Google Elections Subreddit

Sure thing

Attached: 1551321097732.jpg (193x216, 9K)

>r*dditors actually believe this

Attached: 1403905286388.gif (300x300, 2M)

>reddit is just Jow Forums

I wonder if CNN is going to blame the American bots like they did with Russian bots desu

How

>what did he mean by this
OP here, I am new to this site. We got banned from our original subreddit (read more here )

Please have patience while I learn to navigate this site and use your "terminology".

Why don't you post the full uncropped presentation slide you dishonest fuck?

She was clearly talking about 2016 foreign election interference, but Project Veritas are dishonest hacks and their audience are 80 IQ retards.

>Why don't you post the full uncropped presentation slide you dishonest fuck?
no need for such harsh words, this subreddit is not going to be moderated by me. You can upload it yourself if you have it.

Attached: 1561441789173.jpg (592x684, 141K)

Nothing burger. When has a project veritas video ever turned out to be real. They have a history of making up sensationalist "news"

Are you a bot? You seem bot-like.

(you)

>Are you a bot? You seem bot-like.
Yes, I am a russian bot (v 2.1.9, patched with newest memes)

I honestly can't tell how much of this is bait. On one hand, in today's day and age literally everything is bait and nobody ever posts anything sincere anymore, on the other hand you're playing up the clueless act pretty well.

Attached: 1560984165586.png (1035x254, 112K)

find a rope asap

>the only news coverage about this

youtube.com/watch?v=2quCgvqeZrY&t=1s

Attached: Screenshot 2019-06-26 at 04.11.26.png (1496x854, 1.68M)

>find a rope asap
>I honestly can't tell how much of this is bait.

this community is not very friendly.

Attached: Screenshot 2019-06-24 at 22.43.56.png (844x698, 72K)

Sure, but it isnt a secret that youtube has been censoring the shit out of everything remotely right wing.

>watch joe rogan
>end up watching a vid recc'd to you that tells you black people are inferior and that you should always act in your own self interest
>also fuck LGBT people and remember freedom of speech is deontological even if it leads to violence or hurts peoples feelings (which actually matters, believe it or not)
>youtube puts a stop to this
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WE'RE BEING CENSORED AAAHHHHHHHH
stop baiting or a put a bullet in both your parent's heads for giving birth to you then do the same to yourself you fuck

>Please have patience while I learn to navigate this site and use your "terminology".

lurk more

>projecting this hard?

if there were such videos, they'd be deleted by youtube.

Attached: 1561491291651.gif (300x252, 2.79M)

my wife's 10 year old son just asked me if men can have periods.... ty google.

Attached: Screenshot 2019-06-24 at 17.59.15.png (670x488, 51K)

>act in your own self interest = hard capitalist society with absolutely no socialism
aka american style of governing (conservatism) which if you deviate from in the slightest makes you S.O.Y BOY BETA KEK FAGGOT GOMMUNIST
> freedom of speech is deontological
this is literally every single right wing person on youtube's view of freedom of speech
IT'S MY RIGHT TO CALL SOMEONE A NIGGER
>would you ever do it?
N-NO BECAUSE THAT'S RACIST AND MEAN
really makes you think
>also fuck LGBT people
literally every single right wing youtube fuck thinks trannies are scum
>black people are inferior
race realism

want me to start posting links?

I think you should go back to Jow Forums

>curating search results
>tempering with SEO algorithms
>tempering with youtube algorithms
>shadow-banning content

I think this is very technology related. Might cost you lot of money if you mistakenly get blacklisted by MLFairness as a right wing activist.

>project veritas
I think you are very retarded and should go back to your containment board/subreddit

Attached: 1478784940948.gif (248x225, 203K)

Are people really being muzzled by the megacorps for talking about this? Or are you LARPing as cyberpunk freedom fighters because you want to feel leet?

>IT'S MY RIGHT TO CALL SOMEONE A NIGGER
I watch many alt-right commentators, and I have never seen them curse or use the N-word.. Most of them have centrist viewpoints, but fascist like you put them into the "alt-right" category because the believe there are only 2 genders.

can you stop projecting?

you don't know what deontological means do you

Some of it is bait, some of it is purposeful misinformation, and some of it is actual idiots drinking the kool-aid

It's more or less impossible to tell who is who

incredible, you just put all of them into the same box and label all of them alt-right race realists?

