YT is a private company they can demonetize as they please
For true online liberty you need Net neutrality.
The mutts voluntarily killed it to piss off the liberals.
Congratulations American conservatives, you played yourself.
YT is a private company they can demonetize as they please
For true online liberty you need Net neutrality.
The mutts voluntarily killed it to piss off the liberals.
Congratulations American conservatives, you played yourself.
that wasn't what net neutrality was about at all
N-NO!! SHUT UP!! STOP TALING!!
I HAVE FREEDO OF SBEECH!!!
worth it il build my own
I HAVE POSTED THIS BEFORE FUCKS SAKE
youtube.com
youtube.com
"All Youtube Alternatives Are Horrible | Vidme, Bitchute, Minds, review"
youtube literally runs at a loss
Shitty bait thread is shitty.
Reminder
if you had NN it would be a lot easier to start a competing service to YT,
you dumb mutts are fucked.
How would mandating that ISPs charge Youtube no more for the data it uses than any competitor, which is exponentially more than any potential competitor initially would be using, make it easier to start a competing service to Youtube? Please explain this mystery.
BBBBBBBBBRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
snnnnniiiffffffffffff...oh yes my dear....sssnnnnnnnnnnnniiiffffffff....quite pungent indeed...is that....dare I say....sssssssnniff...eggs I smell?......sniff sniff....hmmm...yes...quite so my darling....sniff....quite pungent eggs yes very much so .....ssssssssssssssnnnnnnnnnnnnnnniiiffffff....ah yes...and also....a hint of....sniff....cheese.....quite wet my dear....sniff...but of yes...this will do nicely....sniff.....please my dear....another if you please....nice and big now....
BBBBBBRRRRRRRAAAAAAAPPPPPPPFFFFFFFFLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPFFFFFF
Oh yes...very good!....very sloppy and wet my dear....hmmmmm...is that a drop of nugget I see on the rim?...hmmmm.....let me.....let me just have a little taste before the sniff my darling.......hmmmmm....hmm..yes....that is a delicate bit of chocolate my dear....ah yes....let me guess...curry for dinner?....oh quite right I am....aren't I?....ok....time for sniff.....sssssnnnnnnniiiffffffff.....hmmm...hhhmmmmm I see...yes....yes indeed as well curry......hmmm....that fragrance is quite noticeable....yes.....onion and garlic chutney I take it my dear?.....hmmmmm....yes quite.....
BBBBBBRRRRRRRRPPPPPPFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTTTTTTTTTTT
Oh I was not expecting that…that little gust my dear….you caught me off guard…yes…so gentle it was though…hmmmm…let me taste this little one…just one small sniff…..sniff…ah….ssssssnnnnnniiffffffffffff…and yet…so strong…yes…the odor….sniff sniff…hmmm….is that….sniff….hmmm….I can almost taste it my dear…..yes….just…sniff….a little whiff more if you please…..ssssssnnnnnniiffffffffff…ah yes I have it now….yes quite….hhhhmmmm…delectable my dear…..quite exquisite yes…..I dare say…sniff….the most pungent one yet my dear….ssssnnnnniifffffffffffffffffffffff….yes….
NN means all data had to be priced equally.
Not that all services pay the same.
IF someone tries to start a competitor to YT now, Google will just throw a few thousand $$ at every ISP and they are prices out of the market-
Post more brappers
Infamy.org
They selectively enforce their rules based on political affliction so they are a PUBLISHER NOT A PLATFORM.
It's a leftwing political activist organization that upholds the sentiments of the ruling class which hate you and the rest humanity
>brappers
and american conservatives handed them victory,
imagine the power of those braps
Except its all the NN people who now defend Youtube for no longer actually providing net neutrality by curating a public space as private company.
Better luck next time, libshit.
