Africa is a shithole

>implying Europe hasn't been pillaging Africa for centuries
>implying Europe is not doin everything it can to keep Africa a 3rd world shithole by destabilising any African country that dares speak of the ongoing theft
Nevermind

Attached: 1560440236374.png (576x528, 481K)

Actually forget "some", most parts of Africa barely have electricity.

When it's Europe or North America being imperialist they'll just deflect it on Jews, Russia or China.
Whites simultaneously commit crimes and play the victim.

Kek Japan and China were the same way, look at them now.

Attached: American Foreign Assistance to Africa - Eritrea - Nigeria - Egypt - Ethiopia.png (915x627, 317K)

This is still an ongoing matter, improvement will begin once the theft is stopped

Segundo
Implying all those foreign aids benefit the actual people. They'll go into the leader's pockets, civilians get none of that
And back in the day, human beings didn't have the industrial power they have now...ressources are stolen at 2000 times the speed

Colonization actually helped them. The weather is better for survival. It's corrupt because it's run by niggers.

Reminder that Africa had less people than Europe at the time of colonization, despite being several times larger. It was basically empty. There was literally nothing wrong with colonization. Also, whites are the reason there are more niggers alive today than ever before. Same with poos.

Africa (that is to say, sub-Saharan African) has had rich men in the past, such as Mansa Munsa, but the problem was that these men did almost nothing with the great wealth they were able to accumulate (in fact Munsa is famous for devaluing gold across all of Africa because he shamelessly showed it off to everyone by giving it to strangers in these ridiculously gaudy slave drives). They were a little smarter and a little more tactical than their neighbours, perhaps used Muslim introduced weapons, and then took over their competition. But fundamentally, he never achieved anything of real note, despite how the media attempts to prop him up; and that's the consistent case with most of the continent.

This isn't a taboo thing to acknowledge, though. Africa is a very hot, VERY large place, with tribes and kingdoms spread out across vast, dangerous, predator and disease ridden terrain and as such, is a realm built to quash innovation or abstract thinking, only survival and continuing to survive matters. If you're just smart enough to survive in Africa, then you're just smart enough.

I remember I saw someone on here a few years ago describe it pretty well: They're a hunter-gatherer people that were dragged kicking and screaming into the modern age when they just weren't ready for it. And now, they're an albatross around everybody's collective necks. Incidentally, if there WERE smart Africans, the Bantus probably genocided them, as Bantus did with most of the more peaceful African ethnicities.

Attached: literal kang.jpg (480x280, 49K)

A big factor is the evolution of intelligence in humans spreading in to the northern hemisphere. Not having access to food for 3-5 months of the year required long-term planning and in turn that probably came with thousands of other evolutionary adaptions in factors such as team work, sociability, organisattion, etc.

White imperialism has very little to do with African success (or lack thereof), though. Especially when one considers a fair amount of these Africans now live in societies conducive to making the most out of yourself.

Imagine how rich a man like Samuel L Jackson is in comparison to most Africans. Not saying this justifies imperialism, they should've been left alone, but I don't really see why white people should flagellate themselves for African colonialism when they've already been doing that for the last century.