Is Dave Rubin an alt right race realist as well? How about Ben Shapiro or Steven Crowder? What about Dennis Prager?

also, please check the poll in the OP, you are the minority even on /g.

nice ad hominem

stop arguing with them, they aren't operating in good faith. they know they're wrong, but want you shut down anyway because it gets them what they want politically. stop being so fucking naive, they've been at this a while. call him a faggot and post a pepe like any other non boomer would in response to shitlib tyranny.

where's the argument? meme arrowing the organization name? there is video

>nice ad hominem
nice fallacy fallacy
You need to go back. This place isn't for people without two brain cells to rub together. Your place is Jow Forums or the_donald.

>stop arguing with them
as long as they keep bumping my subreddit

youtube.com/watch?v=tuQBM-Ho_ds

KEK look at this nigger

so you don't know what it means
how do you have such a strong opinion on politics, morality and ethics if you aren't even aware of the terminology

also trying to counter the argument by naming specific people to specify the argument into non sequiturs like you just did (youtube is censoring right wing content, this is ok because most right wing content that you stumble upon via youtube's very own algorithm is intense right wing stuff, UHM NO ITS NOT OK BECAUSE BEN SHAPIRO HAS NEVER SAID NIGGER CHECKMATE ATHEIST) is utterly laughable

Attached: tumblr_ovh8gqiVUe1vjov3vo1_1280.jpg (593x970, 238K)

>now you are projecting that I don't know/can't lookup complex words

wow, how disconnected from reality can you be? any history of schizophrenia in your family?

>a private corporation with direct and clear competition for its services is enforcing licensing and terms of service agreements
Shock and horror

Attached: 1419190745461.gif (300x290, 1.74M)

oof, big swing and a miss pal

they are legally obligated not to do what they did under US code title 47 section 230 so your poll is pointless and misleading

>A poll with a leading question made by a Jow Forumstard is misleading
no, you don't say!?

>so your poll is pointless and misleading
in what way? I just wanted to expose
people like him for being a small minority even here on /g. They are just crazy fucks samefagging harder than intel shills, most /g posters don't agree with hem.

>with direct and clear competition
Imagine believing this unironically

everyone who posts here already knows about lolbertarians

Because it's fake news.

it is not hard to believe such things, when you have shares in Alphabet (Google's parent company)

you literally have no rebuttal to anything i've said and you don't even understand ONE concept i've mentioned but im crazy? fuck off you 12 year old inbred

>Because it's fake news.
Tucker is the most watched news show for a reason. He is the only one telling the truth in cable news on various subjects (even among Fox hosts).

Literally a free market out there, make your own, better platform and it should succeed
>it doesn't
turns out people don't want to associate with racists, have sex incel

>my leading question poll linked to by a Jow Forums thread is representative of all of Jow Forums
It's genuinely sad that people are so stupid these days that I can't tell if this is bait.

>he doesn't use duckduckgo
go back

Attached: search engine activism.png (751x473, 202K)

the congressional hearing missed the center of this issue by a mile

>putt ugly roasties as CEO's of divisions
>be surprised your company goes to shit

Attached: Screenshot 2019-06-25 at 23.47.27.png (1144x1236, 1.06M)

Jow Forums is reddit for people who aren't faggots

Interesting. Do you consider Tucker a journalist or a commentator?

>my leading question poll linked to by a Jow Forums thread is representative of all of Jow Forums
I have created that poll and it was never linked on any other board. I just reposted it several days in a row on /g (usually in threads, that is subreddits like this one).

see how much you are projecting... all those theories in your fucked up mind have no basis in reality.

Exactly thus. Fox is garbage without Tuck

The core of the issue is that we should not be allowing corporations to be arbiters of morality under any circumstances.

>a commentator
A commentator, who breaks news that nobody else does (for some weird reason).

Even Jimmy Dore, a leftist, increasingly shills Tucker, since he is impressed by his integrity.

depends on what definition of morality you mean.
governments and churches are just corporations with monopoly power on those things.

So then he's a journalist? Why don't you want to call him a journalist? Is it because he's clearly biased and therefore his reporting isn't worth a shit?

I could guess your opinions on any cultural/political topic and be right 80% of the time.

You couldn't guess mine.

You niggerfaggotsheep.

I've never said he is a journalist. There are no journalists in MSM, not one on CNN, not one on MSNBC and not one on Fox news.

