9/11 truth and nothing but the truth

43,600 windows
600,000 sq ft of glass
200,000 tons of structural steel
5,000,000 sq ft if gypsum
6 acres of marble
425,000 cubic yards of concrete
chief of fire department's comment on the debris "nothing but powder and metal"

only 1 horribly melted filing cabnet, from the ben and jerrys near WTC 1, was recovered (out of an estimated 45,000). remnants of file holders found inside

13 first responders, 1 civilian, survived at the base of the buildings and in stairwell b.. and walked out

Jay Jonas (firefighter, survivor in stairwell B)
"I looked and said, "Guys, there used to be 106 floors above us and now I'm seeing sunsine."
..."There's nothing above us. That big building doesn't exist."
...These are the biggest office buildings in the world and i didn't see one desk or one chair or one phone, nothing"

Attached: 36-95d1274378.jpg (903x678, 159K)

cannot be explained by thermal or kinetic mechanisms:
faster than gravity destruction
no appreciable rubble
no appreciable seismic impact
bathtub survived
dustification
cool dust cloud
nano-scale dust
continued breakdown of dust
over 1400 toasted cars
exploding scott air tanks
levitated cars and witnesses
cylindrical building cutouts
unburned paper
materials glowing w/o high heat
smooth bends in structural steel
round holes in windows
peeling and thinning of metal
rapid rusting
ground fuming years later
tritium without ionizing radiation
iron rich micro-spheres
bankers trust demolition
jumper anomalies
parallels to the hutchison effect
hurricane erin
shifts in the earths magnetic field
(partial list)

Attached: Screenshot-22_07_2018-10_02_00.png (1438x952, 2.03M)

where did all the rubble go?
youtube.com/watch?v=lGXDmNZCeKo

200k tons of steel each building alone.

Attached: HTR-combine.jpg (560x420, 114K)

Attached: 1537924258434.png (1949x1006, 1.78M)

Attached: 1534865935977.png (1224x577, 529K)

"truthers" love to talk about building 7. yet, hardly any mention of 3/4///6, even though they were all very interesting as well.

Attached: Screenshot-21_07_2018-22_01_33-Custom.png (1024x768, 1.9M)

Attached: building 3.png (1865x954, 2.13M)

interesting so far.
we have all heard of this, alrgiht let's keep going.
what? what's going on here?
>most wtf pic possible
>"mossad, cia, mi6/5, pakistans iss or whatever, china, russia, theyre all really unified at the top"
this is starting to smell like bs
ok but how was that used? The settings and physics look so different, could they have? Let's keep going and find out
ok it's all over, it's words followed by words but without meaning.
>faster than gravity destruction
>no appreciable rubble
>no appreciable seismic impact
>bathtub survived
>dustification
>cool dust cloud

alright, the first thing you need to do is burn a car (or look at others cars near a major incident) second you need to drop that car from a high altitude, you will see that the volume it now occupies is smaller
>where is the turn signal
>why can't you find the pack of gums in the passager seat
>the A.C control is missing, coincidence?
>yet the papers in the glove box are ok.

Attached: building 6.png (1685x1080, 3.19M)

>we have all heard of this
youd be surprised how inaccurate this seems to be

>this is starting to smell like bs
maybe not the members themselves, but theyre all pyramid systems within a pyramid system. at the top, theyre unified, the little people may be playing out the show, but it doesnt matter.

>ok but how was that used?
im not sure where there is relation, if any, outside the hutchison videos

>words followed by words without meaning
theyre characteristics of the evidence found at 9/11, just basics. perhaps you have some in particular that have "no meaning" to you?

