I respect Christ - but what has Christianity really given us?

And this

Attached: gothic-cathedrals-07.jpg (400x267, 39K)

Attached: 1561652456289.jpg (3000x3174, 2.83M)

>antikike
>New Testament
Choose one

Compared to the standard created by Christ's loving sacrifice on the cross, the laws of men pale. But it is precisely because we have Christ as the guidance force of our lives (whether we accept him or not), that humanity is able to thrive.

2000 years of spiritual desert. It's a difficult blackpill to swallow that Christianity was the worst thing to have ever happened to Europeans. But it is true.

Attached: 1505918912585.png (1600x1385, 2.05M)

one thing's for sure, there's definitely no jewish kike Yahweh god
Christians are still worse than Atheists. you have to have some kind of chromosomal deficiency fucking alcohol syndrome fucked up deformed brain to believe in some jew semite god
>all humans are equal, goy
>you will spend eternity in "paradise" full of shit-skins, spics and niggers, goy
>statistically Christianity is majority non-white on a global scale
>go to heaven and spend eternity with niggers and mexicans
>turn the other cheek
>suck black people's toes
>jew on a stick
>jews are the chosen race
>Israel is your holy lands, not Europe
>doesn't matter if whites go extinct as long as the swarthy brown horde are all christians that want to suck jesus' toes
>worship a holy foreskin of a desert jew carpenter that got yeeted on by Roman paGANGs
>niggers and spics are equal to white men
>it doesn't matter if you're a pedophile rapist as long as at the end of it all you repent and subject yourself to Yahweh and his physical jew incarnation, Jesus
>thou shalt not kill (what weak faggotry nonsense is this?)
>if a nigger-mexican hybrid spic rapes and kills your blonde 7 year old daughter, don't kill him, just turn the other cheek... oh now he's repented and turned to jeebus, nice you can spend eternity with your daughter's pedophile rapist murderer that ate her pussy in heaven and your 7 year old daughter's in hell because her Nazi grandma told her about indigenous European gods and goddesses and she really liked Frigg and made some offerings to white gods. but that doesn't matter you don't need her, you can play black jack and poker with her rapist murderer in heaven

Christianity is the most non-white fag cuck religion on the face of planet Earth
literally none of that sounds good or based to me
anyone who's a Christian clearly doesn't have a white soul

Attached: christian 5.png (1080x1120, 206K)

The white race gave the world those things, not christianity you blithering fucking dumb cunt. If those contemporary whites at the time worshiped our white indigenous gods those temples would have been even more glorious

Attached: white race 4 - inventions.jpg (1200x997, 1.18M)

but the taste of authenticity, purity, courage, trust and simplicity combined with happy relationships in your small community are also these parts of the Middle Ages... however, there were many many negative parts, such as ignorance, the distrust of the foreigner, little hygiene, many enemies, severe and spoiled sovereigns and a great deal of superstitions

Attached: 1_dragon.jpg (660x533, 64K)

>(((Christians)))
useful idiots are useful

Its pretty obvious what christianity did for Europe. It created the conditions of the successful western society. Sure, aspects of christianity failed the modern world, where brown people weaponise our empathy and use it against us, but you couldn't have the good stuff we have without it.

We aren't soulless bug people because we are taught to value life and civil behaviour. Stealing, cheating, murdering etc, all sins against another person get you a 1-way ticket to eternal suffering. Dumb peasants had nothing else going for them, and had no choice but to believe it. Basically our people were conditioned over thousands of years not to act like stupid niggers, poos, chinks etc, and to treat each other with some degree of civility, allowing our 'tribe' to tolerate a greater number of people to coexist with. Villages become cities, and the country became united, creating the British Empire.

The Germans were worshipping trees until boniface came

Attached: 8106812-3x2-700x467.jpg (700x467, 89K)

Enjoy hell Faggot.

>people will fall for this niggerflagger's bait

burn in hell jewberg antichrist slide thread

The Romans could not even build something on this scale

Attached: work_183.jpg (386x308, 42K)

There is a British guy going around poisoning and killing ancient oak trees in England right now by drilling holes in them and pouring in a poison. If he said he was doing it for Jeshua Shekelstein then he would be canonized.

This truly shows you the nature of the Christian. We have to remember this every time we have a conversation with a Christian, not matter how friendly he might appear or how much he says we have in common politically.

Attached: 1506718828728.jpg (1280x852, 1.27M)

>reeee, these arent real Christians!!!!
every thread. According to you no one is a real christian

Why are you using a memeflag?

