Why is height still so important when there's no real biological advantage to it in modern society? There's no need to be big to fight anymore. Shorter men take less space, consume less resources yet somehow being below 6' is equal to being a genetic failure.
And yes, I'm a coping 5'9" manlet.
Why is height still so important when there's no real biological advantage to it in modern society...
Brody Fisher
Cooper Torres
>Why is height still so important when there's no real biological advantage to it in modern society?
Are you fucking retarded?
The biological advantage is that you will be more attractive to the opposite sex. There are countless other biological advantages like taller men making more money, taller men being more respected and less likely to get attacked, just a shitload of small and big benefits.
Do you even know what a genetic advantage is?
Jack Fisher
>no real biological advantage
Emotional control
Leo Lee
>Do you even know what a genetic advantage is?
When a woman's vagina is tight but her brother has a big dick.
Bentley Diaz
You're indisputably correct.
Michael Wilson
>The biological advantage is that you will be more attractive to the opposite sex
But that perception of being a better mate cause you're tall is a mental flaw.
Charles Jackson
>There's no need to be big to fight anymore.
With NGOs flooding peaceful nations with third world trash, who do nothing but fight and kill each other for basic resources like food and water, it's PERTINENT that Western men be fit, large and knowledgeable in armed/unarmed combat. Docility is for the weak yet to be culled. Train your mind and body for war. No man lives a violence free life, anywhere. One day it'll happen to you and you'll regret not training for that moment. If this type of mentality is how you cope with being a manlet, I pity you.
Landon Price
>coping this hard
Grayson Nelson
>consume less resources
for longer.
You consume less resources per diem but live years longer.
t. tall-fag
Owen Brooks
I am not a manlet and I agree with you OP
Hudson Morris
The truth is that being tall was correlated with being strong. Strong is an atractive male trait. Strong males have good genes.
There is no selective pressure in society anymore so shorter guys are still unatractive compared to tall guys.
Joseph Gray
You're making up non-existent terms. There is no such thing as a ''mental flaw.'' Anything that helps you reproduce is a biological advantage.
It doesn't matter if women have any logical reason to be more attracted to taller men, they just are, and for countless good reasons. The taller man is on average is going to be a significantly better mate than the shorter one.
Christian Hill
>You're making up non-existent terms. There is no such thing as a ''mental flaw.'' Anything that helps you reproduce is a biological advantage.
The idea in women that it's better to have a tall man is a mental flaw.
>It doesn't matter if women have any logical reason to be more attracted to taller men, they just are, and for countless good reasons. The taller man is on average is going to be a significantly better mate than the shorter one.
You're just making a bunch of assertions.
A big body is a big burden on the brain.
Nathan Ramirez
Out of interest, is there any advantage to being taller in the era of firearms combat? Like wouldn’t being a tiny manlet help you dodge bullets and hide in little tiny holes in the ground from shrapnel normal people can’t fit in? Kinda like in Vietnam where the viets just hid in their tunnels Americans were too large to fit into
Carter Russell
>A big body is a big burden on the brain.
Josiah Jackson
Yes, the tall men get to command the troops and don't see direct combat. They survive the war and go home to pass on their genes, which are highly sought after.
Hudson Turner
>Yes, the tall men get to command the troops and don't see direct combat. They survive the war and go home to pass on their genes, which are highly sought after.
If tall men have an advantage, it's in rough terrain, easily moving over rough ground.
Being tall doesn't make your brain function better.
Joshua Smith
Also, btw, "what women want" and "what men want" is heavily conditioned by society.
Lincoln Bennett
But what about the tall men who got shucked into infantry roles, how will they survive when the first thing the enemy sees and shoots at is their imposing silhouette crouched among the tree line while the manlets stand perfectly hidden in small shrubs and potted plants
Ryan Smith
because sexual selection is not based on logical modern needs as much as archaic standards of fitness
and that's a good thing
go segregate with other manlets and subhumans you low-key communist phenotype
Kevin Evans
5'9 is the height human beings are supposed to be. i'm 6'3 or 6'4, you'll live longer than me, you can build mass easier, you'll have less injuries, etc. people who care about height are insecure weirdos, but maybe i'm just saying that because i have tall privilege.
Isaiah Sanders
Nice
Michael Roberts
>because sexual selection is not based on logical modern needs as much as archaic standards of fitness
>and that's a good thing
It is functioning. And part of the game has been to push stupid ideas of what is an ideal mate.
But we shouldn't be playing that game given the situation we are in.
Luke Gomez
can't cope eh?