I am a scientists in genetics, and all textbooks also state that race doesn't exist. There is more genetic variation within a single family than between any individual from that family and a person from say Africa.
You can be more related to an African man than to your own mother, hope that doesn't anger too many on here.
Other urls found in this thread:
abc.net.au
youtube.com
archive.is
archive.is
scientificamerican.com
iflscience.com
abc.net.au
sciencedirect.com
theglobeandmail.com
twitter.com
Good, so neither does racism. Got it
ok go live with the niggers
I'm a scientist therefore the obvious isn't actually true. OP is not only a faggot but also transexual. You're too dumb for this place. Go home.
Mom! Australia is drunk again
The national geographic also confirms this.
Yep
so you'd rather take an organ transplant from a random person from another race than your own bother?
got it
>There is more genetic variation within a single family than between any individual from that family and a person from say Africa.
If this was true in the sens you try to mean it, there would be no inherited diseases (but there is), the relatives would not look like each other AT ALL (but they do) and their cognitive skills would be vastly different (but they are somewhat same depending which part of the family they inherit).
It's all
"culture and upbringing, values and traditions and tolerance"
goy
>race doesn't exist
>we need racial diversity
hmm
please kill yourself
you're nothing but a loser OP. remember this and keep making 0/10 bait threads.
>I am a scientists in genetics
no you're not
No Dad I see, as usual
>I am a scientists in genetics
sure you are. If niggers are the same as white people can we ship all our niggers to your nation?
> the relatives would not look like each other
Many times they don't, sorry. Many times people are shocked to find that people are siblings.
>and their cognitive skills would be vastly different
The similarity in cognition inside one family is more to do with upbringing, the children are all raised the same way in a family and suffer or succeed from this in the same way.
In fact if a poor family hands off their baby to rich people, that baby is far more likely as an adult to be someone deemed intelligent by society than if they stayed with their original family and stagnated in a poor environment.
They think "but you're a dumb bigot who thinks it's real, and discriminates on that basis".
Not drunk, under attack. Literally fucking under attack. Apparently we are the battleground for the US-Chinese proxy war.
abc.net.au
Explain to me why medical institutions need to discriminate between races when prescribing medication?
Or why the chances of needing a C-section increase when impregnated by someone of another ethnicity?
Even if these things weren't true, people have instinctive in-group preference as a consequence of evolution and the presence of oxytocin in their body.
Denying this will create social disorder, wether race is real or not. Your claim however, has long been debunked, as is quite literally, socialist propaganda.
Yeah but they call me a white bigot, so how do they know that?
FALSE.
you can find the real facts here: www.clown-world.com
Abhorrent shitposting. I expect this kind of behavior out of leafs.
>www.clown-world.com
''acces forbidden''
>Explain to me why medical institutions need to discriminate between races when prescribing medication?
Plavix Lawsuit killed too many coconuts
>Or why the chances of needing a C-section increase when impregnated by someone of another ethnicity?
because many genes co-evolve and you raise the chances of skull deformities when you go outside of racial borders
>Even if these things weren't true, people have instinctive in-group preference as a consequence of evolution and the presence of oxytocin in their body.
well, SOME people. and even in that case they are color-coded.
>Denying this will create social disorder, wether race is real or not. Your claim however, has long been debunked, as is quite literally, socialist propaganda.
They know. They want social disorder.
clown-world.com/satire.html
All you have done in your post there is reactionary repeated Jow Forums alt-right talking points. Not a single one of them is valid in fact.
You should try gaining an education in science, instead of just repeating alt-right memes you read some other idiots say on Jow Forums. It only makes you look stupid.
Wtf, how do warships "show up" at a harbor. Where is the coast guard?
Yea...
>there are no different dog breeds, just "dogs".
>there are no different types of animals, just "animals".
>there is no difference between humans, fish, birds, dogs, cows, etc. Just "living beings".
>We are all living beings.
>more to do with upbringing
Bzzt. Wrong. If you were actually a scientist in the field youd know that intelligence is one of the most heritable traits independent of environment.
>You can be more related to an African man than to your own mother, hope that doesn't anger too many on here.
hahaha you absolute joke
''well, SOME people. and even in that case they are color-coded.''
Actually, statistically, it's most people.
Physical appearance is one of the leading factors which decides if people feel comfortable with being with that person. Babies even show racist traits by choosing to play more often with another baby which has a similair physical appearance.
It's natural and it's fine to have in-group preference.
An African lady impregnated by a white male has a 33% rate of needing a c-section.
All of my claims are true, and in-group preference is proven by statistics, and even behaviour in infants. Do your research instead of denying the psychological reality of tribe mentality.
explain how dog breeds are different. all dogs yet completely different in size shape and mannerisms
>I am a scientists
Again, riddle me this, dogs have been separated from wolves since 10,000 years ago and have since then evolved in 2 subspecies event though the two continuously interbred. Khoisans detached from other humans 100-200,000 years ago, and abos have been living in Australia for 70-100,000 years without any foreign recent admixture minus some europeans in recent times. No inter-admixture between the two ever took place. Both have developed distinctive physical, skeletal and genetic traits. How am I supposed to believe they are the same subspecies again?
the shittiest bait i've seen in a while. put some fucking effort into it. i expected more from a sheep-fucking colonial from down under.
