Watch his latest segment. He's literally arguing for a third position on primetime television with one of the largest audiences available through TV.
He could possibly be our VP in 2020. What a white pill.
Tucker Carlson appreciation thread. Say something nice about him.
You are a good man Tucker, your courage and honesty is truly inspirational.
YOU CAN'T CU€K THE TUCK.
I don't know if I'm quite sold on the VP angle but his coverage in grorious nippon was amazing. It warms my heart to think I have a boomer or who in the family who watches that erry nite.
Video for reference.
youtube.com
>He's literally arguing for a third position
>He could possibly be our VP in 2020.
So why would he attach his name to Trump, the Israeli puppet?
Why do you faggots keep saying Tucker and Tim pool are crypto natsoc.
Are you people this dumb?
Did one guy say it, no everyone is trying to fit in?
My last sentence is equally as gay as you.
If I can quote Plato.
"Truly great leaders dont seek to rule out of a desire for power. They seek to rule out of a fear of being ruled over by lesser men."
Tucker and Trump.
Tucker has been quick to criticize Trump. Honestly I think that Trump believes, as do I, that he won't be able to win 2020 on his own steam.
Having Tucker as VP makes him much more electable imo. I believe Tucker would hold him to account.
Oh and did we invade Iran? I missed the memo. All the Israeli puppets wanted war in Iran didn't they.
>He could possibly be our VP in 2020
no. nice dreamposting tho
I fully admit that the word socialism brings horrible images into my mind, and yet, I find myself drawn further and further into Uncle Adolf's welcoming arms with each passing day.
>what is with this shill bullshit?
Every fucking day for the past week. Its totally forced. Tucker cucked to Antifa never forget. He didn't even use the incident or his fame to get fight back. He isn't to be trusted.
Tim pool.
Lol no.
If you've read enough and have retained enough information. You would be able to see that Tucker has been directly paraphrasing a certain succesful German politician from the 1930s.
Go figure.
You're not monitoring useful information sources if you haven't seen a certain segment trying to drum this up for a while and finally noticing Jow Forums is the easier venue.
>if you dont have a life you can spend all day doing retard research
ftfy
I remember being new. Hang around newfren, it's not socialism like Marxist socialism.
Lool up "The german economic miracle." It can be a little tricky to find but it is documented. NS totally turned Germany from a degenerate Weimar nation to a nation that could singlehandedly bring the entire world to its knees.
Pic related.
I was sitting here trying to figure out what Tim this peabrain was referring to. I gave them too much credit and assumed theres no way they could be referring to tim pool, nobody is that stupid
No, but once you get started, whether that's reading books while your family takes you on vacation or get to sleep at night, or whether that's reading things on the interbutt while you stop to each lunch, or whether that's homing in on better and better talk radio to dull out the boredom, then you start to notice things.
That's all. I'm not your guru. What I do is try to put some time aside to email small essays to my friends. Not too long. But enough to invite them to come up with something that they see in their lives.
You can't be /ourguy/ unless you call (((them))) by their name and for their actions.
Tucker is just another Zogtard.
it's wrong to think of it as socialism
It's not even a third position. It's an alternative to materialism, which BOTH capitalism and communism revolve around. Hitler put labor ahead of money. The people ahead of the economy. Neither capitalism nor communism do this. They are ideologies that are focused only on the material value of goods/products. It's all about how much you can produce, rather than about the wellbeing of the people or nation.
>nobody is that stupid
Alas.
Anyone who thinks tucker isnt signaling third positionism is not sure what to listen for.
The debate isn't whether or not hes signaling the debate is whether or not hes genuine
>I'm not your guru.
ok tony robbins go to sleep
>The german economic miracle
all reference goes to after war era. describe more.
>1 hour
pic related. More accurate please
I don't know who that is, but I guess keep going until you find something better.
Clearly missed tonights segment.
He ripped shreds of predatory international capitalism and usury.
He was even arguing for "economic nationalism" which the bankers don't like.
The only way he could have been more obvious is with vid related. Is that what you wanted him to do user?
It's his opening monologue. He is literally talking about the far right uprising happening across europe but he characterizes them as though they are heroes and the kind of Revolution trump should be leading.
Just watch the first like 5 minutes or so.
>oh vey, goy! you're not really one of "us" unless you ruin your career and political chances by spouting rhetoric that not publicly acceptable!
>hurr durr i cant goggle a name
I actually have a set of 1960s encyclopedia brittanica if you want the reference. It's hard to find because anything that portrays NS in a positive light is burned.
Actually it was quite easy to find.
historylearningsite.co.uk
This, based Nip.
I don't use google and I wasn't interested enough to remember the name. Try again next time.
Personally at this point I'm completely convinced by Tucker that he is genuinely our guy. If you listen to him regularly I dont see how you can come to a different conclusion.
