Divorce conundrum

If women and children are give the man’s income in the “life they’ve become accustomed”, shouldn’t the man get this from the wife as well?
Why do they get a percentage, rather than cost averaging necessities?
Why doesnt the man get his household taken care of and get sexually serviced in the “life he’s become accustomed” if this is the bar set for women and children?
I thought divorce was to cut ties?

Attached: 081D8BC6-1B78-4256-9BDC-619E234BF70E.jpg (350x350, 12K)

Just kill the bitch

That would seem like a last ditch response, when we could actually have equitable divorce laws. I’m trying to figure out the reasoning.

no see because you forget that we gave women the vote, they vote for liberal governments which create liberal laws and appoint liberal judges to enact those liberal laws

so no, the system isnt set up to be fair, its set up to benefit women because they vote more and vote for self interest only

men vote for what benefits society most, women vote for what benefits them the most

Wouldn’t it make sense to just part ways and just give some resources to the spouse until they start working? Then calculate what 50% of the kids costs would be instead of basing off the max if the guys income?

It's not about logic; it's about emotion.

I’m aware of the current system and why, but it would seem that no one is discussing the salient points that would at least expose this legislatively in today’s terms. It mught have made sense in the early 1900’s, but wouldn’t a “strong and independent” feminist lawmaker have difficulty arguing the position that women can’t get off their ass and work?

Yes, but arguing this legislatively might put the unfairness on full display. Why aren’t male legislators doing this? What is the reason for this not happening?

Sure, but arguing this point publicly would make the feminists have to squirm and admit the inherent imbalance. I want to see this exposure, and I can’t imagine there aren’t constituents who don’t want to see it either.

this
if every man who got divorce raped killed the whore who did it, divorce rape would cease to exist within a few months

>but it would seem that no one is discussing the salient points that would at least expose this legislatively in today’s terms.
that kind of thought and talking point is obviously misogynist and therefore sexist so enjoy having your social and economic prospects destroyed by the leftists hate mob on platforms you will be banned if you try to use.

>“strong and independent” feminist lawmaker have difficulty arguing the position that women can’t get off their ass and work
they will never have to make the argument, see above. you cant address the issue until you have dealt with the hurdles in place first.

i honestly do not see a solution other than to beat women into submission or to kill the progenitors of this ideology, aka JEWS, or wait until the west collapses under socialism and watch (((feminism))) be replaced by some sort of patriarchal system like islam

for all of the caucasians triumphs he has failed in the most important act of all: recognising the subversion of the jew and this will ultimately be our downfall.

The answer has been in front of you all the time:

Society despises married man. And deep down, always has. Think about it, a married man gives up his freedom and promises to essentially make a slave of himself in front of a woman’s family and his community in exchange for sexual access to a single woman.

Very few actions a man can take in this world are more pathetic than this, and society responds by essentially saying: you wanted to be enslaved? We can certainly manage that for you.

based leafposter.

Trips based Korean.

Society wouldn’t even exist without marriage.

...and?

Leftism is the reasoning. First and foremost, leftists organize and infiltrate. They’ve been doing it since before Scientology.

They implemented no-fault divorce and the entire family court system followed down the shitter.

>not protecting your assets with a dynasty trust
>and a prenup
>and getting married in a state with no alimony
a fool and his money...

Attached: 1551316336644.gif (463x698, 204K)

And now you know the reason for declining birthrates. The society is beginning to wither away until the inevitable collapse.

Trust me, redpilled the hard way. Married with kids. I just find it so hard to believe that the argument would fall on deaf ears by men in this day and age. I could imagine (much like a full debate on selective service) it would wake up many men as it is unassailable logic: service your man or get no money.

You're forgetting the part where the local courts are allowed to take a percentage of child support payments for themselves when the payment and payment amounts are effectuated by the courts. Sometimes it's just good old corrupt incentives that cause problems, not a particular demographic.

The Bible is so good.

Matthew 5:31-32
31 “It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ 32 But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Didn’t know that...shit. That explains a lot.