Well

Well....

Attached: Screenshot_20190630_204149.png (707x205, 26K)

Only non Jews should be permitted public opinions.

No, watch the warrior poet society on YouTube for why

yeah because thats work perfecty, just look at venezuela
look at what happens when only the military and law enforcement have guns
first world idiots

Only the militia should carry weapons.

>all males, regardless of race, between the ages of 18 and 54

Attached: 1558489040757.jpg (720x404, 29K)

only birds should shit seed but that doesn't stop faggots...

I would imagine people (and niggers) would be a bit more respectful out in public.

No Jews should be allowed to exist

every man has the right to enforce law on people who break the law, as every man has the right and responsibility to safeguard his own community. and every man is the military / militia. so yes I agree. our definitions are just different. the twitter twat probably thinks law enforcement and military should be exclusively statist and not self-regulating autonomous communal aspects of a society, I believe the latter as I am all for self-responsibility. I don't want to be dependent on a state for my own safety or security, because that instantly puts me in a state of insecurity and dependency, which won't turn out well for me.

gun grabbing has never made anyone safer.

Imagine Trump's ICE were the only ones allowed guns.

eat a dick faggot

Attached: 1521774673702.webm (640x360, 1.39M)

Kek

Attached: 1561826506077.png (349x396, 268K)

Are citizens not allowed to enforce law?

They can make an arrest and they can defend themselves with deadly force if necessary, both of which are legal with or without guns.

Not saying guns should be legal or otherwise, just that your logic is pish as citizens are agents of law enforcement whether they are payed and loicenced or not.

NO.

Attached: DA0320B7-3BE6-4510-9900-FE1E0401CD82.jpg (550x487, 25K)

Off loading responsibility of personal defense is how you make weak men and a weak society.

It's really great the police can defend themselves, who is going to defend you when the police aren't around?

It really is amazing how politely people in public places behave when someone with a holstered gun is there. It doesn’t have to be a cop. Shit, paradoxically, when I see a nigger open carrying a gun on his hip, I relax. More guns, more frens.

Attached: 6CBC79AD-1F18-4BC3-93E5-5979A19C0A28.jpg (595x684, 31K)

>only those in a position to impose their will on you should be armed to do so.

No.

Why should they? US Military have killed more people than any other group in America

Every man woman and child is military in the USA. Fuck off and die you gun grabbing faggots.

Attached: 15774903052_d5326bd383_z.jpg (640x422, 46K)

My 14 year old niece is better equipped to secure a free state than most people I know. Her shotgun is cooler than mine. We’d have to be in some pretty raw shit before we let the womenfolk and kids fight, though.

Attached: INTERPOL.png (652x615, 182K)

This is what the Nazis thought as well and Jews were rounded up en masse. Maybe we should just do as this man says then.

What the fuck is he eating?

Based black man

Law enforcement are not under any obligation to protect you. Somebody find that court case that determined police do not have to do anything for you if they are under any risk to themselves. They just have to enforce the law, so if you're getting murdered they can just watch the guy, and then arrest him after if they feel safe enough to do so. That's why you see so many "peace officers" these days, I do not respect their authority.

And while the military has an obligation to protect you, military already is not allowed to carry weapons. Only MP's have weapons on post. Everyone else only uses them when training, qualifying, or deployed. For soldiers in the barracks, they can't even keep them in their rooms.

But even if all that were untrue, and both of those groups had weapons, why would you want that? Why do you trust the government, and the regular joes working for them, to carry weapons around you on a regular basis? And what's to stop people from joining them just for the then ""privilege"" of having a cool gun? Why would you cheapen the force like that? If most people were armed the world would be safer. I know that makes no sense to you lefties cause "more guns means more violence". Right, imagine you had a gun, and some other guy on the street had a gun, and most passers by had a gun, are both of you prepared to die today? Is that what you want? No? Then you probably will never use that thing. It's like the karate kid, training not to fight. You're carrying so you don't have to use it. But now imagine where that other guy has a gun, but you don't. And neither does anyone else around you. You look at him wrong, and he's having a bad day, BAM! You're dead. He's gone. Sans consequences. And he's free to do it as much as he likes, cause who's gonna stop him?

:^)

Attached: Huff Post diversity.jpg (600x762, 109K)

Attached: No obligation to save you.jpg (563x450, 42K)

Why do you describe that as eating? He is playing with food. Quite wasteful.

Every country that isn't a shithole is importing thieves and rapists and shielding them from the law. Shit is raw.

everyone should be allowed to defend themselves, and that includes the use of weapons.
>but
no.

I am the law enforcement and military for my family, home, and property tho.

Someone tweet back "Sieg Heil Funktionshäftling!"

doesn't surprise me, blacks love shooting.

Who *DOESN'T* like shooting?

Attached: Addicts before and after.png (499x499, 201K)