I only watch music videos and DIY videos on youtube
Agenda fags can go fuck themselves.
degenerate, demonic, demoralizing, depressing, disgusting, dumb public suicide nigger cuck
niggered fuckee trash burns in hell
boycott the nappy niggers
discriminate the evil niggers
enforce the old anti-nigger laws
niggers, jail them all
deport the niggers back to aidsfrica
reinstitute apartheid for the niggers
re-enslave the niggers
penectomize and neuter the niggers
bomb and shoot up niggered blacked
Holocaust 2: Satanic Niggaboo, X Y DNA genocide edition
The net neutrality bill was only net neutrality by name. It actually did nothing to keep anything neutral. It was a kike trick.
We do need a new net neutrality bill that actually delivers though.
But it will never happen.
Because, jews.
Title 2 did a decent job of protecting and enforcing NN.
But you mutt retards repealed it,
Net neutrality set the table for the exact opposite of online liberty. We've already gone over this ad nauseum. Read the text, you'll see.
This is a lie. NN ensures that only the biggest companies who have the funds to meets regulations will be viable.
Sees pic related now i have a great idea where one can perform a live action shooting. The beach, why didnt i thibkbif that before??! Lol the beach shooter kek
Imagine being this brainwashed
Bodacious bovine.
The text is free to read online. Either you've not read it or you're a liar.
>t.Patrician Braphog Connoisseur
noice.
>Google achieves a tech monopoly through government subsidization.
>Private company.
How did title 2 fail my subhuman friend?
youtube.com
JOIN US LIVE NIGGERS
what a sperglord
Again no replies to this sacred post, which should become our Jow Forums constitution
sad times
brap is the ultimate redpill
I'm sure glad I don't have to go online and obsess about another country every single day.
Net neutrality would have done absolutely nothing against this. The only way for social media to be fixed is to have it nationalized completely, or at least regulated as a public utility.
What did YouTube do this time?
NN would make competition easier, ATM any competition is bought out.
If they refuse they get muscled out
This
not ban Steven crowder
so they did nothing
Based
imagine taking a hard whiff off of that brappers crapper and snapper.
>YT is a private company
No it's not.
All of you Degenerates obsessed with net neutrality are going to War.
Draft incoming.
>inb4source
is always right.
reuters.com
Oh lord
Having absolute ownership over a public forum doesn't give you the right to limit a persons free speech.
Take a look a real life example.
en.wikipedia.org
>In a 5–3 decision, the court ruled in favor of Marsh.The Court initially noted that it would be an easy case if the town were a more traditional, publicly administered, municipality. Then, there would be a clear violation of the right to free speech for the government to bar the sidewalk distribution of such material. The question became, therefore, whether or not constitutional freedom of speech protections could be denied simply because a single company held title to the town.
>The State attempted to analogize the town's rights to the rights of homeowners to regulate the conduct of guests in their home. The Court rejected that contention, noting that ownership "does not always mean absolute dominion." The court pointed out that the more an owner opens his property up to the public in general, the more his rights are circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who are invited in.
>In its conclusion, the Court stated that it was essentially weighing the rights of property owners against the rights of citizens to enjoy freedom of press and religion. The Court noted that the rights of citizens under the Bill of Rights occupy a preferred position. Accordingly, the Court held that the property rights of a private entity are not sufficient to justify the restriction of a community of citizens' fundamental rights and liberties.
Apples and oranges. The the freedom to pursue anonymously unpopular opinions, speech, commerce, and innovation provided by the internet does not make the internet anything like a utility. When the government give rules of regulations, only the largest companies will be capable of meeting those regulations, effectively eliminating any competition. Why do you think all of the bug tech giants are so in favor of NN? Because they eliminate any up and coming innovation and the pass a lot of the cost of operation onto the customer. Read the text.
>faggots applauding jewtube censorship
fucking hell what happened to Jow Forums?
