Well, Jow Forumserinos?

definitely not c, fuck c

They work together. Through friendship, all things are possible!

he is absolutely correct from the perspective of a communist hence the ironic flag use

Child B

How about nobody gets the flute until you learn to share you little shits.

B

Attached: BEE1C360-96C8-4291-AF84-45AC34834FA7.gif (288x284, 3.12M)

B is a Communist, A is a Capitalist, C is a Liberal

its going in my arse

Child A gets it after paying economic compensation to child B. Child C can get fucked though.

C because hes the male and strongest and can take it and theres nothing those sluts can do about it

You switched A and B

This

slide
thread

Notice how child C is the boy.

:’) this is the only right answer

If B was smart she would hang the little nigger C and split profits from street performing with A.

None of them. I have the flute now. I am sure each child has learned a valuable lesson.

Well, it's B, but she should make a fair deal with A to open instrument's full potential. C should get a job at conveyor belt and support his family.

divide the flute into thirds, give each one third

I hate these kinds of loaded questions; what I would tell three literal children has nothing to do with my preferred economic system.

Leaning A

What's the point of flute if it isn't played?

Why wouldn't C and A hang B?

Why the fuck would B make a flute if she can't play?

You can't learn to play the flute unless you have a flute. Obviously Child A mismanaged her previous flute.

B can let A borrow the flute, B can sell it to A, or B can give it to A if she wants.
But if A thinks she has a right to it then she can get thrown into a wood chipper for that effrontery.
C also gets thrown into the wood chipper.

Give it to child B introduce her to a potential customer Child A.
Ponder how I ended up with the flute while I am brutally murdering child C and his entire fucking family including the family dog so as to halt the spread of a clearly virulent form of fuckery.

fuck off

Attached: 1522945848839.png (354x462, 25K)

They can all share it. A can teach the others how to play the flute if they want, B can teach the others how to make their own, and C can learn from both sand make its own and play it. Are you an only child pol?

They'll hang her and after 76 years their house will collapse to their heads and in ruins they will fight for food and foreign-made flutes. Gonna be disaster.

B made the flute with the intention that someone else would play it (or she didn't think things through), so A should get it, and B deserves compensation. Since useless C has the insolence to take something for himself that he didn't make or can put to good use, he can have a public flogging.

I think it depends on what you do to child C

The answer is to give the flute to Child B. Child A should be put in a camp and eventually disposed of with delousing agent. Child C will be shipped back to Africa.

Attached: LrWw8kq.jpg (600x534, 70K)

Give it to B it is her property. She can do what she wants with it. A & C can work to buy their own.

he can work at mc donalds

Don't fall into the trap of using the same retarded lens as some idiot feminist. That's actively participating in getting dragged down to their level.

flute in pooper

Equity not equality. All 3 get a third of the flute. This is the only correct answer and would obviously lead to the ideal society.

Why does everyone think its about economics?

Give it to C because I fear being lined against a wall and shot or sent into the gassing van

The question assumes there's one 1 flute which is not relevant to the current mass production society of abundance. All three may have a flute.

it is a trap so when you say B it supposedly equals giving the worker the fruit of his work as in communism

as if the entrepreneur machines and management have no value

Attached: 1493077775999.jpg (640x692, 104K)

>there are people who wouldn't select B

surprised this hasn't been posted yet

Attached: 1542233199954.png (1582x491, 221K)

A should get it

Without A's ability to play the flute and make music with it the flute would be inherently worthless so it wouldnt have value and be a waste for B and C

Get fucked commie trash

Trick question. You can't give the flute to anyone because you don't own it. The flute belongs to Child B. If written properly, the problem could ask if you are willing to steal the flute from Child B and pass the stolen goods to either A or C.

Make them play rock paper scissors for it

A. Anyone can make a flute, the untermensche only exists to provide resources for they're superiors to achieve human greatness.

Attached: Nietzsche187c.jpg (1200x800, 455K)

Kill 'em all, none of those niglets deserve anything for free.

Attached: the_talking_gun_by_bokaier_d502l4t-pre.jpg (914x874, 134K)

Using capitalist logic, B is the rightful owner because she supplied the materials, paying for its creation.

Using communist logic, B is the rightful owner because she supplied the labor, putting forth the effort towards actually creating the flute.

In either case, the flute legally belongs to B and no one else.

What does it matter? It's her fucking flute. Everything else is irrelevant.

Attached: 3withaflute (1) (1) (1).jpg (960x720, 116K)

My answer was that but without the proxy of being a dirty kike.

fixed it here

Recognizing that B has property rights is communist now?

Put all three children in an octagonal cage, with flute hung from ceiling, 2 meters away from the ground. It'll force two of them to team up to get the flute. Then, the third kid gets stabbed with the flute. Then, the last two fight to the death.. Winner takes flute, of course, and moves onto the next match.

Attached: 1559874228376.jpg (500x331, 21K)

B is the only right answer. A can buy it from B.

B owns the flute and A will play it, because they’re children, not babies

>after 40 generations of fighting the children don't even realize the flute isn't there anymore. Most of them haven't even heard of or care about the flute.

