Was giving women the right to vote the right choice?

Was giving women the right to vote the right choice?

Attached: 220px-King_George_of_Hellenes.jpg (219x298, 22K)

No.

Nobody should have the right to vote.

yes if you interpret history as cyclic,
no if youinterprete history as linear,
it depends if you interpret history as dynamic and complex

Attached: 1558131900640m.jpg (1024x533, 120K)

is that even a question at this point?

based. Maybe, at this point.

Democracy was a mistake as a whole. The retarded population just votes itself into socialism and gets destroyed.

Nope. They would have gained control by some other means and been just as destructive just less obvious. Probably talk their beta cuck husband into stupid shit and then the husbands would also get to take all the blame

I apologize in behalf of my country for ever going past oligarchy.

If they did it earlier you fucks could have your """wh*te""" Europe with no wars, but its problematic for you male pigs to undearstand that the future is female

shit bait

Attached: thisisbait.png (625x626, 66K)

Only landowning white males.

Don't remember who was it (some greek) that said something along the lines of:
If you were to build a ship, you wouldn't be asking cobblers and shepherds how to make it. But you are all perfectly fine with them getting their saying in state affairs.
Democracy is flawed, even when only a very select few can vote.
Now that the only requisite to vote, is to survive until you are 18 years old. It has become a popularity contest. Whoever get's the most TV time wins, and if it miraculously were to go wrong they would change the results and give you a Soros puppet anyways.
What I'm saying is that since it's already a flawed system, the more restrictive it is, the better. And I forgot to add that women should be property.

MARIA ME TA KITRINA

>Giving them the right to vote.
Giving them freedom above domestic cattle was an abhorrent miscalculation.

How did the founding fathers see things so clearly?

well if ending civilization is the goal then yeah

They were the original shitlords.

No.
Women have no agency.

Attached: 59621869_10157178033233700_325050288966729728_n.jpg (691x960, 74K)

Trump wouldn’t have won without their vote. All the faggots, niggers, etc would’ve wiped the board otherwise

Of course not.

Extra redpilled.

Based and redpilled.

Expell jews.
Restore monarchy.
Have a nation for the people lead by a man who derives his authority from god alone.
Put the interests of the nation first.

Yes; now we know it's a bad idea.

It was wrong to give anyone the right to vote. In ancient Greece only ethnic Greek men who had served in the military could vote (except Sparta where women could vote too) and the greatest thinkers realised how shitty democracy is pretty fast.

t. Democratius

Certainly not a good choice, but I feel like it was inevitable

The reverse seems just as likely at this point they are already being forced to stop killing children

Bullshit. Stalin tier asian tyranny.

Direct election of senators (17th amend) was worse

Yea I don't think zygotes are children tho. Even early fetuses too. We already have more than enough people around. I don't understand pro-life people.

Yes
Labour force participation is the main detrimental effect but if you give and inch they take a mile

Attached: 15416142655941347406596.png (855x2048, 736K)

Giving women the vote shifted politics permanently to the emotional, progressive side. Allowing women into the workforce permanently transformed the economy from a single wage family into a two wage family model.

Based

I'm 100% sure it was a mistake giving women political power, but I also think that by the 20th century the Western Civilization was already a degenerate shit hole.

Unironically true.

The world was a much better place when nations were ruled by strong individuals who were raised from birth to be rulers.