Isn't "anarcho-capitalism" an oxymoron?

Isn't "anarcho-capitalism" an oxymoron?
Like how the fuck do you have capitalism without someone to enforce property and contract law?

Attached: 1200px-Flag_of_Anarcho-capitalism.svg.png (1200x800, 3K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-PnkC7CNvyI
youtube.com/watch?v=ewbTfv40vWs
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-anarchism
twitter.com/AnonBabble

their retarded ideology isnt an ideology, its a religion for feels and fedoras.

just like judaism

You do it yourself, obviously. I swear, so many people say it's a meme ideology but don't even understand the basics.

What's stopping anyone from DIYing the NAP out of existence?

Self defense or private security and arbitration. Read Chaos Theory by Robert Murphy or Machinery of Freedom by David D Friedman

basic theorist:emerson.basic element:the abolishment of every state,and state organisation.basic problem:your question.but in an anarchocapitalistic situation,like in every idealistic theory,everybody will hapilly hount butterflies,and shit won`t smell.

Nuke the arabs

Private security and self defense. You have today automated house security, and people have weapons in their homes. People today often carry pepper spray. It's really not that far fetched on how people could defend themselves.

anarcho-capitalist is even more delusional than anarcho-communist

That's fucking retarded
what's stopping someone with better "private security" from just invading someone with worse "private security" and demand tribute?
How the fuck does the system not immediately collapse into feudalism?

also this doesn't answer the question where would contract get their power
are you also supposed to personally enforce the contracts you sign?

The only problem I see with this meme ideology is they keep insisting monopolies can't form without government.
Which apart from being purely hypothetical doesn't address what happens if there is one.

It's the same reason why china or america aren't invading and taking over smaller countries dispite no world government regulating them, and it's because of reputation and high econmic costs, and also because not everyone is a psychopath with zero morals.

Oh, who will enforce contracts? In machinery of freedom, David talks about the principle of constant dealings where people are incentivized to keep contracts if they plan on making more in the future

wtf? are you literally retarded?

Attached: george-w-bush-declares-mission-accomplished.jpg (1200x677, 140K)

The reason is because the person who doesn't follow contracts will not be trustworthy, so people are less inclined to deal with him

no, its because of mutually assured destruction. unless everyone in your ancap paradise has recreational nukes its not even remotely an accurate comprarison

You enforce it your self

how new are you exactly?

What's wrong with recreational nukes commie? God made man, Oppenheimer made us equal.

Mutaully assured destruction would fall under the high cost category

So what does that matter if theyve already cashed out and are living big?

>A company owns a parcel of land WHICH IS TOTALLY NOT JUST A PRIVATELY OWNED COUNTRY
>You live on this parcel of land but in return you pay rent WHICH IS TOTALLY NOT A TAX
>The company has rules that you must follow WHICH IS TOTALLY NOT A SET OF LAWS
>These rules are made in accordance to the NAP WHICH IS TOTALLY NOT A CONSTITUTION
>The company will hire private security in order to make sure people obey these company rules WHICH ARE TOTALLY NOT A POLICE FORCE
>In order to earn money you need to pay your "totally not a tax rent" you must provide a service to the company WHICH IS TOTALLY NOT GETTING A STATE JOB
>Ah yes so good to live in a true anarchist paradise

Anarcho capitalism is literally just corporate fascism. Now you may think that that's still the perfect system and, hey, all power to you, but that doesnt change the fact that there is absolutely nothing anarchistic about "anarcho" capitalism

conventional warfare is cost. destruction is destruction

Yeah i agree America wasn't the best example because it doesn't have a good history of foregin relations, but right now is the most peaceful time relative to history including the least amount of wars, and that can maybe be explained by the foregin trade between countries and that the costs of invading is often higher than the benefit as of today

not fascism, it's just basic feudalism

It's an oxymoron but at least it's not as retarded as anarcho communism

>ignoring the exceptions, my system works!
Anons itt are right, you are as retarded as the commies

kek ancaps cant come back from being BTFO

anarcho-communism works in small communities of 50 people. anarcho-capitalism doesnt work anywhere

Don't forget that there are competing companies THAT ARE TOTALLY NOT OTHER COUNTRIES, so if you don't like a certain set of rules or the rent is too high for your liking you can just become their customer instead

Anarcho communism doesnt work but at least its inherently anarchic. Anarcho capitalism both doesnt work and is fascistic in nature
If you unironically believe this you are genuinely retarded and there is not much i can say to you so i will promptly ignore any and all posts by your ID

>how the fuck do you have capitalism without someone to enforce property and contract law?

Dumb question. You do have someone to enforce those things. It’s just not the government.

Also, fun uck kikes.

>Anarcho Communism
You can't have a socialist state without an Authoritarian state and Anarchy only exists with no state so that is the definition of a meme ideology. And small, chaste villages with a small amount of people really can't be considered Anarchism or Commuism simply because Feudalistic societies lived the same way but Communism / Anarchy and Feudalism are on opposite ends oof the spectrum

can you give me the definition of fascism you are using?

Do you have literal brain damage or do you just not understand how emigration works?

Just a heavily authoritarian state (or in this case "privately owned corporate land") who tries to police people's private thoughts and actions in order for them to succumb to the superior political force of the party (or in this case corporation). Not using a specific definition, just comparing fascist countries of the 20th century with what ancaps consider an ideal utopian society and i see plenty of similarities. Only there is no country but corporation, which makes it worse actually

So the difference is that the privately owned land is rightfully owned, if this society was aligned with the NAP, which is not the case for the USA because the USA stole its land.

when a person violates a non-violate rule on private property, it is not justified to give them a death penalty or prison sentence. It's justified to kick them out of the property.

Ancaps aren't against laws or police on principle. They are in favor of private law and private security. The difference is that the state police are involuntarily funded and violates individual rights.

I don't see how working for a company is the same as working for the state. Do you make no distinction between public vs private sector?

Ancaps are under the delusion that everyone in their society would be as much of an ideologue as they are. In reality most people don't give a shit and they're just trying to get by. An ancap society would quickly devolve into a plutocracy when the rich buy their way into power.

are you the communist kike? stay in israel and fuck off nigger

I was planning on killing Jews and stealing their shekes to reclaim my birthright. What system of anarchy is that?

Ancaps don't exist. It's just nazis false flagging to make the pipeline from "muh private property" to "muh blood and muh cum" easier to digest for retards.

NAP

Here's a primer on anarcho-capitalism, voiced by David Friedman, son of Milton Friedman, and one of the most famous anarcho-capitalist theorists, and based upon his work, The Machinery of Freedom, one of the first Anarcho-capitalist books.

youtube.com/watch?v=-PnkC7CNvyI

Here's a video where he answers one about the poor:
youtube.com/watch?v=ewbTfv40vWs

Anarcho fascism

Attached: z_p17-Genghis1.jpg (360x240, 41K)

Every Jew involved in ancap is a rich academic faggot who preaches ancap while sucking off the police to protect their wealth.

Egoism or anarcho primitivism

No. But it is redundant. Capitalism is economics sans government intervention. Since anarchy means no government -it is then taken as a given, that the default economics system would be capitalism.

Putting 'anarcho' in front of a term just makes it sound more edgy, new and cool to the dummies.

theres actually a name for that. technofascism

National Anarchism

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-anarchism

I dont like labels, but i say we kill all the Jews and deport all immigrants

>I trade with X
>We agree to exchange Z and Y
>I give him Z
>He doesn't give me Y
>He's now dead because he violated the NAP