Someone cover that Jesus guy up before anyone sees!

You are so painfully obviously a woman, you have absolutely no understanding about how male physiology works.

this.

youtube.com/watch?v=crfk22hqMes

>he doesn't like bare shoulders
Typical faggot leaf.

Am I to understand that religion can't evolve at all? "It wasn't touched for centuries, therefore it will stay the same always" doesn't really speak to me. This day and age =/= back then. A shoulder is not even remotely sexual anymore. Out of the cryo chamber with you

your gay is showing

>tfw married to a devout russian orthodox woman
Pretty sure my wife would slap the shit out of any woman that walked into a church like that while yelling in her babushka, commie, mother tongue about prostitution and the devil.

based.

>the modernist despises tradition
Go figure. No, a true religion does not evolve, because the truth cannot change. Moral theology and the divine and natural law is part of an eternal construct. What was evil is evil, forever. You are a whore, and you are stupid, and a pagan. Take your putrid filth and go to some satanic temple where you belong.

see
>Isn't even remotely sexual anymore

1 Corinthians 6:9-10
>Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

absolutely based priest

checked.

fpbp.

Repent sinners.

Attached: unity.png (1998x1080, 2.72M)

It's a private club. You subscribe to the rules when you join. If you want to not follow the rules of the club, you can leave and will no longer have member benefits.

It's just as annoying as womyn showing up to a men's athletic event (hill hike, in this case here in medpack land) and demanding on the spot that they be allowed to alter the event rules because they didn't like them.

Millions of hills here, pick another and have your own event if you don't like the rules.

Some twit who doesn't want to follow the should rules doesn't get to upend the whole club to get her individual way.

The entitlement of the average person these days is shocking, triple for womyn.

Seriously though, Canadians are trash.

Fucking slut leaving the motherland

So your interpretation of that quote is that an "adulterer" is any person that would display their body with sexual intent, yes? Who's to say that someone else might interpret sexuality in a different way? Call me a whore, call me filth, doesn't matter. Just explain why this is one way and nothing changes that way

1st century christian females were veiled as are modern nuns. your own scriptures exhorts your females to be veiled. modesty is a virtue. when you cannot control your females then degeneracy abounds.

Attached: kknw.png (500x522, 116K)

Yup. Secret's out. Can't play that way anymore, the game has to change.

Elsewhere in the Bible (in the book of Jude), it clearly says that women shouldn't even uncover their heads in Church. A woman isn't supposed to show up to Church to show off her body, shoulders included. I'm not condemning anybody. But I am glad to see women at a local Church have started wearing veils again.

read the bible you stupid pagan whore
>Matthew 5:28 - But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
You are an adultress times some countless large number. You have killed the souls of countless men. You are a genociding Jezebel.

Fucking based.

This is a tad extreme, as there is forgiveness. We can ask God for forgiveness, go to Confession, etc. Just finding some horny roast attractive doesn't mean you're doomed.

I was at the vatican yesterday and there were countless sluts in cut out dresses, over the ass shorts and braless. Even some thots taking ass focused photos in the basilica.

At least they all seemed bored, i overheard one in the sistine saying how jesus crucified statues were creepy and she was a "bit done".

>the specific explicit declaration of Jesus Christ is "extreme"
Jesus Christ vomits the lukewarm out of His mouth. In any case, there is a distinction between temptation and sin, an initial lustful movement is first a tempation and only becomes sinful if not resisted.

should she have wagged her tail?

Attached: doomdance.gif (512x321, 1.73M)

I wasn't calling Jesus's words "extreme" I was calling your calling the possible roastie a "genociding" Jezebel. I was merely pointing out that even if the bitch set out trying to doom souls, she isnt going to be anywhere near 100% successful.

I am just on thot patrol and I have no regard for the feelings of whorish pigs. I was being hyperbolic for effect, maybe so that the truth pierces the thick dark veil that blinds her.

You make an awful lot of assumptions about me and you're a massive prick to top it off. I admit to my lack of understanding in this topic l, as is quite evident up to this point, but you being a cunt doesn't suddenly make your case more compelling. I have a better grasp on the ways of old now and I can see where the problem lies so this thread ended up positive for me. Take that as a win if you want. Fyi, not roast

I am seeing alot of Catholics becoming stronger and unabashed about their beliefs. It's a positive new trend and look forward to seeing it change the broader culture of society. I might even LARP as a christian more often.

Just joined but you write like you've been roasting for some years.

Are you saying you're male? I find it hard to believe any man, whether they agree or not, could possibly be confused as to why women shouldn't wear dresses cut low to show their shoulders to Church.

Why not actually join the Church?

>not seeing a shoulder makes you better

They sound like the type of shit who would suppress a thread...

FA:

Women are commanded to dress modestly in churches. In fact, they are actually required to cover their hair in churches, but Catholicism performs theological gymnastics to pretend this is not the case

What even is the point of "protecting purity of men" if it doesn't go to full muslim mode? I mean, maybe I'm just hypersexual or something, but seeing attractive female face in covered clothing is more than enough to make my mind wander into thinking about my benis in her mouth.

Head covering is making a comeback in some Catholic Churches.

I’ve been watching a lot of old western tv shows and just generally old shows as of late. One thing I’ve noticed about the actresses(who wear dresses in the shows) is that their characters, despite being extremely attractive, seem to have far greater depth of character to them. And I thought about this recently.

A man discerning between two modestly dressed women is forced to have to weigh the character of the women more compared to two modern women because he cannot rely on who has the bigger tits or better shaped ass. Whereas now you can easily tell what a girl looks like naked and at a glance tell which one you find more attractive. Even if a man tries to force himself to judge a girl based on character his choice would still subconsciously be effected by the women’s body.

So back then women had to make up for the fact they couldn’t flaunt their bodies as much by having greater character.

That’s why you have to stop being a fucking roasty slut, have some self respect and cover fuck up.

The bible says women should be modest at church. The fact catholics don't cover their hair proves they are not real christians.

It does actually. Sexual licentiousness is a primal distraction.

if the asshole can't train his eyes to look at females as humans without triggering a base sexual instinct then he shouldn't even be speaking. typical dipshit pastor. was it the 17 year old fault you molested ? these morons are done.

>A shoulder is not even remotely sexual anymore.
Bare skin always is. You're just too oversexualized to see it anymore. Turn off the porn and TV and Magazines and Page Three Girls and don't fap for a month, then come back and say that.
Seriously, the shifting of definitions is the Jew's ultimate weapon. Tens of thousands of supposed catholics and christians spoke out for Gay Pride Month this weekend and said Jesus never said anything about gays, when He explicitly says Sexual Immorality and Fornication are Evil in Mark 7:22
Why?
Because (((they))) changed the definition of sexual immorality over the last fifty years. The slippery slope is not a fallacy.

Attached: Screenshot_20190604-092352_Twitter.jpg (1080x1624, 619K)

This.

an unexpected twist, but a welcome one just the same

I can understand why some might support this, but I don't understand how openly slaughtering negroes will get women to understand not to dress like hookers at Church.