Take IQ test at test.mensa.no, then post the result and if you believe in human caused climate change. You can believe it has been politicised and exaggerated to incentivise change but I seriously doubt anybody who isn’t a brainlet with a sub 120 IQ outright denies it
Take IQ test at , then post the result and if you believe in human caused climate change...
It was never about climate change, it's about the grand solar minimum. Prepare for deathly storms and erratic temperature level.
120iq
>brainlet
Op we know who the real brainlet is here
prove to me that given trillions of dollars and unlimited power you can control the climate. we can work backwards once you've done that
>Online IQ tests
This is surely accurate and trustworthy.
How do you think electromagnetic pollution has affected global climate? Ho long does the energy emitted by the world's millions of Cell towers and wifi spots exist in the atmosphere? Consider the quanta of energy added to the atmosphere since the burgeoning of this tech 20 years ago... can EMF's created by these energetic impulses which are strong enough to activate electronic circuitry at substantial distances not also have influence on how weather patterns develop?
What does it take for clouds to form? Can you see how skies now become overcast when there is no organic reason they should such as humidity or temperature? can these EMF's generated by the immense quanta of energy coming from global cell systems not manufacture conditions for cloud forming which leads to increasing persistence of CO2 emissions?
Anyone who has looked at the science beyond the fundamental principles realizes it's utter nonsense. The lack of reliable historical data effectively makes long-term modeling garbage (as has already been proven, hence the shift from "global warming" to "global cooling" to the more result-agnostic "climate change").
Does the Earth's climate change? Absolutely, significant shifts in mean temperature (far in excess of what we've seen since the "global warming" conspiracy became mainstream) have happened in the past irrespective of human involvement. Does human pollution have an effect on local climate? Possibly, but we should be far more concerned about environmental toxicity than minor, temporary shifts in climate. Should we be more more concerned about climate change from the Grand Solar Minimum than some man-made boogeyman? Absolutely.
"Climate change" is a Jewish scam meant to bilk Western governments out of trillions of dollars while giving nebulous, unelected (((regulatory bodies))) greater control on global industrial development and demoralizing millennials from reproducing. The only worthwhile thing Trump has done was pulling us out the (((Paris Accord))).
>t. 134 IQ
115-120 is the average IQ of a college student. Considering how this mean is dragged down by liberal art majors, I think it’s fair to call anything below 120 brainlet
We can lower emission and perform patchwork solutions in the hopes that it buys us time to conceive real solutions
76°F IQ
Climate changes
Humans affect environment
Humans cause climate to change at least a little bit
they have absolutely no idea what actually causes it. yes humans make an impact but it's insignificant. iq 133.
As long as I'm above average I'm happy
Quick question, all the carbon that's released when we burn coal and oil, where did it come from?
fpbp
I did that one before and got 133, and I essentially deny it.
It might have a minuscule effect, but there is no way it does anything of note.
It's literally just refracting light, and only of a particular wavelength.
Thats all.
you will SUBMIT to the WASP
>135 IQ
it has been politicised and exaggerated so asking whether somebody "believes in climate change" is meaningless
the environment is fucked due to overpopulation and solar panels won't solve our problems. targeted biological warfare is probably the only solution at this point
Lol cope harder retard, I bet your IQ is below 107
Reminder: The left has been in full damage control mode since the announcement of the next solar cycle's forecast by NASA. It will be weaker than the dalton minimum, which killed millions through drought, floods, famine and war. The next cycle will be the weakest in 200 years. There's no denying it any longer, our midwest is being flooded and they also said this minimum will last for another 5-6 years, which will mean deadly repercussions for america and the world as a whole. They can no longer maintain their narrative, but try they will. Zharkova will be releasing her work soon to only confirm in further depth what is about to happen.
nasa.gov
youtube.com
IQ tests are meaningless. Plenty of autistic worthless fucks can score highly in them.
>Reminder: The left has been in full damage control mode since the announcement of the next solar cycle's forecast by NASA
it was not my proudest sentence bong
fuck off ecofaggot
>human caused climate change.
not even possible, and your faggot site doesnt even use this term surprise
I got 108, but I also got tired of the shapes and lines bullshit and guessed through the last half.
i doubt humans created it
its being politicized and normalized as the truth for economical and political reasons
Sure the Earth is warming but there's a lot of alarmism going around. I think it's partly the fault of scientists trying to get further funding and a revenue-hungry state willing to push a carbon tax. Not to mention that "going green" has become a cultural trend and tons of corporate marketing has gone in this direction
>I also got tired of the shapes and lines bullshit and guessed through the last half.
