Is the Second Amendment compatable with National Socialism?

Is the Second Amendment compatable with National Socialism?

Attached: B1A3FE10-2A49-4A3B-A50C-BE9F30002FFD.gif (353x200, 1.94M)

Other urls found in this thread:

solargeneral.org/gun-control-in-germany-1928-1945/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichserbhofgesetz
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Privatization_and_business_ties
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_legislation_in_Germany#Gun_regulation_of_the_Third_Reich
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Yes.

in an ethnostate it wouldn't be an issue. niggers kill people, not guns

Yes

Attached: mein_nigger.jpg (289x292, 23K)

No, National Socialism is impossible without a monopoly of force by the state. The Volk can't be trusted with the means to resist the leaders of the people, as then the leaders of the people can't truly enact a total ownership and socialization of the white race.

>National Socialism is impossible without a monopoly of force by the state
>The Volk can't be trusted with the means to resist the leaders of the people
If the ideal model is followed and a state akin to Germany under Hitler is created, people will not want to rebel. They would be happy in the notion of working for a greater state, a greater tomorrow, and the preservation of their race.

Socialism is compatible with the constitution at all

t.jidf

Attached: hitler didn't ban guns.jpg (732x688, 484K)

Terrible argument. NatSoc is supposed to be altered and varied as the nations that operate with it. A US tyoe would never be suppoeted without the 2A, its also beneficial in that the peoples militias can be a self policing system agains marxists and any types of liberal (classical or otherwise) that would attempt to subvert the nation. Same for druggies amd their dealers.

I'm sure Hitler would have wanted all of his volk to have guns when the red army was raping their way through eastern Germany

What is the volkssturm?

I am not arguing against guns, I think you misunderstood.

Basing an argument off utopian happiness is just a way to get your argument shot down. Plan for dissent, and plan on members of the populace retaining a certain level of force.

Firearms ownership was utilitarian. The Nazi state would never let you own military hardware though because then you would be a threat to them as you then challenge the totality of the state. Also incentivizing you to have a bunch of kids and work yourself to death in factories distracts you and keeps you focused away from other things.

The state is to serve the Volk not the other way around. Right to bear arms is not a concept that began with Americans both Plato and Machiavelli advocated such a thing.

>own military hardware

American can't own modern automatic guns.

>people will not want to rebel
And thus they do not need to own guns.

Yes.
And so is the first.

No, and neither is the rest of the Bill of Rights for that matter.

Attached: american revolution.jpg (700x1122, 470K)

No, you can’t control your population if it’s armed, what the fuck are you gonna do when some rural people decide they don’t want to pay their taxes or go along with you programs?

You can if you're rich, you can buy anything you want here if you're rich

Send the army in? And where's the rural faggots in the US who've decided that? Whataboutism.

The only people who weren’t trusted with firearms in national socialist Germany where Jews and communists and I still have yet to hear a good reason they should get any rights let alone the right to bear arms

Who the fuck are you to decide that? You NEETSoc faggots are just the urban equivalent of effete neoliberal scum, all idealist with no ground in reality but definitely willing and ready to kill anyone who gets in your way, even if it’s the very people you supposedly “care” about

No surprise that the fucking leaf is a statist bootlicker

Attached: 9BCCCC43-F672-4B88-885F-DD5B89C875F2.jpg (634x411, 104K)

Kys anarkiddie solargeneral.org/gun-control-in-germany-1928-1945/

No. It's there to prevent it.

Hitler relaxed gun laws for Germans.

>You NEETSoc faggots are just the urban equivalent of effete neoliberal scum, all idealist with no ground in reality but definitely willing and ready to kill anyone who gets in your way, even if it’s the very people you supposedly “care” about
That’s some serious projection commie scum

>be Rabbi, 1938
>want to buy essential self-defense tools because local SA homos are throwing rocks at Synagogue again
>walk into gun store
>ask for shotgun

Want to take bets on whether or not Rabbi Scholmo Berkowitzstein is going to be leaving with a brand new Browning Auto-5 like he would in any store in America?

Attached: all-in-favor-of-gun-control-raise-your-right-hand.jpg (736x960, 187K)

It's not just compatible. It's necessary.

It's necessary to keep groups like the Nazis out and freedom in.

Attached: 2nd amendment protects the 1st amendment.jpg (720x677, 130K)

Yep, everyone hets issued full auto ar15 in jr high and goes through rigorous firearm training.

Now imagine American schools drilled Natsoc into children's heads instead of liberalism.
This post would be
>It's necessary to keep groups like the Jews out and Nazis in.

I'm not working for the State, nigger. I'm working for myself and my family. I will shoot the first agent of the State that comes to nationalize my farm. Then I'm sharing my arsenal with my neighbors. Fuck the State.

You can, you just need a special license to own automatic guns.

If you have no criminal record, and cost is no concern, you can legally own almost any type weapon here. It's just that most people aren't wealthy, so we have to settle semi-automatic guns.

>I'm not working for the State
>nationalize my farm
>cletuspilled boomer mutt knows nothing about national socialism

Attached: daf.png (1016x986, 699K)

Yes. Absolutely.
checked

Attached: dubs checked 54.jpg (467x393, 39K)

Yeah, Hitler loosened gun laws for all German citizens.

I think it's compatible with a government which shares the same governing principles as National Socialism.

Whether or not the Second Amendment is compatible with the NSDAP is a different question, however.

Attached: 1558058515597.jpg (720x819, 80K)

Given that non-citizens in America can't buy guns, the situation is exactly the same as Scholmo Berkowitzstein as he isn't a German citizen.

they loosened gun restrictions for ethnic germans

Definitely, an armed population ready to defend itself is better and cuts down on the training needed so they become paramilitaries basically if that's what you want.

Describe ag policy under national socialist regimes then.

Why wouldn't it be? It's up to the volk to get rid of the corrupt and incompetent

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichserbhofgesetz
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany#Privatization_and_business_ties

spbp

I’m no communist, I just authoritarian scum and their useful idiots

From what I can quickly gather the Reichserbhofgesetz protected farmers from debt by declaring farms as hereditary. However, those farmers could no longer sell their guaranteed land. Therefore, they are bound to that land, same as a serf. Couple that with the price fixing and heavy production regulation of the Reichsnährstand and you are free in name only. How is a Nazi farmer better off than a Soviet peasant?

Yep

Attached: What is Fascism.png (886x1322, 125K)

Attached: Libertarianism.png (1231x441, 25K)

Attached: Fascism.png (1487x711, 94K)

>You can, you just need a special license to own automatic guns.
>If you have no criminal record, and cost is no concern, you can legally own almost any type weapon here.

No, you can't.

Stop questioning subject, turn your guns in, the state will protect you! Remember these “educated” urbanites know what’s best for you!

>Therefore, they are bound to that land, same as a serf

(((bullshit)))

/thread

What a fag

guns where allowed for ethnic germans, lying jew

If (((wikipedia))) is to be believed, gun laws were pretty lax in NatSoc Germany, except for jews.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_legislation_in_Germany#Gun_regulation_of_the_Third_Reich

How is that bullshit? You can't sell out, so you are stuck. You can't buy your neighbor out so you can't grow, either. You can't grow what you want or sell it at a price that you want. You just make food to feed the state and pump out babies for soldiers. No more, no less. Doesn't sound too dissimilar from serfdom, economically. I suppose that bauers don't have to bow to any aristocracy, but hasn't the State supplanted them in this case?

Hitler lowered the age to own firearm's from 21 to 18, it's a common misconception that he suddenly confiscated everyone's gun's.