No one Will Be my Campaign Manager Because of my Criminal Record

I would run solely to accelerate things and spit in the face of the zog and see what they’d do

Look up Bob Menendez

former sex offender, now Senator of NJ

stop leaving out the part where you're black and you killed a dog, that's the part that really ended your political career

I looked it up, apparently it was a myth so he was never convicted.

Barely anything of a criminal record user. And he talked his way out of it so proven innocent. If you are referring to his brown shirt days well that was totally different people viewed him as a hero or at least a man fighting for something he believed in not feeling woman's tits with his elbow drunkenly (not that there's anything wrong with that really just a bit sad). You can still make it but the most important things to remember are:

1. Every NatSoc compares himself to Hitler at some or multiple points in his life hoping and thinking his got the Will to become Fuhrer or some similar major figure.

2. You need that Will of the great man. By the time of 1933 Hitler had read almost all of Western canon that includes all of the great philosophers, artists, scientists, economists, psychologists, occultists (yes he read the Occult we have proof though it seems likely that he viewed if from a psychological perspective), etc. You have until you are 44 to of read all of that. Keep in mind that's how old Hitler was when he achieved total power so don't be too hasty though remember inaction is a greater bane of men than any accomplishment.

3. You must already have that spark of greatness and the ability to be so as even Hitler admitted if it were not for circumstance he would never of been who he was. However you must have charisma, you must understand how to speak, how to give a speech and how to connect with people. Use your intuition and your people focused emotion. Pic related as example of how Hitler exaggerated his movement, his identifiable mentality and expression so as to amplify that psychic energy so when he does give his speech it will of course no physically be seen as this extreme for he is no cult preacher but the mentality remains with just as much power. The greater taking on the form of the lesser as for its expressive capability's and Hitlers wished appearance to the masses as strong willed.

cont

Attached: Hitler rehearsing his speech.jpg (1600x1216, 97K)

I’ve worked directly on national campaigns, worked for lobbyist groups and political consulting groups. What position are you running for? Criminal record isn’t a big deal at all. Sounds like you are talking to loser campaign managers.

No, the last time he was tried for it, it ended in a hung jury. AKA he is going to be re-tried for it.

Would people care more about a dog than prostitutes?

>he believed in not feeling woman's tits with his elbow drunkenly (not that there's anything wrong with that really just a bit sad).
how the fuck is that sad? I really want to know that

The rest of your post I fully agree with and love though.

State senate, none will be my campaign manager because im a registered sex offender.

Sorry but you're not the one.

5. Understand the previous statement about circumstance. Germany and Europe as a whole is a very different place to America in almost every way. Mentality in the Anglo world is much more relaxed and trained in preference for the easy route disregarding a true higher power. America less so than say Australia (since this shit hole of a country only has about 7 men I can be proud of as Australian culture was strangled in its infancy) yet it still pertains this mindset.

6. Find strength from within not without. Do not depend on National Socialism, do not depend on Christianity or Hinduism or Greek mythology, do not depend on others. Depend only upon yourself and in doing so confront your shadow. This is not a call to self degeneration but a call to self identification and reunification. Identify the most degenerative parts of oneself within the shadow, find your total oppositional duality; find the figure which represents that and takes upon that form and incorporate it into oneself. It has been called many differing things by many differing peoples, Individuation, spiritual enlightenment, Nirvana, Moksha, etc. Find and draw from that the will to survive, the will to life and the will to power - the will to the rejection of life. Return from your shadow, return from your anima, return from the duality and unify the opposites. Become one and draw strength from within not a strength of the continual but a strength of being in itself. And now return from those meditative depths, as the wise man in the cave. All products of man are expressions of man, all truth is expression of man the sciences, philosophy, psychology, history, art, language, etc. Use these outside structures to exemplify that inner self, that inner strength - as expressions of oneself and ones inner will.

cont

Attached: Hitler rehearsing his speech 2.jpg (1436x1600, 139K)

Explain

I really like your ideology and way of thinking. Your posts are inspiring because it really does feel like there is hope. However i was sort of offended by you calling it sad, can you explain why.

Nietzsche was close to understanding the Ubermensch but he never quite did for he was tainted by by the touch of both Angels and Demons. The Ubermensch is not a man that rejects the outer world, he does not reject the great knowledge of the past, he does not reject the great men of the past and he does not reject the men of the present in hope of individual achievement and supersession. But instead he accepts truth and all its forms; and so all expressions of man the artistic, the scientific, the philosophical, the psychological, the linguistic, the sports, the religious, the occultist, etc. He accepts them as expressions of himself, as exemplifications of his inner will of both collective and individual existence. And most importantly he understands his place and his value in no wish of insecurity to prove himself but to only heighten himself to whatever rocky tops he may climb. He hath no fear of the inferior itself and so is in no need of the delusion of the superior itself.

This what Hitler meant when he stated: "Do not compare yourself to others. If you do so, you are insulting yourself."

Attached: Hitler rehearsing his speech 3.jpg (1600x1216, 155K)

Sure user I just wanted for finish writing it as you know it's of an inspirational origin as you somewhat stated. I didn't mean it sad as in "pathetic" but sad as in well it was probably the wrong word to use. If you look to that general area it was a bit of a shambles as my mind was at that point processing the next couple of sentences. I meant more so it's "meh" or "pointless". Like I mean most young guys do something similar or along the lines at some point whether your flirting with a girl and you grab her tit or it is just as you did. You move on from that pubescent mindset. Look to the many descriptions of Hitler. He was a very collective being as with most great men are, it was said he was consistently talking on the state of this world and ways to fix it and help his people. Never thinking too far in his own individual ego. Perhaps it relates somewhat to the collective unconscious, he has some sort of truly "divine" spark which by a collective soul was somewhat infused as much as it was predestined even for as short a period as two hundred years.

