FACT! Democrats are fucked in 2020

They said there would be a crash if trump became president... and the market is still going strong despite all the trade wars and tarrifs going on, its actually stable and so far tarrifs have not effected the American consumer it's getting absorbed because of the strong economy

I agree, will be a shit show

This. Trump had one job and one job only, stop immigration and kick out all 30 million illegals and maybe he might have had a chance. Not only didn’t he do that he got us 1.5+ million extra illegals a year. Fucking failure.

You can blame rinos and the house for not implementing strong immigration policies... it can be fixed but Democrats and fines don't want to fix the issue and it's making the democratic party look really really bad especially when they keep acting like there is no issue, it's going to bite them hard

I agree, but you can't fight degeneracy forever. In future your country has all chances to be ruined in USSR-like mess and then collapse into independent states.

You are correct... it cant be fought and won forever :(

Nope, Trump is a faggot who expenses all his political capital on retarded Jewish tax cuts instead of going all out on immigration. He can go fuck himself when he loses in 2020. They’ll probably even put him in jail because all the people who trusted and voted for him got fucked by being silenced on the Internet and beat up on the streets and this faggot did nothing. He’s got a pen and a phone like Obama so why doesn’t he use it?

The incumbent always wins. 1992 was a fluke, and it had to do with there being a third party that took a sizeable amount of the votes.

>two-party paradigm

Faggot

One party or bust desu.

From earlier threads today, what if they do run Jon Stewart? He’s charismatic, people trust him and he just has to make the right noises to get disillusioned democrats back into the fold. No actual policies needed

>ITT: shills pretend that Presidents can legislate

Attached: 1560229763959.jpg (834x808, 158K)

If democrats pivot to socialism then they will win
If democrats stick to neoliberalism then they will lose

it is really that fucking simple.

If you are smart you would know socialism always turns into communism... your reasoning is a lose lose situation for Democrats

Trump will easily win 2020, can’t wait for the salt and screams.

I hope so.

Sorry to break it to you guys but border security is not on the Republican platform.

Stay home in 2020. Burn this motherfucker down. Stop funding your own demise. Stop paying taxes

This wasnt a failure it was by design

Nope. His base is gone

I agree... I dont think anyone has a chance against trump in the slightest, he is ruthless and will smack you down every time lol

Those issues should have been day one executive orders.

Republicans have proven they will not pursue white American interests.

>It's a good thing we have the electoral college
Sadly the democrats are trying to take that away from us too. Some states have passed bills that will go straight for the popular vote in presidential elections. Luckily the caveat is that this won't go into action unless all the states who signed up for it have a collective 270 electoral votes. However, it's still pretty bullshit.
rollcall.com/news/campaigns/colorado-joins-effort-to-elect-presidents-by-popular-vote-skip-electoral-college

Trump is too busy sending Israel free money to stop the non white invasion. 70%+ of nonwhites vote dem and the dems only need to be against Trump to have a legitimate platform. Literally zero fucking chance of getting the 2020 election unless Trump suddenly stops sucking jew cock to deport the tens of millions of illegal spics. The electoral college wont even be enough to make him win again.

Attached: 1560309542815.jpg (768x1024, 111K)

True. The economy is the most important thing for most Americans, and he's left the Democrats with very little to attack him on. The best they have is China's retaliatory tariffs, and that's not much. Outside of the economy, all they have is social issues. That's being fucked by the fact that their civil war between progressives and moderates is still in full swing
It's all so tiresome. He's issued the ED for the border wall, and everyone seems to forget completely about his savaging of the refugee resettlement program or the fact that he has been fighting to change immigration and asylum law. Progress has obviously been disappointing compared to what was expected in 2016, but that has far more to do with the enormous obstruction and continued RINO backstabbing than it does with Trump (though he has clearly made some mistakes)

>Trump is too busy sending Israel free money
Did you expect the aid to Israel to stop back in 2016? Why? That shit would survive a veto, and vetoing it in the first place would be pure .political suicide considering that a lot of boomer conservatives still support Israel
>the dems only need to be against Trump to have a legitimate platform
Kek, no. They may still win, but basing a party and campaign platform entirely around hating and opposing a rival political figure can only harm them. A candidate should be someone who inspires voters and gives them hopes through their proposed policies, not someone who allows their opponent to seize the entire initiative by framing everything around them.

socialism and communism are the same thing dumbass.

the electoral college is fucking awful dude

>if I call everyone a shill maybe nobody will criticize my retarded president who didn’t fullfill his #1 and #2 campaign promises

Why?

What good is running on promises you won’t keep?

because it clearly doesnt work.
Why have 2 presidents in the last 20 years won the office by losing the election? It doesnt make any sense even from a republican values perspective.

