We share this planet with a small population of highly intelligent hominids of a seperate but similar species that diverged from the majority population long ago likely as a competitor. (not "bigfoot")
>This differs from the Extraterrestrial Hyothesis as a more rational means to explain a more broad range of phenomena. It addresses the a priori and least likely assumtion that these set of phenomena originate from a planet other than our own. >This also adresses the anthropological phenomena of lack in observable variation amongst hominoids now compared to the not so distant past. Where did they all go? Why are humans such a genetically similar discontinous category compared to the continuous specie variation present in all other life? has it been hidden? are we being lead to not question?
These hominids would be similar enough to pass as human but genetically divergent enough that an offspring with homo sapiens would be infertile (like a mule). They would be numerically inferior and nomadic, lacking a specific geographical orgin or homeland in the present time. They would likely maintain their existence amonst the human population through obfuscation by placing themselves where they can influence the human population by secrecy, deception, and social conditioning. They would be talented in areas humans are not, and likely capable of maintaining aliances with select groups of humans. Author Mac Tonnies dies in his sleep in 2009 at the age of 34 from sudden heart failure before publishing his book 'Cryptoterrestrials' (pic related) and just as he began to reveal his conclusions on his blog ( posthumanblues.blogspot.com/?m=1) and in various interviews on television and in podcasts (see below). breif summary by Mac Tonnies: youtu.be/s04-hqHT4Us Podcasts: youtu.be/z3Eta8Gd-8o theparacast.com/podcasts/paracast_070506.mp3 theparacast.com/podcasts/paracast_100411.mp3 Archives: theparacast.com/?s=mac tonnies
Wtf? You must be referring to something/someone else
Joshua Brooks
Exerpts from 'The Cryptoterrestrials': A MEDITATION ON INDIGENOUS HUMANOIDS AND THE ALIENS AMONG US ~by Mac Tonnies
>[...]it’s easy to entertain the idea that we’re the first, evolution’s sole successful stab at the phenomenon we casually term “intelligence.” Yet as we watch night erode the familiar highways and stadiums and ever-encroaching suburbs, our confidence falters. Already, technological forecasters envision a near-future populated by our artificially intelligent offspring. Perhaps as our most cherished certainties crumble in the glow of a new century—full of danger, portent and enigma—it’s become relatively easy to contemplate the presence of the Other; not an other new to our planet, but one predating our own genetic regime. Something unspoken and ancient yet nevertheless amenable to science . . . an intelligence with an almost-human face, until recently content to abide by the shadows of our complacency.
>I propose that at least some accounts of alien visitation can be attributed to a humanoid species indigenous to the Earth, a sister race that has adapted to our numerical superiority by developing a surprisingly robust technology.
>For too long, we’ve called them “aliens,” assuming that we represent our planet’s best and brightest. Maybe that’s exactly what they want us to think.
>We may well share our planet with cryptohominids that have mastered the art of camouflage in order to coexist with us. More portentously, their agenda might be within our ability to grasp. But to do so, we must suspend the assumption that we’re dealing with something as quaint as ET astronauts. The truth, unnervingly, seems much closer to home, threatening to displace our sense of self in a most unexpected manner
Exerpts from 'The Cryptoterrestrials': A MEDITATION ON INDIGENOUS HUMANOIDS AND THE ALIENS AMONG US ~by Mac Tonnies
>Our infatuation with the unknown is systematically provoked and dismantled by a memetic campaign that’s never less than astute in its grasp of human belief.
>If we share our planet with indigenous humanoids—and I think the case for terrestrial origin is at least as robust as the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis—then it would certainly appear that we’re numerically—if not technically—superior. The “others” would be forced to live at the periphery of normal human perception,
>Extrasolar aliens or not, the transgenic angle allows for an illuminating reassessment of the Indigenous or Cryptoterrestrial Hypothesis (CTH). Cryptoterrestrial (CT) hybrids may be “replicants” tailored to survival-oriented tasks, such as infiltrating human society
>Why are humans such a genetically similar discontinous category compared to the continuous specie variation present in all other life? We aren't. Different races have varying degrees of hominid admixture, they are different species.
Cooper Bailey
sciencepost.uk/2018/08/reconstruction-heres-what-julius-caesars-face-looked-like/ >What did Julius Caesar look like? A Dutch museum have just revealed a 3D representation of the Ancient Roman dictator that is deemed to be incredibly realistic. However, the shape of his skull has raised some questions… >The most surprising aspect of the results obtained by Maja d’Hollosy is the shape of the skull. It is commonly known that Julius Caesar was born by caesarean section, which could explain the shape of the head. But at the time, this type of operation caused the death of the mother, or left her dying. However, this explanation may be no more than a legend, because according to testimonies recorded in various works, his mother Aurelia survived and saw her son growing up.
