Kill the Alphabet Goliath

uuuuggggghhh.. fucking congress being as retarded as always.

why there are those niggers in the congress, they all in favour of what those big tech are doing. Obviously niggers get benefits from it

>Wikipedia
Top kek

>Muh hate speech
did one of these suits legitimately suggest hate speech as justification for moderating content before congress?

Dig up and clip that

They dont have to justify shit. They own the servers, you agree to a legally bindi TOS to use them, and the 1st amend explicitly only applies to the government. A private company is totally incapable of censorship

>Niggaboo: do you go over all wikipedia articles you link to?
>SiliconValley: Yes, we manually check everything, we p-p-pwomise
>Niggaboo: You guys are amazing, may I suck the dick of thee?

As usual Republicans completely out of their depth and Democrats pressuring for more censorship. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ This is why you need younger people in congress.

47 U.S. Code §230 exemption from liability as publishers for internet service providers as long as they do not editorialize their content.

Republicans are an embarrassment. They're so weak. They just sit back and let Democrats push for the most insane shit. Republicans never push for anything.

Every one of these traitors needs to hang.

Corporations are not people, they are legal fictions.

What is a "common carrier"? Because it sure ain't google/facebook/twitter. It's time to hold them liable for their discrimination.

Actually the repubs are pushing for more.censorship. They want to force private companies to host their content against their will. Interesting that the party of personal responsibility refuses to simply start their own Youtube

Then we get a left and right echo chamber. Why not just abide by the first amendment and allow organic debate?

But Trump isn't allowed to block lefty trolls on Twitter, amirite? :^)

You can't enforce freedom of speech and expression in one situation and not others. All these social media sites are basically public forums at this point and should be subject to the same rules and constitutional protections.

SC has ruled there's no such thing as hate speech and when they rule them as a public forum they'll have to bring all the nazis you hate so much back

THE CUNTS ARE KVETCHING ABOUT SUPPOSED WHITE SUPREMACISM INCESSANTLY

MEANWHILE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS LITERALLY COORDINATED ATTACKS IN EUROPE VIA TWITTER AND FACEBOOK

I WANT TO MURDER THESE CUNTS

THEY NEED TO FUCKING HANG

THIS IS THE ANTI-TRUST HEARINGS?
CUNTS TALKING ABOUT RUSSIANS PEDDLING FAKE NEWS ON FACEBOOK?

THIS IS WHAT CONGRESS IS UP-TO-ARMS ABOUT?

I AM SO FUCKING DISAPPOINTED

She wants them to edit Wikipedia first to reflect the specific videos that YouTube is linking the article to instead of those pages reflecting the subject. She wants the leftist echo chamber (big tech’s own TOS) to be reaffirmed. Orwellian.

>CUNTS TALKING ABOUT RUSSIANS PEDDLING FAKE NEWS ON FACEBOOK?

America is lost

As soon as congress is held responsible for lying to us.

ITS THE NIGGERS, they agree to what they do, just asking dumb questions blabla neo nazis extremists. Their little brains cant even know the principles of AI

yup, depressing as fuuuuuuuuuuuuuck. Congress being useless as always. They literally can't do anything let alone anything right.

So if all social media sites decided to ban anyone who has leftist views, you'd be ok with it? I doubt it.

The US government is colluding with the social networks to censor the american peoole. Theyre all funded by the CIA to act as spy data collection platforms. The government wont do shit until the people decide to rebel

How is that censorship? They're not forcing anyone to host "their" content, they're urging these companies to look into their internal review process for any sort of biases that would seek to remove content that doesn't violate their terms of service but is still removed.

Also don't give me this bullshit about Google, Facebook, Twitter having rights they disportionately influence and hold a majority of the dialogue on their platforms, in my eyes and the views of probably many others on Jow Forums I don't believe that these companies can be held to the same standard a normal company can and rather be treated like a public utility.

>Muh hate speech
As if these people are full of love and tolerance themselves. Fucking gas it.

