Why did Southerners bring niggers over?

They were actually merchants.

>No one in the North ever owned slaves
>Never
Read a book faggot

Lincoln was gonna ship them all back to Africa, but got assassinated

>southerners

lol ok.

Attached: jewish-slave-ship-owners-fb-img-1467708431908_orig.jpg (600x475, 51K)

Very few Northerners owned slaves.

Reminder that all of the ultra wealthy don't give a fuck about race and would've loved to own white slaves(and did throughout history) but eventually the elite got scared and decided to brainwash retards into thinking that niggers were not human therefore it was ok to "own" them

Slave owners made up a very small section of the population even during the Civil War.

Like I already said, the slave ship owners only brought niggers over because Southerners wanted to buy the niggers.

Do you seriously think that Jews brought over niggers just for the sake of bringing over niggers?

our kikes from curacao did

It was mainly Jews who owned slaves despite making up a super minority.

Attached: jew slave owners percent.jpg (449x337, 42K)

Attached: IMG_1912.jpg (800x600, 85K)

Why does the north continue to be bluepilled cucks that continue voting for the most far left candidates despite themselves being overwhelmingly white?

So the upperclass could save a few shekels by not having to hire white trash to work their fields.
Bonus: after slavery ended the white trash who suffered the most economically from slavery gets to absorb all the blame for it and pay the reparations.

Yes

Attached: IMG_2145.png (500x515, 120K)

I'll take ivory tower liberalism for $500 Alex

Almost everything that Jews do, including selling slaves, is about greed and money.

Like I already said, Southerners demanded more niggers, so Jews and other slave traders provided them. Jews wouldn't have brought over any slaves if they couldn't find any buyers.

This statistic is incorrect and has been disproven on numerous occasions. Simple common sense should tell you that there is no fucking way jews *(an even tinier minority than they are now) would be 78% of slave owners.

Stop sharing obviously incorrect shit on here, you make us all look fucking retarded.

>Southerners demanded more niggers
Also Jews:

It was actually the Portuguese that brought them over. Southerners were simply buying a product.

Portugese never brought slaves to the United States. They only brought slaves to Brazil.

They were trying to find the perfect ass

Attached: 1400679104774.jpg (1420x2346, 575K)

If the retards in the south just started picking their own shit and got with the times, they could’ve avoided he whole civil war and spend that money on relocating the negros back from whence they came.

Or sold them off to the Caribbean/Portuguese for a massive profit.
Then we wouldn’t have any nigger problems.

>it's another "Jews and Southerners brought the slaves over" thread

Jesus Christ, you goddamn stupid fucking nigger-loving Northerners. Slaves were imported by the European imperial powers, mostly by the Spanish and Portuguese, and to a lesser extent by the French, Dutch, and British. Importation of slaves was banned in 1808 at the insistence of Thomas Jefferson, a Virginian.

You can literally learn all of this from a 4th grade history textbook, now slobbering nigger cock and go buy one you stupid fucking Yankees.

Attached: Knights in Grey.jpg (3500x2400, 830K)

Look up Aaron Lopez and his contribution to African to America Slave Trade.

Attached: arron lopez slave ship owner.png (775x784, 216K)

Slaves are a lot more trouble than they're worth. They can only perform the very simplest of tasks, you constantly have to keep them in line, and you can't afford to educate them to do anything because the smarter they are the more difficult it is to keep them under control. Slavery ends up disappearing as any nation advances as a result, and it's not out of the kindness of peoples' hearts.

The reason why the issue had to be forced rather than die out naturally in the US is because southern democrats had inflated their representation through the 3/5th compromise. The instant they lost that, they lost about 30% of their representative power, and that chunk could also then start voting against them. They had a political motivation to maintain slavery as an avenue of importing voting power that wasn't even allowed to vote. It's not far off from their political reasons for doing whatever they can to maintain illegal immigration today. Those people count for federal money, house seats, and electoral college votes. They call it kindness, just as they preached about how hard it would be for the poor whites in the South when the slaves were freed, but at the end of the day they just do whatever gets them more power.

The largest slave traders were in the great commercial shipping centers of the north east. Boston, Providence.

You know, there's medicine that can help with that Yankee impulsivity and race mixing holier than thou leftism, right?

See: serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

>Why did Southerners bring niggers over?
That was the Jews you fucking d&c shill.

Epstein said what now

>The slave traders (not all of whom were Jewish) only brought niggers over because Southerners were willing to buy them.
Why are you trying to get people to hate Southerners?

what the fuck is that picture? did they launder reality? what am I looking at

>Why did Jews bring niggers over?
Fixed it.
don't bump this faggot shit, it's all about Epstein today.

