So, Dostoyvesky...
So, Dostoyvesky
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
No one gives a shit. All he does is point out the obvious "duuh there's differences between men and women" shit that everyone who isn't far-left already knows. I guess he's a net positive influence because he provides academic legitimacy to talking points usually considered uneducated or plebeian but he's still a massive fag.
KERMITTY FROG HERE WITH SOME BREAKING NEWS
The problem is that popular society started to meticulously ignore reality and now attack people who don't. Peterson also tends to support the more traditional elements of our culture which we all contain in our natural world view, but are now under attack from almost all domains, so its satisfying on some level to hear someone who says that our parents and grandparents weren't backward-thinking, hateful retards.
now The Underground Man, or should I say the Undermensch
>that feel when you buy his book, read it, then realize hes a total hack and he already got your money
shucks
SO BANE - AND THAT'S THE BLOODY THING ABOUT BANE - HE REPRESENTS CHAOS, IN FACT, HE'S AN AGENT OF CHAOS, AND IN CONTRAST, WE HAVE CIA, WHO REPRESENTS ORDER, ROUGHLY SPEAKING. BUT CIA, IN HIS BITTER RESENTMENT, IN HIS-HIS POSTMODERN CULTURAL MARXIST IDEOLOGY, HE TRIES TO TAME THE CHAOS - AND THAT'S A BAD IDEA MAN, IT'S LIKE-IT'S LIKE IF YOU TRIED TAMING FIRE, IT'S JUST GOING TO LEAVE YOU BURNT. BUT CIA, HE TRIES ANYWAY, MOTIVATED BY A LUST FOR POWER - AND IT'S LIKE - GOD ITS SO SAD - ITS LIKE YOU'RE NOT A BIG GUY! YOU'RE NOT A BIG GUY, AND NO POSTMODERN RATIONALIZATION WILL CHANGE THAT. THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR. THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE IS EXPLICIT ON THIS MATTER. AND SPEAKING OF TAMING FIRE - WHAT HAPPENS BY THE END OF CIA'S 'EXPERIMENT'? THE FIRE IS NOT TAMED, QUITE THE OPPOSITE, IT'S ACTUALLY RISING. AND THIS DEMONSTRATES EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN THE 20TH CENTURY. AND IT'S LIKE SOLZHENITSYN WRITES IN THE GULAG ARCHIPELAGO - THE BLOODY MARXISTS ATTEMPTED TO QUELL FIRE, BUT IN DOING SO THEY MERELY FUELED IT. AND WELL ACTUALLY, THEY DID QUITE A BIT MORE. YOU CAN'T PRETEND TO BE A BIG GUY IF YOU'RE NOT. WE TRIED THAT EXPERIMENT IN THE 20TH CENTURY, AND IT WAS A BAD IDEA MAN! AND IT. IS. NOT. A. ROUTE. YOU. WANT. TO. GO. DOWN.
So why don't you clean your foreskin?
stop posting and go clean your room
ahahaha
Based
SO SNEED - AND THAT'S THE BLOODY THING ABOUT SNEED - HE REPRESENTS CHUCK, IN FACT, HE'S AN AGENT OF CHUCK, AND IN CONTRAST, WE HAVE JANNY, WHO REPRESENTS NEWFAGS. BUT JANNY, IN HIS BITTER RESENTMENT, IN HIS-HIS POSTMODERN CITY SLICKER IDEOLOGY, HE TRIES TO SUCK THE CHUCK - AND THAT'S A BAD IDEA MAN, IT'S LIKE-IT'S LIKE IF YOU TRIED SUCKING CHUCK, IT'S JUST GOING TO LEAVE YOU FUCKED. BUT JANNY, HE TRIES ANYWAY, MOTIVATED BY A LUST FOR POWER - AND IT'S LIKE - GOD IT'S SO SAD - IT'S LIKE YOU'RE NOT GETTING PAID! YOU'RE NOT GETTING PAID, AND NO POSTMODERN RATIONALIZATION WILL CHANGE THAT. THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR. THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE IS EXPLICIT ON THIS MATTER. AND SPEAKING OF SUCKING CHUCK - WHAT HAPPENS BY THE END OF JANNY’S 'EXPERIMENT'? THE CHUCK IS NOT SUCKED, QUITE THE OPPOSITE, IT'S ACTUALLY SEEDED. AND THIS DEMONSTRATES EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN S11E05. THE BLOODY FRINKIACS ATTEMPTED TO FUCK CHUCK, BUT IN DOING SO THEY MERELY FEEDED IT. AND WELL ACTUALLY, THEY DID QUITE A BIT MORE. YOU CAN'T PRETEND TO BE A MOD IF YOU'RE NOT. WE TRIED THAT EXPERIMENT ON THE OLD SIMPSON PLACE, AND IT WAS A BAD IDEA MAN! AND IT. IS. NOT. A. ROUTE. YOU. WANT. TO. GO. DOWN.