I love it when the bumhole is all grey and stinky looking. And I do adore a hairy hole. An erstwhile female sexual partner used to allow me to lap at her pungent turnipcrimp like a hungry labrador trying to lick an empty tub of Ambrosia creamed rice. When one is in so close one becomes intimately acquainted with every aspect of the delicious meaty taint, heat rising from it in such a manner as to inspire an expectation in me that Lawrence of Arabia himself would arrive in glorious fashion over the brow of her rosy rump. But I digress. I'm not entirely certain that on one occasion I did not witness tiny wriggling specks emanating from her Holy of Holies, which may well have been denizens of the dumpparcel which belonged to the genus Enterobius. I devoured them with my tongue nonetheless, such was my desire to taste that Bovril tang once more. I've always struggled to bury my desire to kill
The answer is simple, if you post on YT, then also post your vids on Bitchute.
Try to encourage your followers to watch them there, and leave YT.
This is especially important if you are conservative, or have a channel about guns, hunting, or farmsteading. All of these categories have been attacked by libtgards, and YT refuses to stand up for these channels.
It is only a matter of time before they start harassing YOU, and YT throws you to the wolves, so you need a place to continue your video posting, and Bitchute claims they will not ban for using your freedom of speech.
We need an exodus away from YT.
the legal issue here is that Jewtube is demonetizing videos and channels that they themselves have already made money off of
>IF someone tries to start a competitor to YT now, Google will just throw a few thousand $$ at every ISP and they are prices out of the market-
No, that would be illegal anti-competitive practices even without internet communism.
bitchute is getting better
BBBBBBBBBRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPP PTTTTFFFF PFT SSSss
>private company
I suppose so
Being that they are a private company, there's no need for the state to give them special safe harbor protections. They certainly don't qualify for them, being publishers at all. Tell me, what's the sentence for publishing terabytes of cp?
Fuck off
>at* a real life example
>contemporary art is money laundering, it should be banned
>youtube is allowed to censor whomever they want, they are a private company
>fucking hell what happened to Jow Forums?
Jew and libtard shills.
Pretty sure it's shooped, but Veras ass doesn't need it
The text simply demmanded isps treat traffic equally.
It had no bearing on services
>Private company
>Gets tax payers dollars from the government
>Refuses to say if its a publisher or a platoform
kys shill
This is another good point.
We need to start turning in YT for everything and anything that might even resemble CP.
One good harassment deserves another.
lol based
pretty sure they can do that from a legal perspective,
and especially considering the TOS
pretty much this
Jow Forums being raided because these fags think they have some kind of victory
and yet, once again they fail to see the big picture and what a massive ass mistake this censorship is
This whole idea of 'make your own' implies that the Left is humble enough to leave us alone if something gets popular.
We all know it's just a bullshit phrase meant to troll.
Private companies have to adhere to regulations
We don’t live in ancapistan
Kosher Braphog in webm related
>net neutrality
That doesn’t mean what you think it means. You’re retarded, OP.
Tell that to OP who I'm responding to. If he loves muh private companies he should love them having full responsibility over not breaking the law. Jewtube and twitter and kikebook break the law every day when they publish cp, muh free market doesn't protect publishers from illegal acts
>might even resemble CP.
I mean they false flag others all the time. Not saying we should do it but its possible they might get hit with a false flag and get taken down that way.
No one has a problem with youtube being a private company doing whatever the fuck they want. What we have a problem with is them claiming they're non partisan and doing shit on the contrary.
If it is a private company, a publisher, then it is not exempt from liability due to safe harbor legislation.
Ergo, the moment they admit and it is decided that they are indeed a publisher, they are imeediately legally liable and considering the content that's been posted over the years, they are tried on thousands of counts.
en.wikipedia.org
>The baptism of Cornelius is an important event in the history of the early Christian church, along with the conversion and baptism of the Ethiopian eunuch. The Christian church was first formed around the original disciples and followers of Jesus, all of whom were Jewish. All males in that community were circumcised and observed the Law of Moses. The reception of Cornelius sparked a conversation among the Jewish leaders of the new Christian church, culminating in the decision to allow Gentiles to become Christians without conforming to Jewish requirements for circumcision, as recounted in Acts 15(Acts 15).