We're all under it, the aliens that interfere are like criminals and are taken into alien like judgment.
Knowledge and wisdom are attained together, only a wise conscious race who hasn't killed itself could have evolved there technology to said point.
Aliens exist check. Aliens are enemies, that is entirely wrong, are enemy is darkness, our ego. Our desires to be above men. Above other species or animal.
Joshua White
Here is the alien redpill. Can’t tell you how I know, but I do.
#1. They are terrestrial. They are an ancient, highly intelligent Ocean species which lives in the far Southern Pacific, Indian and Atlantic Ocean’s.
#2. We have little contact with them.
#3. They are enigmatic and we don’t know what they want aside from control of nuclear technology, as well as occasionally gifting us technology for reasons we don’t know.
#4. They are not hostile. However we know little about them, so it’s hard to say what their end game is.
That’s it. The government won’t disclose this because they can’t disclose a problem they have no control over. They worry about pandemonium and people trying to make contact.
You’re welcome. This is the biggest redpill you will ever get.
Dominic Wright
True but in comparison there is significant disparity.
Aliens are demonic in nature and probably demons with physical form, also have sex and read the nephilim.
Daniel Turner
please Jow Forums give me some good alien kino to listen to before I fall asleep. 30+ minutes long please.
Anthony Kelly
if you don't believe in bigfoot you are a 60iq retard. the evidence is overwhelming.
Hudson Lee
Why would these competitors be under greater selective pressures for intelligence than humans? Why wouldn't they out-breed us and displace us once they achieved their superior intelligence?
Here is the alien redpill. Can’t tell you how I know, but I do.
#1. They live in OP's butt. They are an ancient, highly intelligent Anal species which lives in the far anus, rectum and colon.
#2. We have little contact with them.
#3. They are enigmatic and we don’t know what they want aside from control of laxatives, as well as occasionally gifting us feces for reasons we don’t know.
#4. They are not hostile. However we know little about them, so it’s hard to say what their end game is.
That’s it. The government won’t disclose this because they can’t disclose a problem they have no control over. They worry about pandemonium and people trying to make contact.
You’re welcome. This is the biggest redpill you will ever get.
fuck it, have a bump. personally, I'm leaning towards them being demons. that is, entities which are (for all intents and purposes) native to earth and/or the extra dimensions encompassing it which are using us for some nefarious purposes. why nefarious? because they never seem to be honest with us.
Friends, it doesn't matter whether our species lasts 10 or 10 million years. For lack of a better term we are in a "simulation" and the aliens are the current Admins.
Jesus was gifted to us to help us remember our true purpose in this particular world. When you finish your task here you return Home, rest, and prepare for the next world.
Some of us may even come back as aliens to administer Earth.
Aaron Hughes
there is no logical reason why such a being/entire species would have to hide its existance in this day and age. Diffrent offshoots of humanity would be welcomed with open arms on an international level.
Bentley Gutierrez
Why does bigfoot live innawoods like a retarded goat fucker if he's smart enough to evade capture and solid documentation like solid snake
Jordan Scott
topkek
Michael Thomas
The cryptoterrestrial operates on the periphery of society most likely within the hierarchy of religion and finance
Ryder Hernandez
Earth is it.
Eli Martin
In the following posts I will be citing excerpts from the book (pic related): 'The Humanoids: A Survey of Worldwide Reports of Landings of Unconventional Aerial Objects and Their Occupants'. This book was published in 1969 and editied by: Charles Bowen Gordon Creighton Aime Michel Coral Lorenxen Antonio Ribera Jacques Vallee The excerpts will be from the very last chapter titled: 'The problem of Non-Contact' starting on page 249 by Aime Michel. The chapter contains a set of observations organized into a numbered list of 37 in total. I will copy from it what is most relevant but the entire chapter and book is worth a read. The author's definition of contact refers to a complete exchange between communities
>"1. The first and obvious fact that we have is that such contact does not exist between humanity and the 'x' system or systems responsible for the UFO phenomenon or phenomena" >"2. A second evident fact is that this absence of contact itself is problem number 1 presented by this phenomena. "The greatest mystery of all is this: why don't they show themselves to us openly?" (Charles Fort)" >"3. A third evident fact is that they are here in our world and that we are not there in theirs." >"4. A fourth evident fact is that, if the 'x' system is a multiple one (if there are several origins or multiple parties), then they all obey equally, insofar as our observations permit us to gauge, one single law on one precise point, and that is abstinence from contact." >"5. A fifth evident fact (demonstrated by the existence of problem itself) is that physical contact is possible. Indeed we see them quitter often, we sometimes hear them, and some of us have touched them" >"6. All our speculations on Charles Fort's 'Greatest Mystery of All' spring from the confrontation of these evident features, among themselves, and when set against the facts (known, probable, or possible)." >"Therefore…"
Lucas Cooper