>alright, the first thing you need to do is burn a car (or look at others cars near a major incident) second you need to drop that car from a high altitude, you will see that the volume it now occupies is smaller
how is this relevant? were talking about a "building collapse" here

Attached: buildings.png (1237x929, 1.71M)

>most wtf pic possible
to expand on the seismic data in part of that pic you replied to. these 2 massive buildings hardly shook the ground. a lot of people will claim it was a demolition of some sort, but conventional means to not resemble the evidence seen on 9/11. the kingdome, as vastly smaller building, shook the ground more/longer than those 2 massive buildings

Attached: seismic equilalents.png (1235x925, 219K)

here is the kingdome demolition
youtube.com/watch?v=oiftDBtCFt8

it shook the ground for 52 seconds. a 250 ft building taken down by normal controlled-demolition. you would think the twin towers would have shaken the ground MUCH longer then, yes?

Attached: Slide40.jpg (960x720, 172K)

~9 seconds. it takes a bowling ball ~9.2 seconds to hit the ground when dropped from the top of the twin towers in a vacuum. those buildings experienced 0 resistance

not only that, they made next to no noise. it sounds like rushing wind, where is the steel crushing itself? where is anything?
youtube.com/watch?v=oCPVNLLo-mI

Attached: Slide32.jpg (960x720, 153K)

Attached: Untitled.png (1848x1080, 1.59M)

these are inside views of building 6, shit is virtually empty. doesnt seem to me like this damage was caused by falling building

Attached: 1538056044991.jpg (1308x1028, 244K)

>hurricane Erin
how could such a massive hurricane go so under reported?
youtube.com/watch?v=N-NfElzbyTI

Attached: Slide95.jpg (960x720, 242K)

Attached: Slide94.jpg (960x720, 250K)

Attached: Image749.gif (315x360, 28K)

the earths magentosphere also shifted a few times during the towers being struck/"coming down"

ive had this image for a while and only now really looked at it. some strange shit happened on 9/11

Attached: weather.png (1235x925, 552K)

Attached: Image313.jpg (1024x683, 922K)

steel turning to dust in mid-air
you can see ~3 large pieces turn to dust in this high-definition clip as well
youtube.com/watch?v=dueVm1UGvXo

Attached: Slide-001-99.jpg (960x720, 134K)

Attached: 1534532036567.png (650x301, 263K)

Attached: Slide51.jpg (960x720, 131K)

Attached: Screenshot-21_07_2018-22_01_00.png (1338x1070, 2.85M)

can see this at the end of this clip. this is an interesting one, you can see the smoke from the fire. yet, as it falls, this new "cyclone" of smoke seems to pup up and seemingly absorb the dust. whats this twister looking formation from a building collapse/demolition of any kind?

this picture adds some very interesting questions when thinking about it

Attached: 1534196741585.webm (640x360, 653K)

Attached: how.png (1236x927, 1.88M)

Attached: 1536561094440.png (620x400, 427K)

Go check Ryan Dawson.

>Ryan Dawson
>subscribed to the pancake theory
Can you link me where he covers all of these vehicles? How about the absolute lack of debris/ most of it turning to dust

Christians can sue Saud Arabia, Bahrein, Qatar and other terrorist sponsoring countries for compensation.

We want compensation and reparations.

WTC tower 7 looks wierd indeed, why didn't the building next to it get destroyed?

What's the significance of Hurricane Erin being there on 9/11? I mean, it's weird, but what are the implications?

ryan "it happened exactly as the mainstream narrative tells us, but israeli zionists manufactured it all" dawson. absolute brainlet, another "truther" who ignores/unaware of certain facts. either way, poor researcher

>christians can sue
>we want
all those nations have been in bed with your flag, and the west in general, for quite some time now. the neighbors of those countries, however, arent having such a good time.