Why does niggers always give birth to niggers if race doesn't exist?
>, and all
Made my autism flare up more
Yes of course, a (((scientist))) paid by your (((boss)))
>You can be more related to an African man than to your own mother
Hahahaha, jews like you are ashamed of nothing. Sorry rabbi, anyone with normal intelligence would see that there are many races in humans species, and that all these races are very different, both physically and mentally. Sorry rabbi, human races are a scientific fact. All scientists know it, but they do not say it because they are paid by jews. You are not a scientist, just a rabbi with a VPN who sucks cocks of babies.
Correct. Technically they're different species.
>can't speak English
>doesn't believe in biology
>is a "scientists" [sic]
It's all so tiresome...
"Again" implies that they were, at some point, sober. Based on the Australians I've known personally, drunkenness is their base state of being.
>you raise the chances of skull deformities when you go outside of racial borders
False, I am sorry to tell you this.....but all people are a result of different populations mixing. There is no such thing as a pure race, you probably can't understand this as you aren't a scientist.
Mixing of different populations actually creates more genetic variation and a healthier population. Even the Japanese who are a result of Korean type Yayoi mixed with primitive Jomon people are very healthy people with very low disease rates and high life expectancy. This is thanks to the high genetic variation which lead to a combination of beneficial genes.
>Oxytocin means people have an in-group preference for "muh race".
I don't think you understand what Oxytocin does. Oxytocin itself doesn't magically create tastes in people honey. Oxytocin doesn't have a mind of it's own, it's release depends on the individual and how they feel about things which is a result of upbringing.
Oxytocin is released by different people in different situations, this is because it all depends upon the individual. Again Oxytocin doesn't do anything other than to facilitate the reactions and feelings the person has.
Scientifically speaking. If ever I see this the claim has poor evidence.
>liberal science is right because we said so
>don't question
Ask yourselves why it's always aboniggers starting these shill threads.
>this is what liberals actually believe
> I am a scientists
kek
>If you were a scientist you would "know" dat IQ charts represent innate intelligence and dat you gained your IQ from your parents at birth.
Oh boy, what channers think is science is so cute. Pretty much get the most scientifically ignorant redneck idea, and that's what channers actually think is science.
Nice bait (everything from Aboland is bait) but how do you explain that folks with a little training can look at a human skull and immediately know the race?
tldr; Don't you have some gas to huff?
Again, riddle me this, dogs have been separated from wolves since 10,000 years ago and have since then evolved in 2 subspecies event though the two continuously interbred. Khoisans detached from other humans 100-200,000 years ago, and abos have been living in Australia for 70-100,000 years without any foreign recent admixture minus some europeans in recent times. No inter-admixture between the two ever took place. Both have developed distinctive physical, skeletal and genetic traits. How am I supposed to believe they are the same subspecies again?
You a scientists? I also am being a scientists. Hello!
>If you teach kids to be racist and scared of certain groups you define for them, they will then see those people are a group and be scared of them.
Fail. Luckily 99% of channers will never be parents.
>Mixing of different populations actually creates more genetic variation and a healthier population
SI that why e.g. among African-Americans the higher the European admixture is, the higher the chance of stroke and vascular diseases? Is that why hapas are more prone to depression and mental illness?
Hello fellow scientists...
Holy fuck it’s happening!
That's why "some" was in big letters.
>An African lady impregnated by a white male has a 33% rate of needing a c-section.
>All of my claims are true
You need to seek help, not a single thing you have said in the whole thread is true.
Really? Becaause its all leftists ever talk about
Faggot
>I can't see it on their genes
Don't worry they have it all over their faces, is 100% correct, no but nothing in life is
I don't entertain dumb fucks, how many times do people have to explain to you dumb fucks what dogs are?
You will keep asking the same ignorant shit forever it seems.
"if evolution is true, where are there still monkeys". It's in line with that amount of stupidity, half of you on here are immune to education and are forever idiots.
Prove credentials faggot
If a human reproduces with an ape, what is the result. And lets be serious here.
(picture: Homo Erectus, Smithsonian institute. They lived 1.9million years to 50,000 years ago.)
Scientists say all humans come from Africa. At least they did, about 10 years ago.
New studies say, humans come from Europe.
Newer studies from just a year or two ago say no one knows for certain.
It is established that europeans have about 1-2% percent of their DNA from neanderthals.
Asians have some neanderthal and about 0.1% denisovan.
And tasmanian aboriginals have DNA from neanderthals, denisovans and an unknown extinct human.
Africans have 0% neanderthal DNA. But they have denisovan DNA and also west africans have DNA of an unknown now extinct species.
Instead of Homo Sapiens coming out from Africa, what if it was the other way around.
