1 So I'm opening a cremation business, funerals are expensive and until we find a cure for death, it's very profitable. But I think I've hit a snag... Modern crematories take 2½ hours to reduce a single body to ash, and I really want to maximize my profits. So if I'm running full blast 24/7/365 then I can cremate 7008 bodies per crematory per year. For sake of simplicity let's assume they're self-cleaning through smokestacks that lead to urns that self-package on a robotic conveyer and don't need any management between bodies. Just throw one in, wait 2.5 hours, throw in the next, repeat.
So hypothetically if I was requested to cremate 4,000,000 people in 2 years. Two years is 730 days or 17520 hours which means I'd need at minimum 571 crematories. Unfortunately 46 is all I can afford. I'd just throw in 11 at a time, but even if I chopped them up first I'd only be able to fit 5 or 6 in a single crematory. On top of this, anyone who's cooked anything before knows the more stuff you try to cook at once, the longer it takes to finish.
So what do I do with the remaining 3,677,600 bodies?
they say that around half of them (the magic 6 million number) were put into massive pits (multiple football fields) then burned in massive bonfires as they went a long and buried as only partially cremated remains. that's kind of the state of the art story that came out after a lot of the claims about auschwitz were debunked
Jose Campbell
You got it all wrong white brother. A body is only 80% water, maybe 12 gallons average, that's why you need the masturbation machines to get a few teaspoons of fluid out and then it's spontaneous combustion and chain reactions and a cage with a bear in it, and an electric floor. Its sci-en-tif-ic. as in Wissenschaft! Verstehen Sie? Haben Sie Fragen?
But perhaps I am wrong. Does anyone have any concrete proof that there actually were gas chambers in existence for anything other than delousing? When I see how viciously the jewish lobby goes after anyone who questions the hollywood narrative, I can't help but wonder...what are they afraid of? The truth will set you free.
A massive number of Jews were relocated to Russia from Poland following WWII. Their kin in the west assumed or were told (both probably) they were.Holocausted by ze Natzis. These Jews were then used to bump the Jewish population in Zionist occupied Palestine.
Jaxson Jenkins
How convenient.
Carson Sanchez
Was ist "Warnstoff"?
Jose Stewart
Sorry goys too many redditors here for these repills.
Well actually, according to the main narrative, the Jews were severely emaciated, so it wouldn't take them the average 2 to 2.5 hours to cremate them. It would take them around an hour per corpse. Also, the some of the camps have been running longer than 2 years, you're thinking of the reinhard camps like Sobibor which in fact was only operational for two years, but most other camps like for example auschwitz were operational for 4 years. Also, auschwitz in its second year was expanded upon to give it faster cremation rates, so the math isn't as simple as that
Prove with math it was possible, otherwise I have no obligation to prove the negative. Your a kikenigger and I'd prefer if you killed yourself immediately.
Austin Brown
Sure, 6 camps with say an average of 25 ovens per camp running for 4 years burning one corpse per hour and you'll get around pic related.
Cremation volume can be significantly reduced by diverting some bodies to the lampshade factories.
Seriously though, I wonder if the crematories are mostly for safely destroying infectious material like lice-ridden clothes, typhoidal bodies and biological waste, just like a modern hospital.
Aaron King
>otherwise I have no obligation to prove the negative Also, you can prove a negative. Every historian and eye witness is saying your account is wrong, that your lying. So not only you can prove a negative you as a Holocaust denier have to if you want to vindicate yourself. Saying that you can't is just a cop out
Andrew Barnes
That's if theres no downtime and a 247 input of bodies and immediate removal of remains. Which isn't possible. Your napkin math does nothing to prove the validity of the amount of jews cremated.
Isaiah Moore
It is theoretically impossible for Albert Speer to increase war material production during 1944 while simultaneously liquidating his labor force.
Benjamin Nguyen
>That's if theres no downtime and a 247 input of bodies and immediate removal of remains. Which isn't possible. A fair assumption, and it is possible, because these camps were running off of slave labor, and my cocktail napkin math has way more credibility then your memes of infographics.
Matthew Jones
>It is theoretically impossible for Albert Speer to increase war material production during 1944 while simultaneously liquidating his labor force. Explain
Wyatt Morales
What about the fact that human ash is pH basic and simply burrying or disposing in a moving body of water would create an ecological scar that would be present and verifiable today.
Lucas Gutierrez
>and simply burrying or disposing in a moving body of water would create an ecological scar that would be present and verifiable today. Even to this day? I don't find that very likely. Do you have sources? Also, you do realize that not all of the ashes were dumped in bodies of water, some were buried in the mass graves as well.