Attached: 2014-05-17-what-really-happened.png (1107x483, 333K)

none of the towers outside of the WTC complex were destroyed. this is the extent of the damage outside of the buildings with WTC in their name. this is the Deutsche bank across the street

>What's the significance
im not entirely sure, just a strange data point. even more strange why it was overly ignored/under reported on the news
youtube.com/watch?v=1xWjdYnpxUg
usually theyre all over that sort of thing.

some interesting things come from the works of john hutchison, who was mimicking tesla's experiments with electrical interference/waves
perhaps the strange pathit took is a byproduct of whatever happened? seems its clear some people saw it important enough to keep it fairly quiet. i honestly dont know what to take of it other than my speculation

Attached: drjudywood.com_articles_DEW_dewpics_Image71fema.jpg (675x1023, 321K)

Who and why then?

im not saying who hes saying had no involvement. you'd be a fool to say elements inside israel and zionism in general arent very much involved. its just like i said. if someone either is unaware of facts, or simply ignores them, they are a terrible researcher to listen to. many others have done the work on who was responsible, why only go half way? the main stream story is absolutely full of holes. im willing to wager you havent looked at the thread much, if at all.

for instance, how does a ambulance parked at the base of the towers come out looking like this? no debris landed on it? merely covered in all this dust, just like everything else

Attached: invincible ambulence.png (1665x921, 2.09M)

>why
to hypnotize the world. they went hog wild in the middle east and nobody even batted an eye until fairly recently. these people are masters of the mind, this was a psychological operation at its core

Attached: 1512265555098.jpg (601x346, 51K)

interesting thing of note, this building was inevitably demolished as well.. the steel was rusting over too much for some reason.

Attached: drjudywood.com_articles_DEW_dewpics_Image186.gif (818x1024, 576K)

another strange thing, a whole lot of round hole "cutouts" in glass. that or the glass is completely removed.

here's some raw footage not too long after the collapse, tower 7 is still standing (and "fuming"). look at all these fucking cars. none look crushed, yet they all look like they blew up.
youtube.com/watch?v=QogYKo-DBwk

there is also an interesting interview with an EMT who experienced cars blowing up as she ran from the buildings.
serendipity.li/wot/9110048.PDF

Attached: round holes in glass.jpg (300x199, 18K)

sure whatever buddy. come back to us when you have a degree or two in engineering and some common fucking sense

And the people in the buildings? How many have been unaccounted for? Vaporized?

>a degree or two in engineering
how about 3, including a PhD? =3

was 1500~, but they supposedly "recently" were able to identify some more. at least 1200, absolutely unaccounted for, no body parts, no DNA at all

Attached: expertise.png (1461x497, 273K)

Attached: expertise2.png (1233x574, 299K)

Attached: 1556479570403.jpg (619x553, 95K)

Attached: 1534196826920.gif (640x432, 351K)

similar, this truck right next to the building and only covered in dust.. those odds are pretty unbelievable.

Attached: 1556898588789.jpg (474x315, 30K)

add in the fact that people were inside the buildings and survived after the "collapse". 14 people were inside stairwell B as the building collapsed and walked out afterwards. there's more evidence to prove there was no collapse then anything else
youtube.com/watch?v=LvdNHaOBGk4

Attached: Stairwell B Tower 1.png (1726x1062, 2.27M)

this ABC news broadcast says it all. nothing survived the WTC, except.. paper?
youtube.com/watch?v=K4A9fdTBKL0

cars/random beams on fire, surrounded by paper?

Attached: Image123.jpg (450x335, 38K)

Attached: 0087v.jpg (1024x693, 75K)

here is a fantastic youtube channel with lots of info
youtube.com/user/911EmpiricalEvidence/videos

Attached: car.png (1412x1079, 2.78M)

fucking retard glow in the dark cia nigger faggot. fuck you you lying faggot.

fucking 50 posts in your own thread. you are a dumb fucking nigger posting shit like this for mossad / CIA shekels. no one even gives a fuck lmao. you are such a worthless cia nigger it is fucking insulting that you put in such low effort.

try again with an actual argument, little buddy.