He was honestly such a great man, and to think he was homeless and tons of people walked by him probably thinking "this bum won't get anywhere in life"

Just pay a cleanup crew. How do you think niggers get record deals?

>He was honestly such a great man, and to think he was homeless and tons of people walked by him probably thinking "this bum won't get anywhere in life"

Heh yep, just a lonely artist selling paintings on the street. It was said by many people that his eyes were somewhat remarkable in their depth and look. His childhood doctor who was part Jewish himself Hitler gave a free plane ride home. Once this Doctor arrived in America the government and journalist ready to list all the bad things he could possibly say about Hitler in all his life he never stated one bad thing on him. The closest he ever said to something along those lines were (or at least sounded like this) "He was quite a sad and serious child". Even from the start there were a large difference in him from other men. I do believe his father was quite harsh, it's funny how often great men had troubled childhood's.

>get record deals
Well Mr. Goldstein is probably flipping the bill on that and secondly the modern world is sick nobody cares if the "gangsta" has a bad history let alone some jewish record company

Ok the eye thing just makes me jealous since i don't have nice blue eyes like hitler.

Is this some sort of elaborate shitpost? I suppose you can run on " I totally touched her tit with my elbow" as your campaign slogan.

Would that convince anyone? Or do you not believe me?

>Ok the eye thing just makes me jealous since i don't have nice blue eyes like hitler.
Well I do so suck d... jokes user. I do have blue eyes but my point is that blue eyes do indeed have plentiful character however your eyes still may be deep and beautiful while brown. A difference of beauty sure yet not disadvantaged.

Remember though user a leader is a spiritual, ideological thing not the shell that it is within modern politics. For that is the crime that politics must pay for its separation from spirit and true purpose.

They get record deals in return for sweeping the dirt under the rug if you know what I mean (kill political inconveniences)

>They get record deals in return for sweeping the dirt under the rug if you know what I mean
Though you meant exchange sexual favours which is quite a common thing and you hear a lot of nigs talk about it after leaving the Rap industry though I did think it was an odd expression for it. Same thing happens in all of Hollywood. But was wondering could you give me an example of some of those assassinations?

I love it when I'm on Jow Forums and a poster like you comes. I still have posts in my memory similar to yours, especially about the asceticism of Nazi Germany, that i will neer forget.

>I love it when I'm on Jow Forums and a poster like you comes.
Yes I'm quite the same in that respect, not many good posters around. I've been following your threads and they're a fresh of breath air from so much shit being flooded through Jow Forums. I swear half of Jow Forums is functionally retarded.

>I still have posts in my memory similar to yours, especially about the asceticism of Nazi Germany, that i will neer forget.
I wish I had a better memory or at least better ability to recall long term memory. Because I can only remember there being good threads in the past not many specifics which reminds me there should be another art thread sometime. Also fan of Wagner? He almost single-handedly inspired the 3rd Reich by his Wagnarian/Schopenhaurian aesthetics. I'd probably say greatest artistic genius to ever of lived.

>Yes I'm quite the same in that respect, not many good posters around. I've been following your threads and they're a fresh of breath air from so much shit being flooded through Jow Forums. I swear half of Jow Forums is functionally retarded.
Following my threads? Which ones?

>I wish I had a better memory or at least better ability to recall long term memory. Because I can only remember there being good threads in the past not many specifics which reminds me there should be another art thread sometime. Also fan of Wagner? He almost single-handedly inspired the 3rd Reich by his Wagnarian/Schopenhaurian aesthetics. I'd probably say greatest artistic genius to ever of lived.
Can you explain why? I never understood what is so good about classical music, why is it any more intellectually than say modern music from an objective standard? Is there something to the way it effects our brains that makes us less degenerate or something?

Because from my understanding now all music is just different sounds, so objectively there is no difference

Beto O'Rourke has a criminal record, and he was still able to run for Governor of Texas. He is able to run for President of the United States of America, now. Keep trying to look for a campaign manager.

O'Rourke ran for senator, dummy. Americans don't even know their own country, god forbid they actually try to talk about global politics.

Dutch don't know anything.

I know who Beto O'Rourke is. That's something. On second thought, maybe it isn't.

I stand corrected about Senator VS. Governor.

>Following my threads? Which ones?
I remember some threads of yours talking about your criminal record as with this one so I was keen to see what else you stated.

>Can you explain why?
Oh boy user you really had to pick this subject to start from scratch on. Well it's going to take a while and it's unlikely you'll learn to appreciate Wagner's absolute genius in a day but I'll give a brief over view.