It doesn't mean a commentator can't break news. It is obvious everybody is scared their sites google rank might take a dump, if they broke this. You should be scared, very scared about this...

Attached: 6496052e-1383-4c7a-b28b-28286277ced7.jpg (700x430, 65K)

now we can post tits
also id'ing my posts

youtube.com/watch?v=XDIB0Own64A

NEW JEN GENNAI INTERVIEW FROM SWEDISH CUNTS

found the faggot

jesus fucking christ, tranny jannies moved this thread to /pol...

The sliding is real.

thx mods

now we can spread the gospel of free open source software to the pollock masses

Attached: 1552541459737.png (1600x1600, 666K)

>now we can spread the gospel of free open source software
you need to go back. I think there is a Rust thread that needs your opinion.

rust is a noble failure populated by people with cognitive dissonances

>I've never said he is a journalist.
I know, you don't want to call him one because he's openly biased and you don't want to hold him to the same standards that you hold the journalists you criticize.

>There are no journalists in MSM, not one on CNN, not one on MSNBC and not one on Fox news.
So you're saying that Tucker is no different than any other so-called journalist. Except the clear difference is that he openly has an agenda, peddles in conspiracies and shills for the president. So then why is the "news" that he breaks better than the news that they break when they have demonstrably more journalistic integrity than him?

Rust is a beautiful language with absolutely no flaws and you know it

Attached: 1546481022559.gif (600x550, 3.06M)

let me guess, this thread came from Jow Forums
/mlp/ is always welcomed on Jow Forums

>what ya'll think about Google meddling in our elections?
I think we should crush them!

>How?
Simple, with RICO.
>How do we do that?
By pushing on our State AGs.
>But RICO is federal, not State!
But their methods apply to the States as well, and so the States themselves have standing.

RICO/AG-contact thread: .

Attached: 45mm.jpg (643x865, 127K)

yes, this subreddit came from /g. As you can see in the poll, most of /g is on our side.

except for the """loud minority""" of course. Reading the comments, you'd think 80% of /g is on google side

Attached: Screenshot 2019-06-26 at 22.30.27.png (1290x690, 108K)

Too bad the conservative majority supreme court--included both of Trump's appointees--don't agree with Jow Forums. Ironically, it was the only the liberal judges that argued in favor of holding the company to the letter of the first amendment.

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-06-18 at 3.12.31 PM.png (761x791, 701K)

nice

The (((Magical Hidden Hand of Free Market))) the One True God of (((Cuckservatism))) strikes again.

>boomers
maybe they will revisit this decision, once they realise what the consequences of this could be (for their political careers)

The liberal judges are boomers too, so it's a moot point. Maybe it's just that liberals are indeed the defenders of free speech while conservashits just want an excuse to use other people's private platforms while disregarding the rules of conduct.

It's no different than newspapers, radio, movies and television. There are was Government control because they were private entities. Then as they began to be the main mode of disseminating information, the Government got involved to ensure every company was treated fairly and no one company was a monopoly on the flow of information. It's why the networks have to give equal air time to all candidates.

>no Government control

> It's why the networks have to give equal air time to all candidates.
No they don't.

There was however a state mandated fairness doctrine (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine), but the Reagan era conservatives shitcanned it so they could have Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

Different case based "letter of the law" retard. This ruling applies only due to assumed lack of bias as platforms not publishers which is no longer the case as bias clearly applies. Muh precedent, maybe youve missed all the commies on the court bitching about this courts propensity top overturn liberal precedent recently. DOnt worry citizenship question is coming then roe v. wade overturned as soon as the old bitch dies >implying shes not already dead

in short kys

>
>Too bad the conservative majority supreme court--included both of Trump's appointees--don't agree with Jow Forums. Ironically, it was the only the liberal judges that argued in favor of holding the company to the letter of the first amendment.
The First Amendment applies only to Congress: "Congress shall..."

No, what you want is RICO!

Attached: America - 2.png.jpg (397x425, 50K)

i believe that only works in the state they are incorporated in unless such an investigation has already started there.

RICO is federal; *however* if we make enough noise at the State level, the states will push for it, too.

(The States also have standing via their own State elections.)

Attached: 1552249584463.gif (500x284, 1.46M)

>shit tier heavily edited video with cut and spliced sentences
>refuses to release full unedited video with obviously loaded questions
yawn

Attached: 1541546376868.jpg (361x397, 38K)