Remember that you guys are anti-Capitalist because you guys are so fucking dumb to describe communism

Remember that you guys are anti-Capitalist because you guys are so fucking dumb to describe communism.

Attached: DCCC4B6C-F8A7-4BCA-A201-FE7A4024E6C4.jpg (702x889, 99K)

That's because the dichotomy of Capitalism vs. Communism is a false one. They are both the same game. It's all post French Revolution and post Industrial Revolution bullshit. Living things matter the most.

>capitalism is oppression by the elite
>because it is

No its cause I like to own stuff and things

Great argument, Dumbass.

Twitter communists are one of the most retarded peoples on this planet

That describes both communism and capitalism. That's why we need FASCISM.

Attached: quote-on-what-must-an-elite-be-founded-a-purity-of-soul-b-capacity-of-work-and-creativity-c-corneliu (850x400, 87K)

soon

Attached: uncleted.jpg (650x488, 35K)

>posted from my iPhone X

Commies have a weird definition of suffering.

>hierarchies are inevitable
>prefer ones where you don't starve or get gulaged
somehow we're the unreasonable ones

Theocratic Monarchy is the only true form of governance, there's a reason it's reigned supreme for literally thousands of years.

Attached: god2.0.jpg (600x465, 36K)

Communism will never work because it requires oppression, nurtures and it's rooted on conflict, offers no solution to scarcity that could be enforced with minimal intervention. It's a pipe dream that on top of it produces terrible economic output cause you let the retards have resources and they just consume, never produce or improve upon.

You mean national socialism. Really, better than fascism. Fascism works with an iron fist to the populist and needs that in a multiethnic society. In a homogeneous society, national socialism would be ideal

Usually if you're going to claim some arbitrary high ground you at least try to use the correct words for what you're attempting to say.

Attached: 1536543678551.jpg (480x360, 37K)

Haha
Women...
The logic is so cherry picked to sound smart

this is some top tier faggotry congratulations

The only universal argument that is made about communism is death. Everyone dies under communism.

K

no, the argument isn't against the communist ideal, its describing what communism will inevitably become. it stalls out at the socialism stage when a nation's resources are being appropriated by the state 'for the people.' the state doesn't relinquish their power. this is babby tier shit ffs

As a person who was born under communism:

Why is it that white leftists in western countries are so easily fooled by this failed ideology even though it has so many instances of failure, and even though near everybody who was born under communism or socialism tells them that it's absolute shit?

I don't get why they choose to believe in something that has been proven to fail miserably and that so many people escaped from and warn about? Is it a death wish?

Based Ted

capitalism is fine
the government just needs to make sure that fat corporations are destroyed by allowing terror groups to target them and getting courts to move very very very slowly in prosecution

I'm interested please give me more info to read

Read uncle Ted's book

Attached: images(3).jpg (318x159, 7K)

She makes a up a hypothetical person and response just so she can make a fake gotcha post.
I bet she has a lot of cats and smells.

>USSR WAS REALLY CAPITALISM GUIS
Fucking niggers.

pic related applies to communism and socialism

Attached: XWcDQt2.jpg (1000x652, 24K)

I have never once heard someone attacking/criticizing communism phrase it even remotely close to how she presents it. I'm guessing the only time she has ever been presented with an argument against communism is when her socialist professor made a strawman that would be easy to argue against as an assignment.

The most common one sentence argument against communism I see is "Communism doesn't work because people aren't ants".

Remember that anti capitalism leftists are just weak sóyboys who get beat up by the proud boys

Attached: IndelibleDownrightBrownbear-max-1mb.gif (300x188, 725K)

I never noticed that but I have noticed that communists tend to rely on strawman like in the OP

my main criticism of communism is that it literally is not possible to maintain. even small hippie communes fail consistently, let alone nation states that approach the concept. there has never been a single communist nation, though many nations with castes and state capitalism and black/legal markets have called themselves "communist". to get actual communism to work you would need a state surveillance and security system almost as robust as the population itself, or else people will as they observably do naturally horde wealth/exploit the environment for wealth/form black markets/accept bribes etc. etc.

I suppose you could manage something like it with like a super complex automated security system on a national scale but then you're getting into some THX1138 shit and it's hard to call that communism. and such a hypothetical system can still be exploited.

capitalism isn't what people should be complaining about as much as corporate feudalism, which is what we seem to be diving into headfirst.

