Being pro-birth isn’t as noble of a position as most make it out to be

If you're too poor to have kids; don't fuck.

So that child should be killed?

Correct. But still more noble than murdring the most innocent and defenceless lo beings.

Obvious perfect solution fallcy mate. Lrn2rhetoric.

By abortionist logic the way to help the homeless is by rounding them up and killing them

parents are just people who think its okey to gamble with human life
>am i feeling lucky? should i give birth to a life i can't sustain? Should i bring life into this dark and twisted universe? Should i have sex without a condom and see if i get lucky by someone else getting unlucky?
Its not like this post matters, im just saying it because i feel like it, people are driven by their genetics, and are slaves to evolution and the will of the universe, and they are pushing others into slavery by means of birth

Might as well just kill the homeless or anyone else who doesn't reach our arbitrary standard of a "good life".

Feel free to kys any time

Ban abortion, but also legalize buying and selling of babies.

There are a lot of infertile couples out there, so there is a demand for babies.

Jow Forums logic.
>Force babies be born into poverty
>Kill people in poverty
Normal, healthy person logic
>Let mothers control when they carry a pregnancy to term
>Provide assistance to people in poverty

All life is precious and good

Attached: 6F61945F-EEB8-456E-9FC9-607D037C4594-2222-000002B5596CC5DE.jpg (1200x939, 142K)

Live your dream!
Make sure you kill yourself to lighten the load faggot.

After dealing with enough homeless crackheads and thieves you'll want to help them the very same way.

>shitskins live in filth
we already know this. here's some tangentially-related evidence:

look into childhood asthma incidence and prevalence broken down by race. blacks and beans are greatly over-represented in cases of childhood asthma. why, you ask?

a huge portion of asthma experienced by children and adolescents (continuing into adulthood) is allergic asthma. allergic asthma is caused by the body's response to certain factors in the local environment. these factors include:
>cockroach droppings
>dust mite droppings
>pet dander
>cigarette smoke
>mouse droppings/dander
>etc.

long story short: niggers and beans experience much greater rates of asthma because their houses are filthy and their parents smoke inside with the kids. niggers and beans cannot even be bothered to clean their houses for the sake of their childrens' health

sources:
nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032097
aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/Committees-Councils-Sections/Council-on-Environmental-Health/Documents/GreenBook3rdEdTableOfContents.pdf
niehs.nih.gov/health/assets/docs_a_e/environmental_management_of_pediatric_asthma_guidelines_for_health_care_providers_508.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9927350

even when the shitskins are imported into first-world nations they cannot help but live in their own filth

Attached: 1550124647854.jpg (1092x1220, 316K)

Jesus loves all his children

Attached: 553C7844-79DC-4DEF-8127-8E58F579751A-2222-000002B564B2782A.jpg (1280x720, 212K)

What if we gave the poor people birth control pills, condoms, and sex education in schools so they can still have sex but not produce babies?
Sounds like a good compromise. Great work boys, another victory for problem solving.

2.
Babies are easier to adopt out than it was to get in your pants.

But a life certainly is ended when you chop it up into bits and suck it out with a vacuum.

This. Also living in a region that's been a war torn shithole for ages.

No one really cares about shit skin babies. Just don’t abort the white ones (non Jewish obviously as Jews aren’t really white).

kill all

Attached: 1559253324639m.jpg (768x1024, 79K)

"Sorry your life is shit little buddy, if I had it my way you would already be dead!" By this man's logic then it would be totally moral to walk up and put a bullet in that kid's brain, to save him from a lifetime of future suffering.

First of all people of such caliber should not be having babies
Second, this is nature, this is something you see on national geographic while you're knodding your head

How about the sexual activities of poor people is
1. none of my business
2. entirely their problem
3. not at all my responsibility.
You call things problems that aren't really problems. If the little niglet can survive being poor he might be a little less soft than you.

Attached: 1558017293253.jpg (828x540, 128K)

>If you're too poor to have kids other peoples tax dollars should go towards you being able to do something you don't have to do.

There's no compromise you fucking retard.
If you can't afford to have sex you don't. It's really simple.
Sex is not a right.

what part of "my body, my choice, your tax dollars" do you not understand, bigot?

>So let's kill it instead!
Fucking retards I swear.

