GOOGLE BITCH RESPONDS

So there was foreign interference in our elections, only the foreigners were already here, embedded in Silicon Valley, and working against American interests. Why is CNN not all over this?!

they weren't edited.

You ever wake up and realize you're on the wrong side of the history

THIS WTF

Attached: cnn reporter.jpg (1143x636, 44K)

>I guess they think I delivered
You did so much more than that you arrogant ass retard. This ride just sped up.

Kek, did larping as a revolutionary begin to lose it's luster for her?

>Why is CNN not all over this?!
Reasons.

Attached: (((MIGA))).jpg (800x387, 33K)

i hope she gets executed some day

>I received threatening phone calls
>just because I committed a little treason!
This is sooooo sad. Upbote if you cry every time.

>i'm the victim

>Dat nose

Attached: 1546095694139.png (532x557, 45K)

Attached: A5AA7A61-5B5D-4C86-924A-1C3EA15A3290.jpg (550x467, 57K)

>upbote

Attached: 1550667953987.jpg (640x632, 92K)

>The author has chosen not to show responses on this story. You can still respond by clicking the response bubble.

Interesting

>They say they just want to talk about my job
>ME: 1488 HAIL HITLER DEATH TO ALL JEW!
>HELP! THEY LIED ABOUT THEIR INTENTION AND EDITED THE VID!

Attached: 1560159673455.jpg (596x699, 157K)

This

I've seen that fucker in every thread so far regarding this.

>CoNtToLlEd OpPoSiTiOn Is CoNtToLlEd

Attached: 1558479511678.png (2810x4096, 178K)

Can i get a rapid sprint south? Whats this about?

Is she Jewish?

She probably wasn't threatened. Just playing a victim.

What was video about?

player.vimeo.com/video/344068138

Y---AWN

Attached: images.jpg (216x234, 5K)

No she probably was, just rightly so bub.

I'm stoking my oven for first use

Attached: 1558651995700.jpg (858x908, 142K)

Checked but they don't care about the truth

>In fact, Google has no notion of political ideology in its rankings. And everything I have seen backs this up. Our CEO has said ”We do not bias our products to favor any political agenda.” He’s somewhat more powerful and authoritative than me.
Lmao could you imagine typing this out with a straight face, or worse actually believing it.

bitchute.com/video/re9Xp6cdkro/

she probably 100% unironically believes it

Project Veritas claims its caught Google employees admitting that they manipulates search results to suppress conservative viewpoints.

On the one hand, I absolutely believe that Google would do this. On the other hand, Project Veritas somehow manages to be even less trustworthy than the mainstream media. Think:
youtube.com/watch?v=qEGFaOeUm2A

The guy who runs it, James O'keefe, is an almost steoreotypical journo slimeball. Including trying to set up a sex sting on a CNN reporter with himself as the bait (which failed hilariously)

So when she says the video was spliced and edited misleadingly, well, that's exactly the sort of thing Project Veritas has done in the past.

link to the video?

All im going to say is, that guy they interviewed was a 100%Jow Forumstard that was either trolling or believed all the bullshit he read here. The bits about his life being in danger and "I realized that was a world I didnt want to live in so im fine if people might kill me. Btw steven crowder, tim pool, reuben report etc"

Im all for watching google crash and burn, but the only useful bits of the video were the recordings of the chick which can be claimed as "not representative of google or its values"

I want more investigative journalism. I want google to be dismantled, but this is not enough

Attached: 1523908078796.jpg (600x811, 99K)

Oh this poor victim. Fuck me "the jew cries out in pain as it strikes you" once again. Do they never change?

it's truly a modern-day mystery

Attached: (((media))).jpg (4500x4602, 3.88M)

>Is it us who is wrong? No, surely it's the goys.
OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN GOYIM

i dont know which one of you faggots are sending her death threats but keep up the good work
>they tricked her by claiming they wanted to set up a mentor program for wamen of color
AAAAAAAAAAAAHaHAHAHAHAHAhaha
best fucking part

Attached: uncle sam.jpg (337x456, 148K)

This is rather huge though, all big tech companies are slowly getting themselves into a corner, sooner or later they will have to open up all code

Barr is going to swing the anti-trust hammer like Donkey Kong and destroy Google/Facebook

I wonder why

waaahhh i'm the victim. They need to be tried for treason, Fucking commie scum

Attached: 1560383312862.jpg (447x595, 37K)

you are a fucking shill and when we have the day of the rope you and your family are going to die you fucking traitor

Look at this victim complexing Alinskiite gas lighting the blame on us and making herself the victim

Our enemy believes in "holding systems accountable for equitable outcomes"

In other words, lying, trickery, fraud force are all noble and good if its done for a good cause (tikkum olam)

Attached: 1524167747293.png (799x385, 43K)

bitchute.com/video/re9Xp6cdkro/

goddamn i wanna blow my load up that giant shnozz

It won't be enough, see intel, huawei, facebook feeds. The writing is in the wall for the death of proprietary code, its getting too dangerous to let companies have secret code

Yes. Once they're too far gone.

Trump and Republicans have hinted at the idea of an IBOB, internet bill of rights.

Intel, Huawei, Faceberg, they wouldn't be able to do shit with a properly written IBOB.

