Top Living Philosophers

I did several searches for the worlds top living philosophers and Molyneux never came up anywhere. What gives?

Attached: mulyneux.jpg (225x225, 5K)

>The female orgasm is a myth invented by marxists to destabilize the nuclear famil
100% truth. thots just want everything men have. they want an orgasm only because men have it. i've fucked many women and all of them try to simulate the extreme pleasure from sex, while clearly it's just a bunch of bad acting(gets on my nerves when they are too laud, especially when a bitch starts yelling "i want to cum" ffs bitch you're not gonna cum.. stop larping)

also, i assume women may feel pleasure from sex but it's more of a tactile type of pleasure similar to sensations from a back rub. it may feel nice, but it's nothing to orgasm about. also women feel pleasure from pain. on multiple occasions they asked me to beat them or to pinch'em or twist their nipples really hard. the same shit with anal for women, they just want to be fucked in the ass for the feeling of pain or something like that. in general sex for women is mostly about feeling pain and feeling wanted. it has nothing to do with orgasms or anything like that. they would fake whatever they think is appealing to men. also they will fake horror or being rape or insulted. women have to fake everything(appearance also) because their original form is devalued after they hit 20y.o.

for survival women have to depend on how much attention they get from men. so they act to get attention.
women are bad actresses. even on pro level in the movies - nowhere close to being as good as men. when i see women awarded for acting it makes me laugh. it's like giving retards prizes for participation.

the same shit is with female orgasm. a women would award herself with a larping orgasm pretending that she's satisfied, so she could larp as if she's the judge for male performance. it's ridiculous. it's makes me laugh on the inside when these bitches tell me "hey i came with you so hard" like it's suppose to be some kind of an award for me ahahahaha.

women are all a part of mentally and physically challenged olympics.

Obvious.

Attached: RIR-170303-watermark.jpg (1920x1080, 1.76M)

He isn't a philospher.
All he ever says is "Not an argument" over & over

this

It isn't his fault that you don't understand what logical fallacies are.

gr8 pasta my friend

>He isn't a philospher.
Not sure about that skip.

Is there a ministry of philosophy that hands out badges to philosophers now?

The top ten are all Zizek. After that and a dozen academics, then you get to your youtubers

Yep, it's called the democratic party.

Even the commie zizek is more a philosopher than this twat. He's just a laughable youtube celebrity that likes to trigger the libs

His mom beat him and now he's eternally hating on women

:3

Ryan Faulk has BTFO zizeck and all conventional philosophers.

Radical Empiricism is the truth bitch.

Not an argument faggot
Kill yourself

Attached: Used to be a Goddess.jpg (800x1204, 135K)

Molymeme is a kike
saged

Didn't he literally think you couldn't perform an organ transplant between two people of different races?

>I don't listen to people who are more than 25% Jewish, because whatever they say can't possibly be true.

>that time he got triggered by his spagetti hoops for having female superheroes on front despite the fact the campaign they were running also included batman etc.

Attached: C8lrdqcXkAA1eV0.jpg (749x966, 138K)

there are two types of philosophy
-political philosophy which is mostly sophistic and driven by whatever is appealing to certain groups of people. it's a philosophy that's is not of truth but of mind control and social engineering. in essence, political philosophy is nothing but a bunch of schools that try to come up with the best excuse for why one should serve. essentially political philosophy is trying to justify slavery. that's what it's all about

then there is
-empirical philosophy, which is a contemplation about what has been experienced and giving it values on the empirical scale. empirical philosophy is very complex and publicly unappealing, it deals with uncomfortable truths, it clearly defines weakness and strengths, it's not debatable. the only dialogue that is possible in empirical philosophy is one of complimentary thoughts. empirical philosophy corrects itself by practice and experience. it's impossible to refute an empirical philosopher by critique. empirical philosophy is very rare. almost never would you encounter an actual empirical philosopher speak publicly, since an empirical philosopher considers the public to be unworthy of being addressed. usually empirical philosophers would make short public statements and retire back into shadows. empirical philosophy is the ultimate trolling of the clown world.

then there is one more.. the rarest
-divine philosophy, which deals with fundamental values of judgement. it's the most secret art
i do not wish to explain anything about it, since you wouldn't be able to comprehend of it
only the chosen are introduced to such philosophy.

Philosophy is study of fundamental questions, not promotion of free market and occasional mildly philosophical questions of counseling. Dr. Phil also does counseling, is he also a philosopher?

Google bases their results on interest fag

If Moneyjew is a philosopher then I'm an illuminated poet guru.

Attached: 14f17i.jpg (804x446, 55K)

Man is free when he is free in his Volk, and when it is free in its realm. Man is free when he is part of a concrete collective will, which takes responsibility for its history. Only reality can decide whether such a collective will exist, a will that binds men and endows their private existence with historical meaning.

Attached: thinking statue.jpg (278x182, 17K)