Michael Robinson
I don't care what you find likely buried or disposed in water would both be an environmental superfund site if even half the claimed jews worth of ash was actually deposited.
Wyatt Stewart
No explanation is required. Think of the camps as a business. You cannot increase productivity in a labor intensive production facility while killing your employees en mass.
Christian Jackson
No, I get that, and I know human ash can have adverse effects on surrounding flora. I just don't if it's effects would still be visible today, almost 80 years later.
Again, do you have sources for your claims?
Juan Edwards
>You cannot increase productivity in a labor intensive production facility while killing your employees en mass. If there was a net decrease in slaves, then yes, but the fact is Jews were constantly being deported to these camps in the hundreds. Also, your statement doesn't make sense when you consider the fact that persons like the handicapped or the elderly were sent to these camps. Nothing would happen to productivity if these people were exterminated
Logan Butler
That's what you see in Schindlers List and what they want you to believe.
All you would do is char burn the bodies. They would still mostly be intact as an open air fire pit, doesn't get hot enough to turn bodies to ash.
Colton Myers
Where's your proof? Show proof. The hall of cost is founded upon coerced confessions, fabricated evidence, and ancedotal claims.
Proof for what? The only statement I've made in the post your repsonding to was that human ash adversly affect the floara around it. You want proof for that?
Leo Sanders
There isn't one (1) Holocaust denier standing today that hasn't already been BTFO - whether they were caught lying or completely misrepresenting their sources. From Irving, to Cole, to Rudolf, to Mattogno, to Faurrison, to Zundel, to Weber. Even Eric Hunt has retracted most of his claims. Irving doesn't even deny gassings anymore - have a look at what he say about Operation Reinhard.
I'm pretty sure nobody gave a shit about the flora around the camps 50 years ago either. Why are you interested anyways? The allies have taken pictures of the mass graves. Finding environmental studies is simply superfluous at this point.
Michael Thompson
>There isn't one (1) Holocaust denier standing today that hasn't already been BTFO False. forum.codoh.com/ >BTFO Nice use of Jow Forums lingo, JIDF.
Jayden Martin
>There isn't one (1) Holocaust denier standing today that hasn't already been BTFO >codoh.com His point still stands
Dylan Robinson
Not an argument. There is an incredible amount of evidence on there that dispel the conspiracy theory that is the Holocaust.
Lmao wow, wonder why Irving would change his tune after being jailed for over a year?
Cooper Roberts
Seriously? A single 94 year old man is your single source for the ENTIRE Holocaust? Do you think he would've denied anything happened either way? All of his children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren would immediately begin to despise him. Use your fucking brain.
>Seriously? A single 94 year old man is your single source for the ENTIRE Holocaust? Well, no its just a single example. Im not sure why you immediately assume that's the only proof that exists. What about the eichmann memoirs where he confesses to exterminating Jews there? Are you saying those also came from duress as well?
>If we had killed 10.3 million Jews, then I would have been satisfied and would say, good, we annihilated an enemy. … I wasn't only issued orders, in this case I'd have been a moron, but I rather anticipated, I was an idealist
And no I haven't read the memoirs because no English speaking publisher has mass printed the book and I, like most other people, don't give a shit about nazis.
So he was just bragging about wanting to kill jews despite the fact he hasn't killed a single one? That sounds magnificently stupid. If he's supposedly being hunted down for allegedly committing genocide why would he make a boast about it?
Brandon Jones
He didn't brag about killing Jews. Not only that, but the website's translation is a lie.
How is that a mistranslation? The only incriminating part was the 10.3 million line, and that bit Google translated almost exactly as the quote I gave you. The rest of the quote is irrelevant? Again, why would he brag about killing jews?
Julian Garcia
Notice how he admits to not being any normal Nazi commander (after admitting to wanting genocide). Your quote is actually evidence it didn't happen rather than the other way around.
Carter Hughes
See
Ethan Perry
But there were fags and gypsies in the labor camps too. Can't they dig them up and leave the hand rubbing jew skeletons?
Caleb Sanders
The cognitive dissonance it takes to believe this.
The reason he's saying he's not a normal commander was because he didn't just take orders, he thought of them ahead of time as well, hence why he says he was an idealist. But even then, who brags about genocides they haven't committed, especially if youre being persecuted for allegedly propogating one?
Christian Turner
>So what do I do with the remaining 3,677,600 bodies?
You smuggle them into the US so even if Americans win the war they will live the rest of their lives in Jew slavery.
Tick tock, shouldn't you Yanks be fighting another pointless trillion dollar war in the middle east to please your jew masters?
