Why does pol think the rights of a pea sized clump of cells are more important than that of an actual human woman?

Why does pol think the rights of a pea sized clump of cells are more important than that of an actual human woman?

Attached: 181231-elizabeth-warren-se-447p_5eb15bd6563c24e7aad22ab8ba9d0997.fit-760w.jpg (760x508, 69K)

because it might be a boy

sg
ae

Attached: Abortion Inconvenience.jpg (700x700, 72K)

>spread your legs and have unprotected sex
have right to do that
>don't use birth control
have right to do that
>get pregnant, another life with its own DNA is growing inside you
'have right to do that
>decide this other life that arose out of your own shitty choices should be ended because of convenience
fuck you

>Why does pol think the rights of a pea sized clump of cells are more important than that of an actual human woman?
The clump of cells might be male?

fpbp

thats your rhetoric dummy, we think attempting to legislate the human body is equal to slavery

Because the potential for greatness is infinite in an unborn child
We know the capabilities of a "grown" woman
It's clear what benefits humanity more

Attached: Abortion explained.jpg (395x480, 31K)

Because women shouldn't have rights

I am pretty right wing. However, I am indifferent to abortion, in fact, in some cases abortion should be mandatory.

Attached: 35D51E57-4C46-417A-8470-F78AA233A064.jpg (258x245, 12K)

Spot the disco trannies.

praise.

Women are also only a clump of cells. So why should I care?

Attached: 1561785910864.jpg (783x1102, 139K)

Because women are fucking awful and babies haven't done anything wrong yet.
Additionally, there is clearly a heirarchy of rights. Firemen are able to break down doors in a burning apartment building because the right to life is more important than the right to property.

If women couldn't get abortions, fewer of them would be in the workplace, and that would be a huge benefit to society.

I've had it with insufferable women shitting up my profession, endlessly talking about, sometimes even employed to talk about, "DIVERSITY".

Do you know how you get more women in a job? By just getting on with your fucking work and doing a good job.

Seriously, when I'm hiring, if the candidate even mentions diversity, or equality, or any of those words, I mark them as a troublemaker, probably not worth the risk, and move swiftly along to the white guy who's just happy to be getting on with his work.

>pol

/thread

What color is it ?

What other purpose does a woman serve? If a woman kills her own kids, she kills her own value. The child is absolutely more important than the woman herself. The woman herself exists to bring that child into the world.

Because women are subhuman

Or a nigger

Attached: abortion rate race.png (960x730, 168K)

Women can make more than one child. Children, historiccally, did not always survive infancy. This is why greater value is placed on women.

Spartans and many other civilizations agreed with this conception.

Only a fully grown daughter would be worth more than a fertile mother. A fully grown son who could become a warrior would be on parity.

Sparta was a feminist dystopia. I don't want to live in Sparta. And children can survive infancy better now so we don't have to apply ancient excuses to modern practices. A woman exists to give birth. She has no other purpose, she has no other value. She excels at nothing else. She evolved to be a controlled walking incubator. Our policies should reflect that reality.

Scientific advancements do not change primordial attitudes.