>National Socialism
No, we need full on Eco-Jihad to return humanity back to early agrarian tribal confederation

It’s different this time

Attached: 91C8472C-4824-4CC7-BDAC-F3B0E58A5CCF.gif (192x213, 1000K)

genetic engineering and artificial gestation experimentation on humans with a focus on cognitive augmentation and lifespan extension > somehow convincing everybody to LARP as hunter gatherers until we inevitably develop an advanced level of technology again or get wiped out by an asteroid

Kike trying to cripple us. Don't listen to this BS. The poor are better off in a capitalist society. I'm in capitalism, parents are dirt poor, still have status symbols and decent house. If you don't work, you don't get shit and that's the way it should be. But if you do anything at all, you live a decent life.

you weren't born under communism. you were born under a caste based state capitalist society with black markets and a redistribution system.

communism is impossible, and there has never been a communist nation for this reason. even if it was possible, it is conceptually dysgenic.

>we need bigger government

statists fuck off

>that's not real communism
t. Communism Has Never Been Tried

Then why are people from socialist countries fleeing their homeland to come to capitalist countries? Lmao

Attached: 415664D4-38B2-4728-AED4-E94E01FB8388.png (1107x424, 601K)

If you love communism so much why are you in Canada right now? Go back since its so great.

communism has been tried by hippies on a small scale. no actual attempt at communism has occurred in a nation state, and any actual attempt would be a shitshow because it is impossible. did you even read my post? communism isn't possible. it fails even on the level of hippie communes, and literally cannot function on a nation state scale.

name one communist country that has existed. that means no castes, no markets, no state trading.

Communism:

Full state control to no state control. It's inherently irrational.

No one has ever gotten past the 1st part, because guess what? No one will ever give up power.

Something being impossible to achieve does not make it impossible to attempt.

If I go outside and attempt to jump high enough to reach the moon that's me attempting the impossible.

Quit being stupid

>reading
pfffffffffffft

Based. We need third positionism.

you guys are really low IQ today. did you read my post? I literally said it has been attempted by hippies.

it has never once been attempted by a nation state. the very first thing every single nation state that has ever called itself "communist" has done is implement it's social caste that has access to a majority of the nation's wealth resources. literally step one.

an actual attempt at communism on a nation state scale would have zero cohesion because everyone would have to agree to some kind of code of conduct and somehow organize the infrastructure to redistribute materials and goods on a national scale while absolutely nobody takes advantage of the transition to amass wealth and power, internally or externally. the security and surveillance required to enforce such a system is ludicrous, so people would all have to magically agree or something. it literally is not possible on the scale of a nation state to attempt. and that's just discussing the attempt, if it was somehow magically implemented it would have to persist, and that's equally impossible. this is proven watching tiny hippie communes, all of which fail within a few decades.

>get elected
>employ socialist policies
>problems occur
>blame your competition
>get elected again
This game plan has worked for far longer than it has any right to.
Fuck Communists. Antifa is what foreign interference in American affairs actually looks like. Before them it was the hippies, too.

Attached: 1545770802094.gif (400x204, 44K)

Two things. One, they unironically think all those instances of socialist/communist countries becoming shit pits under brutal dictatorial governments weren't real communism/socialism, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the ideology that could be causing these results, and that they'll get it right this time. Two, each and every one of them thinks they'll land a cushy office job high up in the party as Minister of bull preparation and ethnic sex toy testing while all the lower class plebs they hate will be the ones starving to death in potato fields.

Attached: 1560457582927.jpg (640x358, 19K)

the reason is that literacy rates were abysmally low for literally thousands of years

FUCKING TELL THEM

So there has never existed a capitalist country either?

Just because a pure communist state has never magically appeared does not equate to no states ever attempting to become a communist country.

What you are describing just sounds like a kind of purity spiraling. Do you truly believe that it's either 100% communist or it's not communist at all on any level?

The only way it could be feasibly possible if an ethical, moral AI were developed that understood both human needs and the human propensity to take advantage when faced with scarcity alongside a richly developed automation system which enacted the processes by which humanity could be sustained. Even then, humanity would need to form cohesive tight knit groups with the moral understanding of caring for and providing for each other.

Orrr is it that communism killed 500,000,000

Over half of that is China alone

A quarter to a third of the Cambodian population

60,000,000 Christians directly under Bolsheviks

Etc etc etc

Also, capitalism is not an ideology it's the default and got its name from Communist 'intellectuals'
Kek

Wrong. In Capitalism a middle class exists, unlike Communism.

Also there is upward mobility under capitalism. Your only hope in a communist system is to be the kid of a general or high ranking party member.

B-b-but capitalism killed 100 million

So communists are capitalists now?