Attached: Jewish slave ships.jpg (647x861, 277K)

Bitch punks just dont get that kikes run commerce and are the original idiot merchants. Jews owned every slave ship and crypto kikes signed off on the ships ledgers..... The proof is in the museum of London.

>what the fuck is that picture? did they launder reality? what am I looking at
It's a degenerate that has 4 TB of anne frank preggo porn on his computer. He literally believes he's in love with a pregnant version of anne frank and he believes that if anne was alive during the civil war she would've sided with the south.

...despite the fact that anne frank didn't exist.

So just point at him and laugh for being a degenerate freak.

I get the impression that Southerners imported niggers in part because they wanted to have sex with them.

Disgusting.

It's a meme you goddamn newfag.

>It's a meme you goddamn newfag.
No, that poster is literally in love with a pregnant, confederate anne frank. I've had many dealings with him in the past. he always shows up in revisionist threads to post his porn.

you can tell by his rebel meme flag and the fact that he's the only person on the board who posts those pics.

Southgroids will never understand that they love niggers when the majority of the south is all niggers

Attached: Largest-Ancestry.jpg (1600x1130, 392K)

The niggers should have never been brought over. But how could the southerners have known back then that the northerners would go on a crusade to turn them loose on everyone, and then fight a war to do it? It is so crazy that it probably never crossed their minds.

It's a /his/ meme, Jow Forums isn't the only board on Jow Forums.

>It's a /his/ meme, Jow Forums isn't the only board on Jow Forums.
Regardless, that user is a degenerate in love with a pregnant, confederate, fictional anne frank.

$$$

Why did the European Union?

By the way, you fucking stupid bastard, the ships that brought and sold Africans to the US were European Dutch and Yiddish.

Oh shut up meanie

Attached: tfw no Anne Frank with a Dilly Bar gf.jpg (3118x4160, 1.84M)

>Oh shut up meanie
anne frank didn't exist and the holocaust didn't happen.

Include me in the screencap.

Attached: kkk recruitment poster.jpg (1511x1400, 1.55M)

Attached: Patrick Stern.jpg (332x460, 82K)

>Southerners
Look, I get it
You are trolling
But the *British* bought a ton of slaves in ALL of their territories, and the UK.
After the Revolutionary War they remained in both nations.
There were slaves in the north, too

>supports the Jews
>acts like he's pro-White
lol

The slave trade didn’t come to the new world through America you fucking moron. It was already well established for Europeans to go to the New World and enslave people to harvest crops. When those people died they were replaced with slaves from other countries.

Southerners didn’t bring slaves to America any more than they discovered America.

>Confederates kill axis enemies
>the only jewish military cemetary anywhere in the world outside of israel is a confederate one in Virginia
>first synagogue in America founded in the south
>many monuments that were vandalized recently were made by a jewish confederate veteran
>the famous macy's was founded by jewish confederate veteran who died on the titanic giving up his seat on life boat to women/kids
>yankee general signs order expelling jews from his newly conquered districts

Okie doke

Attached: image.jpg (236x307, 14K)

Jews are anti-White
NatSoc is pro-White.

WW2 was a Jewish war to destroy the only threat to their power structure.

The holocaust didn't happen and anne frank didn't exist.

>anne frank didn’t exist
That’s a new one.

(((i wonder why)))

>That’s a new one.
The diary was written by Otto Frank in pen. There is no evidence of Anne Frank actually existing.

>NatSoc
>pro-white

lmao

Attached: germans are the niggers of europe.jpg (640x760, 106K)

>what am I looking at

Something beautiful.

Attached: 1489993151564.jpg (511x850, 570K)

>lmao
You're literally in love with a fictional, underage, pregnant Jew.

You're not pro-White and you have no basis on which to determine what is or isn't pro-White.

Do you still have 4 TB of pedo preggo porn, incel? Or do you have more now?

Even in peace their Merkel plays with fire

Attached: image.jpg (429x360, 43K)

Because that is what the yankee kykes do

Welcome to fucking Jow Forums.

>The diary was written by Otto Frank in pen
Now that’s a provable claim. Is there proof?
There is proof of the birth and life of Annelies Frank, on the other hand.

>Now that’s a provable claim. Is there proof?
Of course. Go find it.

>There is proof of the birth and life of Annelies Frank,
No, there isn't.

I bet you believe there's proof of the Holocaust too, don't you?

More like why did they spread their aids to everyone else after the civil war. Southern retards are directly responsible for the great migration. Detroit and Chicago would be jewels of white civilization if not for southern salt at getting btfo.