>HUMANS SHOULDN'T BEHAVE LIKE HUMANS
>REEEE @ ABORSHUN

Jow Forums logic
>Let mothers control when to carry a pregnancy by not being a whore
>Have mothers get husbands to provide for them
Normal, healthy person logic
>Force babies to die from whoredom
>Poverty always kills
3/10 bait overall

I agree it's none of your business. Let them abort, that's also not your business.
>The right to resources that allow you to have safe sex that doesn't produce a new mouth for the state to feed 9 months later isn't something we could easily fund
You didn't do your cost/benefit analysis of how we could spend our tax dollars most effectively on this and you should feel bad. This is about spending the least tax dollars on the situation, right? Because if a kid is produced, I guarantee you it's 1000x more of a burden on the state than throwing birth control pills at poor people.

Attached: fqtfk.jpg (409x393, 19K)

But if you talk to them about the Holocaust, then that's evil.

Maybe a meme should be created where the holocaust of Jews was the most merciful solution, just like abortion.

We all can't be as noble as those who kill babies for convenience and then sell their body parts for profit.

>YEAH KILL EM KILL EM KILL EM

Attached: 3D792C94-4EDA-49AF-A7FA-5F995302F028.png (1200x1200, 54K)

the suffering of poor children will teach the poor to not be reckless with their children, or it wont. Where is the fault in logic?

>NXIVM detected

What if I told you there's a biological difference so vast between a fetus and a baby that we've been aborting for hundreds of years? What if I told you televangelists in the 1970's drummed up the fallacy that live begins at conception as a social wedge issue to stir voting blocs?
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8274866

Attached: Morpheus2.jpg (334x302, 20K)

op thinks it'd be better to shoot the child in the head than let her live. let that sit in your conscious

neat - violently ending it is not any less awful because some people have rough lives

>5M+6Y+2Z
What did they mean by this?

What if I told you before 20 weeks a fetus has a brain so underdeveloped that it has no idea what the hell is going on and that terminating its existence isn't an ethical problem at all.

Attached: Morpheus3.jpg (334x302, 28K)

the majority of pro lifers on here support the killing of downs kids. kys faggot.

adoption exists you retard.

this dumbfuck's logic
>sarcasm? what's that?
>i don't understand what people are saying
>where am i?
>why do i smell toast?

I used to sleep on an air mattress on the floor that would deflate as I slept on it because there was a tiny hole somewhere.

Bless you.

>Just don’t have sex you disgusting noncel
Can’t believe I never thought of this, nice one user

Attached: 73F6CDE9-FE09-4154-BC87-7783CBF8D6ED.jpg (800x450, 44K)

Slaughtering the unborn isn't justifiable as you trick yourself to think

Because I'm making late breakfast, obviously. So you agree, we might as well let women be free to have abortions before the point biologists are concerned the fetus would be bothered by its own termination? And we should probably help the poor and downtrodden because society should be a warm, welcoming place where people have a chance at happiness?

Attached: TortimerNL_00000(noise_scale)(x2.0)(level2).png (1000x1442, 913K)

A life is literally saved. Retard.

All children are blessings from God, especially the deformed and rape babies.

Attached: A4D5AB53-095B-4137-9568-5EFE8BDB9723-2222-000002B538CAC23F.jpg (900x1200, 167K)

>some third world shithole
now that's a big straw

Attached: Noggler.png (888x885, 171K)

But consider this, if you save a person from a fire, did you REALLY save them? Let them burn.

so a leftist would kill that kid?

based panties thieving hobo

Are you aware of this meme and the context behind it? Your response to this is essentially the same thing in every way.

Attached: Wow.jpg (636x408, 35K)

>I'd rather murder children than have anyone be unequal
fuck off marxist

>adopted kid in uk
that kid was molested since birth

a comatose or a sleeping person has no idea what's going on if you suddenly blow their heads off with a shotgun
guess there's no ethical problem xD

Me, you, no body knows what the soul is or what life is all about. These are questions that our peasant brains can't answer. We can't make assumptions like this or else we are playing "God". All I know is life is one of the only things in this universe that moves away from the chaos of entropy that happens in the Universe. Biology is all about order in a Universe that is continually becoming disorderly, the Universe designed it to be like this. Don't ask me why and you certainly can't make these broad assumptions.

>I'm an inside guy
No you're just a fucking idiot.

>The right to resources that allow you to have safe sex that doesn't produce a new mouth for the state to feed 9 months later isn't something we could easily fund
Nice strawman you fucking retard
Why don't you build some more strawmen, knock them down, and then act like you're intelligent, and have accomplished something

You fucking dudditz.
I did do my cost benefit analysis. Taxation is theft. Stay away from me money.