> I never understood what is so good about classical music, why is it any more intellectually than say modern music from an objective standard? Is there something to the way it effects our brains that makes us less degenerate or something?
>Because from my understanding now all music is just different sounds, so objectively there is no difference

Well yes it is objectively better and music has been slowly degenerating since Wagner's death. Differing sounds have varying emotional effects on us and so a collage of them in varying complex ways have an amazingly varied effect on mans emotional reception. Jazz as an example does not contain a strong order to it, it is erratic and actually disrupts the brains working ability and frequency's because of this it was banned within Nazi Germany by Hitler. Now look to the aboriginal tribes who bang their sticks together, blow the didgeridoo and hum repeatedly the same notes. A very basic effect now man for thousands of years has been advancing within music constantly building upon its previous predecessor as with any knowledge. Just as a painter uses differing forms and colours to express emotion the musician uses varying diatonic(you know f, b, etc) and chromatic(varying forms of those previous notes) notes.

cont

Attached: Wagner with hat.jpg (300x300, 10K)

to be fair, you should probably be killed for heresy

Now as an example of how music degenerates and generates one can look to modern music even though as a grouping is a degenerated form from pre-modern within modern music we can see further smaller groupings of how music has degenerated over time. For example all top tracks and musical hits since the 1960's had been tested in terms of complexity, originality and I think a few different factors that I now forget. They even processed it through machines and they found that it had decreased in complexity, originality and the other factors. Over all degenerated. The music industry and record company's no longer said "ey we'll put it out and if it sells we'll put out more". They now say "ey this is what the kids want and this is what we want the kids to want". Rap when it first came out was almost universally hated until it just kept being played over and over until people identified the typical response to repeated and familiar stimuli - positive. We start to like it because we hear it so much, our animals instincts tell us it is safe and friendly and a normal sound since it is so often heard then our higher functioning brain does the rest of the work and we start to enjoy it. Now back to classical. It is much more complex and so varied in creativity and so with all that available emotional expression. I cannot give a history class of music but there exists the common practice period which contains people like Bach and Mozart. This period itself is split into three more

Baroque period - Bach, Pachelbel and others like that. It started at the end of renaissance period at around the early 16-- and finished around the early 17--. Monteverdi: youtube.com/watch?v=oYdnUHCpomQ

cont

Attached: Bach.jpg (220x271, 15K)

Seth Rich. Look at some of the names that started hitting it big in 2017

So listening to modern music is bad for your brain?

Next period is classical now even though the classical period is a period within the common practice period often the common practice period is named the classical by those uneducated. This classical period contains people like Mozart and Haydn. It started in early 17-- and ended with late 17--.

Beethoven transitioned this period to the next.

Romantic period - greats Beethoven, Brahms, Wagner. It started in the early 18-- and ended in the early 19--.

Now each period and each great musician I have mentioned transitioned advanced music amazingly but no one quite like Richard Wagner. His sheer reach and ability and creative power is unable to be told. He desired a culmination of all the arts with drama, poetry, music, painting, etc, while having a philosophical and cultural ribbon run through it with an expressive aim. In his case it was his own personal philosophy mixed with that of Schopenhauer. His advancements in music alone are ingenious. Look to something like the Tristan chord, a cord first used in one of his late Opera's Tristan and Isolde. It conveys the philosophical sense of longing and prolonged desire. I hate that sodomic jew Stephen Fry but he explains it well: youtube.com/watch?v=dWLp7lBomW8 . And this is truly just one millionth of what Wagner created.

Some of Wagner's preludes which were meant to be only heard differing with most of Wagner's music which served to be heard while culminated with the varying images of the Opera.

youtube.com/watch?v=AQOfIENN2tk

youtube.com/watch?v=SRmCEGHt-Qk

youtube.com/watch?v=J-qoaioG2UA

No words can ever truly explain Wagner's genius for if that were true he would of been in no need of music. It is something to be intuitively grasped.

Wagner shall always be the total peak of all Western art, culture and music in
general - The Third Reich was the last continuation of this Aryan spirit birthed forth from a reactionary nature.

Attached: Wagner - old.jpg (200x252, 10K)

This may sound dumb but does listening to music in your head count as degenerating your brain? I am willing to do anything to be an ubermensch I stopped drinking I don't smoke i work long hours I read a lot. However i do listen to modern music i know a lot of it has degenerate lyrics but i like the sound.

I notice sometimes i hear it in my head even when im not listening to it, does that too have to stop?

Against degeneracy
>Convictions for drug dealing and sexual assault
Do us all a favour and just switch teams to the left bring them down with you

No though it depends on the piece. For example I still appreciate and enjoy some modern music like Don McLean (American Pie will always be a classic) or the Eagles however once you appreciate the likes of Wagner and understand his music and its complexity and so in turn truly appreciating it modern music though will always express the same emotion it won't move you anymore or if it does it will do so only with the greatest modern songs and randomly at that. The emotional impact will be limited and you it will no longer "move" you.

You clearly didn't read, i didn't sexual assault anyone.

>I notice sometimes i hear it in my head even when im not listening to it, does that too have to stop?

Try to user, it's obviously in your subconscious so you should try to stop listening to degenerate music. If you stop it will go away after a week or two. Try listening to some of the music I have selected to fill that annoying ring. The Monteverdi one is especially great.

So how do i enjoy Wagner? Because when i hear classical i just hear boring sounds to be honest. I only like Beethoven's Ninth and that's because it seems to make me excited with its speed.

>it will go away after a week
No it doesn't, because when i went to jail i didn't listen to any music besides the occasional radio i walked by. I noticed even at the end on my last day after three months. After a positive experience and i felt excited i could hear the music in my head again. It was very pleasurable but if it's degenerate music that rots my mind then I don't need it. It was three months of not hearing the song yet i still enjoyed playing it in my head.

It was literally shake it off by Taylor swift. and yes i know it's liberal nonsense but i liked the rhythm to it.