Attached: 305849679345.jpg (445x424, 52K)

Censorship of anybody that goes after israel maybe

This is why capitalism is a problem

Theybare abiding by the 1st amendment. The 1st amendment explicitly only applies to the government. There is no law or right that states a company has to allow you to use their servers for free.
Nice try but president Trump is using the POTUS account which is publicly owned. Obama was also not allowed to block people because the president is acting as a public elected official.
Thats sovereign citizen style thinking. Does Jow Forums have a right to ban people who viilate the TOS? They why doesnt Youtube?
Islamic terror videos are also.blocked.

>moot is still an user, leaking insider Google info

They're obviously lying but she is actually

>They want to force private companies to host their content against their will.
Worst post I’ve seen all morning. What have they actually done over the last 10 years? Absolutely nothing except some grand standing to appease a few voters. Republican donors are behind most of the insane, divisive bullshit happening right now. That’s why they do nothing. Stop falling for the circus.

>Live: Execs from Google, Facebook, Twitter testify before Congress

Oh look, kabuki theater at its finest.

Nothing will come of this dog-and-pony show.

Just staged theater for the plebs to feel like they have our (the American people) best interests in mind.

It wpuldnt be a problem if we acknowledged that corporations are legal fictions and force them to abide the first amendment as a requirement of incorporation

That higgins guy seems pissed off as fk

NIGGER, THIS LOOKS LIKE FUCKING GAMEOVER
THIS IS THE HOMELAND SECURITY COMMITTEE. THEY ARE FUCKING GLOATING AND CHEERING THAT THE TECH COMPANIES ARE BANNING RT AND NO ONE CARES ABOUT VOX, CNN AND MSNBC.

I WAS LEGITIMATELY HOPEFUL, YOU CUNTS TOLD ME THE ANTI-TRUST PROBES WOULD CRIPPLE THEM

FUCK THIS

Sorry but a private xompany has no obligation to let anyone use their servers and they are free to selectively enforce. Why not just use bitchute or gab or even start your own company?

Nigger corporations are legal fictions. They have NO FUCKING RIGHTS.

All hail to this man

Attached: mayn.jpg (1050x685, 117K)

this sort of facetious line of argumentation really doesn't work when you are discoursing with the people trying to shift the republican party in a more third positionist direction

what a chad

Dont worry. Insurrection comes soon.

Gab is run by controlled op kikes too.

Congress us owned by the Tech Left, nothing will happen.

>starts right off the bat with christchurch
IMAJIN MY SHOK

THEY CAN'T BE TRUSTED.

It’s not impossible at all. It’s already happening. Their ToS are defined by NGOs who are backed by billionaires that want to play social engineers to use you for more money.

If this shit doesnt change soon the fiber lines will be cut and anyone with a platform will become a target for violence. Enjoy.

BASED

>youtube.com/watch?v=oRMqTBCxn2Y
BUMP ALL GOOGLE THREADS
MAKE MORE GOOGLE THREADS
THIS ENDS WITH GOOGLE GOING OFFLINE

Kill yourself

>why remove all these normal videos?
>define "harmed" snake!
>uh it's stuff and uhh hate speech, what do you mean?
goes off to rant over nothing instead of bringing up the prageru videos to body slam the kike

the controlled op kikes are under your bed m8

This shabbos look tough.

fucking kikes let me shitpost your retarded livestream

mods should make a sticky

You know jewgle will just line their pocketbooks to get what they want. Just like that kike rat Zuckerberg did.

he clearly wanted to put a bullet on the kike

this CUNT choked.
This fucking moron went on a tirade instead of GRABBING THE LOW HANGING FUCKING FRUIT and mentioning some thousands that have been censored.

Lurk moar you ignorant faggot

Attached: 9A1572B7-9E92-4D23-BDD3-5D6F21BB75F4.jpg (1000x562, 159K)

yeah true, i was hoping for freedom of speech time

Attached: Evil-Toddler.jpg (500x331, 27K)

Remember the outrage and congressional hearings when ISIS videos were on facebook, youtube, twitter?