Knows and is forced to pretend isnt real
This pasta is delicious.
>make a bunch of descriptive statements
>when people ask you to clarify just say you are just pointing out findings and observations
>this qualifies for an intellectual in 2019
SO CRUSTACEANS
>kermitty frog
Should we tell him?
this is the height of conscious thought
GULAG ARCHIPELAGO
There's difference between saying "men and women are different" and proving with exhaustive reference to the relevant scientific literature AND integrating those findings with our millennia of inherited cultural myths. The idea behind Maps of Meaning isn't obvious.
Why do I get the idea that he is an atheist who is trying to escape nihilism by embracing christianity even though he doesn't actually believe it?
Will he ever recover?
From a guy who threw the debate in order to impress retards?
one, nothing wrong with me
that's one ugly motherfucker
two, nothing wrong with me
the research literally contradicts his conclusions, his cult victims are just toostupid to check for themselves
Needs to clean his room
>All he does is point out the obvious
Modern western society is so fucked that we need someone to point out the obvious
That's the whole point of why Peterson became a thing
Why is this boomer so popular among millennial demographics? It's not like he believes anything different from other mainstream conservatives
they didn't even really debate
zizek is still a retard though
Hegel was absolutely retarded and anyone who believe in his fairy tale religion is also a retard.
>Why is this boomer so popular among millennial demographics?
Isn't it obvious?
He's against the modern leftist SJW bullshit that is force fed in universities.
He basically tied in the self-help manuals of the 70's/80's with some right wing thought and turns out, it spoke to a lot of young men who feel lost in today's society.
Zizek is a snivelling retard and still dragged him through the mud. Peterson failed to understand the topics at hand even on a basic conceptual level and did little or no research.
juden peterstein
three, nothing wrong with me
>Zizek is a snivelling retard and still dragged him through the mud.
not really, they didn't even debate
>Peterson failed to understand the topics at hand even on a basic conceptual level and did little or no research.
based
>BTFO by cocaine addicted retard marxist
I hope he's ok
Blessed image
>It's not like he believes anything different from other mainstream conservatives
That's the thing. He says nothing new, nothing out of the ordinary, but at the same time he is presented to have some revolutionary thought. He appeals to the forgotten manchildren on the right, the donald type, that have probably never had a father figure in their life.
Peterstein is the definition of a con merchant propped up by jews. He says nothing, he does nothing, he speaks of things you should know since the age of 10 and his views are very meek, non-confrontational and very in-line with mainstream thought. Yet, the jews prop him as some boogeyman National Socialist all the while promoting him in any media 24/7 (weird, isn't it). Why? Because Peterstein is a gatekeeper goy. His job is to stop the disenfranchised youth from actually rebelling against the system and actually being nationalist by giving them a very meek, palpable view designed to make them think they are actually doing something against (((corporate))) interests, all the while the deluded neckbeards that orbit Peterstein and others of his kind - like Ben Shapiro and Joe Rogan are still playing the jewish game.
You think you can talk about fiat money with that sort of audience size?
