Pol cries about muh censorship

Repeal Citizens United. Corporations have NO rights. They are LEGAL FICTIONS granted the privilege to exist by the government. Since corporations are essentially arms of the government, they should be required by law to respect the Bill of Rights. Anything else is treason and deserving of death.

are you 100% sure that Youtube doesn't get any government money, or use any government services that are payed through tax payer money?

>>YouTube is a privately owned company
So the constitution doesn't apply to companies?

Is that what you're saying?

>1 post by this ID
Oh. you're a shill.

>haven't used YouTube as a form of entertainment since 2008
>saw it going down hill as it grew bigger
>zoomers are stuck with the worst form of internet ever

Attached: 1559258819384.jpg (600x717, 47K)

Attached: DqxFxcQVsAIvMsI.jpg (1000x1000, 235K)

This. Bring down one of their building around lunch time when their SJW employees are in the nap room

>it’s allowed
Not for long.

>it's not actually censorship despite the fact that youtube is a monopoly and you have no alternative for your voice to be heard.

youtube.com/watch?v=e94iDMyCKrQ

GET IN HERE

youtube.com/watch?v=e94iDMyCKrQ

GET IN HERE

youtube.com/watch?v=e94iDMyCKrQ

GET IN HERE

youtube.com/watch?v=e94iDMyCKrQ

GET IN HERE

>acts like a Jew
>gets called out for a Jew
Don't act like a Jew and you won't be called one.

>"Two decades ago, the US intelligence community worked closely with Silicon Valley in an effort to track citizens in cyberspace. And Google is at the heart of that origin story. Some of the research that led to Google’s ambitious creation was funded and coordinated by a research group established by the intelligence community to find ways to track individuals and groups online."

>"The intelligence community hoped that the nation’s leading computer scientists could take non-classified information and user data, combine it with what would become known as the internet, and begin to create for-profit, commercial enterprises to suit the needs of both the intelligence community and the public."

Wahhhh mommy i can’t see the racism videos anymore. Wahhhh mommy my favorite right wing faggot got demonetizes mommy. Wahhhh the left controls everything mommy.

Do you faggots even hear how pathetic you sound ?

I was just gonna post this

Oi Vey! Remember the six gorillion also!

t. rabbi

Can I not hire or serve niggers and Mexicans at my business, now?

Imagine still making this argument, top powerful people,politicians and whatever have acknowledged the influence of sites like YouTube in current democracy, it is the public place for ideas, and that's why it is being controlled now in a certain direction

And which direction is that? It is to ensure that a abnormality (trump) can NEVER be elected again

We still don’t care.

TOS are for entertainment purposes only.

>Step 1: replace the public square
>Step 2: ban all dissent

YouTube is a public utility now.
You socialist cock suckers are about to learn about eminent domain.

Attached: image.jpg (250x244, 8K)

oh, no, no, no
you have to hire niggers and faggots, goy
they're protected garbage you have no choice

>Wahhhh mommy i can’t see the racism videos anymore
Except the racist videos targeting Whites.

>Wahhhh mommy my favorite right wing faggot got demonetizes mommy.
Except the left wing faggot is still monetized.

>Wahhhh the left controls everything mommy.
Why is the left fine with monopolies when it's the left controlling them?

>Do you faggots even hear how pathetic you sound ?
And yet if we started a revolution to restore our rights you'd still be bitching.

Lol yeah so much for the free market. It's only good when it suits me!!

Can you seriously believe these guys think every idea is worth arguing if it's a good idea or not? Imagine if you could run any political campaign with some bogus idea like government subsidized free spaghetti for all left-handed people and all your opponents needed to literally debunk your idea everytime it's brought up

This is why white supremacists are to be ignored, why even talk about ethnic cleansing it's such a dumb fucking idea you should be censored

>I read 1984 in highschool ik this is the beginning of wrongthink!!
No I just don't want to argue why genocide of over half the human population is not a viable strategy every time I see one of you

youtube.com/watch?v=e94iDMyCKrQ

GET IN HERE

ITS HAPPENING NOW

Better dox him and ruin his life like you faggots love to do.

Go to BitChute.

>unfair is not censorship,
When they target one form of speech it is.

>your poor retarded denialfags aren’t having their freedom of speech taken away, they just can’t do it on YouTube
It is when youtube is a monopoly and promoting only anti-White liberal speech.

Attached: 7002752018217.jpg (3500x3000, 2.29M)

>no dogs
>no niggers

privately owned but they use govt money

That's right, faggots like Varg aren't welcome on youtube and you faggots whining about it must be newfags if you're still using youtube. fuck off newfag trash

It's amazing how the leftists are claiming "private owned = the constitution doesn't apply"

you mean TAX PAYER money. the government has no money that wasn't stolen from us. google also hires government employees from DARPA, and received subsidies before they were profitable.