Bitch looks like Jared Kushner is a wig

She’s projecting as if it was some jab, having the condescending upper hand. She’s really shitting herself because google likely told her to clean up the more than obvious mess she made.

Hey scumbag
Show proof.
Show one instance where Veritas released a video that was "selectively edited" that the victim came forward with a complete unedited transcript or full recording.

These are the same gas lighting Alinskiites that believe any sound bite about Trump as if grab the pussy wasnt out of context

Attached: SmartSelect_20190116-012315_Chrome.jpg (1052x1746, 890K)

Trusting them to properly write an IBOB would be a stretch. There probably wouldn't even be an article preventing collection of metadata.

>inb4 veritas releases raw interview with her to make her look look like a caged rat

I would like that very much, user... very much

Attached: 1560740108193.png (657x527, 35K)

Its true, ALL OF IT.

If any of it was false, she would sue them, and then during deposition she would lose and have to pay their attorneys fees due to filing a bogus claim.

Attached: 11528587314781.jpg (986x553, 96K)

>K
google caught red-handed spending all its energy to influence the 2020 election to make sure 2016 never happens agian and only the "desired" candidates win

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

open source everything pls

And how would you enforce said legislation if you couldn't look at what they were doing?

bump

Attached: 474.gif (311x366, 133K)

>selective editing
yeah thats what they said about the planned parenthood vids

aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/artificial-intelligence-reinforces-power-privilege-190612210731092.html

and they were israeli jewish rats! NOT russians!!

I'm surprised they're not claiming it's a deep fake desu

Can't an antitrust suit come any sooner?

*sip*

Attached: 1557439024555.jpg (1024x789, 108K)

>show me a recording or transcript someone made when they didn't realize they were being recorded

I haven't watched this video yet but everything else I have seen from Veritas was heavily edited. You might not understand what an edit is or looks like but basically any break in the recording is signs of an edit. It may seem that the camera stuttered or something but it's the video being edited.

An algo wrote this response

kill yourself shill rat

Maybe you're too young to remember, or maybe you're too boomer to have been watching any news source that wasn't Fox News at the time, but if you'd been paying attention in back when James O'Keefe first hit the spotlight in 2009 you'd know what kind of guy he is.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACORN_2009_undercover_videos_controversy#Investigation_by_California_attorney_general

Short version: O'Keefe claims to have evidence that a left-leaning non-profit ACORN is involved in sex trafficking. A media storm is whipped up and ACORN is disbanded. When various law enforcement agencies actually investigate the "crimes", they find:

>The video releases were heavily edited to feature only the worst or most inappropriate statements of the various ACORN employees and to omit some of the most salient statements by O'Keefe and Giles. Each of the ACORN employees recorded in California was a low level employee whose job was to help the needy individuals who walked in the door seeking assistance. Giles and O'Keefe lied to engender compassion, but then edited their statements from the released videos.

(Direct quote from the California Attorney General's Office)

>So when she says the video was spliced and edited misleadingly, well, that's exactly the sort of thing Project Veritas has done in the past.
This. Scumbag O'Keefe edited out the part where she said:
>haha okay I'm gonna pretend that google is actually an evil organization that engages in all these social manipulation tactics, as a joke.
>But if you're secretly recording me, make sure you include the fact that all these statements are actually a joke and I'm just kidding around here.

Watch the video rat boy

kill yourself shill rat

>cries out in pain as it strikes you

Attached: 1555470087352.jpg (486x600, 43K)

When did Jow Forums become filled with NPCs?

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-06-24 19-43-31.png (1038x380, 79K)

Attached: Sneakyyou.webm (956x488, 2.92M)

2 shekels have been deposited in to your bank account comrade. You may pick up your pay stub at Google headquarters later this week.

>internal documents showing that they edit search results
>video evidence from multiple sources corroborating internal document
>not enough
???
shut up, leaf.

Well, that's that I guess. Another nothingburger like always

inb4 PV release the entire unedited video

You're the npc, even if you are being genuine with your posts.
We all know google is doing this shit.
There is 99.9% anti-right-wing bias in the media.
It's possible that O'Keefe edited some stuff out that makes her look slightly less guilty, but she still said everything in the video.

The fact that you instantly take the media/google's side, that O'Keefe is just lying (even after you have seen some pretty damning shit come out of her mouth - edited or not), shows that you are a programmed leftist drone.

G L O W I NG
L
O
W
I
N
G

>California Attorney General's Office
>downplaying sex trafficking allegations
>thinking anons give that any level of credence
where do you think you are

GoodbyeGoogle

DAMAGE CONTROL KIKES RIGHT ON TIME

This has happened before, and nothing definitive ever came from it. You could get alphabet's CEO saying nigger on tape and it wouldnt be enough. What about Hillary? What about the judges who commit legal treason? Nothing bad happened to them.

If you want to destroy google, youre going to have to do it yourself by fucking with their revenue streams. Which is incredibly hard when they frequently meet with the government for intel, and have no true competitors

Oh no guise. We were wrong!!! SHE'S THE VICTIM HERE!!!!

>show me a recording or transcript someone made when they didn't realize they were being recorded
this is a fair point

Same thing when I worked at one of the larger older shilicon valley companies. They even setup a job listing page specifically for "black processionals".

Oh my god I am so ready let's make this cold civil war hot

THIS

bump

Attached: 1558050996099.jpg (1080x478, 71K)