Why are Georgians chimping out?
Russia/Georgia conflict
Other urls found in this thread:
>chimping out?
>incorrect usage of "internet word"
normie detected. thread ignored
youtube.com
hurr durr, he sat in the wrong chair
that's a textbook chimpout, burger
aaaand thread closed on grounds of stupidity on your part.
so you know, i typically ignore people who are clearly just using "internet words" to gain attention. and this one also is coupled with white guilt where you're doing the stupid "look i said something you dislike about black people about white people, you must now dismantle all the damage i FEEL you've done in the past and damage yourself and declare me the winner of this topic. HAHA! dumbasses! i am very smart, don't mess with me"
cringe dude
Georgians are not white
Although I guess compared to 56% land, they kind of are so I can understand your confusion
My first guess would be neocons stirring shit up on another front, but that's without knowing any details.
Why the fuck USA and Southern Europe exist?
NZ on the ropes.
Hawaii > NZ
sheep shaggers just got #rekt
Saakashvili’s old party(our ex ex president) is trying to come back in power they basically capitalized on what happened to blame the government that they were in cahoots with the Russians.
During the first protest there were people who were genuinely simply protesting but saakashvilis party tried to escalate the situation by chimping out/attacking the riot police then their leaders ran away letting the people fight and played the victim card to again blame the government.
Anyhow there are parliamentary elections in 2020 and they’re trying to win since only like maybe 30-35% of the population vote for them.
As for Putin’s decision that’s pretty hilarious they even have vatniks spread misinformation that their tourists are in danger or whatever when last year we had like 1.4 million russian tourists and there sure as hell weren’t cases of discrimination or whatever. The so called protests that saakashvili’s party is trying to maintain doesn’t even have that many people in the first place maybe a couple of thousand which are mostly their drones.
So are Georgians chimping out at Russia? Nope, what’s wrong with saying the truth that 20% of your territory is occupied?
Is there a power struggle behind the scenes which is the main cause of what’s really happening? Yes.
woah what a beautiful looking world. All issues are fixed
lol I'll never forget one morning listening to Saakashvili do an interview with Glenn Beck and Glenn is all like
>oh you're so great
>we all love you
>putin is so evil
and I'm just sitting there wondering wtf is this supposed to be about nobody even knows there's a country on the other side of the world called georgia
That was shortly before Putin had to start rolling the nukes in to make the neocons quit it.
I hear Atlanta is burning
dugin in his book foundations of geopolitics said that russia needs a land corridor to armenia.
The Caucasus itself consists of two geopolitical levels:
Northern Caucasus and the territory of three Caucasian republics - Georgia, Armenia
and Azerbaijan. Alongside this sector is the area of Russian land of
to Taganrog to Astrahan, that is to say, all the Russian lands located between
The Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, where the Kalmucia space also enters.
The entire region is an extremely important strategic hub,
because the peoples living here have a very high social dynamic, they have
ancient geopolitical traditions, and the region borders with Atlantic
which in turn controls from a strategic point of view the border area,
area which from the point of view of the relief belongs to a unitary space of
the Caucasus Mountains.
It is one of the most vulnerable points of the geopolitical space
Russian and it is no coincidence that these territories were, traditionally,
the arena of fierce wars between Russia - the heartland and the rimland-
- Turkey and Iran. Control over the Caucasus opens, at first glance,
the exit to the "warm seas", and each move (even the smallest)
the frontier to the south (or to the north) means a substantial gain (or
loss) of the whole continental force, telurocratia.
The three horizontal layers of this region - the Russian lands,
The North Caucasus of Russia and the Caucasus themselves - have, of
also, their continued potential, to the south. This additional cord,
purely potential, not only beyond the borders of Russia, but also of
CIS consists of South Azerbaijan (located in Iran)
and the northern districts of Turkey, which to a large extent are populated by
Kurds and Armenians. This region, like the Caucasus ethnicities that enter (or have entered) Russia, presents the same for Turkey and Iran
ethnocultural issue.
Therefore, there are all objective premises
to extend continental influence to the depth of the Caucasus area.
So, between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea is highlighted
four layers or levels that require an approach from the Center
differentiated.
The first layer, Russian proper, must be fully unified
Latitude orientation, creating a tough construction Rostov-on-Don-
Volgograd-Astrakhan. This is a link of the greatest importance
for the Russian space as a whole, as it lies on the north side
Central Russia, and more to the north - to Arhanghelsk - the most important port
of the North and the potential capital of the "Northern Trapeze". Given the distances
relatively small compared to the European central, then compact population
and the technical development of the triangle Rostov-on-Don-
Volgograd-Astrahan is Russia's most important outpost in the South. It is
a kind of substitution for the Eurasian Center, a sub-center connected to the spaces
peripherals through an uninterrupted territory. That is why the region must
to become the geopolitical core of the entire Caucasian strategy of Eurasia, and
for this purpose it is necessary to strengthen it strategically and technologically
and intellectual. It is desirable to create here an integrated, integrated Russian area
from an administrative and political point of view.
