Allies were obliged to evacuate.
>repeal gun bans >implement stand your ground and castle doctrine >abolish hate speech
Dylan Wood
Decent point
David Martin
They only relaunched in November so the first national elections they were eligible for were the euro elections but they stood aside for the Brexit Party. Patrick O'Flynn who used to be UKIP MEP for the East is running as their candidate in the Peterborough by-election. It's a long game they're playing because they haven't got anything like the cash or media attention that Farage commands
Listen Mac I don't have many points about any Chamberlain so you'll take what you get cheeky scouse
Juan Hughes
I thought I warned you split-threading faggots yesterday. I come home from a hard day being a wagie, and you retards have made 3 brit/pol/ threads. Fucking state of you lot. You never heard of discipline? You make me want to punch my sister.
>Brexit party >polices that have nothing to do with brexit.
I dont think you understand why brexit party did so well. It did so well precisely because it had no policies. UKIP did shit mainly becuase it had policies which alienated large sections of the electorate, brexit party brought together communists, libertarians and working class nationalists
Isaac White
>haha yeah luv t' empire i do >fahkin churchill cunt is responsible for the pakis and wogs. shoulda elected mosley >wot do ya mean mosley hated imperialism
All of the policies I listed there are popular with the public. BXP isn’t just about Brexit, it’s a movement to change British politics. Nige has said as much.
Daniel Davis
>Free visas for Pakis and Africans >Yank system for the NHS >Sell off anything still publically owned
I'm literally saying the kind of shit Farage advocates for
Michael Collins
Until it's TBP party policy, you're just shitposting.
Eli Torres
golden brown texture like sun
Brody Murphy
i m not sure, ive seen people link a website in brit/pol/ a couple times like "hey guys come and watch a movie"
Jace Kelly
Netflix?
Zachary Rogers
It’s called public relations and spin.
Landon Lopez
YouTube?
Jose Williams
You cant just cobble together a bunch of popular cuases and then expect everyone vote for you
Most of them policies are supported by UKIP let they have never got over 15% in the national vote of a parliamentary election.
Some issues are wedge issues , it doesnt how matter many goodies you throw in, if you support one of these wedge issues(biggest being immigration policy) , you vote will end up capped at the support for the most controversial policy
>expect everyone vote for you Unless Brexit is resolved amicably by the time of the next GE, policies aren't going to count for shit. The only issue will be how are you going to deliver (or not, for the lefties) Brexit. The tories need to wake up and realise the only way they can survive is delivering Brexit, quickly. Ideally through a FTA with the EU with no back-stop, if not, then a no-deal. Fail, and kiss the old Tory party goodbye. The by-election in Peterborough will prove my theory, TBP will win. Even with no manifesto and no policies.
Henry Gutierrez
UKIP were amateurish with their optics and standard of candidate yet they still made waves. You can already tell this is different, BXP are cleaner cut and more professional, their also very social media savvy.
Asher Thomas
He needs to drop the NHS shit then considering its the national sacred cow I am shitposting, but I wonder how accurate it will be
Michael Davis
she's circling the drain, all bets are off
Carson Smith
you're uninformed TBP doesn't support any of this
Samuel Davis
As for immigration, poll after poll shows that the public want immigration reduced, especially immigration from Muslim countries.
Hunter Clark
Apu pepe is cringe now the normies on reddit have adopted him.
Aiden Gutierrez
>free billion pounds for everyone >deport all forerners >taxation is theft abolish hmrc >muh ENNNN AICH ESS rate my manifesto lads i polled my friends and when i asked them each policy individually they 100% supported them dude im going to win 100%
Yeah the NHS is his achilles heel but a basic policy of ‘more monies for Ethel’s carers and Abdul’s operations’ should be good enough to win over the spacks who can’t see past the NHS’ failings.
Eli Hughes
The BXP doesn't have any policies yet, so neither of us can say what they want beyond Brexit
>Railway nationalised >House of Lords gone I like it
Alexander Price
>public want immigration reduced then why wont they vote for one of the anti-immigration parties and not give 90% of votes to pro-immigration parties if immigration is such an important issue to them
Nathan Jones
more in relation to the last one
Aiden Carter
>guns for everyone >30 rounds each >1 week in which murder is legalised >winner takes all
How you like my election policy guys? Should thin the herd a bit. Nice week long purge. Remember lads, only 30 rounds (you can scavenge round off the corpses of your enemies), so make them count. ;-)
