Why was the 19th century so /aesthetic/?

It truly was the peak of european and american aesthetic design

Attached: 7720264f6554d71bc062af4d644c1512.jpg (1294x1600, 587K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolipile
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

slavery was still around

Slaves picked cash crops, they didn't design beautiful architecture, go whine elsewhere Tyrone, you didn't "build this country".

Im sorry, does pic related look like its made out of cotton?

Attached: gettyimages-463967029-594x594.jpg (594x419, 51K)

r e p a r a t i o n s

must be paid

Things were still made out of natural materials (wood, carved rock) and the upper classes had a sense of beauty.

19th century design and art deco are peak european design. I also like gothic and renaissance architecture but they might be a bit too archaic for todays world

>niggers weren't roaming around the cities as though they were people
fixed

we peaked in the Victorian era

True

Attached: Triple_Expansion_Laboratory_Steam_Engine_(1928);_Discovery_Museum_5780.jpg (3264x2448, 3.41M)

Slavery makes nations poorer as it removes the incentive to industrialise. Niggers picked cotton and made a handful of Jews rich, and everyone else poor, and today's Jews are exploiting the faggotry of modern whites to milk as much as possible out of it. The aesthetic in question emerged in those places which had industrialized, and these places were able to do so precisely because they didn't practice slavery.

bro, if africans were responsible for the white man's success, why haven't africans succeed themselves?

do you see buildings and art in OP's pic all over africa? no you don't, just a bunch of mud and grass huts, even STILL today

Attached: 1476145915200.png (395x396, 144K)

Thats why the romans never had the industrial revolution. They were more than capable of inventing steam engines to drive trains, automobiles, ships, factories, etc. but they didnt because they had cheap and plentiful slaves

Whats funny is everyone today calls all that shit "gaudy" and unpleasent because everyone is used to (((modern minimalism))) with an all white flat plain wall with no designs or anything

You know, white men were craftsmen and the actual laborers, niggers didn't do shit except pick cotton and menial shit tasks, the actual professionals were white who made it from the raw material

no they weren't
the metallurgical processes needed to build steam engines were far off from the classical era

Tasteless kikes

The antikythera mechanism would like to disagree with you

cuz jews

pretty sure he's referring to this
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolipile

there's no point speculating on what could've came from that 2000 years later because the industrial revolution required a chain of knowledge and the modern world also requires electricity, which the romans were no closer to discovering how to utilise than the fucks who built the pyramids

this

if I use a hammer to build a house, I don't give the hammer credit

The issue is every fag associated old style victorian these days with some "SPOOPY GHOSTS AND GRISLY MURDER" or some dumb shit with a "story" about how 500 kids were raped and murdered in some old house

Attached: hjiouse.jpg (800x534, 188K)

Oh fucking lol, look at this shit

Attached: Inside-Davis.jpg (2400x1595, 837K)

/comfy/

NO NIGGERS ALLOWED

Just found it randomly look for old Victorian style houses, really goes to show you how far we've devolved as a human race

Attached: 983435cc9db679da4436bb9fc4697475.jpg (1500x900, 312K)

Attached: sdlkjfgosydtf8097y6sd08f7ysdafy708asyd89dy.jpg (1208x1400, 446K)

That looks like Grandma’s home and smells like cat piss and mothballs.

Trump aesthetic is the patrician choice.

Attached: 6CA4CF4D-2D58-4A07-8EC9-0C32F2E3DB59.jpg (480x360, 39K)

Day of the Sickle cell

>Trump aesthetic is the patrician choice
yeah for an 80 year old manchild.

get some class

Attached: 18756v.0.jpg (1200x800, 179K)

Attached: 64364596-80BD-4EAC-8159-12BDBE5E6CFA.jpg (1198x1200, 334K)

Bourgeois culture and aesthetic was still held in high esteem and most people looked up to it as the model.

Attached: victorianghome.jpg (680x960, 134K)

JEWS BROUGHT THE NIGGERS TO YOU

Your grandma is a gross nigger then, get your jew Trump shit out of here kike

Attached: 585CB44E-683C-4365-8BF6-83E02896A665.jpg (600x400, 77K)

Based, /ptg/ is literally the faggiest reddit tier group on the board

Attached: afwe.png (616x591, 983K)

GOHIC BAROQUE ROCOCO

These three are the only viable option for the western man who still has soul within him. Everything else is a declined variation of those three.
Gothic style was the new found soul of a culture. The west found itself and established itself. A spirit of adventure and optimism describes its style. Unending heights of the cathedrals. The mixture of light, colours and wall art, show the center of cultural spirit. The spirit of a people that strive for infinity and absolutism.

Baroque defined everything more. The middle aged culture reflected itself and got more refined. It created a sense for history and adopted things that older cultures invented in a similiar state of beeing. Most well known the antique styles.
Rococo marked the last step of growing, maturing the cultural style with splendor and pure divinity materialized in Architecture, especially interior architecture. Infinity was viewed from within, not just outside.
The industrial revolution marked the total downfall of art, due to the fact that it was the end of spirituality in the west. Materialism rised up and became the style.
Today its even worse. Architecture is just dissolution. Basic geometrical forms, abstract and vague forms. Just like a decomposing body, the body of western culture decomposes and its as ugly as a corpse is.
Bauhaus is a literal carcass.

ROCOCO is an eye sore. it totally out of control

For the same reason it still is. Money.

these things still exist today...they are just owned, as they were then, but the ultra-rich. it's not like every middle class family back then lived in a house like that. use your brain

Art Noveau / Art Deco were the last two genuine design styles. The "internationalist school" ( ie a bunch of Globalist jews) was spread across the globe by Germany driving out shitty garbage studios like Bauhaus, who in turn corrupted and destroyed architectural and interior design, bringing us the big glass box and other wonders.

its all so tacky. its like a some plebeian who just rich and tries to imitate a noble roman

>but the ultra-rich

meant *by the ultra-rich

I agree. rococo needs to dial it back

Of course it is nothing like the quiet brilliance of a greek temple which prevails by having the finest yet simplest proportions.
But that is what was clear from the beginning of western culture. Striving for absolutism opens the dangers of excess, in this case creative excess. But this artistic excess shifted into technology.