>political suicide considering that a lot of boomer conservatives still support Israel
He could have taken 5 billion out of the 38 billion to pay for the wall but he didnt. He still could have given Israel a nice juicy 33 billion dollar package but that wasn't enough
>Kek, no. They may still win, but basing a party and campaign platform entirely around hating and opposing a rival political figure can only harm them. A candidate should be someone who inspires voters and gives them hopes through their proposed policies, not someone who allows their opponent to seize the entire initiative by framing everything around them.
That literally does not fucking matter when orange man bad is all that needs to be said to half of weimerica. Morals and reasoning does not matte one squirt of piss when you're facing fanatical bolsheviks that have already decided they want to kill you

Attached: 1560266263742m.jpg (1024x576, 105K)

>that pic
Lmao

Attached: 49647CD5-4D14-4FB7-A72A-9D814E90DFD6.jpg (940x490, 92K)

All of those were the 2016 republican platforms and they were all lies you kike cock gobbling boomer piece shit.

how the fuck do you expect him to do that? he cant even get his wall up without complete blocking by the activist judges and the deep state. he has to fight in court for every inch of progress. to the point that he pressure mexico now to build his wall at their southern border.
as I can see I agree he made mistakes but he fights tooth and nail to get it done. you cant ask for more.

Which presidents? Lost how? Please don't say the popular vote.

90% of these are impossible for a brainlet to keep and difficult to implement to begin with. Also a few are vague nonsense like womens rights and faggot rights.

We're a republic, not a democracy, and the electoral college is increasingly the only thing keeping us that way. Why would the smaller states bother to stay in the union if they just ended up being ruled by the larger states?
>He could have taken 5 billion out of the 38 billion to pay for the wall but he didnt.
What do you mean? That's not how funding appropriations works
>Morals and reasoning does not matte one squirt of piss when you're facing fanatical bolsheviks that have already decided they want to kill you
You're forgetting that not all current Democrat voters/Americans who may consider voting for Democrats are that way. They're retards for not recognizing the obvious dangers of the progressive wing, but that doesn't mean that they're so easily influenced by it that they can be motivated purely by an anti-Trump agenda. Especially if Democrats want to win back the Rust Belt, they need a position that's more than hate
>Abolish ICE
There's a reason why the current Dem field isn't running with this

a republic is clearly worse than a democracy
fuck the republic

bush and trump
>less people voted for them so they win
stupid

Better and more coherent than the republican alternative, also definitely not what OPs pic said. The left has tons of tangible policies and practical plans to achieve them, it’s just easier for the right to plug their ears and pretend they don’t exist

Attached: 5CF1D4BD-E251-4C4A-9F8F-9CD8D39449E0.jpg (828x682, 153K)

how are they impossible when a ton of other countries have that same shit

>a republic is clearly worse than a democracy
Democracies are nothing more than mob rule, and thus inevitably degenerate into either de facto or literal dictatorship. Look at Europe's demise for an example. And again, what point would there be for the smaller states to stay in a union where they have no political power? Imagine if the EU turned into the United States of Europe while not using an electoral college. What would the smaller nations like Austria get out of it? They'd just be dominated by the major population centers

FACT republicans are not for border security.

Their biggest donors are the biggest employers of illegals

>tangible policies and practical plans

You call taxing the fuck outta the rich a viable solution? Even if they'll let you get a "solution" like that passed, what're you gonna do when they pack their Megabucks up and flee the country? You are a fucking dumbass.
SOCIALISM DOESN'T WORK RETARD!

>less people voted for them so they win
If you're going by the popular vote then of course it doesn't make sense how they won. However, that's not how presidential elections work in our country. We use the electoral college so that every state can have a voice in the future of our country. By using the popular vote, states such as California, Texas, and New York can each individually outvote several states. Some cities alone, such as San Francisco, can potentially outvote an entire state.
Does that seem fairer to you? That a single city can decide the future more than an entire state?

a bunch of whiny little cunts who didnt get everything they want immediately and are having a temper tantrum, really a good portion of Trump supporters particularly the National Socialist arent much different than leftists, you are whiny entitled bitches

Not a single thing isn't retarded or useless buzzwords

>this tired old argument again
I’m getting tired of explaining this, but I guess I have to once again. This isn’t how the rich behave when faced with tax increases and all evidence proves it

theguardian.com/inequality/2017/nov/20/if-you-tax-the-rich-they-wont-leave-us-data-contradicts-millionaires-threats

Attached: 97F87674-0F43-42F4-9BD4-03CFB1727487.jpg (750x1157, 247K)

The fact is, Trump is still the best chance for us getting our shit together and has been a visibly positive influence on other countries.

>Border Security
At least that's not at the base of the stack, cause that's pretty flimsy based on the last term.

they already left, whole point we are trying to get them back, it took decades to create this mess and you all expect results immediately, name one president in your lifetime that has done more than Trump?

Me on the right (but not a D*mocrat). Fuck Trump, Fuck Kikes, Fuck Zionism, and FUCK Israel.

Attached: 1528409330610.png (1000x1000, 177K)

no panhandling in this thread, GET OUT!
and take his jacket

I'd say that border security is actually looking pretty good with the MPP expansion. It effectively kills catch & release, plus the wall funding/construction etc.

Immigration and border stuff is the #1 issue for nearly everyone, and nearly everyone polled wants less immigration. It's a pretty winning hand, as even if you want to say Trump falls short he's still on the right side of the issue. The Democrats simply aren't.