Wagner was a Schopenhaurian (who was an extreme pessimist). His Opera's focused on the individual rejection of the will to life therefore reciprocally asserting life as the most valuable object in mans possession. Somewhat similar to Kierkegaard's view that whether you choose left or right, action or inaction you shall regret both. Though without the latter. The self rejection for the collective good, self sacrifice for the greater good and so asserting life and its entire "purpose" by means of suffering. Think along the lines of Jesus's death on the cross. Wagner admired all Aryan religions Christian, Norse, Greek, Hinduism, etc. He could even be said to be the one that inspired Aryan pride and Jewish hatred with Hitler for Wagner was the man that truly epitomised that and brought these beliefs forth ever more. His Opera's always featured the Aryan ideal with the likes of the Norse Hero of the sacred race the Volsungs (obviously inspired by the Volsungs Saga). And portraying the villain as an Evil Jewish archetype. His sense of aesthetics was not just the basis for the 3rd Reich in the sensual world of sound, sight, etc, but also in the world of ideas.

Listen to common practice period music as a matter of course and then attempt to totally understand each string piece as a matter of course youtube.com/watch?v=Y76uH2xu670

Hitler admired Wagner as the absolute greatest and peak of all Western culture so much so Wagner's music was played at every rally and Opera's on nigh 24/7 in the city. Hitler loved Wagner with such a raging passion he considered Wagner's two grand sons to be his ideal sons. They called him uncle Adolf and essentially were Hitler sons.

cont

Attached: Wagner - young.png (1217x618, 1015K)

Wagner was even great friends with Nietzsche as well as a paternal figure (as Wagner was the same age as what Nietzsche's father would of been) though the former relationship was destroyed as Wagner's appreciation for Christianity grew and Nietzsche's hatred of it grew. Nietzsche's first book was in praise of Richard Wagner. Wagner viewed art as the natural reciprocate to religion and so often the saviour to it just as much as religion was the saviour to art.

Though to understand Wagner's essay Religion and Art he goes by the presupposition that you have read Schopenhauer. Don't read Schopes yet if you haven't worked your way from the Greeks to Kant as it will just be an even bigger mess. As long as you have a basic understanding of Schopenhauer's philosophy from the internet and you know the bare minimum about history you should be able to understand it if you mull over certain parts. Though remember Wagner is a poet he isn't always talking literally:

users.belgacom.net/wagnerlibrary/prose/wlpr0126.htm#d0e1158

Attached: Wagner.jpg (1369x1897, 417K)

So why did Wagner like Christianity when the Nazis generally considered it a Jewish Abrahmaic religion? I heard Himmler hated Christianity

>So how do i enjoy Wagner? Because when i hear classical i just hear boring sounds to be honest. I only like Beethoven's Ninth and that's because it seems to make me excited with its speed.

You must recondition your mind to how it reacts to outside stimuli. You could just have a nigger tier concentration level and so brain hah! But judging from the fact that you seem quite intelligent I doubt that.

>No it doesn't, because when i went to jail i didn't listen to any music besides the occasional radio i walked by. I noticed even at the end on my last day after three months. After a positive experience and i felt excited i could hear the music in my head again. It was very pleasurable but if it's degenerate music that rots my mind then I don't need it. It was three months of not hearing the song yet i still enjoyed playing it in my head.

Well try subjugating various other music, if you don't enjoy it then don't punish yourself but try to allow oneself to enjoy it. Remember recondition how your psyche responds to outside stimuli. By curiosity what particular music is it that you listen to?

>It was literally shake it off by Taylor swift. and yes i know it's liberal nonsense but i liked the rhythm to it.
Oh well hahahah I found it pretty catchy myself as well. Honestly one of the better pop songs but yes fill your mind with something else. You could just be making a small problem into a big one by focusing on it too much. I'm pretty sure everyone finds Shake it off catchy it's just they are made a certain way to appeal to our basic instinct and so a catchy song becomes even catchier once we hear it repeatedly as with what I told you about identifying comfort with repeated stimuli hence certain smells awaken fond memory's from childhood.

How do I recondition my mind in such a way?

Should I try listening to it and paying close attention to every note or just have it in the background while I work or something?

>So why did Wagner like Christianity when the Nazis generally considered it a Jewish Abrahmaic religion? I heard Himmler hated Christianity

Oh boy a whole other can of worms and I've barely finished on the previous one. Well the 3rd Reich was quite split on this matter (quite like how Jow Forums is now). Himmler detested Christianity yes and he organised the SS in a pagan way because he was the head of the SS and a Pagan. The main ideology of Hitler and the Third Reich was race and God. Race transcending a particular creed or religion. And so a Pagan was not banned from leading the SS just as a Christian was not banned from leading the Luftwaffe. Wagner considered Jesus to be Aryan as well as the Israelite's. Aryan descendants from the Indo-European migrations. As silly as you may call this that was his belief and his reasoning really isn't all that poor. Jesus for the entire third Reich apart from religion was considered an Aryan by all I'm pretty sure even Himmler as Jesus was said to be a Galilean (an Aryan location). It was also said Jesus whipped the Jews in the temple hence why Hitler posed in so many images with a whip. Hitler also painted in 1913 an image of Mother Mary and Baby Jesus Christ as Aryan ideals long before any interest in politics which obviously means he at least had an appreciation and love for Jesus Christ even if he were not a Christian.