>"7. From (#3) we must deduce that 'they' are superior to us on one point at least: technology." >"8. Can we add: and science? It seems probable but not evident. The fish Gymnarchus Niloticus 'knows' how to make his way through the muddy waters of the Nile by using the electrical tensions between his own body and the obstacles. We do not understand how he does it, although we know the laws of electricity and he doesn't." >"9a. We can find herein, if we wish, a primary explanation for the absence of contact: we have no more contact with them than we have with Gymnarchus Niloticus, because they do not possess (any more than the fish does) a discursive type of though. They dominate us only to the degree that the microbe nominates us when we are ill." >"9b. […] as some people believe, the religions of the bible are the religious transformations of genuine extraterrestrial contact (see the book of Brinsley le Poer Trench and Paul Thomas), then the Egyptians, for their part, deified Gymnarchus Niloticus, and for the same reason: the apparently supernatural nature of his behavior." the author is referring to Gymnarchus Niloticus metaphorically >"10. A more sophisticated form of #9 is as follows: the beings who are really responsible for the UFO phenomenon are never there, and nobody has ever seen them ever. All that we see are robots -either biological or not: see particularly, for this latter hypothesis, case number 23 in Jacques Vallee's chapter on page 32 (reported in detail in my book 'Flying Saucers and the Straight Line Mystery- as well as the Cisco Grove case, in Coral Lorenzen's article). […]"
Tyler Nelson
>"11. Among the arguments in favor of such hypothesis, we might recall, depending on the case, that in the Mosaic books of the Bible, Yahweh is he whom one cannot look at face to face without dying (though indeed Moses looked and did not die); that he never has contact with men except through intermediaries; that these intermediaries are either men (Lot, etc.), or humanoids (Ezekiel); that they are capable of interbreeding with mankind; and that consequently, according to the accepted norms in biology, they either belong to mankind or to a species very close to mankind and of similar origins." >"12. One could also point out that in most cases the operators seem to be either human or humanoid; that the small humanoids, usually fit with the idea of interpolation, in the future, of the past evolution of mankind (intensified cephalization, i.e. growth of the size of the head; regression of the vegetative organs, i.e. jaw, mouth, nose, and so on)[…]" >"13. a nod in healthy passing, to the old and still healthy hypothesis of man of the future visiting his own past […]" >"16. […]even if he is neither the product of special breeding nor a man of the future, the humanoid pumpkin head presents an encephalon at least three times as massive as ours." >"17. In man's prehistoric past we find a parallel evolution in techniques and in the weight of the encephalon, the sole exception being Neanderthal man with his voluminous skull (but the exception disappears if we consider only the neo-cortex). The technology of the UFOs and the dimensions of the 'head' of the pumpkin-head humanoids agree with this law. The establishment of this point is an argument in favor of the super-human nature of the thought that propels at least some of the UFOs" >"18. […] One frightening form of this hypothesis would be that 'System X' is not a living being at all, but a machine.[…]"
[end]
William Sanchez
based. thanks for the good read, bro.
Hunter Gonzalez
Here is a sculpture of a pharaoh Akhenaten’s daughter. Akhenaten is believed by many scholars to be the figure in the Bible we know as Moses
Baba Vang’s predicted that humans will live under the ocean in cities.
Maybe the aliens will make contact eventually and decide to let people live around them under the ocean.
Really don’t care if aliens are real or not. About as meaningful as some random Japanese man in the woods coming over to say “hi”. Leave me the fuck alone so I can drink my alcohol and fuck my wife ok?
Mac Tonnies was definitely on to something. "Cryptoterrestrial (CT) hybrids may be “replicants” tailored to survival-oriented tasks, such as infiltrating human society" - it would make perfect sense that they are the intelligence agencies, deep state, who are surveilling us with increasing technological ability, who seem to have advanced technology far beyond what we average people know about, but who are nonetheless outnumbered. The breakaway civilization is what Mac Tonnies, David Jacobs etc. are talking about.
Ever notice something feels "off" about celebrities, news anchors, etc.? So many of them have intelligence agency, deep state ties.
This no doubt relates to the global trafficking phenomenon, pedogate and so on and so on. The global oligarchs are a breakaway civilization with advanced technology, and some differences in genetics, who have a parasitical relationship to humanity. The circumstantial evidence for this is overwhelming.
Justin Walker
Is it a suppository?
David Evans
How many more are named Ben Shapiro? The thought is frightening.
Luis Morales
Combine that with the mystery traditions and everything Blavatsky said and it’s almost a complete explanatory framework
Wrong. Moses is probably named after the royal egyptian house he was raised and trained under, that of the pharaoh Thutmose II or III. Ahmose I is said to have rebelled against the Hyksos and completed the conquest and expulsion of the Hyksos from the Nile Delta, restored Theban rule over the whole of Egypt and successfully reasserted Egyptian power in its formerly subject territories of Nubia and Canaan.
