People say that ancient India was one of the most advanced and developed society along with Europe It's true that ancient India was great but the point is that people who created the civilization weren't actually Indians we know today in the filthy subcontinent They were Aryans and it describes everything as to why today's India is such a fucking poor shithole Indians today are mutts between Dravidian and Aryan In the south it's far worse as literally 99 percent of them are pure Dravidian also known as Australoid
There are similarities... but they are by no means identical.
However, perhaps if you can google hard enough you could find a pair of aboriginal/indian men who look close to identical. In the meanwhile, the stuff you are posting isn't too convincing.
All true. Everything that was great about India came from the mind of blonde haired, blue eyed Aryans, not subhuman shitskins. We're talking about Aryan civilization not the IVC, subhuman. The IVC was invaded and destroyed by the Aryans.
They're not identical because they have a linear genetic affinity not a vertical one. Abos and Indians have been separated for thousands of years. The ancestral component in Indians is AASI/Onge which clusters with Aboriginals and Mundas. You can't deny DNA even if you nitpick the phenotype.
>phenotype Well maybe if Aborigines had designated shitting streets they'd be dominating the IT industry like their South Asian brethren.
Colton Ward
Maybe, maybe not. We only have this reality where uncovering history and fact is all that should matter. What is all European polytheism/paganism preceding the conversion to Christianity? A subcontinent of 2 billion produces a few barely human streetshitters who are aided by the Jewish system to act as puppets in certain corporations. It doesn't prove anything. Besides, no one said Indians are purely AASI/Onge/Aboriginal. It's just an important segment of their genome.
If I had to guess, I would say that some ancient Ukrainians decided to go down and rape a horde of Proto-Aboriginals.
Alexander Carter
>It's just an important segment of their genome. Ok, I think that's clearly a given. But maybe the genes the Indians share with the Aborigines are the good genes... maybe, maybe not. We don't know much except that they are related... I don't see what conclusions we can draw.
Noah Smith
>maybe the genes the Indians share with the Aborigines are the good genes
>I don't see what conclusions we can draw
The conclusion is that they're subhuman. But we didn't need to look at their DNA to know that anyway.
