I also wanted to write about a recurring phrasiology I've noticed that betrays even quite mild normies' lean towards centrally controlled dictatorship and slavery.
Speak to anyone who's not explicitly on the right about world issues, and they'll constantly use the word 'we' to mean 'all of humanity'. "We need to stop this, do that, and start moving this way" etc. They never specify who they mean by 'we'.
This betrays their collectivist mentality. Take an issue like sea levels (supposedly) rising, threatening low land in Bangladesh. A problem almost entirely caused by China, America and India, and which will mostly affect Bangladeshis. Yet, propagandised Scottish people will describe this as "we need to cut back on pollution or WE're going to lose land".
They all do it. Anyone 'educated', in the sciences, any public office, celebrities, IT people, UN pawns, generally anyone plugged into the matrix. They act as if some Chinese dying of air pollution they caused themselves is a grave tragedy in the West, or students and the unemployed in European cities have some right and duty to protest Trump.
They believe wholeheartedly in universalism, probably not even consciously. But universalism becomes dictatorship. Suddenly it's our business how the Middle East treats gay people, it's the government's business how you raise your children, because 'we' all 'know' that 'we' need children who are x, y, z if 'our' civilisation is going to survive.
Once you notice it, it's incredible how often people use 'we' completely vaguely. They will say it many, many times in a few sentences. It's made watching many documentaries impossible for me because I end up shouting at the screen "who the fuck do you mean by 'we'?"
Attached: Screen Shot 2019-06-29 at 18.41.24.png (1452x546, 77K)