Means you're either really stupid or really smart
Humans caused it but not by material pollution (CO2, etc.)
>Take IQ test at test.mensa.no
No thanks, already took the WAIS test a few years ago.
>if you believe in human caused climate change
No, that is factually incorrect. Humans influence climate change but we don't cause it.
I believe it is happening, but part of it is because of natural causes and like 1/3-1/2 is from Asia being fucking retarded... Let's just nuke China, that should fix it
do it and post
It's almost as if we've read about that somewhere before... could it be the book of revelations?
It's too soon to talk about climate change. We need 5,000 years worth of data after the alleged start of man made climate change to see if it's climate or just weather fluctuations. Even then, we won't be able to tell if it's man made.
I did the actual paid for Mensa entrance exam earlier this year and got an IQ of 155. I'm still waiting for the full report.
Intelligent people are just as capable of believing retarded shit. Political acuity is a learned skillset, not something that intelligent people just 'possess'. Smart people will learn how politics works faster, but an idiot and a smart person who have both not studied will operate on the same level.
That said, to answer your question, climate change is real, bad for humans overall, and humans are causing it.
All of the climate change deniers who were open to being persuaded by rational argument and facts have already been convinced, so the only climate change deniers who remain are conspiratorial nutcases and those with a vested interest in denial. Fortunately the numbers of these people are small enough that they can be ignored as the world gets on with the job of finding solutions.
Go flog yourself Eurocuck while the chinks burn coal and dump chemical waste into rivers.
170iq brave user
You retarded fucking faggots know this is a complete meme test right? Go ahead and type random answers in the quiz and see for yourself.
>take this test goy
>climate change blah blah *gargle*, gargle*
kys
Sahara Desert Was Once Lush and Populated
livescience.com
See what those SUV driving ancient Egyptians did to the Sahara.
No one argues that the "climate change" is not real. It is the cause of that change that is up for debate.
Take your own advice. This is with random answers.
you will never go below 100 in this test
Yeah you're fucking retarded. Thanks for proving my point though.
Your concept is flawed from the beginning.
>explosion of plant life.
>absorb massive amounts of co2 and release oxygen
>OMG!! Climate change!!!!
There is nothing stable about this planet, it is constantly shifting from one extreme to another.
It has been doing this for billions of years before we arrived and will continue to do so for billions of years after we are gone.
Are you sure about that?
Yup. This is how I always gauge IQ tests.
This one: six choices per question. Answered totally randomly, without looking at the questions or the answers. Took all of fifteen seconds to click through the whole test. Here's the result. Looks like it's one of those tests designed to get you to buy something else (in this case: a real IQ test by Norway's chapter of Mensa).
60IQ
I believe in man-made climate change. Giving more money to national governments is the only way to stop it!
This
How did you manage that? Did you go for deliberately wrong answers? Check , that's what I got with random/blind answers.
Don't know why the 130 IQ geniuses never thought to see if what they're taking is legitimate.
I deliberately answered the first 15 questions wrong and then random for the rest. I figured 15 deliberately wrong answers would be enough to drag the score down without having to sit through the whole test. was my random answer attempt.
It seems to me that this test is 'calibrated' for 'smart people' in that it expects people of average intelligence to get a lot of answers wrong. But any test that involves an intellectual task will correlate with IQ because IQ measures your ability to perform intellectual tasks.
42 IQ
I believe the evil white man did climate change
>climate change isn't real
>literally can't drink water anymore without ingesting microplastics
to be fair, they just dont want you to think that you are retarded
did you really get that result, i doubt that,
Do you think it would go in-depth enough to measure how incorrect an answer is? Like perhaps a specific answer is wrong but another answer is more incorrect and gives less points?
Plastic is just another name for polymer, you dumbshit
I have no way to prove that I did legitimately get that result.