At the same time, some problems arise with the northern districts of Kalmucia,
which are very sparsely populated. It makes sense that these northern regions of the steppe
be included in a common integration area, stretching them out of the way
from the geopolitical point of view, right between Rostov-on-Don and Astrahan, for
close the triangle at the bottom, with the tip in Volgograd. In this way
geographically and geopolitically, the boundaries will be reproduced
Ancient Khazaria that was under control at the beginning of the first millennium,
the whole region.
This geopolitical structure can be called conventional
The "Khazar triangle".
On the transition from the purely Russian area of the "Khazar Triangle", which
it must evolve according to the latitude (horizontal) logic, although it is tight
connected with the North and the Center (with Moscow), the integration vector is changing
radically the character. The entire North Caucasus and everything else located south
by him, must be subordinated exclusively to the oriental orientation.
The strategic centers of the "Khazar Triangle" have to develop some
independent geopolitical chains, which would go just south. namely
from Rostov, through Krasnodar, to Maikop, Suhumi, and Batumi. From Stavropol
towards Kislovodsk, Nalcik, Ordzhonikidze, Ţinvali and Tbilisi. And in Astrahan
towards Mahacala.
Any latitude delimitation of the ethnic regions of
Transcaucasia, and the longitudinal integration - on the contrary, must be strengthened.
Therefore, it is important to break apart, by any means, the separatist Chechnya,
very active, by Daghestan (and Ingushetia), closing the exit to the Sea
Caspian. If we leave Chechnya only Georgia, located in the south,
then it will be controlled from geopolitical point of view on all sides
and so it could also be directed from Orthodox Georgia. Dagestan and
Ingush must be attached partly to Georgia, which would lead to the creation of a
autonomous areas in the northern Caucasus, economically developed, but located
under the overall strategic control of Russia and the Eurasian oriented. redistribution
general of the North Caucasus could also solve the osetine problem,
because new ethnic structures (for example, united Ossetia) would lose their meaning
of national-state formations, acquiring a purely ethnic and cultural, linguistic one
and religious. Following the same logical logic, it is important to tie
Abkhazia directly from Russia.
All of these steps are geared towards a single geopolitical purpose -
the strengthening of the Eurasian Telurocratic Complex and the preparation of its triumph
Planetary on Atlantism.
That is why this plan can be called "new
geopolitical order in the Caucasus ". This plan involves giving up the attitude
traditional to the existing political formations as "nation-states", that is
fixed administrative structures, with permanent status and a power structure
full. "New geopolitical order in the Caucasus" implies a re-division
total of the existing political realities and the transition from the model of the state-
state or nation-nation to a peripheral-center system - peripheral structure
it must also be determined not by a political differentiation, but by one
ethnocultural.
This can be done with a plan to create the "Federation
Caucasian "which would include both the three Caucasian republics of the CIS
and autonomous formations within Russia. At the same time, the Center would give up
of this region the cultural-economic autarchy, but would provide a centralism
strategically extremely tough. This would lead to a flexible system,
which would not be based on violence, occupation or uniformity of diversity
Caucasian, but on the understanding of the common continental destiny.
A special geopolitical role is played by Armenia, a traditional ally
and hope of Russia in the Caucasus. Armenia serves as the strategic base of
the greatest importance for preventing Turkish expansion to the north
and east - in the regions of the Turkish Central Asia. On the contrary, under
offensive geopolitical aspect, it is important in its quality of community
ethnocultural, which extends continuously to the south, on the territory of Turkey,
where is a considerable part of ancient Armenia and its most holy place
- Mount Ararat. At the same time, it is extremely important to create a corridor
which would cross the Caucasus and link Armenia to the "triangle
Khazar ".
Armenia is also important from another point of view. basing
focusing on ethnic and historical proximity to Iran, Armenia could
be one of the main links in the spread of the Eurasian impulse
from the Center to the Iranian rimland. This means creating the axis
Moscow-Yerevan-Tehran.
Iran (in no case Turkey) should also be associated with Azerbaijan,
accentuating the sympathy, ethnic alignment of Iranian Southern Azerbaijan
and their historical ties. In this way, the Moscow-Tehran strategic ray
through Yerevan, which is of the greatest importance, would double by radius
Moscow-Baku-Tehran, forming a diamond in many symmetrical terms
with the Balkan one. In general, there is a lot between the Balkans and the Caucasus
parallel geopolitics. The main thing is that here is the most
clear the action of the most important geopolitical law - the latitude processes
causes terrible conflicts, and meridional links lead to stability
balance. This manifested itself quite expressively during the war
from Yugoslavia and the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan on
Karabakhul de Munte. The problem of Karabakh is similar to the problem
Macedonia. That is precisely why, to stabilize this region, Moscow
must establish with Karabakh the most direct links for this
territory become a point of equilibrium of the Caucasian geopolitical system.
To this end, four parties have to participate in the negotiations with Karabakh:
Azerbaijan, Armenia, Russia and Iran, with the exception of Atlantic participants, a
whose political presence in the region is unnecessary for geopolitical reasons.
Cry harder, pussy
Putin is a kikeloving Ottoman rapebaby
Someone insulted their Grandma's Khachapuri.
not normie, russina shill
litva flag is fooling noone, say hello to Peterburg troll factory for me son
Georgia today
looks like faggots to me. they should stop whining about losing territories that like nail fungus better than the idea of being part of georgia