Christianity was changed to positive Christianity which essentially put race above and allowed for the worship of really any religion under it. It wasn't so much Christianity anymore but a point to show unification among the Reich.

There has always been confusion among what race the Israelite's were considering that every major Israelite such as King David have always been described as fare and ruddy. As well as a few lines describing the entirety of the Israelite's in the old Testament. Every description of Jesus we have was Aryan.

cont

I have to go to bed it's 5 in the morning here. I still would like to say thank you for your contributions in this thread. I am saving this thread and will read the rest of what you type when I wake up

Also the positive Christianity idea is really interesting. The Christian identity moment I think it's called.

Basically I heard other nordicists say the Greeks and Romans were also blond and blue eyes which I heard has s lot of evidence. And there is ancient Chinese mummies with light features

However Judea has four meanings.

1. A general region within the middle east.

2. A religious sect.

3. A race.

4. An ethnicity (language)

Hence the confusion so lets say that it's possible the ancient Israelite's were Aryans that means that many an Arab and the genuine evil Jews who wrote the Talmud (Pharisee's and Sadduces among other Jewish groups). Eventually because of the Israelite's being out numbered as they were once the migrated to Europe they assimilated totally while the Semetic (modern Jews) didn't and retained their Talmudic religious version. The only reason the Jews have always existed as an identifiable force is because of their murder of Christ as the Sadduces and Pharisees. Their entire culture and religion as Jews revolves around the hatred as Christ for him being the epitome and representation of the Aryan and that great culture they had always leached off. Hence the reason why Jung stated them to be of no origin, no homeland and no true religion or culture for they had always stolen it from the Aryan. In Wagner's view them taking the old Testament was no different.

>I have to go to bed it's 5 in the morning here. I still would like to say thank you for your contributions in this thread. I am saving this thread and will read the rest of what you type when I wake up

Your welcome user, I've really quite enjoyed talking with you. I hope you read this when you get up.

Yea I'll go into the symbol of the Swastika and how it doesn't quite work with the Christian cross in a second so you can read it in the morning user. And yes the Greeks, Romans and even Ancient Indians were all Aryans. Aryan as in the Indo-Europeans who took part in the Indo-European migrations from Europe (The Yamnaya tribe) through the steppe, to Iran to become the Indo-Aryans (eventually just known as Aryans) and then in turn they continued to migrate further and conquer Ancient India at this same point in 2500 BC Hinduism was created and some of the greatest sources for knowledge to ever of been written were created - the Veda's. Later on Buddha himself was born within an Aryan location of India and has always been described and depicted as an Aryan. His depiction as an Asian is a newer invention. Buddhism in turn effect the creation of Christianity though I will go into that later. I have written a few short pieces of knowledge for threads like these. I hope you don't mind me dropping them. But essentially the Indo-European migration theory became controversial after WW2 because of its affiliations with the 3rd Reich and European superiority. It's slowly coming back as a generally accepted fact especially considering that India's population was recently tested genetically and it showed the average 20% European dna proving the Indo-European conquests of India. This is where the cast system originated within India from ancient Aryan kings and such ruling over the Dravidian tribes. The Indus Valley Civilisation (The previous one to the Aryan conquests and creation of Hinduism) was created by some much earlier migrations from eastern Iran.

It has that same character of the cross found in every Aryan culture in every possible form. Some inherent truth to its emotive nature. I could argue its relation to the Jungian quadripartite and by that I mean the relation of the Psyche to the number 4 and all derivatives, the connection of wholeness. The Mandela which Jung was so transfixed by. However obviously its imagery goes far beyond its numerological value even if this may be said to be the core factor.

It has a sort of momentum to it, the masculine, the one half, the uneven, un-centred aspect to it. It represents the Wotanic war God. That once such a man fulfils his ideal the world will surely be thrown into a storm. It is not the centred cross of Christianity for wholeness and peace, it is not the Wheel of Dharma, it is not the Yin Yang - all symbols of the whole and the even. While the Hindu and many native variations of the Swastika beckons forth a further sense of calmness by its position as flat. You see, it is ones own race and its regenerative progression.

Attached: Swastika with Eagle.jpg (1920x1200, 268K)

spreaker.com/show/nordic-frontier

It was a natural progression for such symbolism to be inherently war like for it is what Hitler had desired. For it was what Germany had desired. To reclaim their lost glory yet be so much more, to be reborn - Germany reborn. There is a reason the media is so afraid of showing the symbol itself often substituting it for varying crosses and images. Because of its innate effect upon man. It is not a symbol of life, it is not a symbol of the renaissance of man, it is not a symbol of man. It is a symbol of the Aryan and suffering, two words so irreceptibly intertwined as the Aryan whole not alone from birth but by action and mentality. A symbol of the necessary direct affirmation of life un-neglecting of the Wagnarian/Schopenhaurian aesthetic, it is a symbol for rebirth by revenge; for rebirth by death. As the common archetypal motive of the reborn is expressed so well within the alchemical transmution of lead to Gold. One must endure death before rebirth.

Relating back to that Christian cross one can see in the image for positive Christianity that they are 2 mutually exclusive symbols when applied to the other. Neither one more right or correct than the other but simply of different mindset and expression. As I said earlier it was a natural progression for such a symbol to be more war like, and that if the war had been won by the third Reich likely the placement of the Swastika would of been shifted towards the Hindu placement as flat - still it being the twining of the masculine and its direction inverted the twining of the feminine and so the Swastika as used by Hitler with such direction's masculine identity is further amplified by its circling and diagonal nature. As with the Hindu Swastika's feminine nature is further exaggerated by its flatness. And so the Masculine Swastika placed flat would be nothing other than the ingenious times of peace where in the feminine and the masculine may unite as I shall explain later.

