Cyberpunk 2020 (rulebook from 1988) predicted leftist agenda we have today

I've heard this idea before. Coincides with leftist talking points shifting from class consciousness to idpol almost overnight.

It's what happened. Bankers were starting to get scared, and since the CIA are run by the bankers, yeah (as well as the MSM).

They opened Pandora's Box, though, and out came the most destructive ideology created.

It's so accurate

>got the date wrong
because you're rehashing someone else's post from yesterday. this isn't reddit, there's no karma to whore yourself for.

>Consequently the leftist is never satisfied with the goals he has already attained; his need for the power process leads him always to pursue some new goal. The leftist wants equal opportunities for minorities. When that is attained he insists on statistical equality of achievement by minorities. And as long as anyone harbors in some corner of his mind a negative attitude toward some minority, the leftist has to re-educated him. And ethnic minorities are not enough; no one can be allowed to have a negative attitude toward homosexuals, disabled people, fat people, old people, ugly people, and on and on and on.

Attached: AR-705219964.jpg (394x524, 24K)

Interesting
This

No, because I actually simply just got the date wrong. Stop making hilarious conclusions based on whatever shit you saw yesterday. Everything was said here already I was proof-checking whether this was true and not yet another hoax. I found my old neo tribes cyberpunk rule book, looked it up and realized it was real. Plain and simple. Nothing more, nothing less. Also, your premise on "karma" is wrong as well. If I posted it merely for "karma", why would I post it here in the first place since (as you also realized, cpt. obvious) there is no karma to gain here? Your whole point, whatever it was, falls flat.

Imagine being this delusional to get some (You)s

ding ding ding ding ding ding ding

Attached: 1553148056813.gif (500x361, 1.79M)

All true except the without drugs part. Almost every US citizen is on drugs legal or otherwise right now.

>imagine still being this retarded despite what I just said.

Good job, imbecile.

Upload the ebook and post a download link.

Also this came up prior to occupy. The occupy movement before this plague hit it was a left wing carbon copy of the right wing tea party movement. This coming together toward a common enemy scared the fat cats shitless. But the tea party was hit with the “racist, bigot, sexist” shit that is hand in hand with the progressive stack. That was a few years before occupy. I was part of both movements before they went ape shit.

could probably find predictions of from the 19th century

of it*

It also predicted ancap memes.

Attached: Ancap Health Insurance.png (900x1698, 484K)

so you just randomly pulled 1988 out of your own asshole? "oops"
nothing about your original post even hints that you were verifying. that came after you were called out for being a copycat.
>you misunderstood me
>even though I *completely* neglected to mention that I didn't discover this
yes, it's generally difficult to understand people when they purposely misrepresent themselves.

unz.com/article/alexis-de-tocqueville-democracy-and-the-end-of-america/

Digital distribution is a big part of the conditioning. Charging for digital distribution or thinking that it is acceptable to charge for digital distribution is communist - see Karl Marx' labor theory of value. It also conditions people to pay for literally nothing, digital distribution has 0 scarcity and infinite supply. The company that is making the game has had a part, not nearly as big as Valve though, in normalizing paying for a download. Paying for digital distribution is nothing more than giving a donation to a company, they do not even have the decency to admit it, instead they push the "support the developer" mentality.
Only SJWs, the mentally ill, and/or brainwashed corporate drones pay for digital distribution or think it is acceptable.

also, here's the tweet that was in the thread yesterday, which is where "your" 1988 came from. dipshit.

Attached: 1560726165477.jpg (785x1200, 101K)

i had the finnish edition, but sadly i no longer possess it.

bigthink.com/scotty-hendricks/the-tocqueville-effect-and-why-well-always-find-new-controversies
>Tocqueville is suggesting that as conditions improve we become more offended by the remaining faults in our society. That we become more passionate about social justice as the severity of inequalities around us decreases-even if those remaining inequalities are of a lesser magnitude than previous ones.

Based table top nigger

Attached: DB1784A4-533D-483A-8F2A-A00D5144100C.jpg (853x1280, 938K)

Ant yet that's what CDPR did to the game

Attached: Cybertranny.png (959x1098, 531K)

But having these options for character creation makes perfect sense without the context of this setting. It's not like they've made another Medieval fantasy RPG with these options. One of the most pervasive themes of Cyberpunk media is the breakdown of identity.
It's honestly stunning that you could read the OP and then think that the developer quotes there aren't following the same lines. You've fallen into the exact same trap, so to speak, as the morons who wrote these headlines.

>Pic related. After going through my old Cyberpunk, rulebooks, I found this. It's from the Neo tribes rulebook (not the core rulebook!) for Cyberpunk 2020 (Pen-Paper game). It was released during 1995.

If you can read, then you would realize that I clearly said that it was from 1995. I only got it wrong in the title.

Try harder, faggot. Again, your whole point falls flat as soon as you claimed that I was here for karma, which obviously doesn't make sense, because then I wouldn't even have posted it here in the first place, brainlet.

>One of the most pervasive themes of Cyberpunk media is the breakdown of identity.

Absolutely true. Of course, this is no argument though that this degeneration, which currently prevails, is now legitimate, because the game developers reproduce this destruction of identity from the rulebook (i.e. adhere quite faithfully to the rulebook). In fact, even if the intention was to show that this degeneration and destruction of identity is bad (which probably was the idea on why it was in the rulebook in the first place, as a warning, more or less), it will be celebrated by SJWs and praised for being diverse. And thus, user is still right, that this will actually only push (along with any other kind of entertainment) exactly what the rulebook above said. Anarchy.