FUCKING THANKS DRUMPF

public square
the internet is the new public square
your 'private company' wont fly when this is how people communicate now

>relying on Republicans to save you
eep

It's his fault and victory why they are doing this tard

But this is true, for the most part. The bill of rights specified things the government cannot do. Pretty much every constitutional amendment was concerned with government activity, not private (except for alcohol prohibition).

>It's his fault and victory why they are doing this tard
Oh they're terrified of dissenting opinions, yes.

Problem is, the cuck Trump won't do anything about it. He might, at best, tweet about how wrong it is.

Voting will not save us.

You’re literally just admitting to the crime.

I’ll make this simple then, prove it gets money from the government and I’ll call myself a faggot

>not private
Citizens cannot restrict the rights of other citizens. Corporations are just groups of citizens. Therefore corps can't restrict the rights of other people.

Problem is, the corps have all the money and the justice system is a joke.

you're a faggot regardless if you call yourself one or not.

YouTube is a platform, not a publisher. This entitles them to have neutral policies. If they wish to regulate and become a publisher fine, but then they open themself up to being responsible for content and open to lawsuits. They want to skirt the middle and they won't be able to for long.

YouTube is owned by Google you mongoloid. If you think Google acts like a private company then your shitskin i.q. needs an upgrade.

Attached: 1559541031801.jpg (1014x720, 125K)

the system is eating itself. i love it. i hope youtube dies lol.

Attached: 9868.jpg (552x367, 109K)

except it has received massive tax payer subsidies, and employs thousands of government paid workers, which really means the tax payer pays them because the government forcibly takes their earnings. so, it's not as black/white as you make it out to be with your simple little mind...

the sooner normieweb dies, the sooner we can take back the web.

Of course they can. If you're on private property, you can be ejected for speech the proprietor doesn't like. You can be barred from bearing arms. Again, the bill of rights applies specifically to the government. Laws about murder and rape are not in the constitution.

The protected class bullshit about letting niggers into your store is a federal law, not a constitutional one.

That’s what we said when a bunch of faggots were trying to make Christians bake cakes. You didn’t listen and you think you’ve somehow one but Google and all the other faggot little tech companies will be broken up and Trump will win again. Enjoy bathing in your hypocrisy

>he thinks they'll be held liable
You realize that Alphabet maintains and optimizes the drone targeting system the CIA uses? They will never be held liable for anything.

youtube.com/watch?v=e94iDMyCKrQ

The sperg is covering everything live

>leave my establishment
why
>you're a nigger
lawsuit

shut the fuck up leaf. you're country is a meme

Why can't the water company turn off your water because they don't like your political views?
Or the power company turn off your power?
Or the wireless network provider turn off your internet?

All of this is illegal for a reason

Attached: 1523081290403.jpg (1200x1712, 350K)

It isn't about whether or not it's censorship, because it categorically is. The issue here is that you retarded faggots have no right to complain about this because it literally isn't your business. If you complained when the bakers were forced to bake the fag cake, this is the exact same thing. You're trying to force a private company to publish views that it and many of its other customers disagree with.

Regardless of your views, that is absolutely valid. Stop crying you retards

Attached: 1544900072802.jpg (550x547, 49K)

I see you've never pissed someone off in local government before.

Why did we make those things illegal? Why did we also make it illegal to discriminate based on race or faggotry?

Gee it's almost like there is a principle at work here

Why should private companies be allowed to do whatever they want?
Fags should be executed.

The implications of this, even though it's been brewing for a long time, are really big
Anything other than a standard conservative or democrat won't pass through the system, and this isn't just restricted to america as the internet is obviously global... universal narrative control, I'm getting mgs2 flashbacks here, I can see the tentacles spreading

imagine if the phone company could deny you service because of your political views.

Because something isn't right just because it benefits you. Like I said, it's a hypocrisy. If you don't want right wing or any other business to be forced to do things they don't agree with, then you can't advocate for the opposite. You're looking at this emotionally and not pragmatically

Kek, music to my ears.

Attached: z9nc4brd4tn01.jpg (960x693, 43K)

>. If you don't want right wing or any other business to be forced to do things they don't agree with, then you can't advocate for the opposite.
Yes, I can. And it's not hypocritical. I don't believe in "free speech" I believe in Christian speech. All anti-Christian or faggot speech should be banned.
> You're looking at this emotionally and not pragmatically
Says the guy whining about free speech as if that concept is even justifiable.