Attached: Positive Christianity.png (1200x720, 34K)

Yet what good is a war symbol if not for in war?

The resting Eagle sitting on its ethnic branch may be said to be the saviour of this ravaging drive, it is that which restores the sedative methodical order. However the war like masculine Swastika is not alone its only form, it was common for the flat native Swastika to appear within the 3rd Reich many a time, if the war would of been won no doubt the central placement of the Swastika would of shifted even if only slightly. Testimony to the Third Reich itself. For you see politics, the state, war, conquering all of the outside domain of the masculine; of man. And so within this outside domain it is so often seen an effeminate "touch" where in great creations have been made by the desire of creation itself - not the necessitation of - The combination of the masculine and the feminine to birth forth this so well known creative force of opposites. Jung himself called it individuation though a common theme in Occult prior. Though the beauty of this "renaissance" is great it has often been the downfall of man, for the masculine domain soon indulges within the feminine to such extreme extent it loses both that creative force which was this minglings original product as well as the masculine itself. And so the womans world itself becomes the masculine and the mother is now a strict complainer and the father a pathetic sulker. And so it has been mans aim to find balance between the feminine and masculine energys without total unity for such an act would be death, the duality's God set apart in the beggining may not be unified in totallity lest it collapse into degeneracy - a common theme in all walks of man. Yet the third Reich was not lucky enough to indulge in such a "renaissance" period instead forced to take part in a needless war advancing itself by the masculine necessity.

Attached: Swastika and Swavastika.png (1600x1120, 2.52M)

>says he hates degeneracy
>is a criminal and sexual offender

degenerate scum , i feel no pity for you.
nigger tier behavior.

>degenerate scum , i feel no pity for you.
>nigger tier behavior.
Listen Frenchy get the fuck over it, who cares he still had somewhat of a pubescent mindset most young men do. "Oooooh he touched her teet with his elbo". I know this is bait but try to be creative.

I do not mind whether Christianity or a form of Paganism becomes dominant for they are both of the Aryan ideal representing the continually recurring archetypal patterns of God and Psyche. Take the Christian religion for example, it would not be what it is today if it were not for that central sacrificial myth. Now take Norse mythology, Odin as he hung on the tree and self sacrificed himself for the knowledge of the runes, for a spiritual enlightenment, and what is this gaining of knowledge within the Pagan ways where in which Odin claimed the runes if not for the cleansing of sin? And what is the death of the physical if not the rebirth of the spiritual? This archetypal rebirth is present among that of all great cultures, the Egyptian Pyramids are built in such way to simulate that of a womb and it is said that the Kings would simulate that of a death and eventual rebirth from its many tunnels, or that of the Masons who for an initiation would hit the initiate down with the strike of a hammer on the temple (third eye) and be caught and lifted back forth anew, or the four stages of alchemical transformation known within the Hermetic works of alchemy where in which they would turn lead to gold. The first stage being Nigredo the death, the blackening and this form can be found most famously among that of the Black Sun and as this Sun is composed of the Sig runes and sun wheels and Swastika's it can be said to be the death and so eventual rebirth of the race for rebirth must always follow death as a matter of principle. Secondly we have Albedo the whitening and rebirth of itself into the spirit, the cleansing of the impurities. Thirdly (although often excluded) we have that of Citrinitas the yellowing and transference from the reflective light of Lunar to that of the Sun itself Solar, to stare into the heart of the Spirit instead and not its image on the waters surface.

Attached: Odin hanging himself.jpg (500x591, 43K)

Lastly we have Rubedo or redness the final stage and completion of the Magnum Opus and spiritual enlightenment where in which the soul of lead has been transfigured to that of a soul of Gold. All of these many examples expressing this eternal archetype of self sacrifice, of death and rebirth present with this very transfiguration of Odin himself for he was pierced by the same spear as that of Christ, the spear of destiny in which runs through all of us, our blood, our race, our Volk. For they are one and the same Wotan and Christ, whether theologically or psychologically it need not matter, yet it need not tear us apart as brothers bound by blood.

Attached: The Spear of Destiny.jpg (371x570, 38K)

The word Israelite was changed to Jew with the KJV in 16-- within the Bible. Ethnicity played a major factor among the concept of God's chosen people.

Refer to Matthew 15:21 in which it is shown Jesus refuse a Cannanite woman help for she is not of the chosen people even though her faith were great, Jesus claiming “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel” and later stating “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs”, were we not taught that Christianity cares not for ethnicity?

Attached: Tor's fight with the Giants -Marten Eskil Winge.jpg (610x900, 99K)

yeah right , let's see :

>sex assault
>soliciting prostitution
>drug dealing
>vandalism

complete degenerate and nigger behavior , and he wants to run for office ?

>b-but he turned a new leaf

as if , that's what /polacks said for Trump and so many more.
i love how /polacks hates niggers but would still endorse a man with nigger habits.

