Deus Vult!

even if you are, so what
you are not your ancestor and you are not going to do shit

Attached: hitler_starre.gif (320x284, 1.42M)

True and they removed the Jew. Only recently was this sign removed...translation " kill Jews"
amp.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/22/spanish-village-drops-kill-jews-name

Attached: 98068639-2b8b-4f82-aae5-62ee9fdaf284-2060x1236.jpg (300x180, 13K)

The entire Levant, Anatolia, and Egypt were Christian land before Muslims conquered it. There is nothing about weird about it, just the continuation of the very long struggle between two religions over the eastern Mediterranean. What they would have gained from it is what they considered their own possessions and the safety of Christian pilgrims who want to travel to biblical locations.

DEUS

Do you have light green eyes and brown hair

whatever helps you sleep muhammad

No. Blue eyes, mother had green. Brown hair, blond in my youngest Years

My Christianity and Jesus help keep me soundly asleep +

The majority of people in the crusader states established after the first crusade were still christian, and not just 51%. Conversion to islam happened very slow. Even two centuries ago many middle eastern countries had large christian populations.

Venetian Black Nobility kikes made a great profit by selling weapons and supplies to both sides

It's the same thing as fighting over it for the Jew today. This is why christians are called christcucks and why all judaic religions need to be destroyed.

There's a reason the Crusaders massacred everyone in Jerusalem when they got in
That includes Muslims and Jews alike

>1054, Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic split
>Seljuk Turks invade Roman Empire take away all their Asian territory and push them to Constantinople
>emperor begs the pope for help and offers him the Holy Land
>pope agrees, calls the HRE and France for a crusade
>since it benefits the Italian merchant cities, the elite there (many of whom were crypto-jews) inevitably fund it
>German crusaders kill the jews in the Rhineland, the Catholic church unanimously condemns it and puts in Sicut Judaeis (so much for them being anti-jewish)
>nothing happens until they keep the Romans preoccupied fighting the Turks and they conquer Jerusalem
>a few decades later, the Muslims attack again, defeat them and conquer Edessa
>then the Egyptian Muslims attack and conquer Jerusalem, capture the king and kill everybody trying to kill them
>Richard the Lionheart comes in, beats them, says screw it and goes back home
>next plan is to invade Egypt
>Venetians bribe them to attack Hungary and Constantinople
>the entire plan is screwed up by another crypto-jew Italian city state
>Mamluks (more Turks) come in, defeat the Mongols and the crusaders
>1299, they take Acre and the Knights of Malta are defeated
>meanwhile, the crusaders became Satanists while in Europe
>but at least we got some trade deals goy. Deus vult!
TL;DR: Yes, the jews did fund the crusades.

This.

Muslims are massive golems too, so while retards where playing the Jewsus Kikes hero LARP, Templars (bankers) profited from the dead soldiers and a weakened Europe where they could summon sandniggers and do their kikery at will.
Hundreds of years later and retards still fall for this trick.

I think its time to put a final boot down the neck of (((shitalian))) snakerats

so had it not been for the kikes, christians might have won the crusades... ree

Christians didn't win the crusades. In-fact, Rome couldn't be Christian for themselves. The Templars literally became Satanists and later became the freemasons.

>Did (((they))) start the crusades?
No.
>Something seems weird about all those goyim fighting over the holy land.
Except those goyim/kaffir had that Holy land before Muslims Jihaded it.
>And if they did, what did they gain from it?
They got all of Jerusalem's jewry killed that's what.

I suppose, but they did reduce Muslim coastal raiding and did manage to gain a strong foothold over Mediterranean trade, helping out with the spread of technology, culture and innovations.
>The Templars literally became Satanists and later became the freemasons.
Yeah, and the Fourth crusade, Children's crusade were abominations - as was the crusade against Novgorod, though that was a Christian victory.

A lot of the crusades were targeted against Christians themselves. Not just the 4th crusade or the Russian one, but the Hussite wars (which ended up in a defeat for the Catholics)

they must've been pretty disillusioned for some reason...

Crusades really showed the problem with christcuckery. Europeans hade a chance to completely wipe the Turks from the face of the Earth. Byzantine would still exist and the gates of Europe would be secure. Instead they had to go full autist and aim to conquer and keep the city where some kike on a stick die at any cost. Eventually they lost their stupid city and the mudshits conquered Constantinopel.

You leave out important tidbits like how the Emperor of Constantinople had the Italians there massacred, causing those the deterioration of relationships en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_the_Latins

The emperor massacred the Latins because they were greedy merchant scum.

>templars became satanists and freemasons
French king lies to steal their gold, templars if anything fought the jews that later took the masonry and transformed it into the satanic cult we know today

Nope. The number of actual merchants in a medieval city is probably a few hundred at best. 60k peasants and craftsmen. Stop condoning the slaughter of Christians because you're lazy. Both sides made mistakes and behaved as expected of of 12th century guilds.
Just as killing italians was an an atrocity, it doesn't justify the sack of constantinople, and vice versa. We're all friends now and should remember the true enemy

Crusades were done to sell kid slaves to Muslims.

Nah.

The French king wasn't lying, the Templars admitted it.
>templars if anything fought the jews that later took the masonry and transformed it into the satanic cult we know today
Freemasonry was never good.
The "Latins" massacred were Venetians, Genoans, Pisans, etc. who were inevitably merchants not the old Vlachs that lived there since Roman times.
And were they really Christians?

Yes, "Latins", I don't know why you feel the need to quotation mark them. A few hundred merchants from those city states, and tens of thousands of regular italians, most of which probably couldn't read.
The warring schism period is over, it's better to cooperate and learn from mistakes, not keep them burning

bump

they deserved it

t. jewrat shekelsteinberwitz