Is equality of opportunity a good thing?

I dunno about you, but it sounds pretty neat. However, how do we achieve it?

Attached: thHOODZTYO.jpg (474x266, 12K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mvQ1dtZwmas
youtube.com/watch?v=wMtPwpSYoHE
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Exist in America.

>Equality of opportunity exists in a fucking oligarchy
Are you a faggot?

Why aren't you in bed you NEET faggot?

You're a faggot.
Sage.

Can be asked for you too, retard.
Provide argument, this is not /b/.

>I dunno about you, but it sounds pretty neat. However, how do we achieve it?
>>>

Everyone in the States already has an equal oppurtunity

How can an equal opportunity exists in a fucking oligarchy you retard? United States is controlled by banks and corporations, it's literally an oligarchy by all means.

Imam insomniu picko
youtube.com/watch?v=mvQ1dtZwmas

Isto ovde, nemogu da spavam kolko bese, 2 dana, ali jbg.

no iq determines existance. a sad fact for nigger tier countries and individuals.

better threads

What a fuck does that have to do with my point?

not to mention affirmative action still exists, along with the welfare state, taxes all sorts of shit. equality is a false idol, no 2 human beings to ever exist will ever be fully the same there will always be some small minuscule detail that provides individuality even amongst the most isolated of tribes, the only way to truly be free of all this is removing any form of enslavement or usury. it allows people to succeed or fail depending on their skill level, talent and most importantly amount of effort they have and are willing to apply to whatever it is. the op you posted is almost certainly some feel good commie bullshit written by a woman who owns 4 cats has few friends and will die alone.

Attached: 1539224382049.jpg (1000x1000, 140K)

>Is equality of opportunity
it is impossible/pointless currently, as genetics play a huge role
inconvenient truth

Attached: 1543872428073.webm (710x400, 2.59M)

It's been achieved and we should reverse it because equality of opportunity is fucking retarded

yes. people should maximize their potential

It's retarded. Egalitarianism is a stupid meme. No one is equal, ever. Speak truth. Do not bare false witness. Some are strong, some are fast, some sre smart. A rare few have it all. Others have none of it. Stop pretending equality of any kind is important, it isn't. Dignity, however, is important. The unequal should still be treated wih dignitt. Today, we treat NO ONE with dignity and we murder our unborn.

Because it cant be done, absent some sort of futuristic dictatorship where the government runs absolutely everything. Let's assume we can isolate genetics so everyone on the planet is born roughly the same. Even then, the environmental factors are too strong absent such a scenario. What if you have shitty parents? The state would have to raise everyone itself so shitty parents wont negatively affect the opportunity. Why even bother trying to get rich as well? You obviously want to spend some of that on your children, but if some parents have more than others tha their kids have more opportunity.
So to answer your question, it cant really be done. All we can do is try and narrow that gap to a minimum standard and that's it. Everyone can go to school for example at minimum. But your piece of shit public school wont provide your kids the same opportunity as those going to private school in Switzerland. Its a minimum standard, that's all.

So you are anti-equal opportunity? Guess we are in war then, you mutt. Also equal opportunity means for people to get better at themselves, so why don't you all want blacks to get better instead of shaming them and just being cucks who accept the so called "le truth"? You cucks love to hide your bigotry behind the "Truth". I'll tell you something: I don't care for a guy who wrote the IQ spectrum book, and I don't think he is a racist. However, you are racist because you use those facts to justify your hatred, instead of actually researching to how to get rid of that problem.

This guy gets it. We haven't even tapped into metaphysical things like ambition or purpose or endurance either, which all vary widely across social class, sex and race and may be independent of intelligence and physicality. There are special olympics athletes who work harder and with more purpose than total able people, for example. Good luck quantifying and equalizing that.

I'm against the sentiment because it's an entirelt worthless and brainlet-tier platitude. Nothing more.

I am implying to the equality of opportunity, that is the belief that everyone should have an equal chance to GET BETTER at themselves. And why don't you just abolish the oligarchy already?

it isn't anymore, now it means equality of outcome

when that man lost his titles the slow but soon to be fast coming dark ages began. such a blatant disregard of facts to pacify (((feelings)))

This has nothing to do with anything I've said. There is no opportunnity for equality of outcome. Explain to me how anything I've posted can ever be equalized. I'll wait.

Well you are already proving that you are against freedom to get better at being a human being, so I see no reason why should people deplatform anyone who thinks like you.

No. You simply refuse to admit reality is real. Apples are apples and oranges are oranges. Total equality of opportunnity is as stupid a pipe dream as is equality out of outcome. You cannot equalize two people's ambitions or thirsts for personal betterment. It's a ridiculous idea.

