How do I develop his?

Vocabulary
Patience
Intelligence
>Hard mode I am nonwhite.
(When I mean non white I mean non European)

Attached: 20160411_jaredtaylor_obamalegacy.jpg (1920x1080, 186K)

Be Huwhite

Spend a childhood in Japan, being constantly humbled and made to swallow pride and adopt their methods of communication.

That's how Jared did it.

Read more books, nothing humbles a man like realizing how much you don't know

Have the same conversation with different people for 40 years. That way you've heard it all and can hone your argument into a point so sharp it breaks motherfuckers in the first round of the debates

Isnt he a jew

Marry a jew.

Learn to admit you’re wrong or don’t know something, and be willing to learn.

Not as far as i know, but his wife and children are.

This
Also be born with a very high IQ along with a sharp verbal acuity.
I have always been very good with communication since I was a small child.
I am so far beyond all of my peers with communicating in business or high tension situations that I wonder if I am part kike.

Listen to his interviews and audio books and podcasts. You can pick up signals and conduct from someone and emulate it if you consume and process it. It takes a bit of effort but once you know how and what to say and when and when not to react in a certain way, then you become as sharp, polite, insightful and effective as someone like Jared.

Read books, especially early 20th century and late 19th century literature. Poetry can be helpful as well. Also, whenever you are writing something, study a thesaurus. Watch historical orators.

your arrogance shows you're an honorary kike

Man, to be a fly on the wall when that Fareed guy met with the producers or whoever about interviewing Jared.
>we know you can't beat this guy if you let him talk so interrupt him every chance you get. Or else they'll start wanting their own caucus's, Moloch forbid

Read books and write

Yeats, Eliot, Pound

Thank you guys but unfortunately English is my second language but boy do I wish I had a fluent vocabulary like Jared does

Based advice. Much gratitude.

It's more about talking to people and finding out how a variety of different people respond to your point. Once you've heard all the bullshit counter arguments, you sort through them and start putting together your own zingers that are irrefutable to the majority of their counter points. Jared wastes no time getting to the point in a debate because he's heard just about every counter they could possibly come up with that isn't so far out , it makes themselves look stupid.

Much gratitude.

At the still point of the turning world. Neither flesh nor fleshless;
Neither from nor towards; at the still point, there the dance is,
But neither arrest nor movement. And do not call it fixity,
Where past and future are gathered. Neither movement from nor towards,
Neither ascent nor decline. Except for the point, the still point,
There would be no dance, and there is only the dance.

Eliot is superb. His book "Christianity and Culture" is worth a read as well.

Attached: 1558982781622.jpg (1520x1000, 1.13M)

good luck, i am also curious as how to write and speak better

Easier said than done I have a impulse control of a nigger. As soon as I hear someone contradicts himself my blood pressure skyrockets

Have you checked this out?
some user made it on /lit/

Attached: 1548935682006.jpg (720x2277, 670K)

Inside I have this. But I was beaten regularly at schools (Opus), made me a better man.

Patience said the Lord. The Hawk strikes when the prey is most opportune. If you lash out at any contradiction, you'll miss the coup de grace.

That's why Jared is an amazing advocate. The same goes for Jacob Rees Moggs, and Juda Peterson.

good shit

realistically i probably will forget about this by tomorrow but it looks like a good reference

read and write a lot. Start crushing people on Jow Forums with well written posts for a start.

Basically, the tenets of a Jesuit education.

The bit that's missing from this, is to go on shitpiles like Plebbit and argue from both sides, understand what arguments work, don't work.

This isn't Ancient Greece. Memetic warfare must be a/b tested to scale.

Intelligence can't be improved. IQ is genetic. Kind of like talent.
You can get very proficient at something but if you don't have that natural spark, you're gonna find your ceiling soon enough.
That said, vocabulary can be improved by reading a lot.
Patience by getting control of your impulses.

why don't you save it then?

Gee if only there was decades worth of research on the strengths, weaknesses, and paths towards personal development for the xNTx (Keirsey, Socionics, MBTI) 'Rationals' so that you could better coordinate between the thought patterns of ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, and INTJ

Read books. Exercise your mind. If you're non-white you're going to have an inherent handicap (unless you're Asian) but you might be able to overcome it if you exercise your mind enough.

Contradictions are ridiculously common. Sounds like you have no problem identifying them. Everytime it happens you need to keep yourself from exploding, and then deconstruct the person's logic in front of them.

Before I was every a political person I was still a contrarian. Now i started finding holes in leftist thought, but I didn't realize everything I was deconstructing was leftist until later on. That's what lead me here eventually. Here's an example (1 is me, 2 is whoever)

>1 - should a man be able to marry a man
>2 - ofc
>1 - should a man be able to marry his sister
>2 - ofc not
>1 - why do you think a man should be able to marry another man
At this point the conversion can go in several directions, but with about 75% success, person 2 says some bullshit for why someone would support gay rights without realizing that same logic should extend to the hypothetical incestuous couple. "Love is love", "doesn't affect me", "why should I care", etc. When they bring up birth defects you remind them this is a conversation regarding marriage, not sex and continue to push the question. Very rarely can they formulate a logic that truly echoes their views in defense of gays and against incest (Bonus points if you ask them about homosexual incest)

(1/2)

Attached: 1554232716266.jpg (640x425, 68K)

People will realize there's a problem in what they've said and jump to defend it, but by the time theyve messed up, you've won. Do not let them push the conversation further, it will bury the fact that their views are not consistent, and THEY were the one to show it. By sticking around, they generally end up making attempts to justify their positions, but they aren't trying to convince you, they're trying to convince themselves their right.

This is what you do to someone who follows flawed logic. Chances are they won't learn a dammed thing, but by having an audience, you expose them. The less you say once they've proven themselves to be inconsistent gives them less ability to twist the argument into a victory in their mind.

Blowing up on people only pushes them farther in the direction they stand. Remember you are only creating more enemies whenever you explode.

And to answer your question in OP, read more books, especially older books. Listen to points of view you disagree with, and people who are smarter than you. Cultivate discipline, exercise your skillset.

I would rather accurately assess my strengths than have false humility.
I have many weakness' and am aware of many of them.
Interpersonal, business or otherwise, communicating is not one of them.
What are you good at user?
In what areas do you believe in your strengths?

profound info
thank you user I definitely shall consider it.

If one decides wanting to read books, which wich one should one start? I've only read 1984 and have no clue what further i should read..
Fiction? if fiction which fiction?
Help would be appreciated

sorry for autism english btw. x3

You can develop your vocabulary by reading a lot, especially if you read the classics.

>which wich one should one start?
Ask everyone in the thread to tell you their favourite novel. Mine is Moby Dick.

Read 20,000 leagues under the sea. My fav book, its fiction, but from the perspective of a scientist. It tells a fantastical tale, but goes into almost too much descriptive/scientific language. Fucking phenomenal book from a lingual point of view. Plus the story itself is quite the enjoyable read.

Other stuff you could get into are old classical stuff like 'the trial and death of Socrates'. Its a good start.