Of all the people calling him a shill or a plant or gatekeeper I've literally never seen one specific example that wasnt from years ago and its obvious that tucker has totally changed his viewpoint by now.
yeah i'm gona try again to spoon feed a fucking retard lol
lol yeah lol
He could do that and I'm still not voting for him a second time, he pulled the mask back and revealed what he actually was. Any attempt to 180 from what he has done should be seen for what it is, another farce.
ALL MSM Pundits/politicians are controlled opposition.
Revolt or die.
>Personally at this point I'm completely convinced by Tucker that he is genuinely our guy. If you listen to him regularly I dont see how you can come to a different conclusion.
>Of all the people calling him a shill or a plant or gatekeeper I've literally never seen one specific example that wasnt from years ago and its obvious that tucker has totally changed his viewpoint by now.
I totally agree. Sure you can go back to 2003 when he was a NeoCon but he's apologized for that. I believe in second chances and I trust him personally.
sieg heil trump 2020
So vote for Biden, dont whinge to me about it. I was picking Biden to win but if Trump can harness the power of the Tuck, I like his chances a lot more.
Peddle your blackpills elsewhere. Tucker has done more than nearly anyone to push the overton window over the last four years.
Wont be Biden it’ll be Kamala
I just won't vote at all, how's that? Shouldn't you be in /ptg/ cheerleading your boss?
All you zoomer kids who don't remember the previous version of Tucker on MSNBC, being a bow-tie wearing libertarian faggot.
Not sold on Tucker. Pretty convinced he just has some good writers for his opening monologues. When it comes to being on his own in interviews and arguments with guests, Tucker is no where near as articulate as with "his" talking points.
BASED RIGHT WING SOCIALISTS!!
After tonight's show i sent a fb message to ticker carlson tonights fb page asking how to apply to work for Tucker.
So based
camel toe is the choice of the communist party true
Thank you. But not very flattering article
Dont agree. His interviews are pretty good. Problem is his show is formatted in the typical boomer fox news fashion and interviews last only 3 minutes.
this, 300%
>responds to an absolute retard
Well Kamala will lose and Trump will win. She's too radical she will scare off moderate dem voters.
Do as you will user.
I'm not a very big fan of Trump tbqhfamalam. Tucker has more leadership qualities in his right hand than Trump has in total.
Perhaps first and foremost. Tucker doesn't want to be a leader. That's a part of what would make him such a great one.
I was checking out some botposts before this thread and it seems to be the theme.
>user says something positive about Tucker.
>user says something negative about Trump like it has anything to do with Tucker.
I think you're afraid of him. I think that your senses, so dulled in other directions are incredibly sharp in this direction.
>Recognizing a greater man than you and trying to destoy him.
Based English teacher/swedish exchange student
DO
IT
MR. PRESIDENT
National socialists?
I believe that was the point I made in the OP. Thanks.
>Trump will win.
Should be interesting to see how he does. Bill Gates' big bucks is absolutely carpet bombing the media with anti-Trump fakery.
No worries.
Read between the Pilpul.
"Using the most basic of statistics, Nazi Germany certainly underwent major economic change. Like most other countries in Europe, Weimar Germany had suffered from a very high unemployment record and Nazi Germany inherited this. By the time World War Two started the unemployment rate in Germany had tumbled: trade unions had been tamed, the work force had seemingly developed a positive work ethic and job prospects were better."
Reminder that they also fought the entire world. That money and success came from somewhere.
Was it already there in the 1920s?
Afraid of Tucker? Absolutely not. I simply just don't want Tucker to muddy his chances by attaching his name to Trump's very real purpose of acting as a pressure release valve to whites realizing they are being actively replaced in their own country.
Dirty tricks, Mi6.
You know I watched Goldeneye the other night for teh lulz. The way they say "For England" stirred something in me.
Ye, i am agreed. And i watch video, Tucker has a point. Legit.
Did you see the segment with Douglas Macgregor where they directly tackled demohraphic change?
It's a good episode. Worth watching.
It was spot on for Tucker to be a traveling correspondent, since the rest of them have nothing whatsoever to add. And none of the rest would have ever asked an insightful question on camera. That's a good deal.
fuuuuck
there's literally nothing i disagree with of what he just said
I've seen Tucker cut interviews and kick off more people like a frustrated bitch in just the two years of Trump's presidency than O'Reilly in the same time slot ever did over a decade. Hell, Bill would usually offer up the last word to even the worst leftist guests.
I'm still pissed at Tucker for fucking over Ron Paul with evangelicals back in 2008 when Tucker got Dennis Hof to offer a "two for the price of one" special at his whorehouses if you signaled support for Paul.