>he confesses to exterminating Jews there Yeah, Like 9 or 12 millions. Don’t remember exactly but it wasn’t 6 millions
Justin Gutierrez
>The reason he's saying he's not a normal commander was because he didn't just take orders Notice how that line you use as evidence wasn't even part of the quote and just came from the website's faulty translation. >But even then, who brags about genocides they haven't committed He didn't brag. You keep saying this, but it's simply a lie. He said (fairly clearly, too) that he just would've been satisfied. You are so transparent, JIDF. Please try harder, this is entertaining.
>Notice how that line you use as evidence wasn't even part of the quote and just came from the website's faulty translation. Actually, the two translations were pretty identical. The only difference was that Googles translation was more verbatim, but it still gave the same message
>He didn't brag. Ok, then why did he say he would be been happy if he'd killed more Jews? Lol
Matthew Barnes
>Actually, the two translations were pretty identical. The only difference was that Googles translation was more verbatim, but it still gave the same message It really didn't. >Ok, then why did he say he would be been happy if he'd killed more Jews? Lol He didn't. You aren't going to convince anybody by lying, I hope you know this.
Benjamin Ross
>It really didn't Amazing argument!
>He didn't. You aren't going to convince anybody by lying, I hope you know this He literally said he would be satisfied if had killed 10.3 million Jews. I showed you the quote and the source, not sure how I'm lying about there. And then we have the previous example of an ex camp guard apologizing for the Holocaust.
Dominic Russell
>So he was just bragging about wanting to kill jews despite the fact he hasn't killed a single one? That sounds magnificently stupid I see you've never met anyone who has served in infantry, or the military
Ayden Adams
A warnstoff is a marking element, usually smell in gas and aerosol containers to make clear when something is leaking.
Chase Hall
>Amazing argument! Your argument consists of "It did, though! Lul!", so you aren't really one to talk. You have the burden of proof anyways. >He literally said he would be satisfied if had killed 10.3 million Jews. I showed you the quote and the source, not sure how I'm lying about there. That isn't bragging. He just says he would've been happy if that had ever happened. >And then we have the previous example of an ex camp guard apologizing for the Holocaust. Circular argument. Your JIDF badge is showing.
>hey Adolf why did you kill 10.9 millions of Jews. >I didn’t, but I would be happy if I did. How hard that to understand?
Michael Hughes
>The reason he's saying he's not a normal commander was because he didn't just take orders, he thought of them ahead of time as well BWAHAHAHAHA!!!! To think you need to say something this ridiculous to maintain a narrative. Every single officer in any competent military anticipates orders that come down the pipeline. This is 10x more true for a commander. Fuck what a dumb thing to say.
John Ross
I don't know. This guy is either delusional or an actual, real JIDF shill.
Luis Murphy
Well his entire self identity and future based on that
Isaac Hall
>Your argument consists of "It did, though! Lul!", so you aren't really one to talk. That's not at all how it happened. You've asked me to point to an incriminating passage in the memoirs. I've done this. You later attempted to discredit it by posting it in Google translate and insinuate that the translations were wrong, and then you got btfo and resorted to "no you didnt" tactics.
>That isn't bragging. He just says he would've been happy if that had ever happened. But it is a boast, he's saying that 10.3 million would've made him satisfied because apparently 6 million Jews, a ridiculous enough number to begin with, wasn't enough. Actually a similar version of this boast is used on here from time to time. Some poltard would say
>how many Jews died in the Holocaust. >HUUR DUR NOT ENOUGH
I think you're just in denial, bro.
Christopher King
>You later attempted to discredit it by posting it in Google translate and insinuate that the translations were wrong, and then you got btfo and resorted to "no you didnt" tactics. Go ahead and show me where I was btfo'd, m80. Hint: You can't. >But it is a boast, he's saying that 10.3 million would've made him satisfied because apparently 6 million Jews, a ridiculous enough number to begin with, wasn't enough. Ad hoc fallacy.
Luis Moore
>6 million Jews Go watch his trial, they never brought up 6 millions number. It was much higher
Ayden Evans
>Go ahead and show me where I was btfo'd, m80 In the last four or so posts, moron
>Ad hoc fallacy. Again, youre resorting to "no, you did" tactics. How is what I said an ad hoc fallacy?
