Re-judaizing Christianity

First 15 seconds. youtube.com/watch?v=0oDt8wWQsiA

You are literally having visions of Mary. Wtf more do you need to have faith. Do what she says lmao
99% of Christians haven't that's all I'm saying.

Oh joy, here comes the Catholic groaning.

Attached: 1529MartinLuther.jpg (971x977, 271K)

>muh jesuits
I think I'll go with E. Michael Jones than some wannabe pope francis, but thanks anyway

literally this

Drew Carey's devout brother

>protestant pretending he's better than a catholic

Attached: marty.jpg (680x272, 32K)

SSPX is the path, gentlemen...

Attached: 29540993_1534196516709570_1095531240364765453_n.jpg (670x503, 59K)

I don't think I'm better.
Just not a cry baby.

>Jesus : Don't lie
>Luther : Lying is okay when I like it

honestly this is how you defeat

You know where that quote comes from?
Max Lenz' writings on Luther, which were published three hundred years after Luther supposedly wrote them.

So they'll write about Jesus centuries afterward and you'll believe every word, but then someone writes about Martin centuries afterwards and it's all lies?

Attached: markmartin.jpg (824x329, 105K)

Bishop Barron is a borderline heretic who admires the great heretic Martin Luther

Absolutely entartet.

I'll have to look up those books
Because when I try the phrases all I get are gay Catholic websites that make me roll my eyes.

>Re-judaizing catholicism
So he wants to throw out half the NT where Paul (mostly, and a little Peter) specifically and repeatedly condemn those who try to insist Christians have to follow the old covenant?
The Vatican II sect isn't the Catholic Church
youtube.com/watch?v=z5w9RvyvI44

>Re-Judaizing an Abrahamic desert cult

Attached: l_2128.jpg (251x201, 9K)

>has gotten too much European culture
>says too many mean things about Jews

Is Vatican II ((()))?

Catholics do this, they shapeshift to steal converts, too bad they can't shapeshift in to Orthodox, ha!

t's pretty obvious that you didn't bother listening to what Father Barron was saying here, so allow me to Tl;DR:
What he is saying is that people have a tendency to view the God of the Old Testament (OT) as separate from Jesus in the New Testament (NT). They see the OT God has angry, Tribal, strict and Jesus as Merciful, kind, and nice (Nice Heresy). What Ftr. Barron is saying is that people should stop separating the two "separating him from his roots", he is saying that Jesus was not "nice" or excessively merciful. Jesus, like his father, condemned wickedness openly and loudly. He is saying that the OT God and Jesus are one and the same. That he will punish wickedness, that he condemns degeneracy in all of its forms, that we need to be reminded of that. He is pointing out that people misunderstand what the NT is really about. Listen to him talk about Paul and the Law. He points out that only certain elements of the law fell away, but the spirit of the law remains the same. Understanding the spirit of the law is the guidepost one uses in knowing what remains and what does not. God expects one to use logos to understand him..

The Church has become weak at dealing with heresy.

She is the Queen of Heaven. Do as she asks. Dedicate yourself to her and she will remove the effects of sin from you. Start saying the Rosary. It's 20 minutes per day.

>So they'll write about Jesus centuries afterward and you'll believe every word, but then someone writes about Martin centuries afterwards and it's all lies?
>By faith ALONE
Martin added the word ALONE to justify his heresies. That word is not in the original Latin or Greek. That should tell you all you need to know about (((Protestants)))

>She is the Queen of Heaven. Do as she asks.
And you wonder why we make fun of you.

Wonder when you are burning then

Is that the best you've got?
I know they don't teach you Catholic boys independent thought or debate.
But do try to think of something more clever would you please?

>t.(((a kike)))

>Everyone I don't like is a Kike
Oh, however will I sleep at night now that you have slandered my person.
The horror.

