Why are there any white people left in the Democratic Party?
Why are there any white people left in the Democratic Party?
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
twitter.com
Or men for that matter?
There's no Europeans in the democratic party, only jews.
Why no white women?
why is "Jewish Women" listed twice?
It already says jews. White is not a synonym for European.
Because Democrats hate white people.
Also notice one group they just had to mention twice.
Let's not
Oy vey how dare you insinuate it's listed twice! Are you an antisemite?
Never forget the jewish women
Jewish nationalism = white nationalism
I'm going to come at this from the perspective of a Chinese person, so bear with me.
In ancient China back when you idiots were still wearing bear skins and hitting each other with clubs, a guy called Kong Qiu. You might know him as Confucius. He was a philosopher who correctly identified that there are exactly two (2) kinds of people in the world. Useful people who are rightly ordered and virtuous, and useless people who are disordered and evil.
Now, in China, after millennia of warfare, bureaucratic administration, self-reorienting political upheaval and deliberate education, we came to the conclusion that the only logical thing to do was to encourage every person to be useful and virtuous, and to destroy useless and evil people. Mandarin bureaucracy, legalism, Confucian values. We promoted the birth of righteous people by awarding those who demonstrated ability with sexual power. We separated the weak and inept from the strong and adept through war. Through 5000 years of uninterrupted effort, we have gradually strained our race of inferior people. Mao Zedong literally exiled successful people to the countryside, not because he hated them, but because he wanted them to become rural and thus breed more, encouraging the system. We even destroyed our own culture because it had become decadent and corrupt, because we knew that we could recreate our values in a more primal sense because our GENES had been trained to do so.
And, as usual, Europeans caught on to our plan in the last ten minutes, and decided to do the same thing, but to skip the whole 5000 year thing. I say this with respect to you and your people. You did the exact opposite of what we did, but with what I assume is the same end. You simply made it legal for inferior people to kill their own children.
You made it legal. For inferior people to kill their children. And then you encouraged them to do it. And they're doing it. Do you think we can't see what you're doing? We are watching you.
tl;dr
Im down for it. Women make terrible decisions and care more about feelings than facts. The faster society collapses cause a woman in power was moved to tears cause of some meanie in a shithole, the sooner we can all be liberated from this existence.
TL;DR
But why do you cook dogs alive?
A black disabled transqueer Muslim millenial will be our next president.
Now you might be asking "well wait Ching Chong, what does that have to do with Republicans and Democrats?" Well that filthy island monkey Hiro hasn't abolished the character limit yet so I have to do this in two posts.
Back in the late 19th century (adorable, btw) American progressives realized that eugenics was the obvious solution forward, no doubt learning from us, because like everything you goofy-eyed freaks have ever done, you are really just imitating China. One problem, you don't have 3000 years to achieve eugenic superiority. You have maybe one century before you run out of steam. Roosevelt encouraged eugenics and early 20th century (never going to stop laughing at this) ideologues encouraged more radical reforms, one of them was named Hitler. But that didn't sell because, as it turns out, when your civilization is built on barbaric notions of personal license to be degenerate, you can't just ORDER people to die.
So you invented the notion, and I do love this, that people have no duty to have children. Pleasure is more important that family. Consumption is more important than family. It's better to have two cats and a Nintendo Switch than to have a family. In one stroke, you convinced the inferior side of your race to commit genetic suicide. This is why white people vote Democrat. Because it is part of the program. As a man seduces a woman by ignoring her, the useful people of the whites convinced the useless people of the whites to kill themselves by pretending to oppose it. Uselessness is based on contrarianism and laziness, I think they call it Leftism.
This idea is so frighteningly effective that in the last half century the Americans have successfully annihilated ALL white left-wing movements. We watched you do this with horror. So when you ask, "why do white people still vote Democrat," well that's easy. You tricked them into doing it to exterminate themselves. I am not wrong. I see you.
How dare they only list Jewish women twice.
China is five countries pretending to be one. Do I ask you why you eat dogs because the Swiss do? Look it up, it's true. Do I ask you that? Do we just pretend that Britain is Switzerland because it's part of this thing called "Europe?" No. China is an economic union between dozens of ethnic groups and multiple kingdoms united by an inability to defend our land from invaders without unification. This is what the entire Jurchen incident was about.
I've never even tasted dog meat in the same way nobody from Swindon has ever tasted haggis. It's a cultural thing that weirdos from like two provinces do.
In summation: The entirety of Western politics is obviously a eugenic system to encourage left-leaning (useless) people to kill themselves off.