Again, you teen faggots don't remember the MSNBC version of Tucker. It's like the leftists who don't remember the Republican versions of Nicole Wallace and Morning Joe.
Tucker is based and would make a good VP to Trump, unironically.
Thanks for watching fren.
I remember the MSNBC version of Tucker. That's why I never cared if he passed across the talmudvision while I had to interolerate it being on in my presence. He's grown up since then.
Actually did, I'm glad Macgregor had the balls to even go on and lay it out like it is.
i am trumps VP. wait i mean i like his VP.
yeah
15:05 "in our country some people
definitely are getting special treatment
Republicans should oppose that with
everything they have"
What did he mean by that, I wonder?
Macgregor has brass balls.
I don't have the clip but Tucker once asked him who was keeping us in the middle east.
He replied.
>It's the international elite, it's them and their lobby.
>bowtie version of tucc
kek wasn't that cnn crossfire? against james carvile?
I think you're just little baby queers looking for a big bull queer daddy hero aka cocksucking beta boys looking for their next proxy alpha to live vicariously through.
Fucking faggots
More Cucker Tarlson
Watching it too, user. Perhaps I'll send it to my dad who's a bleeding heart liberal who says that conservatives have lost their heart.
Yeah people have to go back to 2003 to criticize him.
He said and did a lot of silly things then. But weve all done silly things and men deserve second chances.
Nice digitz
You should user. Tucker is a voice of reason and it's so obvious that he cares.
Would u fuck him?
Need more buzzwords
Something like that. The whole thing was just so insufferable all I could think about was why won't my boomer parents turn this shit off and stop polluting their minds.
It's kind of funny when his guests try to use the bow-tie as a way to gain ground these days. It's like a sign they're just going to gurgle and drown, and it's not going to be worth watching unless they flounder for a clip later on.
Agreed
oh oops my finger slipped
I didn't mean to memeflag; but rather it's time to cook breakfast!
tucker carlson is the most hardcore civic nationalist american that i know of. you guys are retarded if you think he supports any kind of white nationalism
The muffin in the gas oven is right.
atleast something
first civic then full day of the rope shlomo
thats like saying first capitalism then communism. they are polar opposite concepts, one only leads further away from the other
Seething
>tucker carlson is the most hardcore civic nationalist american
I'll raise you your evidence free assertion with Mcgregor's segment on demographics and Tuckers show tonight.
ahayku amsalem
youtube.com
Overcoming your own programming is the hardest challenge set before you on the road to enlightenment. You must simply remind yourself every time it happens that the word "socialism" doesn't necessarily mean what Marx and other egalitarians say it means. They didn't invent the word. The only defining feature present in all ideas is the concept that Socialism is an anti-capitalist economic system that is managed by the community for the good of the community. It doesn't necessarily involve state-anything. To anyone with a brain, the Soviet model, as an example, is neither community-managed, nor works in the interests of the community. The Soviet model is the basis of the average Westerners revulsion when they hear the word, and yet is conceivably not actually socialist in the first place.
National Socialism is the harmonization of a human Economic system that is entirely based in evolutionary principles: that the individual competes against one another within the group, but that group works cohesively and without conflict when faced with other groups. To me, that is what Socialism truly is.
Tucker is addicted to humiliation porn
You have to start somewhere. We're at a point where borders themselves are in question, and that's an untenable position for any state in the long run.
i disagree. In 2019 some base civic for start seems reasonable.
It's one thing to approve of socialism for all, and it's another thing to approve of socialism for only whites.
I'm fully supportive of helping my fellow man, but I'm not supportive of helping animals. They don't deserve help.
He's not running on a civic nationalist platform. He's running on an American nationalism platform. Which happens to contain a lot of white people.
He's said multiple times that leaders need to take care of the people in the country first before international obligations and immigrants.
You are trying to decry him because he hasn't said anything overtly extreme enough to lose his platform. Because that's actually what you want, for him to lose his platform.
I bet you don't like hin talking about predatory international capitalism, usury and our debt based economic system. I bet you didn't like it at all.
I don't think he supports white nationalism per se, but he definitely isn't "the most hardcore civic nationalist".
He is openly hostile the Jewish-derived "creedal nation" nonsense pushed by neo-cons and their pawns and insists on America being a nation of a distinct group of people.
He seems to be more of an advocate of the V-Dare/Steve Sailer type model of "citizenism" that people like John Derbyshire promote, which is basically nativism for current American citizens without regard to ethnicity or any other factor. Basically legal citizen who is here now can stay, and everyone else can fuck off.
american nationalism is civic nationalism because american nationalism has never meant white identity
>I'm fully supportive of helping my fellow man, but I'm not supportive of helping animals. They don't deserve help.
It's that simple, honestly. People want to help their own, not help others who then turn around and try to tear down everything good and decent while those who helped continue to slave away to support their existence.