Your initial statement lacked any argument what-so-ever, yet you accuse me of doing what you yourself have done. That is pilpul and projection, kike. You argue like a jewish woman. Now fuck off. /qFs7vsCq/

You don't have to do any of the gay jewish bullshit including chopping off part of your dick -Galatians 4:20

>Your initial statement lacked any argument what-so-ever
Oh spare me you poor little Catholic feelings.
None of you can defend your beliefs without resorting to insults and childish little hissy fits.
It's so pathetic I actually have pity on you.

Vatican II in the 60s didn’t do enough damage?

Why would you mock the mother of God?

Except he's talking of "balance" instead of clear categories. To the extent he's teaching salvation by works, like the Jews attempted, he's wrong. To the extent he's saying that despite NT grace for salvation, we still need on earth legal codes ("White Sharia") that enforce godly morals - he's right.

Mother of Jesus you mean.
And I don't.
I mock this nonsense that Mary should be worshiped as Queen of Heaven.

>To the extent he's teaching salvation by works, like the Jews attempted, he's wrong
"Faith without works is dead"
>By faith ALONE
The word ALONE is not in the original greek or Latin. Martin added that word to justify his heresies. Stop believing Schofield kikes, user

>Queen of Heaven

Is a demon who was worshipped by idolatrous jews.

>" The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger. Do they provoke me to anger? saith the LORD: do they not provoke themselves to the confusion of their own faces? Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, mine anger and my fury shall be poured out upon this place, upon man, and upon beast, and upon the trees of the field, and upon the fruit of the ground; and it shall burn, and shall not be quenched." Jeremiah 7:18-20

>" Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, saying; Ye and your wives have both spoken with your mouths, and fulfilled with your hand, saying, We will surely perform our vows that we have vowed, to burn incense to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her: ye will surely accomplish your vows, and surely perform your vows. Therefore hear ye the word of the LORD, all Judah that dwell in the land of Egypt; Behold, I have sworn by my great name, saith the LORD, that my name shall no more be named in the mouth of any man of Judah in all the land of Egypt, saying, The Lord GOD liveth. Behold, I will watch over them for evil, and not for good: and all the men of Judah that are in the land of Egypt shall be consumed by the sword and by the famine, until there be an end of them." Jeremiah 44:25-27

Catholicucks are always sucking Jewish cock though. The Irish-American catholicucks were the ones always marching hand-in-hand with niggers and heebs. American Protestants are usually redpilled on the jewish question.

Just to add: If you truly believe and love God, then you must live the life as well. You can't just say "I believe" while resting on your laurels your whole life. If you believe then you will want to live a Christian life. That means works. God wants and calls on all of us to spread the "Good News". That doesn't mean that you need to travel around Africa converting natives or even bother going door to door, you can do it from your computer, much as I try to do sometimes. If God made you an introvert then God wants you to be an introvert, just as he hardened the heart of Pharaoh to his ends and softened the heart of Cyrus the Great to his ends. I myself was convinced to return to the Church by the Catholic Generals on this board, proving what an effective method it is. IF you love and believe then you must live the life, that means works. It takes more than just talk, you have to walk the walk. God will never put more on your plate than you can handle, but he will push your limits. He wants us to step out of our comfort zone for him.

wow! ben shapiro shilling life insurance. who would have thought?

According to ancient tradition and the sacred liturgy the main principle on which the royal dignity of Mary rests is without doubt her divine motherhood. In holy writ, concerning the son whom Mary will conceive, we read this sentence: “He shall be called the son of the most high, and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of David his father, and he shall reign in the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end,” and in addition Mary is called “Mother of the Lord,” from this it is easily concluded that she is a queen, since she bore a son who, at the very moment of his conception, because of the hypostatic union of the human nature with the Word, was also as man, king and lord of all things. So with complete justice St. John Damascene could write: “When she became mother of the creator, she truly became queen of every creature.” Likewise, it can be said that the heavenly voice of the Archangel Gabriel was the first to proclaim Mary’s royal office (Ad Caeli Reginam, 34).

Jeremiah 7:18:
>Do you not see what they are doing in the streets of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem? The children gather wood, the fathers kindle fire, and the women knead dough, to make cakes for the queen of heaven; and they pour out drink offerings to other gods, to provoke me to anger.