I am against that bullshit though. You cannot just give special privileges in order to "help them". You have to teach them responsibility. Say, why would anyone believe that it is bad that you hunt more meat because you are stronger rather than because you are hunting more meat because you enslave other people to do it for you?
I am not talking about equality of outcome.

But that cant be done. I went to a shit public school, and granted I did well in post secondary. However my colleagues went to private schools where there were field trips to Europe and everyone got new instruments and it had a rock climbing gym and semi-pro athletes teaching specialized physical education.
Are you telling me we had the equal opportunity in this scenario? Obviously not, but I was provided with AN opportunity that met a minimum standard. That's all we can do.

>The truth nigga, da truth accept just as it is
>be a cuck and don't help disabled nor anyone who is opressed
Wow, what a fucking cuck you are.

Well there cannot be an equal opportunity if THERE is a state. The state should not exist, nor wagecuckery jobs.

you are the most retarded person in serbia, if you are not blatantly trolling me here which i assume you are since what you just said was a bunch of insults and buzzwords stringed along with some vague accusations of me hating people for operating at the capacity I expect them too. how do you call someone a mutt and a racist? isn't race mixing the end goal of equality amongst races? shouldnt blacks be equally allowed to marry whites and reproduce?

That's kind of off topic.
The point I'm getting at is there is no eQUAL opportunity, but there is a role for providing people with AT LEAST some opportunity.
Think about the Indian caste system. An untouchable has ZERO opportunity. And that's not good. That's what is to be avoided.

How does helping disabled mean they have an equal opportunnity to non disabled? It doesn't. They aren't equal from the get go and never fucking will be no matter how much help you give them. Should they be disrespected? No, humans all have dignity and should be taught about their own dignity and to try to live with dignity but that doesn't make them equal or increase their chances for "equality" either.

It's just fucking absurd. Such an utterly stupid thing to waste time on. You keep saying id we abolish STATE there can be equality but that makes no fucking sense. You think hunter gatherer societies are more egalitarian? Give your head a shake.

>memeflag
larping anarchocapitalist cuck nigger

>Equal opportunity
>For everything except the philosophy of equal opportunity, that is dogma and not to be challenged

Attached: 1761773587553.jpg (360x394, 135K)

I called you a mutt since you don't like to be called like that.
Keep being a pessimistic bitch then.

Already exists in the US.

>Not understand the tolerance paradox
What a fucking retard you are.

Not when provided by the government, especially an oligarchy.

>sounds neat
Can you explain to me what equality of opportunity means exactly?

if you wanted to call me something I didn't like, just call me your friend. I don't think anyone likes to call you that considering the way you are acting this whole thread!

Attached: 1551309334517.png (640x680, 50K)

Equality is contrary to human nature. Any other discussion is misguided in disregarding the most fundamental aspects of man.

It means to give people the help to get better at themselves, which cannot be enforced by government because government is fucking shit. It must be entirely voluntarily to work though, and the equality of "OUTCOME" is not good, because you do not encourage the person to get better, you are just making it lazier, while encouraging him to be better is good.

>but muh hooyman nature
7 million years ago, we were fucking savages not even capable of a fucking math, you leaf. How the fuck do you even believe that the human nature will never change?

I explained this in the most basic terms. Just because your schools in whatever Slavic shithole your from didnt teach you well enough is not my problem.
So case and point - your opportunity is shit and theres nothing you can do about it.

So equality of opportunity is essentially taking responsibility for yourself. You have to make yourself a better person. Is this correct?

>Equality of opportunity
>Wont tolerate deviating opinions
Seems like you've got it all figured out.

rofl Serbians

I love it

Of course, and giving other people the opportunity to be better at themselves, and encouraging them to be better. Inequality is good when it's not used as an excuse for exploitation, that is my point, there might be always some inequality with people of one kind or another, but that should never be used as an excuse for opression.

calm down; have sex
he didn't say human nature will never change, that's just a strawman
he's speaking in present context, which is a very long time in evolution, so it's significant in the discussion

>Strawniggering of definition of equality of opportunity intensifies
What a fucking retard you are

Yes. Look at it through the looking glass of our people and don’t include nonwhites in the discussion. (((They))) subvert everything to include non-whites.

Yes humans were fucking savages, my point is that man dominating others has scaled quite well with industrial technology whilst still being an essential core part of man. The person who gets rich by eliminating thousands of jobs with a 300 line python script is simply exploiting the inferiority of others for their own gain. Equality cannot and will not exist as long as people are in competition with each other.

