Shocking concept, i know
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
grammarist.com
twitter.com
Why are post colonial countries so much shittier after post colonialism
How about I bully you and then punch you in the balls constantly and let you fend for yourself?
Genocide doesn't sound so bad of a concept, does it?
>Shitskins don't like their country being ruled by whites
>Whites leave
>Shitskin country turns to shit
>Shitskins want to come to country ruled by whites
I think a bit of re-colonisation is in order.
I'm responsible for my corrupt leaders actions which I'm not allow to kill & stacked the system in their favor. Mhh seems fair.
what are you implying?
are you some kind of antisemite?
Yeah, they definitely aren't coming for 4 to 20x the wages of there home counties mong.
As if we "destabilised" any african country in the last 40 years
You don't have to host refugees if you don't let them in.
Or kill them at the border.
kill all shitskins and kike
this
Libya
Also, if these countries are really so unlivable because of "Western interference" they why are the locals breeding so prolifically? There's really no excuse for exacerbating bad conditions by introducing more people into that environment, except that leftists don't consider Achebe, Mohammed, Pajeet, and Juan to be smart enough to do anything but breed like rats.
>bigotry of low expectations
How exactly did Europe cause the Syrian Civil War, genius?
Its called fighting communism
This would be true, if almost like all refugees weren't in for the gibs, but actual safety.
The best solution, if not the final one.
Reminder that foreign aid fucks over local farmers and industry who can't compete with free gibs.
We need to stop sending aid so their local economies can grow, allowing them to unfuck themselves.
Now there's a fair chance that they're just low IQ shitskins and won't be able to sustain themselves no matter what. If that is indeed the case then we needn't interfere with natural selection.
"destablizing"
This is actually true but heres the facts
>western governments (plus Chinese) and NGO's pump money in
>food aid funding grows population, leads to scarcity of resources and opportunity
>educational attainment increases due to development funding
>higher education leads to flight of "refugees" because increased aspirations and reduced opportunities
>"destablization" through brain drain
therefore the solution to "destablization" is to stop giving them money for "development", stop growing their populations through "food aid". a win-win, if only NGO's and cucked governments would stop doing it
Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia? What has the west done in these countries?
Yeah, because those Germans sure did de-stabilize the whole of Africa with their 2-3 colonies in the middle of nowhere.
Of those brits who raised the living standard of every nation they were in and left a great basis for blacks to build their nations
or italy who was a joke even to it's colonies
>it's colonies
Should be "its colonies."
Not trying to be an ass, but I love language and want to help foreign speakers of English. "It's" is "it is." It doesn't show possession. That's how fucked up English language rules are.
Italians did quite a bit.
>the west needs to accept refugees from the third world because they destabilized their countries
This is such a retarded fucking argument
1. Why would they want to live with the people who are responsible for destroying their homes?
2. Why should westerners let in people who have a grudge against them?
I love you, Hungary.
Doesnt work like that guilt-ridden first world faggot
When did Sweden destabilise Somalia?
When did Australia destabilise China?
You know who destabilised all those countries? Jews. Also even if true, no one has to host anyone. Also host implies it being temporary, which you know it never fucking is.
JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW JEW
We need a polish-hungarian empire to take over europe
okay dude
They are not refugees.
They are economic migrants.
And they are too dumb to run a civilisation, so they come here to ruin ours.
We never had colonies but EU is still forcing us to take them in.
It's your penance for fucking with Germans.
You would never had destabilized countries if you switched to nuclear power in the 50's, never created debt based currency and gassed all kikes, american golems.
Gee, almost like I have a say in what happens.
>double spacing
>"um, aktually"
>followed by false humility with a little self deprication
>being this much of a faggot
Back to plebbit
>fatposting
we dindu nuffin
I'm a linguist. I obsess about language. I also appreciate native speakers helping me out when I'm speaking their language. I'm sorry for you mental deficits, sir.
It's is used in the possessive form in the constitution.
>”Why would you want compensating from the guy who wronged you?”
Come on, you’re making yourself look stupid, user.
>meme flag
I'm not even going to see if you're correct.
Kill yourself faggot nigger
have sex
If I fucked up in Chinese, I would be appreciative for you to correct me and help me to be better at speaking/writing Chinese.
Regression to the meme. Establishing colonies is something that requires top tier humans to do. You need strong, courageous, intelligent people willing to brave the wilds of the frontier and survive. And, in the case of European colonialism, moral fortitude. The true "cream of the crop", so to speak. Now the problem is that while many of these traits will be passed down to their immediate descendants, because these initial achievers were already on the fringe of human excellent, it's statistically unlikely that the next generation will be even better than them. Over many successive generations, the old weaknesses, pettiness, tendencies towards soft living, bureaucracy, ideologically-motivated political maneuvering, etc will work their way back into society, undermining it from within.