The left-wing counter to this is mass immigration, but this is stupid and myopic, which makes sense when you remember that the people doing it are useless people.
If they were not useless, they would try a plan that might actually work. I predict a civil war in the West in the next 200 years. That's what would happen in China. But like everything else, the whites always want things to happen in a tenth of the time they're supposed to. I don't know what it is with you guys and speed, it's like you think the universe is going to end tomorrow. What is actually going to happen is that ethnic strife will increase in Europe and America gradually to the point where it results in war, not all at once but in one region at a time.
By this point the useless fraction of the white population will be extinct. America is further along in this regard than other white countries, which means that it will probably be the best situated to win its war first. Eastern Europe will be next, then maybe the West. Suffering and strife are a form of eugenics in and of themselves, so you can see that North and Western Europe are actually the LEAST well situated to deal with the coming troubles. You are learning, but you should have been learning 2000 years ago.
We solved our Muslim problems with flamethrowers and Confucian bureacracy. You guys have a lot to learn but you will win. It will hurt, but you will survive, at least.
Why are there are any in the Republican party? I could easily imagine Republicans agreeing with this.
That's not what I asked chink. I asked why do you cook dogs alive, not why do you eat them? I know that some cantons of Switzerland eat cats and dogs, I've yet to see any videos of them blowtorching or boiling them alive. You can buy haggis across the UK btw, plenty of people in Swindon will have tasted haggis.
I could ask other questions about behaviour I saw in Beijing. Why does every constantly hack up phlegm? It's like being in luminous green rain. Why do people, (particularly toddled with a slit cut into the seat of their trousers) shit in the street?
Cruelty has always been a part of Chinese culture. I suppose an answer to this is, we do not treat animals any worse than we treat criminals. It used to be a common practice to tie men to poles and slice pieces of them off with a knife until the crowd got bored, at which point they would be killed with a stab to the heart or lungs.
Because our people are inured to cruelty and violence against their own, does it not logically follow that we would be especially inured to violence against animals?
I do not approve of it, nor do I excuse it, but explaining something is different from excusing it. Parts of China have been effectively ruled by serial killers for centuries, and that is just a fact of the geopolitics of China, there is no way to unite the North South and West without having people who rule with despotic methods running at least one of them, and that sort of governing naturally creates a pathological society.
I could actually give a whole explanation of this in and of itself. In fact, I will.
So a large part of understanding Chinese politics is understanding the geography of China. Since time immemorial there have been three major regions of China which could actually be controlled by a central authority. The North, the South, and the West.
Northern China is poor as shit, but very largely rural, has a lot of people, and has always been militaristic.
Southern China is mercantile. It has all of the major ports, it has very little fertile land, but it also has navigable rivers and access to the Yangze.
Western China is poorer than shit, it's a desert and a little bit of jungle. This is where I used to live.
Now understanding Chinese political history means recognizing that there is ZERO commonality between these kingdoms. The North always has the most power, but it cannot project that power onto the other two. The South always has the most money, because it trades with other countries/nations and it is impossible to invade. The West is worthless so nobody wants it, but the people who live there are impossible to control, and also a bunch of them are Muslims.
So, how do you build a country out of this? Well, you get two kingdoms to agree to dominate the third. The result historically is something like this. The North has military manpower. They fight with the South until they come to an agreement, usually that the South gets favorable taxes, and then they work together to wreck the West. The one time this DIDN'T happen was in the 3rd century when the South and the West combined to wreck the North, but in the end the Jin (North) still ended up running the country, so it was a futile effort.
Today, the communist party deals in compromises. The South funds construction projects that serve no actual purpose in the West. The North provides calories and military power to both, and the West gets unlimited free money to build cities that nobody lives in. They also wildly overrepresent the West in the party itself to make sure nobody gets shafted.
So when you look at all of this, this gigantic clusterfuck, this is like if Italy France and Britain all decided to somehow form a country.
The only possible way to run this is through two institutions: The Intelligence Services, and HUGE bureacracy. And that means you're going to have a public sector with the population of... Uh... China.
And the result of that is despotism. Powerful men naturally rise to control huge elements of Chinese society, and the sort of people who rise to power in such institutions are almost always gigantic dickheads. Or worse, you get Northern warlords who come in and kill the bureacrats who held power--but they're huge dickheads who have armies.