Would it help or hurt to start advocating for a three child policy with mandatory abortion after the third child? Would it rightly horrify leftists or would they agree with it??

Chinese used to drown children and leave babies in trees that doesn't make it moral.
>what if I told you I can tell you're from reddit?

I'm sure the little girls in the Philippines feel the same way, after getting ravaged by British tourists every day for 5 bucks. They know Jesus loves them and they're happy they go to heaven when their broken, desperate lives are over. They are so blessed.

Child are like animals, can't feed it ? Don't have it.

Wow, must be nice to have the only validation of your existence be promiscuous behavior.
Please drink bleach.

t. Podesta

Honestly, I'd find it easier to talk to those kids to their freaky faces than to that fake-smile creep.

1. That person can exist outside of another person's body
2. That sleeping person has people who depend on them who will lose a lot if you kill that person
Just a couple ethical points where the disparity is notable. Don't bank your ethics paper in college on the point that blasting a living, fully developed human being to death so quickly they can't comprehend it to terminating a fetus before a certain trimester.
How'd you get on the internet? Taxpayers got the cables in the ground. I suppose you also don't drive on roads either?
Yeah, that's definitely not the same as using medical research from esteemed biologists to perform a highly modern medical procedure.

Attached: celn026oncb01.jpg (3840x2160, 1.29M)

I agree. If you can't feed the kid, abort the little fucker. Next time don't use a condom that's past the expiration date. Learn from your mistake, and be more careful next time.

That guy is creepy as fuck, agreed.

You'd rather just kill them because they are suffering? Every life has a fundamental element of suffering, that doesn't make it right to kill innocent people. That is a fundamentally genocidal, luciferian world view you are espousing.

This.

That guy is a real Jesus.

If you're aware you're not equipped to raise a child in a way that gives it a decent shot at a normal life, you should take responsibility for whatever dumb shit you did to get accidentally pregnant by aborting that little sucker before the fetus gets too developed. It's the adult thing to do when the worst happens.

Yeah that looks pretty rank, lets kill that kid

it doesn't matter where a person is, it's not moral to murder them
>That sleeping person has people who depend on them who will lose a lot if you kill that person
so if it's a old hermit with no associations sleeping in the woods, you can blow his head off and it's fine xD

Here's an idea: execute the nonces.

Attached: garyglitter.jpg (634x1020, 151K)

>How'd you get on the internet? Taxpayers got the cables in the ground. I suppose you also don't drive on roads either?

I'm forced to live in this world, and play by its rules.
You are obviously a child.
Me believing taxation is theft (it is) does not exclude me from using things like the internet (that I paid for), and using roads that were built before I was fucking born, and had no say in.

You are a retard. You can't argue. You are obviously underage, and are too fucking stupid to even engage in a political conversation.
You don't have the life experience to be having these conversation's if you're going to make a retarded argument like that.

You should stay on reddit. They love retards like you.

Attached: 1559257194035.png (480x300, 209K)

Is the Left now advocating for killing the poor?

Attached: 1546369514364.jpg (883x937, 239K)

Being poor isn't the worst thing to happen.

Pic made me viscerally mad, unironically. Shit parents get the rope after Jews.

Everyman should just be a kinslayer if they are bad parents!

Oh, so now we're admitting that killing shitskins because they're better off dead than alive is merciful?

Okay. I'll let that sit on my [sic]conscious, you fucking retard.

Attached: unknown (2).png (1280x852, 328K)

Yes,
Kill the poor.
KILL THE POOR.
KILL NON-WHITE NON-ASIAN CHILDREN!!!
KILL
THE
POOR

Attached: honk'd from the start.jpg (226x223, 8K)

You realize nearly everyone before 1800 lived an incredibly deprived lifestyle by modern standards? Should they have all killed themselves and ended humanity because muh suffering?

>Should they have all killed themselves
YES

EVERYONE SHOULD FUCKING KILL THEMSELVES.

EXCEPT FOR THE ROTHSCHILDS AND THE ONES ABOVE OF THEM.

Attached: If only.jpg (518x561, 37K)

Than you would be wrong
There's a heartbeat at 8 weeks. At 8 weeks the genetic code is written that determines whether or not you'll be bald be predisposed to certain genetic disorders and numerous other traits

want to stop abortion?

male pill. literally that simple.

only question is how many times bigger the drop in abortion will be then with the female pill.

???
Ok user, I was gonna kms anyways