Infrastructure is a hot mess bullshit though. There's literally nothing happening there. Trump was a fucking idiot for doing an ACA repeal attempt before that.

>they already left
Hahahahahahahahahaha

Attached: 1917E25A-477E-4471-9EE0-662AB1CE9A6D.jpg (1200x800, 67K)

The only thing tired is socialism. You throw up a guardian article like that's a fucking argument. Your retardation is breathtaking. That's a biased "study" on a biased left wing rag. The super rich ALREADY take their money out of play to evade and minimize taxation. That's not some cherry picked, pie in the sky "study", that's reality. And considering the montherfuckers already run the government, you're double-plus stupid if you think tightening the screws of the very rich is going to anything other than increase income disparity, eliminate economic mobility, and plunge our nation into a fucking dark age.

Fuck neocohens. Fuck boomers. Fuck Zionism. Fuck faggots, niggers, women, mooslims, jannies and chinks. Fuck moot.

Attached: 1558838997548.jpg (250x213, 9K)

>not using archive
Easiest way to spot a newfag. Arguing against the economic benefits of Trump's tax cuts should be a lost cause by now, ,but I guess that old habits die hard. Also,
>70 percent top marginal tax rate on Americans earning over $10 million per year
Who in their right mind thinks that this is ethically or economically a good idea?

>you're double-plus stupid if you think tightening the screws of the very rich is going to anything other than increase income disparity, eliminate economic mobility, and plunge our nation into a fucking dark age
Really? Because it hasn’t done it in Scandinavia in the slightest. Weird. Also what is “double-plus stupid”? I swear the only two books you people have ever read are 1984 and Atlas Shrugged and you treat them like gospel

Attached: 58A119E5-3360-4685-81D3-1A42FC97DD5C.jpg (750x1118, 252K)

>Who in their right mind thinks that this is ethically or economically a good idea?
Literally 99% of the US population

>Republicans
>''We hate white people, we love niggers and jews! fuck borders n sheet!!!''
>Democrats
>''We hate white people, we love niggers and jews! fuck borders n sheet!!!''
Who even gives a single fuck at this point?

He's not a king though. It's not his fault democrats AND republicans are stopping everything he does. The courts block every attempt he makes. It's all a fucking joke. At least he's jamming the courts with conservatives, so at least we get something out of him.

>This isn’t how the rich behave when faced with tax increases and all evidence proves it
Yes they absolutely do. They may or may not not give up citizenship altogether, but they will shield their monies in various offshore vehicles, or in tax-free vehicles, or take up residence elsewhere in extreme cases.

The article you cites is authored by the guy who wrote:
>The Myth of Millionaire Tax Flight: How Place Still Matters for the Rich

Meanwhile back in reality we have examples in France (happened bigtime from 2012 onwards to today):
money.cnn.com/2016/04/01/news/millionaires-fleeing-france/index.html

And within the United States, moving from state-to-state as is VERY common:
cato.org/publications/commentary/wealthy-taxpayers-are-fleeing-these-states-droves

More info on global shifting:
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-30/millionaires-flee-their-homelands-as-tensions-rise-taxes-bite

nytimes.com/2018/06/02/opinion/sunday/millionaires-fleeing-migration.html

>Really? Because it hasn’t done it in Scandinavia in the slightest.
Kek. Today I will remind them

web.archive.org/web/20190605172059/https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/denmark-tells-bernie-sanders-to-stop-calling-it-socialist/

Unless you're talking about this kind of socialism, it's doomed to go the way of Venezuela

Attached: 1559874714718.png (1000x600, 67K)

I voted for Trump so he would end the Obamacare mandate. And he did that, so anything else he does is just a bonus.

Exactly. Plus I'm hoping once they do take back power, the economy will hit the fan and then someone much, much worse than Trump comes in and then the fun begins.

this. what we now know as kike-controlled media is already starting with their twisting of literally who tier polls with sample sizes of literally what. They'll just run the same game over and over until the Demographics shift enough to ban guns and get them elected forever.

There is nothing called socialism any more, its all neoliberal market economy. Remove boarders, nations and genders so everyone can be a happy consumers and continue to make the markets rise.

They’ literal shills

Didn't the Koch Brothers flip Democrat recently. Yeah, they did. Kinda makes you think, don't it?

My dad can drone your dad.

Okay, here is some friendly advice for the election - if the plan is to run "against socialism" you are going to lose. People under aged 60 or so in the modern US do not fear "socialism," and actively want certain socialistic policies like universal healthcare. Running against "socialism" as a generic bogeyman won't even come close to working, especially in a country where so many people increasingly feel fucked over by big, wealthy institutions.

A candidate should declare their plan for office is to genocide all white people just to see how people react
I’m genuinely curious how much pushback politicians would get for actual calls to violence in our current climate

Yes or no - do you trust California's reported vote totals? I sure as fuck don't. The electoral college puts California's mass-scale fraud into a single-state silo. That's ONE big advantage of the electoral college.

>but they are playing demographics to take over.

that and they are banning right wingers from all online platforms that were the ones that helped get his message out in 2015 and 2016.