four, nothing wrong with me
The rogan wall is a good way to discern how tall his guests are
ONE, SOMETHING'S GOT TO GIVE
fucking based beyond all good reason
ahahaha
cool response dude
gonna kill ya
70% of non practicing Christians have this mentality, the second you remove that last shred of faith is the second it's game over for anyone fighting depression
SO THEN WE COME TO THE JANNY, SEE HE DOES IT FOR FREE. AND IN THE CHAOTIC POOL OF THE GENERAL USERBASE, A FIGURE LIKE A JANITOR, AN ANCHOR IN THE CHAOS, WHO DOES SO OF HIS OWN FREE WILL, IS A PRETTY BLOODY SIGNIFICANT THING. BUT THEN WE COME TO THE MOTIVATION OF THE JANITOR, WHY, WOULD HE UNDERGO SUCH A TASK AS HIS, FOR FREE. HE HAS TO BE GAINING SOMETHING FROM IT RIGHT? WELL OBVIOUSLY ITS ABOUT STATUS, SOCIAL HIERARCHY, HE WANTS TO ELEVATE HIMSELF, WELL, HERE'S THE THING, HE'S ANONYMOUS, HE IS INDISTINGUISHABLE, FROM THE REST OF THE CHAOS, AND THROUGH ALL HIS WORK, HE WILL GO UNRECOGNIZED. NOW I'VE WORKED WITH A LOT OF JANITORS, AND MODERATORS BEFORE FOR MANY YEARS, WHEN I WORKED WITH ONE PARTICULAR GUY ON REDDIT, AS MANY OF THOSE I WORKED WITH CAME FROM, I SAW THAT HE SAW HIMSELF AS A KIND OF AVATAR. AN EMBODIMENT OF A JUSTICE OF SORTS, NOW THOSE WEREN'T HIS WORDS BUT THAT'S WHAT HE WAS FUNDAMENTALLY SAYING. HE, THOUGH, UNLIKE THE /tv/ JANNY, WAS KNOWN, HE HAD A NAME TO HIMSELF, AND HE COULD HAVE PEOPLE KNOW, WHO HE WAS, WHAT HE DID, WHY HE DID IT, AND THAT HE DID IT FOR FREE, WHICH MAKES HIM A KIND OF LEGITIMATE CHARACTER TO OTHERS. SO WHY, WOULD SOMEONE DO THIS, FOR FREE, ANONYMOUSLY? IT DEFIES RATIONALITY, AND IT'S THAT KIND OF DEFIANCE OF WHAT YOU THINK SHOULD BE THE STANDARD BEHAVIOR OF SOMEONE, THAT YOU ARE GOING TO NEED TO GRASP, AND LEARN BY. THE. BOOK. IF YOU ARE GOING TO SURVIVE
>Millennial straight white males feel lost and bereft of meaning
>get bullied by leftists who hate them on principle
>Daddy Peterson commands them to take control of their lives, styles their journey to self discovery and self improvement as a Jungian epic that makes them feel heroic and important.
>Daddy Peterson also dabs on the Leftists that bully the loser straight white males.
lmao
holy based
My nigga
Jordan "Netflix TV shows are on the same level of complexity as great literature" Peterson
>Great literature
Here we go. Books suck you know?
>zizek is still a retard though
Indeed, but not for what you think.
He sells the idea of nobody else saying it.
Yeah I know, i only read PDFs
OH NO NO NO NO
>Ben Shapiro
>Playing the Jewish game
He literally wears his little Jew hat in all the videos
This. His rise to international fame was like a nature balancing itself out after a period of huge potential difference between societal wishful thinking and reality
>The problem is that popular society started to meticulously ignore reality and now attack people who don't.
You're living under a rock, get off the internet.
lol brainlet cope
Stop listening to Peterson's political bullshit and instead watch his based lectures for free!
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
>Watch the biblical lectures
>Meandering, but interesting
>Q&A at the end
>"Uhhh, what do you think about SJW pronouns?"
>for free
Thats pretty communist move from a guy who hates communism and loves capitalism. Whats wrong Peterson can't live like you preach?
>nitpicks 0.000001% of the free content
>hurrr it's all shit
That's why everyone thinks you guys are braindead. Attention span less than a goldfish for fuck's sake
post YFW people take life advice from a retarded jew that takes SSRI's and cries about individualism on camera youtube.com
>zizek is still a retard
And yet no one argues that he is less intelligent than Peterson
I'm saying that the 12 Rules stuff and the social politics is brain dead because it's so easy.
Analysing biblical texts and Mesopotamian ceremonies in relation to a evolutionary whatever (even if it's false), is more interesting. Saying a lesbian who hates men is dumb is too obvious.
Exactly. Peterson wouldnt have become this big 20 or 30 years ago. He's popular now because we live in a clown world where we have to call mutilated men "she" by law and to point out the obvious fact that single mother households are detrimental to society
Zizek bringing the bantz! There is no stopping of this absolute madlad
>clown world
the biggest cope word
>they didn't even really debate
They sure did
Communists are retards. People who like Peterson because he is a father figure to them are retards.
Cope with what?
Peterson just got exposed as a dilettante, and a poor one at that.
1) Anyone who has taken a 100 level course on Marx could have given as good or better of a rundown and critique of the Communist Manifesto that Peterson gave.
2) No serious Marxist reads the meme pamphlet Marx wrote for uneducated workers, it's not an academic source, it's a propaganda piece.
3) Peterson, although claiming to have read and understood at least a modicum of Zizek's works, was not able to produce a single meaningful critique of his theory, even going so far as to be impressed with Zizek's take on Christianity
3a) Peterson is in many ways a scholar of religion, in particular Judeo-Christianity; he also critiques Marxism for being an athiest doctrine which rejects these principles. So if Peterson had done so much as read Zizek's wikipedia article, let alone an article on him in an encyclopedia of philosophy, let alone read one of his books on Christianity, he would have known this position and not been impressed by it. It means he didn't even watch Pervert's Guide to Ideology. Incredible lack of research.