The Israelites were said to be a fair and ruddy people (Lamentations 4:7 "Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire")("Anomalous blue-eyed people came to Israel 6,500 years ago from Iran, DNA shows" Iran was the land of the Aryans), King David was described as fair and ruddy(Samuel 16:12 "And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to"), Jesus was his direct descendant, it was said Jesus had a golden face and hair (Psalm 45:2–3 describes him as "fairer than the children of men" as a prediction)(Revelation 1:9-20 "The hair on his head was white like wool, as white as snow" as a description risen Jesus)(Matthew 17:2 "And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light"). Jesus's pale beard and features were said to look remarkable among the many dark coloured peoples listening to him though this specific account is of dubious origin (Historic Letter written by Pontius Pilate to Tiberius Caesar About Jesus). Even if we listen to the Evil of the Talmud it is said his Father was a Roman Soldier. Whichever way you look at it Jesus was an Aryan ethnically speaking. Christianity's prime influence was that of Zoroastrianism the first known monotheistic religion and the religion of the Ancient Aryans.

Attached: God Speed - Edmund Leighton.jpg (2904x4000, 3.65M)

Secondly its influence was that of Buddhism the religion of the descendant of the Indo-Iranians known as Buddha who was inspired by Hinduism which itself originated from the Aryan invasions within India as well. Jews appeared when Abraham's descendant Jacob/Israel had his first son Judah, who was the progenitor of all jews. Judah was jealous that Joseph was going to be given the Abrahamic Blessing so he had him sent off to Egypt, but when he returned with his two sons the sons (Manasseh and Ephraim) were given the blessing instead, and together with all the other tribes (except Judah, the jews) they created the Kingdom of Israel. The (The Kingdom of Judah was created by the Jews after they were barred from Israel and later led to racial intermixing by this tribe after Judah married a cannanite), Israel eventually though turned from God (like most empires do) and fell into degeneracy, however the Greeks north of them let the remaining good Israelites travel on their ships eventually leading to them assimilating into Europe's fledgling civilizations. (Thus fulfilling the prophecy of Joseph's sons being Fruitful and Forgetful). And still I have yet to even dive into the Old Testaments views on racial intermixing.

Attached: Loki and Sigyn - Marten Eskil Winge.jpg (440x559, 65K)

The Talmudic Jews have always stolen the creations of the Aryan man in this case his culture and religion of this time. Christianity has been degenerated and degenerated over history by the men of sodom and Judah and now you are viewing it through a Jesuit lens. In every way you look at it whether ethnically or culturally Christianity is an Aryan religion of the highest grade.

Wagner himself the greatest of all artists - an artistic genius himself. Viewed Christianity as the greatest and purest of all religions yet neglect not did he Aryan culture nor Aryan religion of any merit. The Third Riech itself was built upon Wagnarian aesthetics, its creation would be unlikely without such a man. Hitler himself idolised Richard Wagner with the greatest of burning passions so much so he was called uncle Adolf by Wagners two grandsons and considered them his ideal sons if he were to ever have anything - Hitler was a father figure to them. Hitler was family to the Wagners. Read Wagner's Religion and Art - you shall understand: users.belgacom.net/wagnerlibrary/prose/wlpr0126.htm#d0e1158

One realises there is so much more than the right - and the classical. Then one realises there is so much more to the right - and the classical. Of course it does not always work in such equally valued and distributed manner among the many faculties of the psyche yet it occurs on the subconscious level to the very least. Such is the way with the modern Fascists obsession with postmodernism - he shall come to see what infinite depth not regress the classical has such as the likes of Wagner - he appreciates Wagner without understanding him and so is no appreciation at all.

Attached: The Accolade - Edmund Leighton.jpg (2329x4000, 2.06M)

>Does anyone else think it's messed up how that one incident makes it so i can never win an election due to public viewing?
It's entirely messed up, yet you got to deal with it.
You need a good lawyer as friend and a judge who feels you, that's how to win it all back.

Attached: Blondi_und_Führer.jpg (850x1250, 219K)

To Op:You seemed interested in Wagner's reasoning behind his love for Christianity. This is the best defence I could give without going into the philosophy which itself would take far too long so for the philosophical defence refer to: users.belgacom.net/wagnerlibrary/prose/wlpr0126.htm#d0e1158

by Richard Wagner himself.

Attached: Wagner - profile.jpg (1527x1081, 234K)

Different user here, but I will run for office later in my life as well. I've got nothing to lose, and everything to gain.

>I feel I legit would make a great candidate since I hate degeneracy, corruption, and I am actually a true Conservative unlike the cucks in office and want to fix this society.
Lmao. In Weirmerica? Unless you are a kike puppet your chances are less than 0 fren. Though if you goal is to raise awareness and gather support than go for it, I'll throw some neet bux at you

Do you like Gustav Holst and his Planet pieces? I particularly enjoy Mars - The Bringer of War

I too wll run for president in the 2024 elections, gl hf

The first one is an incorrect accusation. However yes degenerates can change, he suffers from some of the greatest of sins and rightly so for his wrongdoing. He did not deserve being put as as a sex offender for their reasoning however perhaps it is punishment for his other sins in the way of what is deserving and what is not - not a divine retribution necessarily.

Of the other three prostitution is by far his absolute worst yet perhaps he hath no good parents to show him the way. He must pay for his crimes as selling out one of our own and a woman's sacred act is truly a great sin. However I do believe he may make amends and redeem his soul. He must still live with these actions no matter what.

>Different user here, but I will run for office later in my life as well. I've got nothing to lose, and everything to gain.
Don't we all user, but if you ever achieve great public value in yourself you shall find you have everything to lose and so nothing to gain.