I have no idea. I'd assume not though, mostly because I've never heard of any IQ test doing that. I also don't think that level of depth is necessary to give an accurate-enough score. If you're smart you will (probably/in theory) get enough questions right to get a high score regardless of if the ones you get wrong you get very wrong or only a little bit wrong.
It takes a high iq to know that global warming is bullshit for 30 years
>post to facebook
proof this is a fake test
>Plastic is just another name for polymer
- American education
That's fair, it's most likely to prevent retards from killing themselves after looking at their scores so it only goes so low. Either that or they're just trying to erase that nogs will score lower than the white average
Human climate change is a scam to make people stop consuming gasoline to run the oil industry into the ground making it obsolete, affectively bankrupting the middle east and giving israel an easy target. 4d chess bros
>College Students
>avg 115-120 IQ
I find this hard to believe as I met some mighty retarded individuals in my days as a student. That is unless you are referring to STEM students.
>It seems to me that this test is 'calibrated' for 'smart people'
No, all online "IQ tests" are calibrated for people dumb enough to buy some "official certificate".
CLIMATE CHANGE IS CAUSED BY GERMANS
KILL ALL GERMANS, STOP THE GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE
135
I do not believe in man made climate change
136 (DoD tested), and I also think AGW is blatantly false.
Global Warming is real
89
it's fake
i have the same result lol
My IQ may only be 87, but I know for a fact that it's fake. You don't need a big brain to figure out something so obvious. The climate changes by like 15 degrees from day to night and these frauds actually think that 1 degree is a big deal?
you want the rainbow pill on climate change? Humans have expelled carbon in the sense that there is more there than there was before we were able to produce it. But its actually a non-factor in effecting the weather.
it makes sense
>post the result
140
>and if you believe in human caused climate change
yes
Fuck off leaf. You never said anything about 20 dollars. The test was easy though
I honestly can't say because I've never bothered to try and understand it beyond 'greenhouse grasses block sun rays in the atmosphere for too long' which sounds like BS to me because that would mean they also REFLECT sunlight
Also I know that countries like China fund green parties in western nations to destroy industrial competition
Also fuck niggers
>136 (DoD tested)
DoD "corrects" IQ scores to compensate for all the niggers that take their test.
You're 120 tops.
Take a hike
Its not the sunlight they are keeping in its infrared radiation generated by the sunlight heating the earth.
141
Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fact
Imagine having only 140 IQ
Anything that requires energy produces heat.
Really boggles the noggin when you begin to consider that the more power you produce the more heat you produce.
that's ok I guess
>IQ too high for this feeble test to measure
Academia blown the fuck out.
My issue with climate change is "climate crusaders" refuse to tell me what % of climate change is directly the result of human interference. Considering a volcano can burp out more c02 in an hour than humans have injected into the atmosphere in 100 years... it presents a huge issue.
I'd rather focus on more significant problems... like the giant island of plastic in the ocean, or us exporting our pollution to other economies like Asia etc. It's a multi-faceted problem, and it can't be solved just by blaming fossil fuels.
There's a huge supply chain involved and the energy required for the production of green energy just exacerbates the problem.
Oh and lets not forget us essentially bleaching the life from our soil with pesticides etc.
and I believe that although climate change is cyclical and inevitable, humanity has contributed to accelerate the changes in the current cycle
The Earth's climate has changed constantly since it's had an atmosphere. It fluctuated wildly before life existed and will continue long after it's all gone.
>I'm too dumb to look something up, therefore it doesn't exist
>Considering a volcano can burp out more c02 in an hour than humans have injected into the atmosphere in 100 years
More retardation
Did all random answers and got a 91, so it can go under a 100.
Doubt that is accurate, but guaranteed the one I was involved in was not one of those. (I refuse to ever retest, in case I score lower.)
IQ tests = autism diagnosis tests
Global warming is bullshit, a socialist doomsday scenario, a religion for semitarded secularists too stupid to realise that they have replaced religion with the state
Bong scores bullseye.
No, it's bullshit
Source: I studied climate science for 3 years
123
I believe it is possible, but I am not convinced that it is real, given the fact that 90% of scientific studies are funded by 7 corporations. Of these, nearly all are Judaized. So why should I put any faith in what "the experts" tell me I should believe?
I got 110, 114 when I did my GED.