Given this fact, is it any surprise that a large portion of Chinese culture is totally sociopathic? How couldn't it be? Imagine if Margaret Thatcher had slit a man's throat on television every day for her entire reign. Would it be outlandish to assume that slitting peoples' throats would stop phasing people after three or four months? That is what happened in China. We HAD to rule through violence and fear. And the result of that is the normalization of cruelty.
Again. Not a good thing, but the alternative was Chinese Balkans. Would you like to live in Chinese Serbia? No. So you do what you need to do, and if that means that people no longer see a problem with boiling puppies alive, well, that's better than letting Dong Zhou run the fucking country.
Even though I don't agree with everything in this, the base idea is pretty redpilled: leftism is self-defeating and adhered to by weak and dysgenic people. I don't think leftism was consciously introduced to destroy the weak though. Thanks for the posts, Chang.
>the Chinese attempt to understand western democracy
>only logical conclusion is that it’s a covert genocide
This is the scariest chain I have ever read.
I think the analysis is mostly correct though.
more importantly what to straight men of any race still vote for them.
thats anti-Semitic
OYYY VEEEYYY
What the fuck is AAPI women?
What do you mean it's listed twice? How could it be listed 3 times? It's crazy of you to suggest that it's on that list 4 times!
Wtf I love chinks now!
ass ass poopy icky women
>disabled women
Kinda redundant, dontcha think?
Asian American Pacific Islander (aka commie gook whores)
>woman women
Youre a bunch of ant-people with zero ability to create anything. No souls, no love, just mewling hideousness. A clone of a clone of a clone.
Yeah big case of sorry not sorry there. Would you rather we be black?
We built something already, it’s called fucking China, and when your people are scraping together bits of cornmeal to eat, it will STILL be fucking China, because that’s how we spent our skill points.
You’re welcome, by the way.
Let's look at all the places we've done that and consider if we should continue doing so.
I'm starting to think that people of Jewish descent are trying to mold my mind utilizing subliminal messaging
men (women)
I think I figured it out.
America and most of the west is transition form what Aristotle called the Politeia to the worst most extreme form of democracy called Demagoguery.
This movement is being led my mini tyrants propped up by egalitarian extremists. Think about how much control through mob rule these Demagogue tyrants allready have. What happens if you speak out against LGBQT in the work place? What about some one in LA that holds up a trump sign in public? Think about what mass media will do to you if you speak out against there extreme ideals?
Here is what Aristotle observed about extreme democracy. Anything in there look familiar?
Other measures which are also useful in constructing this last and most extreme type of democracy are measures like those introduced by Cleisthenes at Athens, when he sought to advance the cause of democracy, or those which were taken by the founders of popular government at Cyrene. A number of new tribes and clans should be instituted by the side of the old; private cults should be reduced in number and conducted at common centers; and every contrivance should be employed to make all the citizens mix, as much as they possibly can, and to break down their old loyalties. All the measures adopted by tyrants may equally be regarded as congenial to democracy. We may cite as examples the license allowed to slaves (which, up to a point, may be advantageous as well as congenial), the license permitted to women and children, and the policy of conniving at the practice of “living as you like.” There is much to assist a constitution of this sort, for most people find more pleasure in living without discipline than they find in a life of temperance. (
So basically the men in those movements live a life without discipline, (which is obvious have seen the guys in those movements?) and believers in this extreme form of equality.
No Indian & Asian women lol
So what you’re saying is we need an American Cao Cao to beat the shit out of everyone and make them fall in line
because whites were slave owners, so they have to let the people of color to lead the country now
sloppy job
>lets elect minorities
>2020 presidental canadite is a white male
What did the DNC mean by this?
>Jewish women twice
Your historical revisionism concerning Mao Zedong is noted commie faggot.
You just made a comparison about Italy, France and britian. If be fine living in any if those. Your globalist superstars are retarded
Remember that you threw away your heritage for a communist meme. So stop taking credit for the work of those your slaughtered once cold blood you niggerbrained chink.
DARK women
RETARDED women
>Chinese communism isn’t just Confucian bureaucracy 2.0
Not to defend communism, but srsly
They forgot Asian women, I wonder why
Sure.
>changes legal gender identity to female (and yes, you will be able to this on a day by day basis very soon in the future)
Okay, elect me.
how close is america to civil war because this is the most bizarre shit I have ever read. do any of them actually care about community or just appearances...? they do know without community everthing will come crashing down right?
because democrats are obsessed with jews. they actually scare me because unlike stormfags, they arent fringe weirdos. their brand of jew-hatred is mainstream
Holy shit the Jewish women x2 is real
Why have the chinks never invented anything?
Honest question