Geisler and MacKenzie comment:
To call Mary “Queen of Heaven,” knowing that this very phrase comes from an old pagan idolatrous cult condemned in the Bible (cf. Jer. 7:18), only invites the charge of Mariolatry. And Mariolatry is idolatry (p. 322).
I can certainly sympathize with their thinking here. I once thought the same. But the truth is: this text has absolutely nothing to do with the Blessed Mother as Queen of Heaven for at least three reasons:
Jeremiah here condemns the adoration of the Mesopotamian goddess Astarte (see Raymond Brown, S.S., Joseph Fitzmeyer, S.J., Roland E. Murphy, editors, The Jerome Biblical Commentary, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1968, p. 310). She is in no way related to Mary. In fact, “she” did not and does not exist in reality. Mary, on the other hand, was a real historical person who was—and is—a queen by virtue of the fact that her son was—and is—the king.
Jeremiah condemned offering sacrifice to “the queen of heaven.” In Scripture, we have many examples of the proper way we should honor great members of the kingdom of God. We give “double honor” to “elders who rule well” in the Church (1 Tim. 5:17). St. Paul tells us we should “esteem very highly” those who are “over [us] in the Lord” (1 Thess. 5:12-13). We sing praises to great members of the family of God who have gone before us (Psalm 45:17). We bow down to them with reverence (1 Kings 2:19). We carry out the work of the Lord in their names (Matt. 10:40-42, DRV), and more. But there is one thing we ought never to do: offer sacrifice to them. Offering sacrifice is tantamount to the adoration that is due God alone. And this is precisely what Jeremiah was condemning. The Catholic Church does not teach—and has never taught—that we should adore Mary (see CCC 2110-2114; Lumen Gentium 66-67; CCC 971).

>“When she became mother of the creator, she truly became queen of every creature.”
Odd thing that Jesus himself didn't seem to see her in any special light.
Because he treated her like any normal woman.
>Jesus' Mother and Brothers
>(Mark 3:31-35; Luke 8:19-21)
>46 While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him. 47 Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee. 48But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? 49 And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! 50 For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.

I will now add Revelation 12:1-2; 5; 17 to the mix in demonstrating Mary’s queenship:
And a great sign appeared in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; she was with child. . . . [S]he brought forth a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron, but her child was caught up to God and to his throne. . . . Then the dragon was angry with the woman, and went off to make war on the rest of her offspring, on those who keep the commandments of God and bear testimony to Jesus.
Here Mary is clearly depicted as a cosmic queen giving birth to both Christ and all Christians, all the while wearing her royal crown. She rules and reigns with her divine son at the center of the perennial battle between the kingdom of God and the kingdoms of this world in union with “the serpent” of old. These texts alone demonstrate Mary to be queen of the kingdom of Christ.

Psalm 45:1-9a prophesies in some detail about Christ the king:

My heart overflows with a goodly theme; I address my verses to the king… In your majesty ride forth victoriously for the cause of truth and to defend the right. . . . Your divine throne endures forever and ever. Your royal scepter is a scepter of equity; you love righteousness and hate wickedness. Therefore God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness above your fellows; your robes are all fragrant. . . . From ivory palaces stringed instruments make you glad; daughters of kings are among your ladies of honor.

In the New Testament, the inspired author of Hebrews 1:8-9 quotes verses 6-7 of this very text as referring to Christ, his divinity, and his kingship. But immediately following those verses is another, lesser-known, prophecy that speaks of Mary:

. . . [A]t your right hand stands the queen in gold of Ophir. Hear, O daughter, consider, and incline your ear; forget your people and your father’s house; and the king will desire your beauty. Since he is your lord, bow to him; the people of Tyre will sue your favor with gifts, the richest of the people with all kinds of wealth. The daughter of the king is decked in her chamber with gold-woven robes; in many-colored robes she is led to the king, with her virgin companions, her escort, in her train. With joy and gladness they are led along as they enter the palace of the king. Instead of your fathers shall be your sons; you will make them princes in all the earth. I will cause your name to be celebrated in all generations; therefore the peoples will praise you forever and ever (Heb. 9b-17).