Attached: meme flag .png (160x84, 14K)

fag

Take the 4 periods of European civilization and compare them to each other.
Rome had good sides but a lot of bad sides too. Like crazy emperors, low living standards, always at war and slavery.
Christendom was rather peaceful, wars were just small scale fights between a couple thousands soldiers in armor, a lot of culture, architecture, art, national unity and lots of high level civilization fruits like universities and hospitals were created during this time.
Then we have all the revolution periods, starting with Protestants, French revolution, 1848 revolution, Bolshevik revolution, WWI and WWII. Those are probably the worst times in European history.
And we're at our times and things are really shit, as you know.

So if you compare those periods, Christendom and Rome were the height of Europe.

europe today suck we ruled by kike it's was better when the church controlled everything now have degenerate running in the street naked and we are invaded by shitskins and niggers

No I'm saying that pre christianity the Germans were building nothing it wasn't until they became civilized that they actually started to build the greatest things that have graced this earth

>MUH TREES
Why do you Pagancucks worship trees so much?

> still believing 20 years old blog posts' memes
OP showed once again to have a shoe size IQ, as usual.

What about the self-sufficient hygienic tribal communities from Germania?

Nigger-tier civilization.

Pre christian germans were about as advanced as monkeys
newscientist.com/article/2079630-what-do-chimp-temples-tell-us-about-the-evolution-of-religion/

in the bible there is written to respect living creatures, not to mention the fact that the meeting of the Christian mass should have taken place under a tree, so you are a liar

Attached: yoda2.jpg (1536x864, 179K)

christian europe despite being like 10% of the worlds population spread civilization and inovation everywhere, colonized the backwards places and dominated the violent people
after losing the faith and being subverted by jews the natural superiority of the christian european was eroded leaving the savages free to do as they like

You should read up on what the Christians did to the sacred groves in Italy. The very same groves where people like Pliny had gotten so much of their inspiration and had admired.

But I know you do not care about that because you are of your father, the Jew. You've adopted a foreign religion and it's customs and ways are of the desert.

Attached: 1556727169594.jpg (1024x625, 83K)

Complete nigger tier societies

The fact that you would say such a dumb thing really shows what sort of a mental poison Christianity really is.
>And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place. - Deuteronomy 12:3

Attached: 1560103423004.jpg (920x960, 62K)

Niggers aren't hygienic, nor very successful in defending territory. The ancient Germans fought of Roman civilisationists with relative ease for quite a while, while staying independent, clean and free.

>middle ages
>bad
Hahahhahahahahah holy shit. Stop watching movies

Good thing that there's no hell in the jewish religion

Lol

>what has Christianity really given us?
The way, the truth and the life.

>Middle Ages bad
Read Evola, dumbo. Middle Ages were Europe's peak.

There is nothing sadder then a German insulting his ancestors. Everyone feared the barbarians from Germania. They were disciplined, strong, free, quick, clean and autonomous. Rome was the place where they fucked little kids and other men. Even cuckolding was a thing in ancient Rome. Same goes for Greece.

>I respect Christ - but what has Christianity really given us?
Salvation. That is the only purpose of Christ even walking on this earth.

Intelligent and civilized men don't worship tree. Whatever the Christians did to those hippie like places llike the groves that Pliny describes as "fig trees with magical power" was a good thing. You sound like you smoke pot all day like some tree-hugging hippy.

Sounds like the zulu

If salvation is interconnected with opening up your borders and letting your women be raped by invaders and your race being bred out of existence, i'll pass.

A random fucktard is going around poisoning trees, and you just up and blame it on Christianity based on nothing? How does this show anything about Christianity?

All of you guys understand that we're on a fallen, dying planet and that the Earth is ultimately doomed, don't you? Jesus promises destruction of this world and the wicked. We're not here to preserve or govern over the Earth — humanity lost dominion at the fall.

Pursuing utopia or thinking that you're somehow going to achieve societal autonomy through political agency on this planet is foolhardy and arrogant. We're told that Satan is the prince of this world — no political revolution or social movement will overthrow the power of Satan over this planet.

We're on a sinking ship and Jesus is the life-guard, we're chiefly here for character development and conforming to the truth of Christ, not to "fix" the planet. Jesus already won on the cross anyways.

You can say what you want, there has never been a civilisation which didn't succumb to degeneracy. That's a historical fact.