Encourage them to fight hand-to-hand for it. Maybe give them some cudgels. A kind of looks like those little fat redhead girls, maybe she'd have superhuman strength or something on account of munching on twinkies all day long. B looks tall. Maybe her height and development will give her the edge in order to defend her produce. Child C doesn't have a chance. Her dyke single mother gave her a dyke haircut and she probably lives off of pure onions mix for breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day. The natural estrogen of being a woman being overridden by slightly weaker phytoestrogens, the daily grind of watching trashy Youtube videos and being hit by her resentful mother has probably turned her into an angry, sad runt.

I'll place my bets on Child B because I've got a thing for brunettes, but what I'm trying to say is that the Right of Conquest is completely legitimate. Whichever child comes out on top gets that flute.

slide

based and cunnypilled

The question was written by a communist academic, most likely in a socialist country.

By extension, we use our powerful U.S. allies to bomb all three children back into the caves their country crawled out of.

Fuck these contrived hypotheticals.

but he is also the entrepreneur, manager, and owner.

Give to child B to make Child A pay for the flute. Not sure what the issue is here. If Child B has any thoughts at all she would give to A. But I hope A gets it in the end.

Maybe Child A and C could provide some service to Child B in exchange for making them their own flute?

Attached: pr18441DV11xvq568o1_1280.jpg (853x1280, 261K)

B Made the Flute
She is the means of production.

> Seize the means of flute production
> Give A & C the other flutes B was forced to make at gun point
> Shoot them all when they start rioting for food

The children are obvious communist traitors for participating in this obvious propaganda.

All three are put on the first death flight out of our proud nation, preferably helicoptered into a volcano.

Obviously, the flute never existed, because this is a hypothetical situation to further communist propaganda.

even hoping that is gay. child A's a bitch.

>Be user see this thread
>Twisted giggle.exe
>Go to work on image
>Drop image and dip
>30 minutes well spent
>1 post by this ID
Never change Jow Forums

B easily.

I'd pay child B a nominal amount for the flute and then employ that child to create more flutes. I'd then sell another flute to child A and give 5 percent of profits to charity that serves child C so I get a tax write off. Eventually after "obtaining" flute instructions from Child B I'd then then patent the design and fire child B after taking him to court and suing him for everything.

I am become Jew.

Child B trades flute to Child A in exchange for A helping B with homework

Child A teaches Child C how to play, in exchange for C helping with B's homework instead

Child C can commission a new flute from Child B in exchange for C helping B with chores as well as homework

Child C is now able to play the flute like Child A, and learned from the extra homework and chores C took on
C's life has been enriched

this is called an "economy"
work will make you free

Attached: 1559848358378m.jpg (1024x683, 112K)

Based user solving the problems of the world.

Break the flute in three and give a piece to each child inserting it in its rectum.

None of them will ever bother me with retarded shit ever again.

Attached: 1558286868013.jpg (174x225, 9K)

Explains how I got the flute, but I am still sadistically murdering Child C and his immediate and extended family except this time I won't be pondering where I got the flute I will be humming the Dragnet theme song.

Judging by the responses, this communist propaganda has failed as hard as a lefty meme. So nothing to see here.

A is conscripted into the National Orchestra to play music that glorifies the country. A flute shall be provided by the state. Failure to play adequately will result in being sent to a work camp.
B is placed into a factory making flutes. Failure to meet her daily flute quota will result in being sent to a work camp.
C is placed into a work camp gathering flute-making materials. Failure to meet the daily material quota will result in execution.

I keep the flute.

C is a niggest cockroach
A gets to play it when she wants in exchange for lessons to music lessons given to B.

Obviously A, there is no argument

I would be very curious to see how many regular people would seriously justify any answer that isnt B. Property rights are a basic foundation of any society and must be respected.

I monetise the flute, by securitising it as a tradeable financial instrument. I then divide it into packaged saleable shares that are bought by boomers for their retirement funds. All three children then work themselves into an early grave trying to buy shares for the new inflated cost of flutes that results, only to find they will never ever get to own a flute.

Consequently, the children give up caring about the flute, and regress to an aggrerian primitivist lifesstyle to not feed the boomer's insatiatable need for share dividends. By disconnecting from the economy, the children are liberated from participating in hypothetical quizes such as this, thus putting all academics out of work due to a collapse of boomer retirement funds.

Who the fuck is taking and giving flutes? Sounds like a jewish trick

None of them. If they want a flute their parents can buy them one.

B is the only right choice. B can decide to give/sell it to A if she wants, but she is the one to decide that.

> Child A
Based

Child B, obviously. They literally bought the materials for it and made it. You stole this poor child's flute. Give it back.

Thief nigger

Nigger Child B will just make another flute realizing the value and sell it on the black market. Eventually Child B will hire Child A to help make better black market flutes that faggot ass boomers can OD on. They then both savagely murder Child C and his Boomer parents Grand parents and all there friends.

Don’t even read their responses, the white male should get it and the other two should have to perform sex acts on him for use of his flute.

her father or husband you mean. it's a decision, not a rimjob.

Fuck A, Kill C, Marry B

Stupid nigger