Set in the context of a royal wedding, on the literal level this psalm referred to the king of Israel, likely Solomon, receiving a new bride, with his mother standing at his right to symbolize her power and authority. But on the spiritual level it refers to Christ and Mary. T.E. Bird says of this text:

But although the poem may have been written in honor of a royal wedding (probably Solomon’s), the inspired writer’s thoughts reach beyond the actual event; he sees a king fairer than an ordinary man (3), one whom he addresses as “God” (7,8), one whose throne is to remain forever (7), whose rule is to extend over the world. . . . It is not surprising, therefore, that Jews and Christians have seen here the espousals between the Messiah and his people. The Targum treats the Psalm as strictly Messianic; St. John Chrysostom could say that on this point Jews and Christians were agreed (PG 55, 183); St. Thomas Aquinas gives the Catholic interpretation: “The subject matter of this psalm is the espousals between Christ and the Church.” On feasts of the Blessed Virgin, the Psalm is recited as Matins; (10-16) are applied to her as the Spouse of the Holy Ghost and the Queen of Heaven (A Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture, p. 456).

Who is this woman of whom the Lord said, “I will cause your name to be celebrated in all generations; therefore the peoples will praise you forever and ever”? Not one of Solomon’s wives fit the prophetic description.

Most every Christian—indeed most of the world beyond Christendom—knows the name of the Mother of God—Mary—who in fulfillment of this prophetic text said, “All generations shall call me blessed” (Luke 1:48).

Happy nigger? Or are you to proud to hear the words of God?

>get saved by doing works, like a Jew
Thanks for the speech. And knowing all you know, it has earned you a spot in heaven? is that right, Mr Perfect? Otherwise please don't try to sell us a method of salvation that you can't guarantee has worked for you.

Based and savior-pilled.

Your pride is your sin, user. You choose to ignore the word of God because they aren't convenient for you. That is your problem. God does not care one iota what you think, he doesn't bargain or negotiate.

blah blah blah
Jesus rebuked the crazy lady that tried to sing Mary's praises:

>" And it came to pass, as he spake these things, a certain woman of the company lifted up her voice, and said unto him, Blessed is the womb that bare thee, and the paps which thou hast sucked. But he said, Yea rather, blessed are they that hear the word of God, and keep it." Luke 11:27-28

See also,

>" While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him. Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee. But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:46-50

Your shit is so out of context it's fucking laughable. You bend the word of God to match your heresy. You have pride. The word of God is the word of God. You have been given free will to hear it or not. You have clearly chosen not.

Dude, I know what you're doing but giving Catholics scripture is pointless.
They haven't even read the Bible for themselves or had a free thought before.

Jesus never called Mary his "mother" a single time. And whenever she asked him to do something he ignored her.

>John 19:25-29 New King James Version (NKJV)
Behold Your Mother
25 Now there stood by the cross of Jesus His mother, and His mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. 26 When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple whom He loved standing by, He said to His mother, “Woman, behold your son!” 27 Then He said to the disciple, “Behold your mother!” And from that hour that disciple took her to his own home.
Jesus was speaking to you and I as much as his disciple. You again choose to ignore the word of God for your selfish pride.

that's not true, she asked him to help at the wedding in cana when he turned water to wine.

youtube.com/watch?v=IP4G8_alAT4
I have shit to do. Cya later kike

They'll shape shift into anything if it's convenient.

All Semitic religions are crap

Attached: IMG_3643.png (922x920, 841K)

You are being visited by a demonic entity.

>He said to His mother, “Woman
He called her "woman" as he always did. He never called her his mother, not even once.

Jesus called Mary "woman" in that instance.

When she asked he rebuffed her, so then Mary turned and told the people to listen to Jesus directly and do what he told them.

>" And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim." John 2:2-7

Luther regretted separating

>I have shit to do
Yes, you're good works.

>" Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:" Philippians 3:8-9

>" But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away." Isaiah 64:6

Yes I know
But the Pope and dumbass Archbishops forced his hand with their sperging.

Roman Catholicism literally justifies its schism from the Orthodox Church on the basis of the supposedly supreme and infallible authority of the Pope. SSPX denies this authority. You are fucking Protestants LARPing as traditionalists.

I feel like almost nobody ITT (or in the comments for that matter) actually watched the video. He's basically just talking about the fulfillment of the original judaism via Christ. He's not talking about wanting to turn Christianity into rabbinic judaism.

>Go to the feast yourselves; I am not going up to this feast, for my time has not yet fully come.
>But after his brethren had gone up to the feast, then he also went up, not publicly but in private. (John 7:8,10)
Your kike on a stick is a liar himself

>The Vatican II sect isn't the Catholic Church
If Vatican II is not a valid council then you deny the authority of the Pope and the bishops, which completely invalidates your traditional faith, which is based on the rock of the supreme and infallible authority of the Pope

Christianity has always made weakness a virtue. These are just the fruits of 2000 years of Christianity.

>mother of God
This is a heresy. The third ecumenical council affirmed Mary as the Theotokos which means God-bearer, not Mother of God.

Why do Catholics always do this? When you win in an argument against them they always turn tail and run?

yup. very redpilled comment section too, particularly considering barron is mainstream

Attached: 1559915018594.png (1084x656, 283K)

>Roman Catholicism literally justifies its schism from the Orthodox Church on the basis of the supposedly supreme and infallible authority of the Pope.
Wrong

>SSPX denies this authority.
Wrong

For starters, it justifies """""its""""" schism on the basis of the infallibility of the Church founded by Peter. When the schism happened, papal infallibility was still a distant concept; the debate was primarily over papal primacy, not supremacy or infallibility (and even papal primacy as it would later become didn't really get going until the 13th century).

As for SSPX, they denounce the popular culture attached to the (mis)understanding of papal infallibility, however they recognize the infallibility of the pope on dogmatic matters spoken ex cathedra and they recognize the infallibility of the ordinary magisterium.

>Holy Mary Mother of God, pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen.

schizophrenia

Attached: CF949638-1861-444A-AFCE-9A6910538784.png (635x509, 343K)

>As for SSPX, they denounce the popular culture attached to the (mis)understanding of papal infallibility, however they recognize the infallibility of the pope on dogmatic matters spoken ex cathedra and they recognize the infallibility of the ordinary magisterium.
So you accept the Pope's authority when he changed church teaching a year ago regarding the death penalty?

...

This. She's the mother of God and the mother to all good Catholic Christians.

This guy isn't a Catholic, he's a Novus Ordo faggot.

>authority
Personally, I recognize his spiritual authority, yes. However, authority is not the same infallibility, and in this case infallibility isn't applicable since it wasn't proclaimed ex cathedra.

Also, if anyone here wants to see a real Catholic Bishop look up Bishop Richard Williamson, he's currently in Prison for denying the holohoax.
youtube.com/watch?v=QuRJAVCi5vs
Here he is talking about the Jew World Order:
youtube.com/watch?v=dZaJRIQ2-eU

>hurr durr I'm more Catholic than the Pope
The absolute state of Catholicism

Attached: IMG_1281.png (733x464, 59K)

Francis isn't a legitimate Pope. Benedict is the real Pope. Some might even argue that we haven't had a real Pope since Vatican II.

>In the apostolic constitution Fidei depositum, John Paul II declared that the Catechism of the Catholic Church is "a valid and legitimate instrument for ecclesial communion and a sure norm for teaching the faith"
Pope Francis changed the catechism regarding the death penalty. This is what the church teaches now. This is the Pope exercising his infallible authority (i.e. he's not merely expressing an opinion about the stock market, he is defining a teaching to be held by the whole church with respect to faith and morals):
>when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church

I just got an email from some usual spam mailer who mentions the pope's plan to push communism in Catholicism

Attached: 1535161364605.jpg (356x282, 31K)