>Do you like Gustav Holst and his Planet pieces? I particularly enjoy Mars - The Bringer of War
Yes I quite liked it, he was Wagnarian himself though I do find he often falls under the immense shadow of Wagner often to the effect of how do I say "simplistic" music. Still great though and occasionally he has a real gem. I'd probably agree Mars is my favourite out of all of them.

I love his quote: "Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire"

Maybe so, but the public is fickle. Take away their entertainment, show them the fraud and lies being permeated, and give them hope. It will be hard, but I have faith. Because history is cyclical (to an extent) and the collapse of my country will definitively happen in my lifetime. The only question is: Will I be prepared for it?

>Take away their entertainment, show them the fraud and lies being permeated, and give them hope
And in return they will give you death, only once this original supplier of pleasure ceases shall the dog bite the hand that had fed it and find a new master. Yet the top 20% may be changed as the seed ready to burst forth in all its beauty and bloom. For example one could argue the Third Reich was the blooming of the German Nationalism appearing in the mid 19th century. I just hope we don't have to wait so long for this just planted seed to bloom.

>Because history is cyclical (to an extent) and the collapse of my country will definitively happen in my lifetime. The only question is: Will I be prepared for it?
A depression of the West - yes, if a war, revolt or revolution will come directly from that I do not know but I do know that it shall allow this seed to burst forth. The war shall begin, during the depression or after as with the third Reich I do not know.

And yes history is cyclical yet only in the way that as a snowball collects more mass it shall always continue to roll in the same way. Think along the lines of Hegel's dialectic history and the singularity.

I admit, I am not as well read on Hegel as I should be. I will re-read his work, along with the likes of Plutarch, Locke, and Mill. I've already read Machiavelli (I thoroughly enjoyed The Prince), and I've read Leviathan by Hobbes.

Tell me, do you like Vivaldi? Either La Follia or Violin Concerto in A Minor RV 356 would be my top selections. When it comes to classical music, I know the artists not the time periods behind the artists. Reading your previous posts was enlightening to say the least.

>t. Literal retard
Spoken like a true liberal. Ted Kennedy would be proud. Fucking kill yourself

Attached: IMG_20190404_210304.jpg (576x1024, 56K)

>I admit, I am not as well read on Hegel as I should be. I will re-read his work, along with the likes of Plutarch, Locke, and Mill. I've already read Machiavelli (I thoroughly enjoyed The Prince), and I've read Leviathan by Hobbes.
Yea I really liked Machiavelli since we are both Entp's.

>Tell me, do you like Vivaldi? Either La Follia or Violin Concerto in A Minor RV 356 would be my top selections. When it comes to classical music, I know the artists not the time periods behind the artists. Reading your previous posts was enlightening to say the least.

Of course user I love him though honestly I haven't noted Vivaldi that much, don't get me wrong I listen to him often but from someone with a bad memory I can just never really remember his works names though I really liked Stabat Mater even if it is somewhat of a pseud choice. And glad I could help user, I really do enjoy writing these posts so it really makes me happy you appreciated them. Btw what do you think of Monteverdi? He's the type that's famous for most to know who he is but you'd be surprised how many don't really listen to him. I posted this earlier but it's just so sublime youtube.com/watch?v=oYdnUHCpomQ

And forgot to say

Apart from jokes Hegel is notoriously hard to understand but from someone who has quite a strong intuition I find that once you mull over a certain difficult part for a few minutes it somewhat "comes to you".

This is the first I've listened to Monteverdi. But this song reminds me of Don Quixote for some reason (I'm thinking of the spanish guitar in the background). It also reminds me a bit of Gregorian Chant because of the vocalizations coming in and out again. I quite like it!

>This is the first I've listened to Monteverdi. But this song reminds me of Don Quixote for some reason (I'm thinking of the spanish guitar in the background). It also reminds me a bit of Gregorian Chant because of the vocalizations coming in and out again. I quite like it!
Yes indeed, I just found the pitch to be so entrancing. On a second note Wagner's love of the famous pessimist Schopenhauer is understood so beautifully in Wagner' letters as I shall quote one from Wagner to king Ludwig -

"My King, I am not well: life has become a burden for me, and my artistic labours are far from easy. The whole effort, moreover, of reviving so strange a work as Tristan has left me very tired. What depresses me is not the malice of the world -- but the extreme difficulty of working effectively and creatively, so that I feel like a stranger, almost like a fool, in this world of ours, and in this century" - Munich, 5 July 1865.

Often telling Liszt in letters that he wished to die. The tormented artist, Wagner was everything his Opera's expressed and more.

Attached: Schiller.jpg (136x186, 6K)

I like Wagner because I can feel a sense of victory being taken away from the jaws of defeat. I feel it most strongly in his Valkyries piece, and Entry of The Gods Into Valhalla.

Indeed, yet it would not be Wagner if it were not for a bitter sweet taste in the mouth of all appreciators of Wagner - it is true beauty.

I find it funny how many mentally ill are attracted to the music of Wagner as well as how many Wagner's music has turned mentally ill or insane - it literally killed the lead actor for Tristan und Isolde in the opening night with the last words "Farewell Siegfried; console my Richard" for Wagner to later admit his music had "driven the singer to the abyss"

It was nice chatting with you user, but my presence is unfortunately required elsewhere. Until next time.

>It was nice chatting with you user, but my presence is unfortunately required elsewhere. Until next time.

You too user, be well.