They have found Homo Sapiens skeletons in a cave in Israel that is from 200,000 years ago and another skeleton in Morocco from 300,000 years ago.
What would it look like, if homo sapiens would mate, not necessarily with an ape, but with a Homo Erectus. And they would continue this for the next, say 200,000 years.
So I was just wondering, if a Homo Sapiens went into Africa, 200,000 years ago, and mated with whatever came across it, what would its kids look like?
not trying to sound racist or anything like that.
>anyone with normal intelligence would agree with my Jow Forums redneck ass about "race". If they don't then they don't have normal intelligence.
lol
>2019
>Lysenkoism
ORIGINAL NATIVE AMERICANS WERE FROM EUROPE AND WHITE. archive.is
Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa, scientists find. archive.is
links:
scientificamerican.com
iflscience.com
abc.net.au
Nobody claims that races aren't a mix of different populations mixing, that doesn't take away the fact that groups of people who have been evolving in the same region for a long time are acclimatized to that region, and therefore function better in that region than others.
People with blond hair, blue eyes, and fair skin function better in European climates then people with black skin, brown eyes, and black hair.
It's widely known blacks suffer from vitamine D deffiencies when living in West/North/East Europe and Russia.
The relation between oxytocin and racial in-group preference wasn't discovered by whites, but by asians; sciencedirect.com
And yes, oxytocin indeed does play a role in racial in-group preference.
In short, no answer, the sòylord is in full panic&denial mode loool
Hence it can be desumed that different human subspecies exist as shown by genetic distances and as extrapolated by data hinting different human groups have stayed completely separated without intermixing for tens of thousands of years, enough to lead to subspecies differentiation.
Again, dogs have been separated from wolves since 10,000 years ago and have since then evolved in 2 subspecies event though the two continuously interbred. Khoisans detached from other humans 100-200,000 years ago, and abos have been living in Australia for 70-100,000 years without any foreign recent admixture minus some europeans in recent times. No inter-admixture between the two ever took place. Both were selected to live in fairly harsh environments requriing many evolutionary adaptations. Both have developed distinctive physical, skeletal and genetic traits. They are hence subspecies.
Also, how am I supposed to believe that all human subspecies and populations are equally capable? We clearly see how they fare differently in a variety of physical feats like running, swimming, marathon, weightlifting, etc., how some have enhanced eyesight, some enhanced sudoration, some enhanced lung capacity, some are more prone to certain diseases, some are sensibly less prone to them, some are more tolerant to certain foods, some are even more prone to certain types of behavior (e.g. Warrior gene in Maoris and Polynesians)
Is it too far stretched to think differences could apply to mental capabilities too? We do know intelligence is largely hereditary, afterall. Even leaving aside the IQ tests which show a certain subspecies as constantly under-performing, how come e.g. said subspecies failed to achieve civilization whereas all the others did, despite the land said subspecies lived in being very advantageous to them for building a developed civilization? How come they are still failing to this day, no matter the environment they are in? I can find no explanation if I believe we are all equal in all capabilities, which all empirical, historical and logical data do not seem to agree with.
Why would I believe you? Because of the stupid fucking appeal to authority in your first fucking sentence? Well, I'm god and you were my one mistake.
theglobeandmail.com
I'm quite convinced that your a troll, but might as well leave proof of my claims for others.
>You can be more related to an African man than to your own mother
Doesn't that tell you something about the reliability of your statistical analysis?
Lewontin fallacy.
Oy vey!
Well to me that would be an offense as Danes also are chronic alcoholics yet not retarded
Well I don't know if I'm a dumb fuck or not, but your flailing/baiting definitely entertained me.
>family resemblence don't even be real
Scorching take.
Swear to God, the National Geographic took on a Jewish editor-in-chief (or something), shortly before it started being wantonly 'woke'.
Not sure OP is sincere, & thus I should expend effort or not. That's one problem with trolling - effort-fatigue.
How come no one makes apost on topic anymore? I mean, instead of saying "hey guys lets talk about this"
People are always "Im gonna represent the OPPOSITE of what I actually want to talk about"
Just fucking make a normal thread, stop with all the deception...FFS
All labels are made-up
hahahahaha what the fuck, look at his face even he's upset he has the nigger gene!
Hahaha this argument is so twisted.
>reality is all subjective you know dude
If races dont exist, these should be the same
Supposedly this is true for chimps and humans, too. I know that there's a /lot/ of variation within chimp genomes - more in one tribe of chimps than among all humans - but I can't personally vouch for, that it's greater than the distance between chimps and humans.
If races dont exist, these should be the same
>Is that why hapas are more prone to depression and mental illness?
Let me guess, Elliot Rodgers is your basis of what a hapa is?
Sorry but you are a mix yourself, all people are a mix in fact. Sorry that you think you are some "pure" existence. You may want to look up the origin of Europe and don't cry when you realise all of the populations that came from outside that mixed and created Europeans.
Also depression doesn't relate to genes. But instead a variety to factors, like economic situation, whether you are outcast by people for being different, whether you had bad life experiences, abuse etc.