Attached: 41-231dacfdcb.jpg (903x678, 136K)

Lying POS denied pools of molten steel
youtube.com/watch?v=5j4ziiHiwKQ
Nukes were used on 9/11

Attached: 2xte1n.jpg (720x414, 47K)

Internal explosion blowout revealed with contrast and gamma adjustments.
Nukes were used on 9/11

Attached: 911 blowout.jpg (500x987, 166K)

>pool of molten steel
you will never find evidence of this. ive heard the reports, ive seen glowing material, but no pools of molten metal

>nukes were used
yet no radiation resulted? no

Attached: Slide74.jpg (960x720, 137K)

like i would waste an argument on bumping your pathetic cuck thread you miserable faggot. youre lucky to even be talking to me now, since i didnt notice this thread is just you and you alone (you have 50 of the 60 or so posts, including mine).

>it was so hot
>2k temps underground
i dont think so

Attached: Slide76.jpg (960x720, 210K)

Bedrock melted
Nukes were used on 9/11

Attached: 911 granite 1.jpg (650x472, 122K)

Massive beams hurled into buildings across the street.
Nukes were used on 9/11

Attached: 1552004335585.jpg (290x174, 11K)

>nuke goes off in basement
>leaves 14 people to survive closest to blast
>continues to turn the rest of the building and all of its material to dust
>no radiation
whats this magic nuke that doesnt leave radiation?

Attached: Biggart1833.jpg (650x448, 71K)

Mossad did 9/11. My father even told me he either knew an Israeli directly or knew of an Israeli plot to blow up a "tanker truck" in NYC in May 2000. He died a month later and 9/11 happened about a year later.
regardless of the "planes" Mossad used remote control UAV and exploding vans as per the NYPD scanner audio of the detonated van between 6th and King st: youtube.com/watch?v=Huf2Kz7bV2k
markdotzler.com/Mark_Dotzler/WTC_Artists.html
archive.is/89UCH Israeli (((art students))) harass DoD/DEA officials in early 2001
In early as March 2000 (possibly earlier) foreign (((art students))) from at least two separate countries were using free art studio space on the 91st floor of WTC to plan out the attacks. Team Gelatin even removed a window from the 91st floor prior to 9/11. These art students had construction passes and dismantled a window without a trace nytimes.com/2001/08/18/nyregion/balcony-scene-unseen-atop-world-episode-trade-center-assumes-mythic-qualities.html

Attached: 911eteam.jpg (600x456, 89K)

>nuke goes off in basement
>doesnt rupture surrounding walls

Attached: Slide29.jpg (960x720, 204K)

Looks like Jewtube took the NYPD scanner audio down. The audio can be found here web.archive.org/web/20081130094614/http://www.firehouse.com/audio/wtc10.wav

can you show me another building that turns to dust from explosives?

Attached: Slide5.jpg (960x720, 117K)

Only approx 1/4th of the dead ever recovered and identiified by DNA, and many were found blown into chunks or charcoaled.
Nukes were used on 9/11

Attached: wtc-victim-bdr.jpg (599x426, 55K)

>hurr durr it's the nukes
Look here kike, I dont care how you did it, I just know it was you rats that did it.

The shockwave and heat of nuclear demolition disassociated the concrete into fine powder.

Attached: 911nn410.png (1036x711, 194K)

this. OP is a dingus

>shockwave
the shock wave that didnt travel through the earth?
>the heat
there is plenty of evidence in this thread already to disprove this, and there's more

>the concrete
there was virtually no steel left after the fact. the entirety of the building turned mostly to dust

Attached: Slide57.jpg (960x720, 126K)

here's some help for you

Attached: 1553019724272.png (1061x795, 172K)

The presence of high levels of radioactive isotopes only explainable by nuclear processes were found by the USGS
nucleardemolition.com/GZero_Report.pdf

Attached: 911 dark swirl.jpg (300x200, 17K)

>heat of nuclear demolition disassociated the concrete into fine powder.
but left all the paper in the building alone.. right

Attached: firewalker_5139.jpg (409x600, 26K)

Jewish disinfo

Attached: Judy Woods Space Beams 911.jpg (500x500, 61K)

>nuclear elements
>no radiation
>175 pages
no radiation.. it really is just that simple
>space beams
never presented anywhere in the work, just shows you only know about the work through hand-me-down disinfo. not gonna link your boyfriend fetzer today?