You're being intentionally obtuse. People would have fewer issues w/YouTube's ToS if it was applied evenly and fairly. The problem is they don't ban Islamists and other fringe groups shouting death to infidels or death to whites. But as soon as a Nazi shouts dead to niggers, he's demonetized and deplatformed. They are clearly not enforcing their ToS fairly; they are merely using it as a tool to restrict certain types of speech and push an agenda.

Factually incorrect. The supreme court ruled corporations are legally humans.You are literally the complete opposite of right.
Sounds like you have a market opportunity to start your own company
Not an argument
Censorship only applies to the Government. A private company is incapable of censorship because they arent legal authorities.

We just need to start shitposting IRL until they realize its better to let us sit at home and say the shit online.

yeah and the US isn't a national socialist country so until it is, deal with capitalist laws.

also do searches for google and veritas on search engines so the searches spike.

Attached: bro.jpg (736x678, 47K)

oh shit they just mentioned that veretas shit

The court of Jow Forums finds you four guilty of the crime of treason. You are to be taken from this place and hung by your necks until dead.

Attached: guilty.jpg (1252x644, 160K)

Citizens United is a fucking joke.
The SCOTUS is a fucking joke. I want proof of life of RBG nigger.

What a retard. There is a difference between censorship and violating the first amendment. Go fuck your self.

Actually Islamic extremism is routinely banned. In addition Youtube is a gloabal.company appealing to a market demographic of all races. The Nazi shit turns off viewers and runs advertisers away which hurts revenue. In the TOS is states they grant themselves leniency and discretion when applying the rules much the same was a police officer has discretion when to apply the law. There is simply no legal grounds backing anything you say up. Its sovereign citizen style logic and wishing

It's a private company and you're using their service for free. The fuck do they care if you have a problem with their ToS? Take your problem and shove it up your ass.

BOMBS DROPPED

Attached: bombs.jpg (1419x744, 144K)

>Asks for a specific example
>Doesn't give a specific answer.
But they're a huge success story because they've had millions of views!

Attached: google doodle.jpg (868x538, 32K)

the only reason nazi and nazi-adjacent content like Molyneux or Lauren Southern ever got popular is because the youtube algorithms reward shock value. Giving these people an equivalent platform is not fair or free speech, the debate was rigged from the start because of YT's algs and recommendation patterns.

No one on the right wants to admit this or force YT to reveal the alg, they just want to force ever public forum to be 50% nazis for the sake of "fairness". thats not free speech its an artificial crisis Republicans invented because they know even their own voter base hates their economic platform

RBG was a dissenter on Citizens United. Read a book, you dumb fuck.

>mr pickles
oh fuck its satan
>also, ANCAP AS FUCK

Of course you're dodging this question. "Muh private company" retards never face this.

Private companies ARE NOT UNDER SAFE HARBOR IMMUNITIES. THEY ARE LIABLE FOR THEIR CONTENT

THESE COMPANIES ARE LISTED AS PLATFORMS AND ENJOY LEGAL IMMUNITIES

youtube.com/watch?v=-bWfIikxqw0

It's not a private company, it's a publicly held company. Different rules apply.

(((Civil society groups)))
God I hate california

THE CUNT BOOMER CHICK DIDN'T SIMPLY ASK "WHY"

WHY ARE THEY IN RESTRICTED MODE? WHY? ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION.

THIS IS A CHARADE

>THESE COMPANIES ARE LISTED AS PLATFORMS

Wrong. Some dude listed them as platforms. Until he can prove that they are platforms, they're private companies.

Neck yourself asshole!

What do you expect user, they are boomers.

ASK THE NIGGERS IF THEY ARE PLATFORMS OR PUBLISHERS.

THEY KEEP REFERRING TO THEMSELEVES AS PLATFORMS, BUT PLATFORMS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DELETE OR CENSOR ANYTHING THAT DOES NOT VIOLATE US LAW