Should monarchies still be allowed?

Attached: 10e47feaa32fbaf6bb62cdca62d9a0a0.1000x563x1.jpg (1000x563, 65K)

The problem is that this old bitch has been around so long, that the UK hasn't had a proper king since the 50s.

Notice how in the 60s, Britain led the degeneracy movement with their music industry.

They serve no purpose than themselves.
Outlaw them.

Monarchies dont need consent to exist.
That's the perk of being a monarchy

My grandfather had a Ford monarch.
was a great car in the 1960's
A to the Z muthafukka

The only country with a monarchy. And the post says they are shit. And retarded Cletuses from the New World say they love it. It REALLY makes you think...

this guy gets it

absolute monarchy is the last way forward user

NO, LETS CUT 'IS HEAD OFF.

Attached: 1557872695157.jpg (839x711, 77K)

You got a better idea you Monarchless cuck?

Hobbes user, british monarchy is not true monarchy because the crown is not the state
Only when the crown the state and the economy are the same we can fight off the juden

I like monarchy in theory but hate every current monarch, all content or actively participating in the subversion of their countries
Also Punk is gigacringe

we have a monarch hes just not in power for the time being
SOON

Love how the British Monarchy is getting Nigrified to the Delight of Soros jews

Based. Finally someone who has actually read Hobbes. Monarchy is literally the best system of creating a stabile state, there was always great chaos when the Regent ruled, every other ideology is a very long regency

Attached: monarchism.jpg (640x223, 49K)

Do you think the British monarchy will survive when Scotland leaves after the no-deal Brexit? Will Scotland retain a personal union or will they go republic? Could they elect a Scottish king?

>Will Scotland retain a personal union or will they go republic?
>Scotland
>a republic
>Scotland
>its own king
Lmao. Google Berwick upon Tweed and find out why its population is lower now than in the 10th century.

Attached: Edward I.jpg (151x295, 13K)

Care to elaborate, friend?

Redpill me

Alright, I will tell you why an hereditary monarchy is the most natural and best system of governance

1. The King is tied to the nation. The Kings children will inherit the nation, this makes the King more likely to make the state stronger. Whilst a politician who is elected could screw and plunder the nation because his children will not inherit it, so the future wellbeing of the nation matters far less to the leader.

2. The Child is trained for the leadership position his entire life. Whilst a politician rarely have this advantage, the child of the monarch grows up with the knowledge he will lead the nation, this makes them better leaders.

3. The ruler ship is far less disputed. Anyone can be leader in a democracy or non-hereditary dictatorship, this leads to rampant intrigue and scheming, whilst a clear law set in place on who the monarch is, leads to a far more stable nation.

The only advantage the democratic state has is the ability to remove bad leaders, I must prefer the thirst three advantages of this one in favour of democracy.