Muh private company argument doesnt work when we're talking about de facto monopoly, faggot.

Attached: 1559507885462.gif (480x480, 2.49M)

>I don't believe in "free speech" I believe in Christian speech. All anti-Christian or faggot speech should be banned.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA kys you faggot

Attached: 1543133608448.jpg (750x735, 37K)

Anti white liberal speech? That’re actually monetized by the website? Show me one

or here

youtube.com/watch?v=gZ9qH61OfOA

Not an argument.

No proof? Shame, I was wanting one of you retards to prove me wrong, stay mad though incel

So, if YouTube wanted to shut down every person with red hair, they should be allowed to that? Also a small baking shop is not comparable to a social media platform with 1.5 billion monthly users.
>Communist
>Wants private companies to have more power

Attached: 1512286925724.png (478x523, 80K)

Anti trust lawsuits are inbound faggot, enjoy this while you can.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 131K)

>>you're a nigger
>lawsuit
Not in the constitution, you fucking moron. Do you genuinely not know the difference between the constitution and federal law? Jesus christ, the American education meme is real.

>Repeal Citizens United
tfw right wingers start turning commie.

Attached: 1529785833215.png (1280x1233, 909K)

you are trying way too hard

>Also a small baking shop is not comparable to a social media platform with 1.5 billion monthly users.

Legally they are, lady justice is blind for a reason

>privately owned company
>public corporation

Technically, the internet has not legally been defined as a public square. Granting the internet that status would leave it open to all types of government regulations.

That’s why I am national socialist, you kike.

Except that I was in agreement with the Christians refusing to bake the cake for the gays. That’s whats wrong with you right wing fuckwads, every time something happens you’re so quick to call anyone else hypocrites without realizing everyone’s different, no wonder you hate diversity. You want everyone regardless of race to be as dumb as you lot are

Not necessarily. It has yet to be tested in court.

>So, if YouTube wanted to shut down every person with red hair, they should be allowed to that?
Yeah why not. Don't you want to be able to kick a hijab out of your restaurant?
>Also a small baking shop is not comparable to a social media platform with 1.5 billion monthly users.
why? there is no legal precedent that a private company becomes a public service at a certain size. Book stores don't sell offensive materiel, do you have a problem with that?

Buddy, you were the one who made the baker comparison, which does not hold up in this situation, since youtube is a global business with literally zero viable alternatives or competition, with an absolute stranglehold on information sharing, while the fags could literally go down 2 streets to find another equally good baker for their fag cake.

It would only be a fitting comparison if the baker in question owned all bakeries in the state and banned any and all gays from even entering his establishments. In which case he obviously would get taken to court and forced to open his shit up since there is nobody else who people could turn to instead. This is literally the case with youtube. There is nowhere else people can actually share ideas and information like youtube, which is why they should not be allowed to refuse service to people they personally don't like, just like a baker with monopoly on bakeries should not be allowed to refuse people he doesn't like service.
So don't say it's emotions, it's pure pragmatism. If youtube had actual competition, everyone who hated them would welcome this move, since they'd lose massive numbers of users who'd migrate to the platform that doesn't shit on its users.

People are complaining precisely because there's a huge double standard, you subversive retard. The government has already stepped in many times and overruled the rights of businesses to choose their customers, when small and local companies wanted to do so for moral reasons. Now all that's left are massive corporations doing it to silence their political opponents and suddenly it's okay.
Eat shit. You don't get it both ways, faggot. Either everyone has to serve everyone, no matter how much they dislike it, or we bring back the days of racial, religious, and other forms of segregation.

Communism and Capitalism are two sides of the same shekel. Corporations are LEGAL FICTIONS. Prove me wrong.

it has, you can't create a separate set of rules just for large companies.

Unless they are declared monopolies you are SOOL

>YouTube is a privately owned company
Well we've decided to enact a law that makes hosting videos and search engines on the internet illegal
Whoops bye bye Google

Attached: waterfox_2019-06-05_17-42-57.png (408x358, 31K)

>YouTube is a privately owned company
Not a valid argument, companies are to adhere to the constitution.

Attached: 1552517428215.jpg (329x550, 53K)

>lady justice is blind for a reason
Justice is blind to the laws of men. That is the true meaning of that statement.

Leftist sounded the alarm on corporate control of media and job security, and conservatives responded by giving them basically unlimited power. Nobody in Washington will legislate this away because all they care about is the bottom line too.

Attached: 1459279789248.jpg (848x474, 65K)

>Government Subsidiary
Respond to this