The hyksos are kikes or a semitic people that let the hebrews (joseph's family) settle in Lower egypt -- remember that lower egypt refers to the northernmost part. They were getting the nubians (niggers) to attack the egyptians from the south so based thutmose led military campaigns against both groups and oppressed them. >bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-exodus-date-1440bc.htm
Akhenaten’s head bust or statue might have a large and extended parietal bone to hold a crown that was made of fabric or other material- those headpieces were large and heavy so would need the big head to hold it in place on an angle. Or it's an exaggerated artistic rendering due to a genetic condition of inbreeding among the royal families.
Leo Torres
>Solving The UFO Question it's simple: we rape their females to establish dominance.
jews arent ayys, they're just an aggressive and parasitic branch of humanity that cannot exist without the protection of the dumb goyim they hide among and pretend to be.
People who believe alien ufos Fall into one of the following:
1. Haven't spend serious time researching it. or their research has been quality consisting of YouTube videos and listening to dubious 'ufologists' who embellish and lie.
2. The highly credulous 3. They lack critical thinking skills 4. Those who want to believe like a 'faith' 5. Those whose money from books, speaking etc and want fame / attention.
Jaxson Allen
#2 ... you forgot to mention that many, many probes have been sent into OPs anus but none (yet) is big enough to reach them.
Think of it this way, if our civilization collapsed there would still be lots of steel around even though our ability to make it probably will be gone for a couple centuries, why would we beleive we are at the height of mankind’s technological progress? If mankind had previously had a civilization collapse that was far superior to ours, say 100,000 years ago if there were remnants around who had access to the technology why would they share it? Think Rothschilds but with antigravity tech and paranoid. There is no reason to beleive UFOs are from “out there”. In fact, the odds are against it. The best chance of a prior civilization more advanced than us? Why would we think it’s “out there” when we know for a fact a technological civilization has arisen here at least once?
Parker Martin
>technological civilization has arisen here at least once?
You'd have to provide some examples, beyond blank assertions. I see no evidence of that in the Mesolithic period. I'm 99% doubtful you could NOT provide anything from the preolithic saying otherwise.
Bet 1btc.
Eli Torres
>A perfectly shaped ball sucking up solar energy and then blasting off at hyperspeed is a solar prominence. Anyone else getting sleepy? Anyone else getting sleepy?
Yes user. But if you want to think an alien UFO 100,000miles wide was sucking energy from the sun, you can.
Just don't try to breathe and eat at the same time.
Tyler Lewis
Took a cursory look into this woman, she offers nothing to support her 'claims'. Another one for the 'Chorizo list'
I'll start a Blog soon.
Grayson Reyes
do you get paid by post or by the hour?
Ayden Myers
Wouldn’t an artifact at 30,000 feet decelerating and accelerating at well above 12 G’s pretty much be the “evidence”?
Aiden Wilson
Thank you for this resource. I'm leaving Jow Forums to migrate here. Everything I've ever posted was satire.
Connor Allen
>Solving The UFO Question Ok, let's solve that: The UFO Question is a long-running counterintel psyop by the CIA and 25th Air Force, that was designed to flush out the Soviet moles in the DoD that over the years took on a life of its own. If you believe any of this is literally real you are 100% retard.
No, just someone who should be doing other things. I'm passionate about the ayys topic, I wanted to believe, and get a handle on the truth. So I did some pretty intense study going over the declassified docs; I also thought that ayys could be proven by looking for 'eye witness accounts' in antiquity. Fortunately most of the best cases have already been found by Vallee and others, so it was a case of looking at them and finding patterns. I used an enthnological approach comparing different countries sighting prior to 1870: and to cut a long story short the data doesn't support modern UFO sightings and sightings in the past were not coterminous with each other.
I dare say there's more 'evidence' for dragons than for 'disk shaped' objects resembling flying craft.
Samuel Morgan
/sci/fag here. It is physically impossible for a solar prominence to keep a perfectly round shape right outside of the sun's atmosphere and massive gravitational pull. Solar prominences are giant explosions. Explosions dont make perfect shapes.
No. You're assuming something like that is manned. Also I'd need to calculate how much stress that would put on an flying object, with the correct figures if they are available.
Jose Wilson
They are called cavities. I was reading 3 or 4 academic papers in them the other day. Astrophysics isn't my forte, but it seems legit. I'm phone fagging, otherwise I'd send you a few links from my bookmarks.
Lucas James
Here you go first google hit. Stop being a faggot. If there was something a 100,000miles wide flying around in the solar system we would have observed it by now other than somehow surviving the intense radiation and heat from the sun.
Please ffs. I too want to believe but stop being retarded.