Jesus disciple literally baptized a black in the bible
> And the angel of the Lord spake unto Philip, saying, Arise, and go toward the south unto the way that goeth down from Jerusalem unto Gaza, which is desert.
>And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of ETHIOPIA, an eunuch
>Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus.
>And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.
Acts 8: 27 - 39
>The Ethiopians were white as well
Not according to the bible or DNA so wheres your proof?
>Can an Ethiopian change his skin or a leopard its spots? (Jeremiah 13:23)
Notice it says a Ethiopian cant change his skin, White people can change thier skin when they go out into the sun their skin changes from sun burn to red then to brown, When black people go out into the sun their skin stays black IT DOES NOT CHANGE The Ethiopian cant change his skin so they have to be black to fit that definition
Also according to DNA tests their is no white admixture among the Ethiopian population
Bitchute has gotten much better, and it now has a lot of diverse subject matter, being posted by some pretty good talent.
I'm guessing it will be the YT replacement, as things look now.
>Simply demanded equality
No it doesn't. You've obviously not read the text. That's your homework assignment. Come back when you're prepared.
TOS don't mean jack if they are breaking laws
I could have terms of service requiring women to fellate me but it doesn't make it legal
are they a platform or publisher?
it was ok to make money off of offensive vids until some spic faggot complained loudly enough?
why are they only going after Right Wing channels?
lot of good legal questions here
you cant tell me how to think, you stupid cunt.
go sperg out on reddit where you belong.
>Not saying we should do it
I am.
Holy shit could you imagine ?
Who even is the president of Norway? Does anyone even care?
If Ford and McDonalds are not paying you on thatTube, they won't pay you on thisTube
This
They’re trying to have it both ways they want the protections of a platform while openly acting like a publisher
LOL
THIS IS WAR.
Fuck your private company excuse. I don't want to be censored and there is nothing you can say to me to justify it.
Eat shit.
I've been signed up to Bitchute for a while but I just started taking it seriously.
>that big ass pimple on her ass cheek
Nonsense. I watch lots of non political stuff on YTB and the quality and depth is only possible with serious adbucks. You won't get tons of adbucks outside of the normie world.
Glenn Beck build his own network and became CNN light and managed to get into cable deals.
Thats how he build his empire. To become more normie
It's not a private company when they get government funding
sorry my Hellas friend
But that's not how safe harbor provisions work.
>kill all white people
Your YouTube award is in the mail
That's exactly how they work.
Twitter, facebook and alphabet enjoy immunity due to the provisions. There are hundreds of thousands of illegal and infringing videos being posted daily, there are hundreds of thousands of terorrists, extremists, groomers and pedophiles that use the platforms daily.
If they are not platforms and use the argument that they can censor whoever they want due to the fact of them being private businesses, then they are not eligible for safe harbor immunity.
It's an open and shut case, legally, but no one wants to put their necks on the line because these companies are worth hundreds of billions and own the judiciary system and congress.
"What good is defending America - if our traditions don't survive with it?" (John F. Kennedy)
As Bitchute grows, and people hear of it, advertisers will follow.
First the smaller companies that can get a large audience for a good price, but then the large companies that can't stand that there's a growing platform without their presence on it.
Ultimately, shekels rule, and even if the vermin corporate boards want to push garbage dumps like YT, they won't be able to stay away from any other growing audience.
These things always start out modest and then grow, and with the current reputation YT is getting, a lot of people will be more and more likely to leave it, especially if their favorite youtubers are posting elsewhere, too.
YT has no talent. It uses the talent of others. And now, it's becoming tyrannical, bullying those they disagree with.
They are officially the bad guys, and whoever gives people an alternative will be the heros.