Why is the media saying there hasn’t been the citizenship question on the Census form since the 1950s?
It’s always been there until Obama removed it in 2010. ( he also ran the Census out of the White House, instead of Commerce)
Pic related is 2000 questionaire.
Citizenship Question on Census
David Torres
Other urls found in this thread:
bitchute.com
constitutionallawreporter.com
twitter.com
Camden Williams
Better question is why do people think the question is for illegal border crossers and not people staying on a green card.
Jonathan Adams
i want people who lie on their census form to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
Caleb Roberts
Because it is illegal. Read the constitution.
Now, they ask HUNDREDS of illegal things and I'm for asking because it can only benefit me. But it's illegal.
The constitution says they will count the people. It doesn't even actually say to count only citizens.
The only reason this isn't brought up by either side is so that they can keep ALL of their illegal questions.
Christian Hughes
????????
“The People” implies the citizens.
Do you think we issued census documents to negro slaves or native tribes? And it wouldnt be illegal, because its not specifically prohibited. Just unnecessary. Dont be retarded.
Chase Reyes
>implies
It implies it's the same "People" in "We the People."
It's illegal for the to have any sort of repercussion for my non participation.
If we go by the constitution all these Illegals still have to be counted a 3/5 a person.
"three fifths of ALL OTHER PERSONS"
Owen Cox
I didn't answer any part of the optional survey in 2010. The only consequence was a bunch of calls that I didn't answer because the caller ID said it was the census, and then they sent a creepy guy around get the dirt on me from my neighbors.
I accidently answered the door one time without realizing it was probably the census guy again, but at least that lead to an interesting conversation. Still didn't answer the survey.
William Evans
They threaten and use whatever they can to push people into answering. But they would never actually prosecute, because they don't want a court ruling it as obvious bullshit.
So, the laws on this are just for intimidation.
Sebastian Campbell
Wrong. 14th Amendment : Section 2 clearly says "citizens"
John Harris
What copy are you looking at?
Juan Morgan
this is just for gerrymandering thats why we cant have it
seriously fuck off with your kike-right shit
everyone is against gerrymandering here
Jose Baker
If you read carefully it actually says CLEARLY that they are going to count everyone and then apportion representation to CITIZENS in proportion to the people. Two different things. That's the whole point of the 3/5 thing. They were counting them and giving representation based on a full total count (except Indians).
We can leave Elizabeth Warren out of the census.
Juan Harris
The reuters article on this is Weasely as shit, stating that 66% of Americans support it then halfway through the article framing it as a racial Hispanics vs white republicans issue when it’s citizens vs non citizens
William Flores
This, even though I'm sure the Dixiecrats would have loved it if their numerous slaves counted as "The People" and helped construct districts in their favor.
Dylan Lewis
The Constitution applies to US citizens, all of this is very clear except we are in clown world
Parker Price
You are retarded. They literally were counted and added to representation. It's the 3/5 person thing they always say is proof of the massive racism of our past.
Julian Edwards
They were counting slaves as 3/5 and using them to apportion representation. Slaves were not citizens in any real sense. Just for counting.
Ryan Peterson
"3/5" people were still legal US residents at the time, not people that entered willfully, illegally
Ian Roberts
Yes, exactly. It's clear from the very first sentence. It's not "the people of earth" or "the people of north america"
"the People" are the entering into a contract with the state. Those are the citizens.
>We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Aiden Miller
They counted them, they just didn't expect the browning of America LOL
you retards just keep getting your asses kicked while trump drinks 'joo joo cum'
lol!
>master please may i have some more!
>joo joo cum! joo joo cum!
>me want joo joo cum!
>damnit mr president not yet!
haha
bitchute.com
LOL YOU CAN'T EVEN AGREE IM LAUGHING SO HARD ABOUT THIS CONSPIRACY SHIT
mUh CON-stItuTIon
wE tHE PeOPlE
>paddock guns down 100 people
>in 60 seconds
MuH sEConD AmeNDmEnT
America is a shithole it will be forever but because of white people and there historic views that pervade even among some stubborn whites today. It's honestly incredible.