The human nature is always based on the fact that humans are greedy, thus making you a fucking pessimist. I honestly respect Stirner for just telling us that humans are just "neutral" more than you retards who use "human nature" as justification of opression

That image is lying.
SJW's and left-leaning people support equality of outcome, which is the opposite of equality of opportunity.
Everything they push for is suppressing equality of opportunity to push equality of outcome based on identity.
Too many whites and Asians are getting high scores to get in to university? Kick them out to make room for more black people with shittier scores.
Men make up the majority of X job? Put in a law that employers need to hire a certain amount of women.
The socialism they advocate for is literally equality of outcome; no matter how shitty you do in life, you achieve the same as people that do better than you and produce more value than you

>>inequality with people of one kind or another, should never be used as an excuse for oppression
what did he mean by this? an excuse or justification?

That sounds like an anti-social behavior to me.

So why give it such a shitty grandiose title. Why not say "let's practice responsibility and get off the gov tit"?

Why wasn't I born to a rich family? That's unfair and unequal.

Also SUE antifa

>t. aussie shitposter who never read a Critique of Gotha program
Take your meds
youtube.com/watch?v=wMtPwpSYoHE

Why should it be our responsibility to grant equality of oppurtunity to others? If we were to expect this from others, it would be dismissed as "entitlement".

>Is equality of opportunity a good thing?
no. it's gotten us here. land owning men are the only ones that should have rights. sage

Well that might be unfair and unequal, but I do not support the complete absolute of it. The equality of opportunity only advocates for the equality for an individual to get better at work, health, strength and other aspects of their lives, and everyone is encouraged to do so. They are against the inequality that is used as an excuse for justification of opression. Like for example, I do not want to rob anyone who is rich simply because they are rich.

>Butthurt over the internal contradiction within his philosophy
>Doesn't realize he can't even accept his philosophy without breaking its very tenant
>Calls others retards

Attached: thisfuckinguy.gif (400x206, 1.76M)

your whole worldview is fallacious, based on the paradigm: pessimism vs optimism, or some variation
it isn't about that, it's about being realistic, and it's been demonstrated that when given a position of authority, all of the worst parts of human nature shine - greed (for more power too), abuse, exploitation, but i think you're looking at this in a black and white way, that the only 1 answer is to describe: human nature used as justification for oppression. that's a fallacious argument, because someone can be accurate in describing human nature without necessarily thinking it's a tool to justify oppression. i think maybe you're projecting, bud. you're also saying necessarily that is the only morality that can be derived from acceptance of human nature. no one is saying it can change or there is no variation in individuals either, only you

also note: ignoring human nature can lead to equally bad outcomes as using human nature as a justification for oppression, indifference can also lead to oppression

Pessimists are cucks by default. It's like when I am debating with a retard who thinks white race is evil because of its history holly shit.
You are just strawniggering it you goddamn fuck.

>equality of opportunity
Is that where everyone goes to college to get the same type of smartass jobs so no one is left to do all the physical labor so we import other peoples babies but we're still fucking poor, jobless, and with lots of student loan debt because there isn't enough jobs designing the automation that destroys all the other jobs?

Cool, bro

Pff whatever you say. But remember, people never thought that we could fly in the sky, yet here we are now.

You are legit ignorant about it you fucking retard.

congrats, you drove everyone out of your thread with your pessimism

We already have Equality of opportunity.

It's not our fault that Tyrone chooses to drop out of school to sell drugs on the streets, he had the opportunity and squandered it.

It's not our fault that Becky went to a fancy college/university only to chase a worthless degree in feminist dance theory, she had the opportunity and wasted it.

not a pessimist at all. but if you're being honest with yourself, you can't deny that the best way to improve our society would be to shrink the suffrage

It's called plutocracy. You're a slav so you don't understand things as well.

you're looking at it in the wrong way, brother
it's not about being a pessimist or optimist, even human nature itself is important to consider when talking about how people will respond to new information, if you ignore that, it can also lead to oppression, but not being justified by human nature, by a lack of consideration for it
you are conflating what is with how you use what it, and reducing human nature to 3 positions, which is as bad, if not worse than ignoring actual human nature and its complexity on a larger scale

If your philosophy was true, it would be internally consistent. The fact that it can be reduced to an reductio ad absurdum, is evidence of its own foolishness. The very act of accepting your philosophy of "equality of opportunity" as true, is to deny the "equal opportunity" of philosophies. These two positions are in contradiction to each other. This is bad philosophy 101.

Only Whites think it's a good idea, so it can only exist in homogeneous White societies. In America, anti-White nepotism is ubiquitous.

Equality of opportunity is stupid. Different people should have different opportunities that are appropriate to their person and skillset.

No they don't think that at all.
They hate whites, they hate that they are white and they want whites to go extinct.

Poor slav honesty don’t kys unless you want to you have enough shit to deal with

>an 85 IQ fool who wants to be a rocket surgeon should have the same right to be in a class full of geniuses
The epitome of a retarded liberal faggot
>it sounds pretty neat
>we can make the world a perfect utopia because reality doesn't exist and I'm far too retarded to comprehend it's intricacies