TRUMP " YOU BEAT TECH CENSORSHIP BY BEING REALLY GOOD "
>infowars
Haha the boomer solution. Bootstraps and all that.
not an argument Mr. President
What of it son?
READ THIS SHIT NOW!!!!!!!!!
bitchute.com
WOW fuckin based more 4D chess rite fellow pedes ?
>infowars.com
Just accept that we should replace this clown. He's not going to do anything. Fuck him. Warren is more likely to do something than him.
>you just gotta be really good
Holy fuck hahahaha
Wow Trump sure took real action against social media censorship! LMFAo
*TING*
*TANG*
BUILD THE WALLA
*BING*
*BANG*
YES WE CAN... PICK SOME COTTON!
He’s right though. If we are good goys, the jews won’t fuck us as hard as they are doing right now. Based God Emperor of the Universe tells it like it is once again.
>Warren
No fuck you
JUST VOTE TRUMP 2020
don't worry about anything.
ZING
LING
DEMOCRATS IN 2020 MAKE IT FALL
o yeah he never even built a wall in this timeline
>>Warren
>No fuck you
She's actually talking about breaking them up.
Trump is done. He cant even get people to show up to his rallies anymore.
on a different note, OP, you are a foreigner so i kindly ask that you stop trying to interfere in our elections.
t.
kike fuck off
>infowars.com
I have switched to being apathetic (after once supporting the shit out of him) to shit-talking him in every thread.
Die in a fucking fire you piece of shit.
>kike fuck off
All I said was she's more likley to do it than him. Which is clear because there's no chance that he will do it.
It's clear to you that Warren has said this and is telling the truth?
Ummmm govt control of the internet IS what the Left wants.
Why on Earth should we mandate that Govt has control of what can be censored?
Sounds like EXACTLY what the Left wants. Doesn't it? Moron.
>It's clear to you that Warren has said this and is telling the truth?
It's clear to me that Trump has spat on the face of his supporters on this issue.
T_D wasn't good enough.
So how is Warren different?
they dont need to be broken up. they need to either have the protections they currently get removed, or be labeled a public utility which would mean they couldn't discriminate
>Ummmm govt control of the internet IS what the Left wants.
>Why on Earth should we mandate that Govt has control of what can be censored?
>Sounds like EXACTLY what the Left wants. Doesn't it? Moron.
These businesses are using coercive techniques to force other business to ban people they disagree with.
If government was doing it, they'd have to deal with free speech regulations.
But as is these companies have to do these things for fear of lawsuits from Dem administrations. It's a loophole tha tallows government to ban "hate speech" by threatening busineses.
>they dont need to be broken up. they need to either have the protections they currently get removed, or be labeled a public utility which would mean they couldn't discriminate
Whatever. None of that is going to happen under Trump's watch. Trump WANTS people to be silenced..
>repeating stale quotes out of context makes them more believeable
Get those shekels while they're available, Google shill.
Totally correct. As per the 1st amend only the government can censor. If you dont loke Google or Facebook you can start your own website for less than $20 on Godaddy.
>out of context
explain
>>repeating stale quotes out of context makes them more believeable
>Get those shekels while they're available, Google shill.
Didn't Trump recently do a Hawaui deal that favored Google? Winning?
This. It’s obviously a shill shilling because I didn’t hear about this on r/The_Donald either, amirite fellow pede?
>infowars in 2019
AYY YABBA DABBA DINDU NUFFIN!
>AYY YABBA DABBA DINDU NUFFIN!
AYY YABBA DABBA DINDU NUFFIN!
>AYY YABBA DABBA DINDU NUFFIN!
AYY YABBA DABBA DINDU NUFFIN!
>AYY YABBA DABBA DINDU NUFFIN!
Cool self meme Stephan.
Can you name the Jew soon? Please?
Holding corporations to the standards of the constitution is perfectly acceptable. Corporations only exist via the state. They're legal constructs.
Given the benefits limited liability provides, the least that can be done is to make them adhere to basic constitutional restrictions (like applying the first amendment to them, holding them accountable for listening to and then sharing info about their customers, etc).
regardless, this stuff has to happen through congress. a president in the US isnt some king that can just do whatever he wants. and you think Warren doesnt want to silence people? lol i bet anything she would push congress to pass hate speech laws.
Trumps a lying faggot we've all figured this out at this point
the good news is he will probably be impeached very soon. and even if he's not, there is no way he can get re-elected. polls show that even with just republicans he only has 10% support. i doubt he will even hold anymore rallies because no one would show up. He doesn't have the balls to attack iran. He's finished
They are held to the 1st amend: they are granted the right to free speech. The bill of rights explicitly only applies to the government.
America is an embarrassment to America.
>shilling this hard
They are fukkkin scared lmao
Yes no one could be annoyed with the potatus saying 'to beat censorship you need to be rly good xd'
He won't be impeached, but if he does get a second term. Literally nothing will change, America will have even less allies and more spics.
we are at the point where more people are banned from sites than the people who use them
shill harder you must have missed his Florida rally
His rally's are packed to capacity, shill.
>infowars
Stopped caring right there.