>heh dumb pagans thinking nature contains magical and healing properties
>*slurps* mmhhm that some good wholesome Christian footjuice *slurps*
>DEUS VULT

Attached: feeding the flock.webm (640x360, 2.71M)

What are your sources regarding their hygienic habits? They never showered, lived in mud huts, had sex with their sisters and cousins, used to walk barefeet in cow shit and didn't have any form of civilized lifestyle, like running water, roads, canals etc.
They faught off the Romans with nigger tier behavior, like treason, backstabbing, luring them in a forest and attack all the women and children that were in the back lines. They'd carve the women's tits and genitals and put them on trees and perform sacrifices with the children. Is that what you call a clean and free civilization?

Your calling this degeneracy

Attached: UlmMinster0061a.jpg (250x287, 20K)

They call you meme flag, meme flag, meme flag...

Those are orthodox

The monks wrote a shit ton about Vikings.
Same goes for the Romans. Tacitus has always been quite positive about the Germanic tribes. Europeans didn't live in mudhut, they had houses/huts more akeen to yurts then niggershelters.

> They faught off the Romans with nigger tier behavior, like treason, backstabbing, luring them in a forest and attack all the women and children that were in the back lines

Roman's invaded Gaul without any good reason and slaughtered everyone. Roman's invaded Brittain with no good reason and slaughtered everyone (and raped the women). They didn't walk barefoot, they already had shoes and sandals in those days as confirmed by the finding of frozen stone age barbarian Otzi. Roman's plundered everything they came across.

> and attack all the women and children that were in the back lines. They'd carve the women's tits and genitals and put them on trees and perform sacrifices with the children.

No proof whatsoever.

At least they have that going for them.

Attached: 1556464597863.jpg (852x530, 136K)

I'm talking mostly about the teutoburg massacre. There are archeological findings that prove what I said.
Also read the Bellico Gallis by Ceasar and you'll see how primitive the Gaul tribes were. During the Battle of Alesia, when Ceasar had the city sieged, the barbarians started to starve, so they kicked out of the city all the women and children who ended up dying.

Every religion has some nutty people in it and its ups and downs

>MUH TREES
Why do you Pagancucks worship trees so much?

ok venerating a tree like a god is wrong, but the tree is not there, you are not there either

> when Ceasar had the city sieged, the barbarians started to starve, so they kicked out of the city all the women and children who ended up dying.

There was no reason to besiege the city, Gaul had nothing to do with rome whatsoever. Caeser was there for the gold, that's it. Of course he would talk shit about the Gauls, that's the only way he could justify unjust imperial behaviour.

The general rule that there are nutty people everywhere doesn't mean Christianity isn't also absolute shit. fuck yourself, Christcuck.

Attached: 1552088113208.jpg (1024x768, 110K)

Also, send me some info on the teutoburg massacre. I'd like to read some of it.

What proves the archeological findings were not Germanic women and children? As far as i know, there were no women and children in Varus his legion.

No the helvetti attacked the Romans ealierer so Caesar did not trust them the gauls agressed first Caesar offered them safe passage if they could take hostages the hauls refused Caesar gave them plenty of chances by they wasted them Caesar also built a bridge in a day and they stood there dumbfounded

Talk about a shitty religion

Attached: witches-America-678x381.jpg (678x381, 77K)

Varus wasn't send as a military conqueror. He wasn't even an exerienced general when it comes to warfare. He was sent there to colonize Germania. So they took a lot of women, children, old men and women to found cities.
They had a few legions to accompany them and keep them safe. They used some germanic guy who said he left his barbarian people to join rome, when in reality he was working for some barbarian king and luring the Romans into a trap.
The info is mainstream, so you don't have to worry about not finding enough documentation. I mean you can find this shit even on History channel tier documentaries.

None of this is new to me. I learnt about the Greek Gods when learning about the Olympics, and they taught about how the Christians shut the games down. Me being a 10 year old, I didn't know much better at the time, I thought to myself why is the Greek pantheon so bad? Why isn't worshipping Zeus and Poseidon a positive thing compared to worshipping a creator God? But I just couldn't rationalise it like I could worshipping the creator.

Israel is close to the desert but it is not in the desert, the place is at high altitude, plus the Italian is Latin so it is not true that we have adopted the customs and traditions of the Jews, religion is... Christian Jew

Attached: 1558020492437.png (400x400, 627K)

>The church-dominated middle-ages in Europe were the worst time to be alive.
This is (((enlightenment))) propaganda. Feudalism was comfy.