It's at this point you need some major change or culling to return it to greatness, but it's difficult to achieve the right balance. A massive war that doesn't annihilate your side can usher in a period of great improvement and positive advancement, but also comes with the fact that the weaker non-fighters now outnumber the stronger fighting-capable men, which can spell more trouble further down the line in future generations.
its even more simple than that:
you wont have to host refugees if you decide not to
I'm not a bogan, sir. I do have sex. With women. Human ones. I.e, I'm not Canadian, nor Australian, nor Middle Eastern.
>The US is destablizing the middle east for decades as part of their geopolitcal agenda
>Lol EU why don't you want refugees after you caused this
God damnit I specifically told myself I was going to properly type out "regression to the mean" and not make a joke out of it but apparently my fingers had a mind of their own.
It's is good enough for the constitution and it is good enough for you.
It is not that simple faggot! At some point, the rest of the world will have to stop blaming whites for all of their problems.
That's certainly very interesting, m'gentlesir. Now go back to fucking reddit where you belong.
this scares and confuses the (((american)))
gottem
have sex
>keeping jobs in our country destabilizes other countries
>moving our jobs to other countries is the only way to prevent destabilizing them.
>don't destabilize
Well maybe it wasn't us that was doing the destabilizing.
Maybe you should look at the influence of Islamic terrorism over the last 1400 years.
Then you'll realize that Western civilization was in fact the stabilizer and that's the reason people prefer to flee to western civilization instead of Islamic countries.
I haven't been to Reddit since The Fattening. I shall never return.
how about neither?
we owe them nothing
notably, its the open border "diversity is our strength, Islam is a religion of peace" politicians that destabilize them
nationalist patriots owe NOTHING to the hordes
You have to go back
"Refugees" has lost its meaning
They're illegal immigrants
The term is illegal aliens. They're not immigrants. They're invasive alien parasites.
US should just openly invade South America at this point.
Nothing else is going to fix the issue.
have sex
This. Trump supporters are uneducated shitbags who unironically vote against their own economic interests
>vote against their own economic interests
but you can make others host them and thus make them weaker and filled with the inferior race
Partially true. We still don't have to let anyone in after we fuck up a country.
However 9 times out of 10 we shouldn't be destabilizing countries and the same people doing it are the same people I'm fighting against.
Our we could just nuke the countries they are coming from.
Shut up, memeflag. They are crazy as fuck but western retards give them a lot of money to buy weapons and even finance Gibsrael to taunt them 24/7. Also ameritards destabilized several less shitty governments to put crazy sandnigger cultists in its place.
lol France helped US bomb countries the most during Arab Spring, not to mention your warmongering during the late 90s. You and UK are the warmongering parasites in Europe
have kids
Doesn't making babies solve every problem?
His only crime was to want a better future for Africa and to free his people from the shackles of the fed-controlled petrodollars in favour of a gold-standard for trading oil. Of course certain interests couldn't bear the thought of a country free from fiat currency...
The typo you made doesn't make your post any less ridiculous than it already is.
Dude, you literally take half the foreign currency reserves of your former SSA colonies.
>1 post by this ID
SAGE
A
G
E
so
and all that money spent on destabilizing ends up in the pockets of bankers when it could all be yours to build a better life and future.
THE REAL ENEMY IS THE BANKS
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN THE BANKS
KILL THE BANKS AND YOU WILL HAVE PEACE AND PROSPER
HAMILTON WAS A TRAITOR!
JACKSON WAS A HERO!
please read history
So which one did trump destabilize?
Your military is all over Africa. Not to mention France was one of the biggest contributors to the Libyan interention.
>Britain urged by lawmaker to consider taking over Zimbawe and recolonising it amid crisis
Zimbabwe? I don't know any country by that name. I think you mean RHODESIA
Those countries have literally never been stable. We dropped nuclear bombs on Japan and they never got destabilized. You’re either stable or you aren’t.
show flag
He's letting slip the true esoteric historical record.
Name a single country that's sending their chaff to us we actually destabilized, ever.
Also, there's about two dozen safe countries between her and wherever the fuck the rapefugees are coming from, so don't act like they're coming for the sake of safety.
Who the fuck said we have to host refugees? We can destabilize your shit and turn you away. Destabilizing other peoples shit isn't the problem. Letting them in is.
All their countries would be shit regardless of what we did. Demographics is destiny. Mud skins will always flee to whites for gibs.
arms sold to Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar which ended up in the hands of their proxies in Syria. arms sold to Turkey also used in Syria and against Kurds
And I thought it was all the terrorists a d the religious extremists, what an idiot!
Flaggot btfos mutts
Kek
where did the vast sums of gold they bought to switch to a gold standard go?
the world may never know.
Im from mexico, my country has not destabilized central america
I have kot done anything against other countries
Yet i have refugees, coming in every day, recruited by the cartels, stealing and begging on the streets.
Your logic is flawed