Wyatt Richardson
>In the last four or so posts, moron No, you didn't. You had the burden of proof and failed to back any of your claims up. That's why I gave a simplistic "Wrong." answer. >Again, youre resorting to "no, you did" tactics. How is what I said an ad hoc fallacy? lmgtfy.com/?q=ad hoc fallacy
Tyler Watson
>But it is a boast, he's saying that 10.3 million would've made him satisfied because apparently 6 million Jews, wasn't enough You can't boast or brag about a hypothetical you fucking kike retard. You are completely inventing a new meaning for those words.
Wyatt Robinson
well, desperate times ask for desperate measures. fuck the carbon emisions and start to pile up bodys. light up 100s at a time. germans understood the power of simplicity. you fucking americans have lost your jive. the steps must go forward even if we have to step on a poop doggy dogg.
we have massiv burning sites in poland and germany. i know children and grandchildren, and other family members of the witnesses and purpetrators.
my grandma had a retarded cousin and he was taken away by the nazis. my grandma used to buly the mongoloid and she had to live in regret for over 75 years. my dads uncle is a jew who has no more family left, sad and true. fucker isnt making anything up, he has pictures and other memorabelia.
genocide is real. armenians, tutsis, khoisan, jews, gypsys, zoroastrians and next up are the boers in south africa.
americans are on average quite uninformed. be the change brother. jews are white, and hiter was flirting with islam. jews have helped shape our westen world, foor the but also for the good. deal with it and accept your longnosed aryans. east european jews are all converts
Carson Young
build a wall. George Orwell said bodies are a most unhandy thing to build walls with but i think he's a softy piece of shit liar.
Brayden Sanders
>You had the burden of proof and failed to back any of your claims up. No, the claims that I've made, that there exists valid nazi confessions, I have proven. The first one I gave you, you just insinuated that he was lying, something about his family hating him or something, but you never gave any further detail and therefore never discredited the initial argument. The second one, I'm not sure what happened. I think you completely broke and resorted to turning this into a childish squabble over semantics. Lol
I know what an ad hoc fallacy is. I'm asking YOU, not Google, not anyone on this thread, not imgur, you. Why you think it's a fallacy. Bitch
Brayden Scott
The kikes say trauma can be inherited genetically. I want every Mexican to be born knowing instinctively to not cross the border.
Joshua Brooks
>No, the claims that I've made, that there exists valid nazi confessions, I have proven. You didn't prove anything. >The first one I gave you, you just insinuated that he was lying, something about his family hating him or something, but you never gave any further detail and therefore never discredited the initial argument. Further detail? What further detail must I give there? All you is logic and common sense to know his motives to not deny anything. He's also an OLD man who may have dementia. >The second one, I'm not sure what happened. I think you completely broke and resorted to turning this into a childish squabble over semantics. Lol Why are you so desperate to avoid arguing? Is this all that your life consists of; being a deceiving, wetbrain idiot? >I know what an ad hoc fallacy is. I'm asking YOU, not Google, not anyone on this thread, not imgur, you. Why you think it's a fallacy. Bitch God, what a cope. It's a fallacy because like the link says; it's an untestable hypothesis with no logic backing it up. Just plain conjecture.
Robert Morris
>my grandma had a retarded cousin and he was taken away by the nazis
more like they abandoned him to the state so they euthanized him
>my dads uncle is a jew who has no more family left
we did this yestarday the majority of remains at the other 3 camps were surveyed
hadn't been cremated, burned or any thing of that nature, 500k corpses perfectly intact
Gabriel Morales
>There isn't one (1) Holocaust denier standing today that hasn't already been BTFO don't we live in a world where it's now either illegal or professional suicide to talk shit about jews? correct me if i'm wrong but isn't that like saying "nobody talks shit about stalin so they must love and revere him"?
Carson Scott
>All you is logic and common sense to know his motives to not deny anything. Of course, he didn't deny it. Because it actually happened. If he was falsely being accused of crimes he didn't commit, what would blatantly admitting to them achieve, because he would be hated less by his family members? How? He's already being accused of murder, I'm not sure how lying about it is going to make it worse? It's completely overshadowed by the fact that he's accused of one of the ugliest genocides in history.
>Why are you so desperate to avoid arguing? Is this all that your life consists of; being a deceiving, wetbrain idiot? Arguing is fine. I just don't like drilling in the same piece of information in seven different formats because the opponent is being dishonest.
Those are kike techniques of arguing.
>It's a fallacy because like the link says; it's an untestable hypothesis with no logic backing it up. Just plain conjecture. It's not an untenable argument. You must've not been here very long. The "enough Jews didn't die" shtick is a commonly said boast on here.
Liam Lee
The US Government keeps the Nazi's secret superfurnace schematics secret to keep down the domestic crematory industry, the only thing that could pose a true threat to their global hegemony