Attached: Slide87.jpg (960x720, 170K)

Paper blown out by the intital explosions

Don't forget to flush

Attached: 2zhe39-1.jpg (415x752, 47K)

>the heat toasted over 1400 cars
>didnt touch the paper
>not a single burned body on the street
your story is full of holes, more evidence to disprove any heat than there is to prove any

Attached: dragging oxy fuel hose over molten metal.png (1233x433, 1.03M)

Why do you assume a nuke was needed that could create a noticeable shockwave? The point would be to do it discreetly with small warheads so that retards like you 18 years later deny the possibility

what kind of fucking moron sees that there were giant gaping holes in these office buildings over 700 feet in the air and is surprised that paper gets sucked out of them? You're either mossad, a shill, or a retard but I think all three. Fuck off

Attached: 911urbanmoving.jpg (1939x2246, 1.61M)

>Why do you assume a nuke was needed
thats what this clown is presenting. did you see what happened to that building? do you think some small amount of energy will cause 2 500k ton buildings to turn mostly to dust, steel and all?

>small warheads
so the size of the warhead determines if radiation is involved or not? im not sure i follow. all im doing is posting/looking at evidence. this is a picture of the underground, under building 4/5. does it look like any explosions went off?

Attached: purple under tower 5 green under 4.png (1762x1060, 2.11M)

this is the first floor basement.. again, mostly intact/emtpy

i dont think you realize just how much paper littered the streets on 9/11... the only thing to survive those buildings were paper, thats not strange to you? not a single piece of office furniture? no people, but paper?

Attached: underground.png (1588x1037, 1.46M)

this path train beneath the towers, also, doesnt seem to have taken much damage and that shit AGAIN is empty. where is all the supposed debris that filled the basement floors? why the fuck wasnt this damaged from the blast of some supposed bombs/nukes?

Attached: path train.jpg (250x165, 51K)

this is the most damage ive seen in a picture of that underground. hardly anything that would constitute 2 500k ton buildings screaming down on top of it

Attached: 1555413426426.jpg (1862x1048, 263K)

Nukes were used on 9/11

Attached: i-3.jpg (900x567, 145K)

Dry run

Attached: Amalgam Virgo 1.jpg (500x1005, 147K)

you weren't talking about radiation nigger you were talking about shockwaves. You also have no idea about the concept of controlled explosions and directing energy from said explosions. journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0039353
If you actually studied 9/11 you'd see that in the videos of the towers collapsing there is a huge explosion near the top where debris shoots out horizontally almost in a cartoon manner.
Also thanks for posting that picture because a nuke can fit in that bag.

Attached: SADM_container_H-912.jpg (300x380, 15K)

>you were talking about shockwaves
i was responding to his claims about shockwaves.. and if the shockwave is supposed to come from a nuke, radiation would inevitably be involved.

>you dont understand explosives
please show me another case where explosives turned a steel-framed building to dust, you cant. do you not see all these cars ive posted? how does explosives answer all this shit? it doesnt
check this short video
youtube.com/watch?v=lGXDmNZCeKo

Attached: 1534865620177.png (890x543, 532K)

No moron. 50k people worked in the Twin towers. Even if every office worker only had 20 pieces of paper on their desk, that is 1,000,000 pieces of paper not even including blank paper stored in the office building. Why would there be fucking furniture on the ground if paper was being sucked out of the impact zones? How stupid are you
this. Specifically mentioning UAV

>youtube.com/watch?v=lGXDmNZCeKo
wasn't it ready the day after the attacks to sell to China?