Zyklon B?

I've heard arguments saying zyklon b would have been a really expensive and inefficient way to kill (((millions))) of jews, so it probably wasn't done that way. Or so I've heard.

I actually work in an industry that uses cyanide in massive quantities and am familiar with the dangers it poses when it gases off. Even very small concentrations in the air are fatal (although it takes like 10 minutes to fully die). So it seems pretty efficient to me.

Is there some other gas that would have been more efficient to holocaust with? Hydrogen cyanide is not a complicated or expensive compound to produce. Probably cheaper than bullets, honestly. So are the "Zyklon B is inefficient" arguments bogus or is there something I'm missing?

Attached: 20060524_208_600x411.jpg (600x411, 124K)

Other urls found in this thread:

atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp8-c2.pdf
npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5176177
sciencemadness.org/smwiki/index.php/Sodium_cyanide
hdot.org/debunking-denial/ab12-leuchter-report/#_ednref13
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Zyklon B was used to kill insects not poeple.
Because of the low supply by allied bombing alot of insects showed up and Zyklon B was used to exterminate them.
So in other words a Turkish holocaust.

iron poison would have been far more cost effective and quicker

zyklon B was just a delousing to reduce the spread of disease in the summer camps.

It would be most efficient to just kill them with machines. Like the pneumatic pistons that puncture a cow's skull and kill it instantly. No chemicals, bullets, are consumed. You just need a source of power for the air compressor. That is how you do efficiency.

Attached: 63472384234.jpg (3000x3000, 1003K)

Nazi Germany was the world leader in chemistry and had large stockpiles of battlefield grade lethal poison gasses and nerve agents. You'd think some of that would be used for the ultra important jew killing plan rather than an ad hoc arrangement using pesticides and diesel engine exhaust. Its yet another example of how the holohoax legend collapses upon further reflection.

I feel likw you're mangling two arguments together here. The allies bombing supply lines is part of the 'they starved to death' argument. Why would less supply mean more bugs and more access to zyklon b?

>Is there some other gas that would have been more efficient to holocaust with?

Dig ditches in the woods
Tie prisoner's hands, dump them in
Bulldoze dirt on top of them

Because of the poor conditions alot of Head lices showed up.

Welcome fellow goldminer\precious metals recovery guy.