The Great Youtube Exodus (Support Decentralized Free Speech)

Discussions:
>Install to see Bitchute on Youtube pagesgithub.com/pupperdogger/watchonbitchute
>Redpill comments
>Mirror/TOR
>Link/bookmark alternates
>Convert non-political creators
>Coopt TOS to prohibit normie content

Suggestions:
dailymotion.com/blackpigeonspeaks
bitchute.com/soph/
bitchute.com/channel/blondebeast/
bitchute.com/channel/thejollyheretic/
unauthorized.tv/authors/vox-day
bitchute.com/channel/know-more-news/
dailymotion.com/Styxhexenhammer666
bitchute.com/channel/rockingmre/
bitchute.com/channel/thuleanperspective/ Varg
bitchute.com/channel/cultured_thug/
dailymotion.com/ComputingForever
bitchute.com/channel/central-happenings-network/
bitchute.com/channel/sandmanmgtow/
bitchute.com/channel/markcollett/
bitchute.com/channel/pauljosephwatson/
bitchute.com/channel/ashalogos/
bitchute.com/channel/thethinkery/ bitchute.com/channel/sargonofakkad/
bitchute.com/channel/veritasvisuals/
dailymotion.com/therageaholic
bitchute.com/channel/1791l/
bitchute.com/channel/davidicke/
bitchute.com/channel/seekingthetruth/
bitchute.com/channel/muh_fashy_bookshelf/
d.tube/#!/c/theouterlight
bitchute.com/channel/thequartering/
bitchute.com/channel/theiconoclast/
bitchute.com/channel/subverse/
bitchute.com/channel/markdice/
bitchute.com/channel/the-red-elephants/
bitchute.com/channel/turdflingingmonkey/
bitchute.com/channel/noapologies/
bitchute.com/channel/redicetv/
corbettreport.com bitchute.com/channel/corbettreport/
periscope.tv/w/1BdGYAvlYzoGX Scott Adams
bitchute.com/channel/amrenaissance/
bitchute.com/channel/thealthype/

Attached: YOUTUBE.png (690x714, 366K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theverge.com/2019/6/17/18682099/supreme-court-ruling-first-amendment-social-media-public-forum
supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1702_h315.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=F6PUbpz41hs
bitchute.com/channel/mistermetokur/
dlive.tv/MisterManchild
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Guess what cuck.....Google can do whatever the fuck it wants, thanks SCOTUS!

theverge.com/2019/6/17/18682099/supreme-court-ruling-first-amendment-social-media-public-forum

based, take a bump

>muh jewish eceleb spam
just report these threads

This is a Youtube thread, plus the legality of their actions won't matter when no one goes there anymore and they lose their power.

Attached: Jewgle.png (1255x733, 635K)

Thanks, fren!

ahem....Google owns YouTube fucknut

Attached: 1erdp5.jpg (480x360, 50K)

Yes, but it's about Youtube, retard. No one refers to CNN as Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.

Fuck you're dumb.

you really don't fucking get it, do you. this applies to youtube, google, twitter, instagram, facebook, and any other social media organization.

just shut the fuck up and stick your head in the hole, you clearly are too fucking stupid to live

Attached: 6486169816.png (1920x1080, 725K)

I don't think it applies to these things, in fact I think you're so retarded you didn't even read the ruling.
>New York state law requires cable operators to set aside channels on
their cable systems for public access. Those channels are operated by
the cable operator unless the local government chooses to itself operate the channels or designates a private entity to operate the channels. New York City (the City) has designated a private nonprofit
corporation, petitioner Manhattan Neighborhood Network (MNN), to
operate the public access channels on Time Warner’s cable system in
Manhattan. Respondents DeeDee Halleck and Jesus Papoleto
Melendez produced a film critical of MNN to be aired on MNN’s public access channels. MNN televised the film. MNN later suspended
Halleck and Melendez from all MNN services and facilities. The producers sued, claiming that MNN violated their First Amendment
free-speech rights when it restricted their access to the public access
channels because of the content of their film. The District Court
dismissed the claim on the ground that MNN is not a state actor and
therefore is not subject to First Amendment constraints on its editorial discretion. Reversing in relevant part, the Second Circuit concluded that MNN is a state actor subject to First Amendment constraints.

Meaning the ruling was reversed because the first court considered MNN a state actor then the supreme court changed it to private entity. It doesn't even mention online public forums you mongoloid. supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1702_h315.pdf