4) Peterson did not stick to his position that Marxism was bad, instead retreating to a simple repetition of his individualism (at one point admitting that the heart of the individualism leads to the position that you must do what is best for the community anyways "good enough for you/your family isn't enough" which basically recasts JP's position as individually enlightened Marxism)
5) Peterson hasn't read Critique of the Gotha program which is shorter than the Manifesto and much more important (reminder this intellectual has been arguing against the evils of Marx for decades and hasn't even read him in any meaningful sense since he was 18).
6) By the end, Peterson wasn't even able to formulate an argument against the form of Marxism which Zizek promotes. His only point to the debate which had any relevance was to point out Capitalism's productive force, a fact that he also admits Marx agrees with and discusses at length in the Manifesto.
7) Peterson being pressed on and subsequently not able to name a single postmodern neomarxist needs no explication.
Peterson has been exposed as someone who has no real education (or perhaps intellectual interest) in political theory. I am actually amazed there are people who watched this debate and think Peterson managed even the bare minimum of understanding of both Marxist theory and the historical realities of capitalist dynamics.
SO BANE - AND THAT'S THE BLOODY THING ABOUT BANE - HE REPRESENTS CHAOS, IN FACT, HE'S AN AGENT OF CHAOS, AND IN CONTRAST, WE HAVE CIA, WHO REPRESENTS ORDER, ROUGHLY SPEAKING. BUT CIA, IN HIS BITTER RESENTMENT, IN HIS-HIS POSTMODERN CULTURAL MARXIST IDEOLOGY, HE TRIES TO TAME THE CHAOS - AND THAT'S A BAD IDEA MAN, IT'S LIKE-IT'S LIKE IF YOU TRIED TAMING FIRE, IT'S JUST GOING TO LEAVE YOU BURNT. BUT CIA, HE TRIES ANYWAY, MOTIVATED BY A LUST FOR POWER - AND IT'S LIKE - GOD ITS SO SAD - ITS LIKE YOU'RE NOT A BIG GUY! YOU'RE NOT A BIG GUY, AND NO POSTMODERN RATIONALIZATION WILL CHANGE THAT. THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR. THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE IS EXPLICIT ON THIS MATTER. AND SPEAKING OF TAMING FIRE - WHAT HAPPENS BY THE END OF CIA'S 'EXPERIMENT'? THE FIRE IS NOT TAMED, QUITE THE OPPOSITE, IT'S ACTUALLY RISING. AND THIS DEMONSTRATES EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN THE 20TH CENTURY. AND IT'S LIKE SOLZHENITSYN WRITES IN THE GULAG ARCHIPELAGO - THE BLOODY MARXISTS ATTEMPTED TO QUELL FIRE, BUT IN DOING SO THEY MERELY FUELED IT. AND WELL ACTUALLY, THEY DID QUITE A BIT MORE. YOU CAN'T PRETEND TO BE A BIG GUY IF YOU'RE NOT. WE TRIED THAT EXPERIMENT IN THE 20TH CENTURY, AND IT WAS A BAD IDEA MAN! AND IT. IS. NOT. A. ROUTE. YOU. WANT. TO. GO. DOWN.
Remember when he got destroyed by Mark Hamill youtube.com
>"can you name any cultural marxists?"
>can't name any
formally George`s
>He's against the modern leftist SJW bullshit that is force fed in universities.
lmao @ this argument. it's always from retards who have never been to college in any capacity beyond the one art class elective in community college where a girl told them to not be sexist or something
lol
>the chad zizek
>the virgin peterson
>BUT JANNY, HE TRIES ANYWAY, MOTIVATED BY A LUST FOR POWER - AND IT'S LIKE - GOD IT'S SO SAD - IT'S LIKE YOU'RE NOT GETTING PAID! YOU'RE NOT GETTING PAID, AND NO POSTMODERN RATIONALIZATION WILL CHANGE THAT. THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR.
perfection
There are a lot of retarded things at University. I don't know if they get paid out to do these things, but mine had a literal, signed Queer room where gay people sit inside and do god knows what.
>Yes but how does that harm you?
It doesn't. It harms the people in that room firstly, and then it harms everyone else.
Yezh yezh, well done Petersons HOWEVER
Daily reminder that Peterson charged his fans $15 to watch this debate livestreamed on his website (stream also crashed lol) while Zizek donated all his fees.
buy my rug libtard
>t. Clown
You should visit that room since you seem to be a total faggot yourself
Have fun when you have to sit through your new, "How to treat women" seminar in your new job. Oops, did you just disagree with a topic? Sorry sweetie, you're fired ;^)
How does it feel to know that you never have sex and fall sleep after that?