>siding with the kikes to own the north
Great job.

Because they were spiritually Jewish and someone them were just plain Jewish

The air of britain was to free for a slave to breath since like 1400

Because the southerners kept fucking them and it grossed people out

Like the yanks weren't controlled by kykes and when kykes try to get everything you live for, you fight

Of course they fucked the coons, it basically is masturbation and if you get her pregnant you have another slave. Win Win

>kykes
What, you think you're clever or something spelling it incorrectly like that?

why did jews

Consider an alternative history without US slavery. 13% would be closer to 1-2%.
The political environment would not have supported the 1965 legislation or amnesty

Yeah you didn't try to buy slaves. You a good boy. You dindu nuffin

“Southerners” lmao. Oh poor naive user. Poor. Poor user.

>Southerners
you mean jews

By the time the south became the south youre referring to, it was illegal to bring slaves into the country and most slave trades were done in the same way cow trading is; by "breeders" essentially. The busiest slave ports were industrial northern cities thru the 18th century; buying them off of european slavers for use across all the states, for any purpose from housekeeping to field work. It fell out of fashion in the late 18th century and many states moved to discourage or outright ban slavery; besides with the advent of industrial factories it was cheaper to pay workers to work product produced by slaves in other states than it was to own the plantation. The double edged sword there is that as industrialization rose, so did the demand for products that were mainly raised by plantations, meaning more slave labor was necesarry to keep with demand of northernstates and European importers, both of which stood on a moral ivory tower of distaste in slavery while profiting immensely from it's existance

slavery is the best thing that ever happened to modern niggers, without them, the US would be 0-1% nigger and planned parenthood wouldn't exist.

This was actually a shitpost in government debate towards the beginning of civil war, except it was southern politicians claiming the north wanted to free them for sex and marriage, the point of it was how incendiary things were becoming in government, not just the public

One northern politician made fun of of a brooks, family member, I dont recall eithers position, just that after being insulted Brooks beat the guy with his cane and left him paralyzed for the rest of his life iirc

Ironically its the south who industrialized agriculture even while using slave labor, the patents speak for themselves

Good, I can only wish that some soutern gentleman would beat the shit out of AOC or Tlaib

He did that in front of the Congress building, if im remembering what youre referring to correctly, and the exact stretch of fence it happened on is still there today (as of a few years ago)

"Why do farmers buy Mahindra tractors?" That's the same question.

it's always the same story with capitalism over and over
>businesses want increased profits
>what's an easy way to improve profit margins? cheaper labor!
>well we can't force native workers to work for less pay since they have standards
>eureka! we'll bring in foreigners who will work for significantly less!
>demographic shitfest ensues
first it was slaves brought in for cheap labor, then it was the Chinese, slavs and the Irish, now it's spics and poo in loos. It all originates with big businesses always wanting bigger and bigger profit margins at any cost

Attached: 1554490917381.jpg (962x641, 202K)

The industrialization of agriculture was much more complex than the industrialization of cities; and required a lot of training and money that was better spent on more slaves who could keep up production more efficiently for a very long time. The immigrants who worked in the factories in the north werent treated all much better than slaves either, and their pay is laughable for the hours and work they had to do.

You been lied to

Attached: 98197389-B8FD-49C6-ACC4-9E96774D7042.jpg (1024x473, 83K)

This is true, and those same big businesses construe the public to be in favor of "diversity" to justify using those people as a source of cheap labor. The current immigration debate (definitely in the US and most likely in Europe) is a perfect example; democrats in the US want to keep illegals illegal so they can exploit then for cheap to nearly free labor that would otherwise be entirely illegal to pay/expect from citizen workers; and yet they belittle people for saying their jobs are being taken when its not that these people are taking well paying secure jobs, its that work that could otherwise ve done by a fairly paid and protected US citizen is instead done by someone who has no choice but to take a job that pays well below minimum wages and expects far beyond acceptable work hours. Its the big businesses doing this, the illegals are being taken advantage of every bit as much as the citizens aee

I mean tractors were still not a thing yet and wouldnt be for another 20 or 30 years, all the automatic seeders and other tools being invented in the south still required horse/mule or person to work, and slaves as you said its still cheaper than paying someone

And aye im sure there was plenty of plantations that stuck with traditional tools coupled with slavery, not all of them buying the latest shit just like today

>coupled with the fact that much of the growth of slavery throughout the 19th century happened in undeveloped states whichwere only recently admitted to the union mostly as territories didnt even have proper infrastructure to transport all of that; the industrial revolution is the cause of slavery staying around past the 1820s