No, Catholic monks did this as well.

>if something good: It was because were white
>if something bad: It was christianity's fault
Ok.

KYS MEMEFLAG KIKE

Antiquity and "Christendom" vs. the enlightenment is a false dialectic. Feudalism allowed jewry.

Israel...

Attached: israel.jpg (1400x884, 226K)

Contained Jewry they made them live on desperate areas

this is a next level cope that I havent seen before

It's generally accepted they would start colonies to permantly bring Germania under Roman control. Armenius spoke fluent Latin and old German so the possibility is very high he knew about this.

No, they allowed them to stay as moneylenders (which they were in the Temple before which is why Jesus kicked them out, and later in Rome), and many of these jewish moneylenders rose into banking dynasties who married into the royal families, it's estimated all European royal houses descend from them. They call this the "black nobility".

Jews never had any power during Christian rule. They'd take advantage of some Prince or King's greed and lend them money, then perform usury and steal a lot of stuff. But the people would rise up and burn all the jews and expel them from their cities or states.
The jews started to have real power only when Napoleon gave them citizenship rights. That's why a lot of rabbis call Napoleon the Emperor of the Jews.

In what way did it allow jewry? You know that Christian rome was much harder on jews than pagan rome? Did you know julian and the pagan clique wanted to ally jews with against Christians.
You Larpagans act as if paganism was in anyway anti-jewish. It wasn't in the least. Without christianity the jews would have had a much easier time.
>Antiquity and "Christendom" vs. the enlightenment is a false dialectic
I never said you can either have christendom or enlightenment. I said the smear was enlightenment propaganda.

Yes and if they were based pagan they would have refused the loans even thought there is nothing in paganism that even talks about jews, and usury, while the bible is directly opposed to them.

First of all, I'm a Christian, not a pagan: And I admit pagan Rome was just as bad. I'm saying that "Christendom" continued pro-jewish policies. Because again, see:

It's true tho.

Yeah but it actually isn't.

First of all, Christendom is the period that goes from 300AD to 1517. After that Christianity was divided between Protestants and Catholics. Guess in which country all those stuff you described here happened? In Protestant countries.
Under Christendom, the Popes would always release bulls and laws that would ban jews from taking any public office or having any citizenship rights. They'd always warn the local Prince or King to stay away from jews and don't interact with them. It was up to the Prince or King to listen to the Pope or take money from jews.

This. It was an aristocratic decision to take loans. People kvetch about "allowing jews to make loans" but the church did not have complete temporal authority. The church banned giving loans for those who were christian and this is all they could do. It was the king's choice to allow jews into his country and to take loans from them.

you are afraid of the mountains because they are at high altitudes and therefore you worry about the fact that if you go to Israel or Lebanon when you go to the plains and you adapt to the desert heat and then you will go to high altitudes there will be a huge change in temperature that will give you sickness head?

explained better .....

Attached: emoji1.png (1280x1659, 1.15M)

It's the other way around actually, Catholics are the ones that did all of that, Rothschilds worked for the pope.
The Codex Theodosianus literally allowed merchants to set their own prices, and made it illegal to kill jews even for a Christian cause. Then Charlemagne (who was crowned Roman emperor directly by the pope) allowed the jews to do usury because they didn't want Rome to get dirty. It was only until he nearly died that he actually banned jews from doing all of that. This allowed the jews to grow into banking dynasties. Again, all under the popes' domain.
The pope himself issued Sicut Iudaeis to protect the jews from being killed.

Wait a minute, are you Italian or French?

>Rothschilds worked for the pope
They started in a German city after the Protestant reform, idiot. They got rich and powerful only after an aristocrat left them his money because Napoleon's army was going to march into his territory.

Where did you get this Talmudic view of history? What are your sources?

>Rothschilds worked for the pope.
lmao

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_loans_to_the_Holy_See
>It was customary for Catholics to show reverence for what they regarded as the Vicar of Christ, to kiss the Pope's feet when meeting him. As a Jew, Carl Mayer von Rothschild was permitted to simply kiss the ring on his hand instead
Also, Rothschild = Red shield, named after the Roman shield formation. Not a very Protestant thing to do.

>Wikipedia
youtube.com/watch?v=hMBramnCg_s

Its really pathetic that so many brainlets use wikipedia to "learn" about history.

First loan in 1832 was well after they were established in frankfurt.