In your ideal society, would free speech exist?
In your ideal society, would free speech exist?
no there'd be blasphemy laws
Do you support free speech right now?
aside from slander and threats of violence, sure.
but only between 8am and 11pm
Yes because if my ideology can't survive an opposing argument then my ideology was shit anyway.
Looking at you ban happy lefties.
Yes, once you ban one form of speech, you set the standard that anything can be censored.
And besides, the truth is always on our side.
Yeah, because in a free exchange of ideas my ideas consistently win. I'd execute anyone who tried to restrict speech.
The opposing argument is everyone on your side should be murdered for not being on the right side.
Good luck surviving this argument, cuck.
basically this. i also loathe morality cucks
of course. in my ideal society, the dumbest individual would have a 100 IQ by today's standards. average would be 125 and 150 would not be uncommon.
with such an intelligent populace, free speech would be paramount. truth would be one of the most beautiful things. no one would be a propaganda drone, no one would take offense to someone saying something silly or crazy.
100%.
yes, even to a higher degree than current US implementation. (ex. legalizing call to violence, etc)
i wonder why kike
False dilemma since there will never be an ideal society and so we can only strive for unbiased checks and balances, including free speech.
That would only be true if humans were purely rational beings with uniform interests, which they're not.
yes and monopolies wouldnt exist
for this to come true republicans and a few dems would need to be mass slaughtered, but i think it could happen
yes.
i love these psychosis images
Yes. Free speech is a sine qua non condition for human spiritual, moral and scientific development.
Btw, there is no ideal society since humans themselves are not ideal in essence nor in expression of that said essence.
Every ideology since the dawn of man has lead to mass killings and destruction exactly because ideologues will try to chance human essence to conform with their ideal society and that will never happen.
What people generally name as "the right wing" is, in a sense, pure political skepticism
No
Free speech = controlled speech.
You can mock and talk about the things the establishment wants (you can mock religion and disrespect others yay!) but actually talking about certain issues? No nono
free speech is a lie just like open mindness is a psyop
Imagine posting fake ass, easy to debunk pictures like this online and considering yourself redpilled.
It is, impossible, to make such things up yet you will find it happening here daily.
hasids still do this shit you retard repent and seek jesus
Yett you are behaving as a leftycuck.
Conservatism is not an ideology
No
Based
There would be total free speech. However, people engaged in degenerate actions like sodomy or making porn would be executed. The speech would be free, and the actions would be a death sentence.
Why are you so triggered if they're all fake?
andrei hasnt been debunked shitlicker
You may have misunderstood the question.
No, but then again non whites wouldn't exist either so it'd be a utopia anyways. You'd still be able to say nigger and cunt and all that shit, but you wouldn't be able to say commie bullshit or you'd get put up against the wall.
ive heard this exact response to that image i shared word for word at least 5 times
You can't deracinate a society with strong morals right schlomo?
Free speech is like democracy it allows the average mutt to voice his "opinion" which isn't really his but fabricated for him and the average mutt thinks he's free.
we're not ruled by elites, we're ruled by morons who can manipulate idiots like the ones on this board, (hehe I made fun of the pope thank the state for free speech!) All the while you're serving the needs of your betters.
Fucking idiotic society
anyone who doesnt support free speech deserves the rope
im guessing there is no word for "love" in german
im not surprised
WHERES THE ARTICLES/ SOURCES DEBUNKING THE ANDREI STORY
Where would you draw the line? Would erotic literature be okay? Would erotic art be okay?
Yes but you can't insult islam and the prophet Mohammed pubg
>Yett you are behaving as a leftycuck.
How exactly?
>I support free speech
>but if you speak against free speech you should be killed
Free speech supporters are dumb
DUDE THAT GUY WAS A CHILD RAPIST APOSTATE NO BETTER THAN THE KIKES HE HATES JESUS WARNED US ABOUT THE FALSE PROPHETS YET YOU RETARDS JUST EAT THAT SHIT UP WITH A SPOON
yes thats exactly right, i cant subvert a nation if the population arent gay communists
kys
catholocism is just as bad as judaism, you're one of those morons you speak of
using free speech to advocate against free speech is incredibly dumb.
In my ideal society, all information will be exchanged digitally. Any kind of speech will be considered just animal noises and banned
you should be allowed to oppose it but if you actually try to do away with free speech then yes, capital punishmen
No.
what do you think of my idea, juden?
shame Jow Forums is only shills and no one cares
I used to believe in true freedom of speech in which every opinion, no matter how controversial, whether it be right wing or left wing, is allowed. I truly believed that no one should be de-plarformed and that no speech should be repressed.
After witnessing the totalitarian censorship of the left over the past few years, however, my opinion has changed.
Now I cannot wait for RWDS to forcibly gag them at gun point and make them live in constant terrifying fear. When the time is right, our vengeance will be absolutely draconian.
No need for communism.
All you need is feminist whores and men eating goybeans since childhood.
By having an ideology you are subverting the natural state of things.
Any ideology replaces morality and the general principles of jusnaturalism (AKA the core of conservatism) with made up concepts and abstractions, you replace God's will and intellect with human will and intellect.
By doing so, there is no logical difference between you and a leftist, only difference of opinion.
Not entirely.
Anyone arguing against absolutes such as healthy behaviours, families, loyalty to the race, advocating immigration, etc. would be punished.
For the rest, economic system, education, for example, no restrictions.
Fuck off mate, I'm not a mindless biblethumper.
To the degree that if you want to live in a gay or communist country you would be free to leave
No need to be a biblethumper because that is degenerate in itself and a product of protkikery,
Even agnostics recognize the need for jusnaturalism.. your whole common law is based on that dumdum.
You can't be a conservative without objective parameters for what is moral and what isn't.
kill yourself
You need freedom of speech so that people who argue against them can be chatized from society as degenerates.
The problem starts when people mistake freedom of expression with the right of not being offended or challenged
The ideal society in question comes after this.
I'll decide what I am.
>your ideal society
Why have free speech if you're the supreme leader?
No need to. Your actions speak far louder than your words ever could
That's nice m8.
The guy in that picture's German, isn't he?