Oliver Russell
keep laughing, chimp nigger. If history as taught us anything it's that the white man always wins.
Christopher Taylor
>goalposts moving
Asylum seekers are here legally. Count them at least then!
Landon Miller
bitchute.com
OOK OOK OOK OOK OOK
Whatever you say orangutang. lol
Angel White
lol who care? it's all racist dogshit from the start, your racist dogshit videos literally point this out,
you are here pointing it out as well
if its racist at the end of the day who cares you MORON
Nicholas Jenkins
At the end of the day, who cares if it's racist? Moron.
Jordan Morgan
>Projection
"Asylum Seekers" are rejected, having no basis for Asylum, at a rate above 90%, these are economic migrants, encouraged by UN supported NGO's to exploit our laws and kindness. Make no mistake, these 3rd worlders are being exploited by our politicians and one day, if our nation survives this, they will have to go back, kicking and screaming if necessary. Come in the the legal and right way and there is no problem
Owen Butler
constitutionallawreporter.com
If you read the entire section, they are clearly discussing the total number of eligible CITIZENS
Christian Howard
>starts by saying citizen
>switches to legal US resident
>projects projection of projecting onto me
Adrian Wilson
Says the tranny discord shill, I might care if I thought you were actually trying to have a discussion
Thomas Cook
>Almost not citizens
>I am not Shareblue
Adam Sanders
go back to india, Kabilan.
Ameribros, pls excuse this fucking trash. he will be deported soon.
Bentley Parker
No. Read slowly. They are counting everyone and APPORTIONING REPRESENTATION TO MALE CITIZENS.
The male citizens are the ones that represent whatever the count comes out to. That's why MALE CITIZENS got more representation when they added up all their 3/5s people.
The only way to know is to read the Federalist Papers and such. But by pure language it does not say count citizens. It says the government representatives will be male citizens APPORTIONED BY a count of people.
Angel Cook
I am with all the other people that aren't moving goalposts.
Carter Evans
Regardless of legal semantics, which can be argued until the end of time, it's ridiculous to me that anyone thinks it's a question that shouldn't be asked. What happened to common sense?
Grayson Martin
How would the question exclude "the people"? It's simple categorization. Just like the demographic data.
>hurr durr people don't respond
Non response bias already exists for those who don't have registered addresses, also the census takers make a big deal out of pointing out that you can't he prosecuted for any info given on the census, which is how they did it before they took the question off.
Wyatt Fisher
Agreed. The census is not authorized to do anything but count (whoever). It can ask how much money I make, but not if I am a citizen. It's an obvious scam run by, lo and behold, democrats.
I'm agreeing with you. To me, past a simple number count. All questions are equally invalid.
Tyler Lee
Slaves were both US citizens and Legal US residents, Illegal aliens are neither, but you know that
Ryder Green
You are a moron. They weren't citizens til after the civil war. Jesus Christ you morons are insufferable.
Austin Perry
no drumpf wants to gerrymander
the republican party wants to gerrymander, thats why, christ the alt-right is insufferably retarded - they have to do it now to gerrymander better fuck off
Thomas White
>Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age,* and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Only citizens are entitled to representation, even citizens that committed crimes or even rebelled against the government. Non-citizens can't vote and are NOT entitled to representation. The census has to ask the citizenship question to be in compliance with the constitution.
Grayson Clark
>republican party wants to gerrymander
Dylan Bailey
You have low reading comprehension.
Here:
Caleb Cooper
Not asking who is a citizen is fucking retarded. There is such a thing as a non-citizen legal resident you know, people who live in the United States legally but aren’t citizens, and as such aren’t allowed to vote. The democrats act like as if anyone who checked “no” on that box would be rounded up for deportation because they think that anybody who isn’t a citizen is an illegal alien, and illegal aliens are the only people the democrats care about in the current year
Noah Lewis
cite article, section and clause that supports your case, protip: you can't.
Camden Davis
The only one that exists. I'm just reading it correctly. There is a reason they use different terminology in different places.
If they meant "citizen" by "person" they would have just used "citizen" every time.
Justin Young
one question citizen test:
Used toilet paper
goes in the trash [ ]
goes in the toilet [ ]